Under the dam’s feet: an ethnographic study of water flow in India’s Narmada River basin

References

• Anshelm, Jonas, and Simon Haikola. 2018. “Depoliticization, Repoliticization, and Environmental Concerns – Swedish Mining Politics as an Instance of Environmental Politicization.” ACME 17 (2): 561–596.
   Google Scholar
• Anshelm, Jonas, Simon Haikola, and Björn Wallsten. 2018. “Politicizing Environmental Governance: A Case Study of Heterogeneous Alliances and Juridical Struggles around the Ojnare Forest, Sweden.” Geoforum 91 (February): 206–215. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.03.003.
   Google Scholar
• Arthington, Angela H., Anik Bhaduri, Stuart E. Bunn, Sue E. Jackson, Rebecca E. Tharme, Dave Tickner, Bill Young, et al. 2018. “The Brisbane Declaration and Global Action Agenda on Environmental Flows (2018).” Frontiers in Environmental Science 6: 45. doi:10.3389/fenvs.2018.00045.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkins, Ed. 2019. “Disputing the ‘National Interest’: The Depoliticization and Repoliticization of the Belo Monte Dam, Brazil.” Water 11 (1): 103. doi:10.3390/w11010103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baviskar, Amita. 1995. In the Belly of the River: Tribal Conflicts over Development in the Narmada Valley. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baviskar, Amita. 2007. Waterscapes: The Cultural Politics of a Natural Resources (Nature, Culture, Conservation). Edited by Amita Baviskar. Delhi: Permannet Black.
   Google Scholar
• Beveridge, Ross. 2017. “The (Ontological) Politics in Depoliticisation Debates: Three Lenses on the Decline of the Political.” Political Studies Review 15 (4): 589–600. doi:10.1177/1478929916664358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boelens, Rutgerd, Jaime Hoogesteger, Erik Swyngedouw, Jeroen Vos, and Philippus Wester. 2016. “Hydrosocial Territories: A Political Ecology Perspective.” Water International 41 (1): 1–14. doi:10.1080/02508060.2016.1134898.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boelens, Rutgerd, Esha Shah, and Bert Bruins. 2019. “Contested Knowledges: Large Dams and Mega-Hydraulic Development.” Water 11 (3): 416–427. doi:10.3390/w11030416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CAG. 2018. “Performance Audit Report of Government of Madhya Pradesh.” https://cag.gov.in/uploads/download_audit_report/2018/Chapter_2_Performance_Audit_of_Report_No_4_of_2018_Economic_Sector_Government_of_Madhya_Pradesh.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Chitale, Madhav A. 1997. “The Narmada Project.” International Journal of Water Resources Development 13 (2): 169–180. doi:10.1080/07900629749809.
   Google Scholar
• Cornwall, Andrea. 2008. “Unpacking ‘Participation’ Models, Meanings and Practices.” Community Development Journal 43 (3): 269–283. doi:10.1093/cdj/bsn010.
   Google Scholar
• Cremin, Emilie. 2005. “Omkareshvara, a Holy City of the Narmada in the Course of Transformation.” https://www.academia.edu/1278852/OMKARESHVARA_A_HOLY_CITY_OF_THE_NARMADA_IN_THE_COURSE_OF_TRANSFORMATION
   Google Scholar
• Curran, Deborah. 2019. “Indigenous Processes of Consent: Repoliticizing Water Governance through Legal Pluralism.” Water 11 (3): 571. doi:10.3390/w11030571.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuttitta, Paolo. 2018. “Repoliticization through Search and Rescue? Humanitarian NGOs and Migration Management in the Central Mediterranean.” Geopolitics 23 (3): 632–660. doi:10.1080/14650045.2017.1344834.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dikeç, Mustafa. 2017. “Disruptive Politics.” Urban Studies 54 (1): 49–54. doi:10.1177/0042098016671476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dréze, J., M. Samson, and S. Singh. 1997. The Dam and the Nation: Displacement and Resettlement in the Narmada Valley. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dunlap, Alexander. 2018. “‘A Bureaucratic Trap:’ Free, Prior and Informed Consent (FPIC) and Wind Energy Development in Juchitán, Mexico.” Capitalism Nature Socialism 29 (4): 88–108. doi:10.1080/10455752.2017.1334219.
   Google Scholar
• Dwivedi, R. 2006. Conflict and Collective Action: The Sardar Sarovar Project in India. New Delhi: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fallon, J. M., and N. K. Jaiswal. 2012. “Sacred Space, Sacred Water: Exploring the Role of Water in India’s Sacred Places.” Recreation and Society in Africa, Asia and Latin America 3 (1): 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Fawcett, Paul, Matthew Flinders, Colin Hay, and Matthew Wood. 2017. Anti-Politics, Depoliticization and Governance, edited by Paul Fawcett, Matthew Flinders, Colin Hay, and Matthew Wood. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oso/9780198748977.001.0001.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, Ronald C. 1995. Towards Sustainable Development? Struggling over India’s Narmada River. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Flinders, Matthew, and Jim Buller. 2006. “Depoliticisation: Principles, Tactics and Tools.” British Politics 1 (3): 293–318. doi:10.1057/palgrave.bp.4200016.
   Google Scholar
• Friese, Susanne, Jacks Soratto, and Denise Pires. 2018. “Carrying out a Computer-Aided Thematic Content Analysis with ATLAS.Ti.” MMG Working Paper, No. 18–02: 30. http://www.mmg.mpg.de/publications/working-papers/
   Google Scholar
• GoMP. 2006. “Omkareshwar Town Planning Report 2021, Government of Madya Pradesh.” http://mptownplan.gov.in/LU-panel/Khandwa/omkareshwar%20Development%20plan%20draft%202021.pdf as on 17 August 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta, Harish, and G. J. Chakrapani. 2005. “Temporal and Spatial Variations in Water Flow and Sediment Load in Narmada River Basin, India: Natural and Man-Made Factors.” Environmental Geology 48 (4-5): 579–589. doi:10.1007/s00254-005-1314-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, R. K. 2001. “River Basin Management: A Case Study of Narmada Valley Development with Special Reference to the Sardar Sarovar Project in Gujarat, India.” International Journal of Water Resources Development 17 (1): 55–78. doi:10.1080/713672562.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hay, Colin. 2007. Why We Hate Politics. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hay, Colin. 2014. “Depoliticisation as Process, Governance as Practice: What Did the ‘First Wave’ Get Wrong and Do We Need a ‘Second Wave’ to Put It Right?” Policy & Politics 42 (2): 293–311. doi:10.1332/030557314X13959960668217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hommes, Lena, Rutgerd Boelens, and Harro Maat. 2016. “Contested Hydrosocial Territories and Disputed Water Governance: Struggles and Competing Claims over the Ilisu Dam Development in Southeastern Turkey.” Geoforum 71 (March 2007): 9–20. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2016.02.015.
   Google Scholar
• Iceland, Charles, Tinayi Luo, and Gennadii Donchyts. 2018. “It’s Not Just Cape Town: 4 Shrinking Reservoirs to Watch.” https://www.wri.org/insights/its-not-just-cape-town-4-shrinking-reservoirs-watch
   Google Scholar
• JACSES and Urgewald. 2004. “The Omkareshwar Dam in India: Closing Doors on Peoples’ Future.” http://jacses.org/sdap/projects/omkare/Omkareshwar-Briefing.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, Bob. 2014. “Repoliticising Depoliticisation: Theoretical Preliminaries on Some Responses to the American Fiscal and Eurozone Debt Crises.” Policy & Politics 42 (2): 207–223. doi:10.1332/030557312X655864.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joy, K. J., Seema Kulkarni, Dik Roth, and Margreet Zwarteveen. 2014. “Re-Politicising Water Governance: Exploring Water Re-Allocations in Terms of Justice.” Local Environment 19 (9): 954–973. doi:10.1080/13549839.2013.870542.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenis, Anneleen, and Matthias Lievens. 2014. “Searching for ‘the Political’ in Environmental Politics.” Environmental Politics 23 (4): 531–548. doi:10.1080/09644016.2013.870067.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenis, Anneleen, and Erik Mathijs. 2014. “Climate Change and Post-Politics: Repoliticizing the Present by Imagining the Future?” Geoforum 52: 148–156. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2014.01.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khagram, S. 2004. Dams and Development: Transnational Struggles for Water and Power. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lahiri-Dutt, K., and R. J. Wasson. 2008. Water FIrst: Issues and Challenges for Nations and Communities in South Asia. New Delhi: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Lindström, Andreas, and Audun Ruud. 2017. “Who’s Hydropower? From Conflictual Management into an Era of Reconciling Environmental Concerns; a Retake of Hydropower Governance towards Win-Win Solutions?” Sustainability 9 (7): 1262. doi:10.3390/su9071262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luxion, Mona. 2017. “Nation-Building, Industrialisation, and Spectacle: Political Functions of Gujarat’s Narmada Pipeline Project.” Water Alternatives 10 (2): 208–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehta, Mona G. 2010. “A River of No Dissent: Narmada Movement and Coercive Gujarati Nativism.” South Asian History and Culture 1 (4): 509–528. doi:10.1080/19472498.2010.507023.
   Google Scholar
• Mishra, Neeraj. 2011. “Unravelling Governance Networks in Development Projects: Depoliticization as an Analytical Framework.” Environment and Urbanization Asia 2 (2): 153–168. doi:10.1177/097542531100200202.
   Google Scholar
• Molle, François. 2009. “Water, Politics and River Basin Governance: Repoliticizing Approaches to River Basin Management.” Water International 34 (1): 62–70. doi:10.1080/02508060802677846.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molle, François, Tira Foran, and Mira Käkönen. 2012. Contested Waterscapes in the Mekong Region: Hydropower, Livelihoods and Governance. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781849770866.
   Google Scholar
• Molle, François, Peter P. Mollinga, and Philippus Wester. 2009. “Hydraulic Bureaucracies and the Hydraulic Mission: Flows of Water, Flows of Power.” Water Alternatives 2 (3): 23.
   Google Scholar
• Moor, Joost de. 2020. “Alternatives to Resistance? Comparing Depoliticization in Two British Environmental Movement Scenes.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 44 (1): 124–144. doi:10.1111/1468-2427.12860.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mosse, David. 2003. The Rule of Water. Statecraft, Ecology and Collective Action in South India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Narula, S. 2008. “The Story of Narmada Bachao Andolan: Human Rights in the Global Economy and the Struggle Against the World Bank.” NYU School of Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 08-62. http://lsr.nellco.org/nyu_plltwp/
   Google Scholar
• NCA. 2018a. “Annual Report 2017-18.” http://nca.gov.in/forms_pdf/annual-report/annal-report-english-2017-18.pdf
   Google Scholar
• NCA. 2018b. “Annual Water Account of Narmada Basin (2015-16).” http://nca.gov.in/forms_pdf/annual-water-account/annual-water-account-2015-16.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Neuss, Jurgen. 2007. Narmadlpradaksina Circumambulation of the Narmada River. Berlin: Freie Universität Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• Neuss, Jürgen. 2012. “On the Loss of Cultural Heritage in the Narmada Valley.” In Belriner Indologische Studien, 195–248. Berlin: Weidler Buchverlag.
   Google Scholar
• Nilsen, Alf Gunvald. 2013. “Against the Current, from below: Resisting Dispossession in the Narmada Valley, India.” Journal of Poverty 17 (4): 460–492. doi:10.1080/10875549.2013.804482.
   Google Scholar
• Nilsson, Christer, Catherine A. Reidy, Mats Dynesius, and Carmen Revenga. 2005. “Fragmentation and Flow Regulation of the World’s Large River Systems.” Science 308 (5720): 405–408. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3841248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Reilly, Karen. 2012. Ethnographic Methods. 2nd ed. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203864722.
   Google Scholar
• Octavianti, Thanti, and Katrina Charles. 2019. “De- and Re-Politicisation of Water Security as Examined through the Lens of the Hydrosocial Cycle: The Case of Jakarta’s Sea Wall Plan.” Water Alternatives 12 (3): 1017–1037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer, Margaret A. 2010. “Beyond Infrastructure.” Nature 467 (7315): 534–537. doi:10.1038/467534a.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, M. J. 2010. “Narmada Dams Controversy: Case Summary,” September: 1–26. http://www.umass.edu/sts/ethics
   Google Scholar
• Petts, Geoffrey E. 1996. “Water Allocation to Protect River Ecosystems.” Regulated Rivers: Research & Management 12 (4-5): 353–365. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-1646(199607)12:4/5<353::AID-RRR425>3.0.CO;2-6.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, Peter, and Alan W. Hall. 2003. Effective Water Governance. Vol. 21. TEC Background Papers No.7. Stockholm: Global Water Partnership. Available at: https://www.gwp.org/globalassets/global/toolbox/publications/background-papers/07-effective-water-governance-2003-english.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, James C. 1998. Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma, Aradhana, and Akhil Gupta. 2006. Introduction in The Anthropology of the State a Reader, edited by Aradhana Sharma and Akhil Gupta, 1–42. Malden/Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. http://books.google.com/books?id=ImnEMK_hKCgC.
   Google Scholar
• Shrivastava, Rashmi. 2007. “Environmental Stewardship and Sustainable Development: A Study of the Role of Government in Rehabilitation of Persons Affected by Sardar Sarovar Dam in India.” The Indian Journal of Political Science 68 (3): 497–508. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41856350.
   Google Scholar
• Stella, John C., and Jacob Bendix. 2018. “Multiple Stressors in Riparian Ecosystems.” In Multiple Stressors in River Ecosystems, edited by S. Sabater, A. Elosegi, & R. Ludwig, 81–110. Amsterdam: Elsevier Inc. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-811713-2.00005-4.
   Google Scholar
• Strang, Veronica. 2004. Fluid Consistencies: Meaning and Materiality in Human Engagements with Water. Archaeological Dialogues. Vol. 21. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1063/1.2756072.
   Google Scholar
• Strang, Veronica. 2013. “Going against the Flow: The Biopolitics of Dams and Diversions.” Worldviews 17 (2): 161–173. doi:10.1163/15685357-01702007.
   Google Scholar
• Strang, Veronica. 2014a. “The Taniwha and the Crown: Defending Water Rights in Aotearoa/New Zealand.” Wires Water 1 (1): 121–131. doi:10.1002/wat2.1002.
   Google Scholar
• Strang, V. 2014b. “Fluid Consistencies. Material Relationality in Human Engagements with Water.” Archaeological Dialogues 21 (2): 133–150. doi:10.1017/S1380203814000130.
   Google Scholar
• Strang, Veronica. 2019. “Water.” In The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Anthropology, edited by F. Stein, S. Lazar, M. Candea, H. Diemberger, J. Robbins, A. Sanchez and R. Stasch. http://doi.org/10.29164/19water
   Google Scholar
• Strang, Veronica. 2020. “The Rights of the River: Water, Culture and Ecological Justice.” In Conservation and Justice the Anthropocene: Definitions and Debates, edited by Helen Kopnina and Haydn Washington, 105–119. New York: Springer International Publishing. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-13905-6_8.
   Google Scholar
• UN-Water. 2018. Sustainable Development Goal 6 Synthesis Report 2018 on Water and Sanitation. United Nations. New York: United Nations Publications. https://www.unwater.org/publications/sdg-6-synthesis-report-2018-on-water-and-sanitation/.
   Google Scholar
• Vogel, Eve. 2012. “Parcelling out the Watershed: The Recurring Consequences of Organising Columbia River Management within a Basin-Based Territory.” Water Alternatives 5 (1): 161–190.
   Google Scholar
• WCD. 2000. Dams & Developmet: A Framework for Decision-Making. Edited by World Commission on Dams. London/Sterling, VA: Earthscan Publications Ltd. doi:10.1097/GCO.0b013e3283432017.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, Matt, and Matthew Flinders. 2014. “Rethinking Depoliticisation: Beyond the Governmental.” Policy and Politics 42 (2): 151–170. doi:10.1332/policypress/9781447326601.003.0002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, Matthew. 2016. “Politicisation, Depoliticisation and Anti-Politics: Towards a Multilevel Research Agenda.” Political Studies Review 14 (4): 521–533. doi:10.1111/1478-9302.12074.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar