How boundary objects facilitate local climate adaptation networks: the cases of Amsterdam Rainproof and Water Sensitive Rotterdam

References

• Anguelovski, I., and J. Carmin. 2011. “Something Borrowed, Everything New: Innovation and Institutionalization in Urban Climate Governance.” Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 3 (3): 169–175. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2010.12.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arcadis. 2016. Sustainable Cities Water Index. Amsterdam: Arcadis.
   Google Scholar
• Ashley, R., B. Gersonius, and B. Horton. 2020. “Managing Flooding: From a Problem to an Opportunity.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A 378 (2168). doi:10.1098/rsta.2019.0214.
   Google Scholar
• Brand, F. S., and K. Jax. 2007. “Focusing the Meaning(s) of Resilience: Resilience as a Descriptive Concept and a Boundary Object.” Ecology and Society 12 (1): 23. doi:10.5751/ES-02029-120123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, R., R. Ashley, and M. Farrelly. 2011. “Political and Professional Agency Entrapment: An Agenda for Urban Water Research.” Water Resources Management 25 (15): 4037–4050. doi:10.1007/s11269-011-9886-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulkeley, H. 2015. “Can Cities Realise Their Climate Potential? Reflections on COP21 Paris and Beyond.” Local Environment 20 (11): 1405–1409. doi:10.1080/13549839.2015.1108715.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlile, P. R. 2002. “A Pragmatic View of Knowledge and Boundaries: Boundary Objects in New Product Development.” Organization Science 13 (4): 442–455. doi:10.1287/orsc.13.4.442.2953.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cash, David W., William C. Clark, Frank Alcock, Nancy M. Dickson, Noelle Eckley, David H. Guston, Jill Jäger, and Ronald B. Mitchell. 2003. “Knowledge Systems for Sustainable Development.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 100 (14): 8086–8091. doi:10.1073/pnas.1231332100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dąbrowski, M. 2018. “Boundary Spanning for Governance of Climate Change Adaptation in Cities: Insights from a Dutch Urban Region.” Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space 36 (5): 837–855. doi:10.1177/2399654417725077.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dai, L., R. Wörner, and H. F. van Rijswick. 2018. “Rainproof Cities in The Netherlands: Approaches in Dutch Water Governance to Climate-Adaptive Urban Planning.” International Journal of Water Resources Development 34 (4): 652–674. doi:10.1080/07900627.2017.1372273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewulf, A., M. Brugnach, C. Termeer, and H. Ingram. 2013. “Bridging Knowledge Frames and Networks in Climate and Water Governance.” In Water Governance as Connective Capacity, edited by N. Edelenbos Bressers and P. Scholten, 229–247. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. 2006. “Five Misunderstandings about Case-Study Research.” Qualitative Inquiry 12 (2): 219–245. doi:10.1177/1077800405284363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franco-Torres, M., B. C. Rogers, and R. M. Ugarelli. 2020. “A Framework to Explain the Role of Boundary Objects in Sustainability Transitions.” Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 36: 34–48.
   Google Scholar
• Guston, D. H. 2001. “Boundary Organizations in Environmental Policy and Science: An Introduction.” Science, Technology & Human Values 26 (4): 399–408.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoppe, R., A. Wesselink, and R. Cairns. 2013. “Lost in the Problem: The Role of Boundary Organisations in the Governance of Climate Change.” Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change 4 (4): 283–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johns, C. M. 2019. “Understanding Barriers to Green Infrastructure Policy and Stormwater Management in the City of Toronto: A Shift from Grey to Green or Policy Layering and Conversion?” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 62 (8): 1377–1401. doi:10.1080/09640568.2018.1496072.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karhinen, S., J. Peltomaa, V. Riekkinen, and L. Saikku. 2021. “Impact of a Climate Network: The Role of Intermediaries in Local Level Climate Action.” Global Environmental Change 67: 102225. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kivimaa, P., W. Boon, S. Hyysalo, and L. Klerkx. 2019. “Towards a Typology of Intermediaries in Sustainability Transitions: A Systematic Review and a Research Agenda.” Research Policy 48 (4): 1062–1075. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2018.10.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leander, E. 2016. “Water Sensitive Rotterdam: Transitie Stedelijk Watermanagement.” Water Governance 4: 32–35.
   Google Scholar
• Levina, N., and E. Vaast. 2005. “The Emergence of Boundary Spanning Competence in Practice: Implications for Implementation and Use of Information Systems.” MIS Quarterly 29 (2): 335–363. doi:10.2307/25148682.
   Google Scholar
• Mees, H. L., J. Dijk, D. van Soest, P. P. Driessen, M. H. van Rijswick, and H. Runhaar. 2014. “A Method for the Deliberate and Deliberative Selection of Policy Instrument Mixes for Climate Change Adaptation.” Ecology and Society 19 (2): 58. doi:10.5751/ES-06639-190258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moss, T. 2009. “Intermediaries and the Governance of Sociotechnical Networks in Transition.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 41 (6): 1480–1495. doi:10.1068/a4116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norström, Albert V., Christopher Cvitanovic, Marie F. Löf, Simon West, Carina Wyborn, Patricia Balvanera, Angela T. Bednarek., et al. 2020. “Principles for Knowledge Co-Production in Sustainability Research.” Nature Sustainability 3 (3): 182–190. doi:10.1038/s41893-019-0448-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. 2014. Water Governance in The Netherlands: Fit for the Future? Paris: Organisation of Economic Co-Operation and Development.
   Google Scholar
• Pahl-Wostl, C. 2020. “Adaptive and Sustainable Water Management: From Improved Conceptual Foundations to Transformative Change.” International Journal of Water Resources Development 36 (2–3): 397–415. doi:10.1080/07900627.2020.1721268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Restemeyer, B., M. van den Brink, and J. Woltjer. 2017. “Between Adaptability and the Urge to Control: Making Long-Term Water Policies in The Netherlands.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 60 (5): 920–940. doi:10.1080/09640568.2016.1189403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shackley, S., and B. Wynne. 1996. “Representing Uncertainty in Global Climate Change Science and Policy: Boundary-Ordering Devices and Authority.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 21 (3): 275–302. doi:10.1177/016224399602100302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spee, A. P., and P. Jarzabkowski. 2009. “Strategy Tools as Boundary Objects.” Strategic Organization 7 (2): 223–232. doi:10.1177/1476127009102674.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Star, S. L. 2010. “This is Not a Boundary Object: Reflections on the Origin of a Concept.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 35 (5): 601–617.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Star, S. L., and J. R. Griesemer. 1989. “Institutional Ecology, Translations’ and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39.” Social Studies of Science 19 (3): 387–420. doi:10.1177/030631289019003001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steger, Cara, Shana Hirsch, Cody Evers, Benjamin Branoff, Maria Petrova, Max Nielsen-Pincus, Chloe Wardropper, and Carena J. van Riper. 2018. “Ecosystem Services as Boundary Objects for Transdisciplinary Collaboration.” Ecological Economics 143: 153–160. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.07.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steger, Cara, Julia A. Klein, Robin S. Reid, Sandra Lavorel, Catherine Tucker, Kelly A. Hopping, Rob Marchant., et al. 2021. “Science with Society: Evidence-Based Guidance for Best Practices in Environmental Transdisciplinary Work.” Global Environmental Change 68: 102240. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tribbia, J., and S. C. Moser. 2008. “More than Information: What Coastal Managers Need to Plan for Climate Change.” Environmental Science & Policy 11 (4): 315–328. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2008.01.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Broekhoven, S., and F. Boons. 2022. “Managing Boundaries over Time in Integrative Planning Processes. A Process Analysis of Boundary Work in Two Cases of Multifunctional Land Use.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 65 (4): 1–26. doi:10.1080/09640568.2021.1892607.
   Google Scholar
• van der Brugge, R., and R. De Graaf. 2010. “Linking Water Policy Innovation and Urban Renewal: The Case of Rotterdam.” Water Policy 12 (3): 381–400. doi:10.2166/wp.2010.037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiering, M. A., and B. J. M. Arts. 2006. “Discursive Shifts in Dutch River Management: ‘Deep’ Institutional Change or Adaptation Strategy?”. In Living Rivers: Trends and Challenges in Science and Management, edited by R. S. E. W. Leuven, A. M. J. Ragas, A. J. M. Smits, and G. van der Velde, 327–338. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. 2003. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Zuniga-Teran, Adriana A., Chad Staddon, Laura de Vito, Andrea K. Gerlak, Sarah Ward, Yolandi Schoeman, Aimee Hart, and Giles Booth. 2020. “Challenges of Mainstreaming Green Infrastructure in Built Environment Professions.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 63 (4): 710–732. doi:10.1080/09640568.2019.1605890.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar