The unlikely Mexican carbon tax—a question of economic-environmental synergies?

References

• Aldy, J., and R. Stavins. 2012. “The Promise and Problems of Pricing Carbon.” The Journal of Environment & Development 21 (2): 152–180. doi:10.1177/1070496512442508.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen, M. 2019. “The Politics of Carbon Taxation: How Varieties of Policy Style Matter.” Environmental Politics 28 (6): 1084–1104. doi:10.1080/09644016.2019.1625134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arlinghaus, J., and K. van Dender. 2017. The Environmental Tax and Subsidy Reform in Mexico. OECD Taxation Working Papers. Paris: OECD. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/a9204f40-en.pdf?expires=1592251162&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=0A6847DD2977D1C3187ED0820C40274D
   Google Scholar
• Bachus, K., L. Van Ootegem, and E. Verhofstadt. 2019. “‘No Taxation without Hypothecation’: Towards an Improved Understanding of the Acceptability of an Environmental Tax Reform.” Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 21 (4): 321–332. doi:10.1080/1523908X.2019.1623654.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrientos del Monte, F., and D. Añorve Añorve. 2014. “México 2013: Acuerdos, Reformas y Descontento.” Revista de Ciencia Política (Santiago) 34 (1): 221–247. doi:10.4067/S0718-090X2014000100011.
   Google Scholar
• Best, R., and Q. Zhang. 2020. “What Explains Carbon-Pricing Variation between Countries?” Energy Policy 143: 111541. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111541.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blatter, J., and T. Blume. 2008. “In Search of Co-Variance, Causal Mechanisms or Congruence? Towards a Plural Understanding of Case Studies.” Swiss Political Science Review 14 (2): 315–356. doi:10.1002/j.1662-6370.2008.tb00105.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cárdenas Sánchez, E. 2018. “Política Hacendaria En México de 2013 a 2017. Una Primera Aproximación Al Sexenio.” El Trimestre Económico 85 (340): 887. doi:10.20430/ete.v85i340.764.
   Google Scholar
• CESPEDES 2013. Propuesta Al Impuesto Al Carbono: Notas Para El Posicionamiento de CESPEDES. http://www.cespedes.org.mx/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Impuesto-al-carbono-extenso.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Climate Action Tracker. 2021. Countries Rating System: Mexico. https://climateactiontracker.org/countries/mexico/.
   Google Scholar
• COFECE. 2019. Transición Hacia Mercados Competidos de Energía: Gasolina y Diésel. Mexico City. https://www.cofece.mx/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/CPC-GasolinasyDiesel-30012019.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Criqui, P., M. Jaccard, and T. Sterner. 2019. “Carbon Taxation: A Tale of Three Countries.” Sustainability 11 (22): 6280. doi:10.3390/su11226280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diario Oficial de la Federación de Estados Mexicanos. 2017. Ley de Impuesto Especial Sobre Producción y Servicios. Ciudad de México. https://www.sep.gob.mx/work/models/sep1/Resource/17e0fb21-14e1-4354-866e-6b13414e2e80/ley_impuesto_especial.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Dibley, A., and R. Garcia-Miron. 2020. “Can Money Buy You (Climate) Happiness? Economic Co-Benefits and the Implementation of Effective Carbon Pricing Policies in Mexico.” Energy Research & Social Science 70: 101659. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2020.101659.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garduno, R., and E. Méndez. 2013. La Reforma Fiscal de Peña Recibió 317 Votos a Favor y 164 En Contra. La Jornada. October 18.
   Google Scholar
• Gobierno Federal de Mexico. 2013. Estrategia Nacional de Cambio Climático. https://www.gob.mx/cms/uploads/attachment/file/41978/Estrategia-Nacional-Cambio-Climatico-2013.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Green, J. 2021. “Does Carbon Pricing Reduce Emissions? A Review of Ex-Post Analyses.” Environmental Research Letters 16 (4): 043004. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/abdae9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, K. 2010. “The Comparative Politics of Carbon Taxation.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science 6 (1): 507–529. doi:10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.093008.131545.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, K., and L. Sundstrom. 2007. “The Comparative Politics of Climate Change.” Global Environmental Politics 7 (4): 1–18. doi:10.1162/glep.2007.7.4.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernández Gutíerrez, L. 2020. “Cabildeo de Los Grupos Empresariales En El Congreso Mexicano: LXII Legislatura.” Estudios: Filosofía, Historia, Letras 18 (135): 55–87.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman, A., and M. Ventresca. 1999. “The Institutional Framing of Policy Debates.” American Behavioral Scientist 42 (8): 1368–1392. doi:10.1177/00027649921954903.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ICAP. 2019. ETS Detailed Information: Mexico. https://icapcarbonaction.com/en/?option=com_etsmap&task=export&format=pdf&layout=list&systems[]=59.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, M. 2012. Green Growth: Economic Theory and Political Discourse. GRI Working Papers 92. London: Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins-Smith, H., D. Nohrstedt, C. Weible, and P. Sabatier. 2014. “Advocacy Coalition Framework: Foundations, Evolution, and Ongoing Research.” In Theories of the Policy Process, edited by P. Sabatier and C. M. Weible. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kammerer, M., K. Ingold, and J. Dupois. 2020. “Switzerland: International Commitments and Domestic Drawbacks.” In Climate Governance Across the Globe: Pioneers, Leaders, and Followers, edited by R. Wurzel, M.S. Andersen, and P. Tobin, Paul. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Karapin, R. 2020. “The Political Viability of Carbon Pricing: Policy Design and Framing in British Columbia and California.” Review of Policy Research 37 (2): 140–173. doi:10.1111/ropr.12373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karlsson, M., E. Alfredsson, and N. Westling. 2020. “Climate Policy Co-Benefits: A Review.” Climate Policy 20 (3): 292–316. doi:10.1080/14693062.2020.1724070.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz-Rosene, R., and M. Paterson. 2018. Thinking Ecologically about the Global Political Economy. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Keohane, R., and J. Victor. 2016. “Cooperation and Discord in Global Climate Policy.” Nature Climate Change 6 (6): 570–575. doi:10.1038/nclimate2937.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lachapelle, E., and M. Paterson. 2013. “Drivers of National Climate Policy.” Climate Policy 13 (5): 547–571. doi:10.1080/14693062.2013.811333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levi, S., C. Flachsland, and M. Jakob. 2020. “Political Economy Determinants of Carbon Pricing.” Global Environmental Politics 20 (2): 128–156. doi:10.1162/glep_a_00549.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacNeil, R. 2016. “Death and Environmental Taxes: Why Market Environmentalism Fails in Liberal Market Economies.” Global Environmental Politics 16 (1): 21–37. doi:10.1162/GLEP_a_00336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, D., and J. Sharman. 2009. “Policy Diffusion and Policy Transfer.” Policy Studies 30 (3): 269–288. doi:10.1080/01442870902863851.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer-Serra, C. 2017. “Reforma de La Constitución: La Economía Política Del Pacto Por México.” Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Políticas y Sociales 62 (230): 21–49. doi:10.1016/S0185-1918(17)30016-8.
   Google Scholar
• MEXICO2, Environmental Defense Fund, & IETA. 2018. MEXICO: A Market Based Climate Policy Case Study. www.mexico2.com.mx%7Cwww.edf.org%7Cwww.ieta.org.
   Google Scholar
• Mildenberger, M. 2020. Carbon Captured: How Business and Labor Control Climate Politics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nordhaus, W. D. 2019. “Climate Change: The Ultimate Challenge for Economics.” American Economic Review 109 (6): 1991–2014. doi:10.1257/aer.109.6.1991.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. 2019. OECD Economic Surveys: Mexico 2019. Paris: OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/a536d00e-en.
   Google Scholar
• Paterson, M., M. Hoffmann, M. Betsill, and S. Bernstein. 2014. “The Micro Foundations of Policy Diffusion toward Complex Global Governance: An Analysis of the Transnational Carbon Emission Trading Network.” Comparative Political Studies 47 (3): 420–449. doi:10.1177/0010414013509575.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pigou, A. 1932. The Economics of Welfare. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Pizarro, R. 2021. Sistemas de instrumentos de fijación de precios del carbono en América Latina y jurisdicciones de las Américas relevantes. Santiago: ECLAC. https://repositorio.cepal.org/bitstream/handle/11362/46765/4/S2100035_es.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Presidencia de la República de los Estados Unidos Mexicanos. 2013. Iniciativa Por El Que Se Reforman, Adicionan y Derogan Disposiciones de La Ley Del Impuesto Al Valor Agregado, de La Ley Del Impuesto Especial Sobre Producción y Servicios y Del Código Fiscal de La Federación. Cámara de Diputados de los Estados Unidos Mexicanos. http://www.diputados.gob.mx/PEF2014/ingresos/03_liva.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Rabe, B. 2018. Can We Price Carbon? Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ramírez Sánchez, J., C. Calderón, and S. Sánchez León. 2018. “Is NAFTA Really Advantageous for Mexico?” The International Trade Journal 32 (1): 21–42. doi:10.1080/08853908.2017.1387623.
   Google Scholar
• Rosas-Flores, J. 2017. “Elements for the Development of Public Policies in the Residential Sector of Mexico Based in the Energy Reform and the Energy Transition Law.” Energy Policy 104: 253–264. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2017.01.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, D., and M. Micozzi. 2021. “The Politics of Climate Policy Innovation: The Case of the Argentine Carbon Tax.” Environmental Politics 30 (7): 1155–1173. doi:10.1080/09644016.2021.1899648.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanderink, L., P. Pattberg, and O. Widerberg. 2020. “Mapping the Institutional Complex of the Climate-Energy Nexus.” In Governing the Climate-Energy Nexus: Institutional Complexity and Its Challenges to Effectiveness and Legitimacy, edited by F. Zelli, K. Bäckstrand, N. Nasiritousi, J. Skovgaard, and O. E. Widerberg. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schön, D. A., and M. Rein. 1994. Frame Reflection: Toward the Resolution of Intractable Policy Controversies. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Secretaría de Hacienda y Crédito Público. 2020. Ingresos Presupuestarios Del Gobierno Federal. http://presto.hacienda.gob.mx/EstoporLayout/Layout.jsp.
   Google Scholar
• SEMARNAT. 2014. Mexico’s Climate Change Laws and Policies. https://www.thepmr.org/system/files/documents/Mexico_Climate_Change_Law_and_Policies.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Senado de la República de México. 2013. Registro de Votaciones: Ley de Impuesto Especial Sobre Producción y Servicios. https://www.senado.gob.mx/64/votacion/1820.
   Google Scholar
• Silva Rodríguez de San Miguel, J. 2018. “Climate Change Initiatives in Mexico: A Review.” Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal 29 (6): 1042–1058. doi:10.1108/MEQ-03-2018-0066.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, S., T. Naegler, and H. Gils. 2018. “Transformation towards a Renewable Energy System in Brazil and Mexico: Technological and Structural Options for Latin America.” Energies 11 (4): 907. doi:10.3390/en11040907.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skovgaard, J. 2014. “EU Climate Policy after the Crisis.” Environmental Politics 23 (1): 1–17, doi:10.1080/09644016.2013.818304.
   Google Scholar
• Skovgaard, J., S. Sacks Ferrari, and Å. Knaggård. 2019. “Mapping and Clustering the Adoption of Carbon Pricing Policies: What Polities Price Carbon and Why?” Climate Policy 19 (9:) 1173–1185, doi:10.1080/14693062.2019.1641460.
   Google Scholar
• Steinebach, Y., X. Fernández-I-Marín, and C. Aschenbrenner. 2020. “Who Puts a Price on Carbon, Why and How? A Global Empirical Analysis of Carbon Pricing Policies.” Climate Policy 21 (3): 1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens, D. 2021. “Institutions and Agency in the Making of Carbon Pricing Policies: Evidence from Mexico and Directions for Comparative Analyses in Latin America.” Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice (Accepted) 23 (4): 485–504. doi:10.1080/13876988.2020.1794754.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Bank. 2019. State and Trends of Carbon Pricing 2019. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/191801559846379845/State-and-Trends-of-Carbon-Pricing-2019.
   Google Scholar
• Veysey, J., C. Octaviano, C. Calvin, S. Herreras Martinez, A. Kitous, J. McFarland, and B. van der Zwaan. 2016. “Pathways to Mexico’s Climate Change Mitigation Targets: A Multi-Model Analysis.” Energy Economics 56 (May): 587–599. doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2015.04.011.
   Google Scholar