Exploring local land use conflicts through successive planning decisions: a dynamic approach and theory-driven typology of potentially conflicting planning decisions

References

• Allain, S, and N. Salliou. 2022. “Making Differences Legible: Incommensurability as a Vehicle for Sustainable Landscape Management.” Ecological Economics 191: 107240. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andráško, I., K. Dolák Klemešová, L. Dolák, J. Trojan, and D. Fiedor. 2020. “‘Surely it Will Come Again…’ Flood Threat Appraisal, Mitigation Strategies and Protection Motivation in Czech Communities Endangered by Floods.” Moravian Geographical Reports 28 (3): 170–186. doi:10.2478/mgr-2020-0013.
   Google Scholar
• Aubrechtová, T., E. Semančíková, and P. Raška. 2020. “Formulation Matters! The Failure of Integrating Landscape Fragmentation Policy.” Sustainability 12 (10): 3962. doi:10.3390/su12103962.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, A, and U. Grünewald. 2003. “Disaster Management. Flood Risk in Central Europe.” Science (New York, N.Y.) 300 (5622): 1099. doi:10.1126/science.1083624.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benediktsson, K. 2021. “Conflicting Imaginaries in the Energy Transition? Nature and Renewable Energy in Iceland.” Moravian Geographical Reports 29 (2): 88–100. doi:10.2478/mgr-2021-0008.
   Google Scholar
• Bergatt Jackson, J. W. Bergatt, and J. Votoček. 2010. “Analýza Brownfieldův ORP Ústí Nad Labem a ve Statutárním Městě Ústí Nad Labem [Analyses of Brownfield in the ORP Ústí Nad Labem and Statutory Town of Ústí Nad Labem].” Research Report–Cobraman Project. Magistrát města Ústí nad Labem.
   Google Scholar
• Boamah, E. F., and C. Amoako. 2020. “Planning by (Mis)Rule of Laws: The Idiom and Dilemma of Planning within Ghana’s Dual Legal Land Systems.” Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space 38 (1): 97–115. doi:10.1177/2399654419855400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boholm, A. and R. Löfsted, Eds. 2004. Facility Sitting: Risk, Power and Identity in Land Use Planning. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Bosley P. and K. Bosley. 1988. “Public Acceptability of California’s Wind Energy Developmens: Three Studies.” Wind Engineering 15 (5): 311–318.
   Google Scholar
• Cameron, D. C. Osborne, P. Horton, and M. Sinclair. 2015. “A Sustainable Model for Intensive Agriculture.” Grantham Centre Briefing Note: December 2015. [online]. https://grantham.sheffield.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/A4-sustainable-model-intensive-agriculture-spread.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, S. 1996. “Green Cities, Growing Cities, Just Cities? Urban Planning and the Contradictions of Sustainable Development.” Journal of the American Planning Association 62 (3): 296–312. doi:10.1080/01944369608975696.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coglianese, C. 1999. “The Limits of Consensus: The Environmental Protection System in Transition: Toward a More Desirable Future Environment.” Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development 41 (3): 28–33. doi:10.1080/00139159909604620.
   Google Scholar
• Couclelis, H. 2005. “Where Has the Future Gone? Rethinking the Role of Integrated Land-Use Models in Spatial Planning.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 37 (8): 1353–1371. doi:10.1068/a3785.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowell, R., G. Bristow, and M. Munday. 2011. “Acceptance, Acceptability and Environmental Justice: The Role of Community Benefits in Wind Energy Development.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 54 (4): 539–557. doi:10.1080/09640568.2010.521047.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curtis, F, and H. Epp. 1999. “Role of Deductive Science in Evaluation of Alternatives in Environmental Assessment.” Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal 17 (1): 3–8. doi:10.3152/147154699781767981.
   Google Scholar
• CzechInvest. 2021. “National Brownfield Regeneration Strategy.” https://www.czechinvest.org/en/For-Investors/Real-estate-offer/Brownfields
   Google Scholar
• Davy, B. 2014. “Polyrational Property: Rules for the Many Uses of Land.” International Journal of the Commons 8 (2): 472–492. doi:10.18352/ijc.455.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Jong, L., S. De Bruin, J. Knoop, and J. van Vliet. 2021. “Understanding Land-Use Change Conflict: A Systematic Review of Case Studies.” Journal of Land Use Science 16 (3): 223–217. doi:10.1080/1747423X.2021.1933226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, M. 1982. In the Active Voice. London: Routledge and Henley: Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Duke, J. M. 2004. “Institutions and Land-Use Conflicts: Harm, Dispute Processing, and Transactions.” Journal of Economic Issues 38 (1): 227–252. doi:10.1080/00213624.2004.11506673.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EC. 2013. Science for Environment Policy: Brownfield Regeneration. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• EC. 2016a. “Land as a Resource.” European Commission, Brussels.” http://ec.europa.eu/environment/land_use/index_en.htm
   Google Scholar
• EC. 2016b. “No Net Land Take by 2050? Science for Environment Policy Future Brief 14”. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/integration/research/newsalert/pdf/no_net_land_take_by_2050_FB14_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ferreira, A., J. Ribeiro-Santos, and I. Breda-Vázquez. 2020. “Transcending Dilemmas in Urban Policy-Making: Envisioning versus Adapting, Growing versus Stabilizing.” Planning Theory & Practice 21 (1): 76–93. doi:10.1080/14649357.2019.1703029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, S. D. I. Abdi, J. Ludin, R. Smith, S. Williams, and S. Williams. 2000. Working with Conflict. Skills and Strategies for Action. London: Zed Books Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Frantál, B. 2015. “Have Local Government and Public Expectations of Wind Energy Project Benefits Been Met? Implications for Repowering Schemes.” Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 17 (2): 217–236. doi:10.1080/1523908X.2014.936583.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frantál, B., J. Kunc, E. Nováková, P. Klusáček, S. Martinát, and R. Osman. 2013. “Location Matters! Exploring Brownfields Regeneration in a Spatial Context (A Case Study of the South Moravian Region, Czech Republic).” Moravian Geographical Reports 21 (2): 5–19. doi:10.2478/mgr-2013-0007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freemark, Y. 2020. “Upzoning Chicago: Impacts of a Zoning Reform on Property Values and Housing Construction.” Urban Affairs Review 56 (3): 758–789. doi:10.1177/1078087418824672.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freyfogle, E. T. 2003. The Land we Share.” Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Greenberg, M., K. Lowrie, J. Burger, C. Powers, M. Gochfeld, and H. Mayer. 2007. “Nuclear Waste and Public Worries: Public Perceptions of the United States' Major Nuclear Weapons Legacy Sites.” Human Ecology Review 14 (1): 1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartmann, T. 2012. “Wicked Problems and Clumsy Solutions: Planning as Expectation Management.” Planning Theory 11 (3): 242–256. doi:10.1177/1473095212440427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartmann, T, and T. Spit. 2014. “Frontiers of Land and Water Governance in Urban Regions.” Water International 39 (6): 791–797. doi:10.1080/02508060.2014.962993.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healey, P. 2012. “Communicative Planning: Practices; Concepts; and Rhetorics.” In Planning Ideas That Matter: Liveability; Territoriality; Governance and Reflective Practice, edited by B. Sanyal, L. J. Vale, and C. Rosan, 333–358. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hitchcock, C, and E. Sober. 2004. “Prediction versus Accommodation and the Risk of Overfitting.” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 55 (1): 1–34. doi:10.1093/bjps/55.1.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hjalager, A. M. 2020. “Land-Use Conflicts in Coastal Tourism and the Quest for Governance Innovations.” Land Use Policy 94: 104566. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104566.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hladný, J. M. Krátká, and L. Kašpárek. 2004. August 2002 Catastrophic Flood in the Czech Republic. Prague: Ministry of Environment of the Czech Republic.
   Google Scholar
• Hudson, P, and W. J. W. Botzen. 2019. “Cost–Benefit Analysis of Flood-Zoning Policies: A Review of Current Practice.” Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Water 6 (6): e1387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphreys, J. S, and D. J. Walmsley. 1991. “Locational Conflict in Metropolitan Areas: Melbourne and Sydney.” Australian Geographical Studies 29 (2): 313–328. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8470.1991.tb00722.x.
   Google Scholar
• Janelle, D. G. and H. A. Millward. 1976. “Locational Conflict Patterns and Urban Ecological Structure.” Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie, 67 (2): 102–113. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9663.1976.tb01391.x.
   Google Scholar
• Jobert, A., P. Laborgne and S. Mimler. 2007. “Local Acceptance of Wind Energy: Factors of Success Identified in French and German Case Studies.” Energy Policy 35 (5): 2751–2760. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2006.12.005.
   Google Scholar
• Kaya, I. A, and N. K. Erol. 2016. “Conflicts over Locally Unwanted Land Uses (LULUs): Reasons and Solutions for Case Studies in Izmir (Turkey).” Land Use Policy 58: 83–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan, J. 2004. “Siting Conflicts in Renewable Energy Projects: A Biogas Case Study.” In Facility Sitting: Risk, Power and Identity in Land Use Planning, edited by A. Boholm, and R. Löfsted, 56–72. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Klusáček, P., J. Navrátil, S. Martinát, T. Krejčí, O. Golubchikov, K. Pícha, J. Škrabal, and R. Osman. 2021. “Planning for the Future of Derelict Farm Premises: From Abandonment to Regeneration?” Land Use Policy 102: 105248. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knieling, J, and F. Othengrafen. 2009. “En Route to a Theoretical Model for Comparative Research on Planning Cultures.” In Planning Cultures in Europe: Decoding Cultural Phenomena in Urban and Regional Planning, edited by Joerg Knieling, and Frank Othengrafen, 39–62. Farnham, Surrey: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Koelman, M., T. Hartmann, and T. J. M. Spit. 2022. “When Tensions Become Conflicts: Wind Turbine Policy Implementation and Development in The Netherlands.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 65 (3): 375–397. doi:10.1080/09640568.2021.1885018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koks, E. E., H. de Moel, J. C. J. H. Aerts, and L. M. Bouwer. 2014. “Effect of Spatial Adaptation Measures on Flood Risk: Study of Coastal Floods in Belgium.” Regional Environmental Change 14 (1): 413–425. doi:10.1007/s10113-013-0514-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koutský, J. O. Slach, and T. Boruta. 2011. “Restructuring Economies of Old Industrial Regions: Local Tradition, Global Trends.” In Scale of Globalization: Think Globally, Act Locally, Change Individually in the 21st Century, 166–173. Conference Proceedings. Ostrava: University of Ostrava, Ostrava.
   Google Scholar
• Learmonth, R. E. Whitehead, B. Boyd, and S. Fletcher. 2007. Living and Working in Rural Areas: A Handbook for Managing Land Use Conflict Issues on the NSW North Coast. Wollongbar: New South Wales Department of Primary Industries.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, T., H. Liu, and Y. Qi. 2015. “Construction Land Expansion and Cultivated Land Protection in Urbanizing China: Insights from National Land Surveys.” 1996–2006.” Habitat International 46: 13–22.
   Google Scholar
• Maier, K. 2014. “Changing Planning in the Czech Republic.” In Spatial Planning Systems and Practices in Europe, edited by M. Reimer, P. Getimis, and H. Blotevogel, 215–235. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mann, C, and P. Jeanneaux. 2009. “Two Approaches for Understanding Land-Use Conflict to Improve Rural Planning and Management.” Journal of Rural and Community Development 4 (1): 118–141.
   Google Scholar
• Muñoz, L. A., F. Olivera, M. Giglio, and P. Berke. 2018. “The Impact of Urbanization on the Streamflows and the 100-Year Floodplain Extent of the Sims Bayou in Houston, Texas.” International Journal of River Basin Management 16 (1): 61–69. doi:10.1080/15715124.2017.1372447.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norton, R. 2008. “Using Content Analysis to Evaluate Local Master Plans and Zoning Codes.” Land Use Policy 25 (3): 432–454. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2007.10.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Neill, J. 2002. “Value Pluralism, Incommensurability and Institutions.” In Valuing Nature?, edited by J. Foster, 75–88. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pasqualetti, M, and S. Stremke. 2018. “Energy Landscapes in a Crowded World: A First Typology of Origins and Expressions.” Energy Research & Social Science 36: 94–105. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2017.09.030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raška, P., M. Stehlíková, K. Rybová, and T. Aubrechtová. 2019. “Managing Flood Risk in Shrinking Cities: Dilemmas for Urban Development from the Central European Perspective.” Water International 44 (5): 520–538. doi:10.1080/02508060.2019.1640955.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rittel, H. W, and M. M. Webber. 1973. “Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning.” Policy Sciences 4 (2): 155–169. doi:10.1007/BF01405730.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roth, M., S. Eiter, S. Röhner, A. Kruse, S. Schmitz, B. Frantál, and D. Van der Horst, Eds. 2018. Renewable Energy and Landscape Quality. Berlin: Jovis.
   Google Scholar
• Saunders, B., J. Sim, T. Kingstone, S. Baker, J. Waterfield, B. Bartlam, H. Burroughs, and C. Jinks. 2018. “Saturation in Qualitative Research: Exploring Its Conceptualization and Operationalization.” Quality & Quantity 52 (4): 1893–1907. doi:10.1007/s11135-017-0574-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slavíková, L., P. Raška, and M. Kopáček. 2019. “Mayors and “Their” Land: Revealing Approaches to Flood Risk Management in Small Municipalities.” Journal of Flood Risk Management 12 (3): e12474. doi:10.1111/jfr3.12474.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spilková, J, and L. Šefrna. 2010. “Uncoordinated New Retail Development and Its Impact on Land Use and Soils: A Pilot Study on the Urban Fringe of Prague, Czech Republic.” Landscape and Urban Planning 94 (2): 141–148. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2009.09.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sprenger, J. 2011. “Hypothetico‐Deductive Confirmation.” Philosophy Compass 6 (7): 497–508. doi:10.1111/j.1747-9991.2011.00409.x.
   Google Scholar
• Stanilov, K, and L. Sýkora. 2014. Confronting Suburbanization: Urban Decentralization in Postsocialist Central and Eastern Europe. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Suškevičs, M., S. Eiter, S. Martinat, D. Stober, E. Vollmer, C. L. de Boer, and M. Buchecker. 2019. “Regional Variation in Public Acceptance of Wind Energy Development in Europe: What Are the Roles of Planning Procedures and Participation?” Land Use Policy 81: 311–323. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.10.032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tewdwr-Jones, M, and P. Allmendinger. 1998. “Deconstructing Communicative Rationality: A Critique of Haberasian Collaborative Planning.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 30 (11): 1975–1989. doi:10.1068/a301975.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thaler, T. 2021. “Just Retreat: How Different Countries Deal with It: Examples from Austria and England.” Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences 11 (3): 412–419. doi:10.1007/s13412-021-00694-1.
   Google Scholar
• Von der Dunk, A., A. Grêt-Regamey, T. Dalang, and A. M. Hersperger. 2011. “Defining a Typology of Peri-Urban Land-Use Conflicts: A Case Study from Switzerland.” Landscape and Urban Planning 101 (2): 149–156. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.02.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wehrmann, B. 2008. Land Conflicts: A Practical Guide to Dealing with Land Disputes. Eschborn: Deutsche Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit (GTZ).
   Google Scholar
• Yusran, Y., M. A. K. Sahide, S. Supratman, A. Sabar, M. Krott, and L. Giessen. 2017. “The Empirical Visibility of Land Use Conflicts: From Latent to Manifest Conflict through Law Enforcement in a National Park in Indonesia.” Land Use Policy 62: 302–315. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.12.033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zavar, E, and R. R. Hagelman. III. 2016. “Land Use Change on US Floodplain Buyout Sites, 1990–2000.” Disaster Prevention and Management 25 (3): 360–374. doi:10.1108/DPM-01-2016-0021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar