Understanding public administrators’ and citizens’ preferences for a successful transition to pesticide-free urban green spaces

References

• Aggéri, G. 2010. Inventing the Natural Cities of Tomorrow: Differentiated Management, Sustainable Management of Green Spaces [Inventer les villes natures de demain: Gestion différenciée, gestion durable des espaces verts]. (In French). Dijon, France: Educagri édition.
   Google Scholar
• Agren, H., M. Dahlberg, and E. Mörk. 2007. “Do Politicians’ Preferences Correspond to Those of the Voters? An Investigation of Political Representation.” Public Choice 130 (1-2): 137–162. doi:10.1007/s11127-006-9077-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alberini, A., A. Longo, and P. Riganti. 2006. “Using Surveys to Compare the Public’s and Decisionmakers’ Preferences for Urban Regeneration: The Venice Arsenale.” https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=945046
   Google Scholar
• Allain, Y.-M. 1997. “The City: A New Territory for Nature? Differentiated Management in Europe [La ville: un territoire nouveau pour la nature? la gestion différenciée en Europe].” Journal d’agriculture traditionnelle et de botanique appliquée 39 (2): 199–217. doi:10.3406/jatba.1997.3624.
   Google Scholar
• Amblard, G., H. Bonnavaud, C. Buche, D. Cercueil, and L. Charvet. 2009. “Pesticides in Everyday Life [Technical Report Alterre-Bourgogne]. [Pesticides au quotidien [Rapport technique alterre-bourgogne].” https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01190511/document
   Google Scholar
• Aubertot, J.-N., J. M. Barbier, A. Carpentier, J. J. Gril, L. Guichard, P. Lucas, S. Savary, I. Savini, and M. Voltz. 2005. “Pesticides, Agriculture and the Environnement. Reducing Pesticide Use and its Environmental Impacts [Pesticides, agriculture et environnement. Réduire l’utilisation des pesticides et en limiter les impacts environnementaux].” Expertise scientifique collective 789 Inra-Cemagref. http://temis.documentation.developpement-durable.gouv.fr/docs/Temis/0080/Temis-0080961/23321.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Azadi, H., P. Ho, E. Hafni, K. Zarafshani, and F. Witlox. 2011. “Multi-Stakeholder Involvement and Urban Green Space Performance.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 54 (6): 785–811. doi:10.1080/09640568.2010.530513.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baji, P., M. García-Goñi, L. Gulácsi, E. Mentzakis, and F. Paolucci. 2016. “Comparative Analysis of Decision Maker Preferences for Equity/Efficiency Attributes in Reimbursement Decisions in Three European Countries.” The European Journal of Health Economics 17 (7): 791–799. doi:10.1007/s10198-015-0721-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bateman, I. J. 1996. “Household Willingness to Pay and Farmers’ Willingness to Accept Compensation for Establishing a Recreational Woodland.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 39 (1): 21–44. doi:10.1080/09640569612651.
   Google Scholar
• Bech, M. 2003. “Politicians’ and Hospital Managers’ Trade-Offs in the Choice of Reimbursement Scheme: A Discrete Choice Experiment.” Health Policy 66 (3): 261–275. doi:10.1016/S0168-8510(03)00064-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birol, E., and P. Koundouri. 2008. Choice Experiments Informing Environmental Policy: A European Perspective. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan, J. M., R. D. Tollison, and G. Tullock. 1980. Toward a Theory of the Rent-Seeking Society. College Station, TX: Texas A & M University.
   Google Scholar
• Bullock, C. H. 2008. “Valuing Urban Green Space: Hypothetical Alternatives and the Status Quo.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 51 (1): 15–35. doi:10.1080/09640560701712242.
   Google Scholar
• Burton, M. 2019. “Model Invariance When Estimating Random Parameters with Categorical Variables.” Conference Paper Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society (AARES), 2019, Melbourne, Australia. doi:10.22004/ag.econ.285040.
   Google Scholar
• Cameron, R., P. Brindley, M. Mears, K. McEwan, F. Ferguson, D. Sheffield, A. Jorgensen, et al. 2020. “Where the Wild Things Are! Do Urban Green Spaces with Greater Avian Biodiversity Promote More Positive Emotions in Humans?” Urban Ecosystems 23 (2): 301–317. doi:10.1007/s11252-020-00929-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlsson, F., D. Daruvala, and H. Jaldell. 2012. “Do Administrators Have the Same Priorities for Risk Reductions as the General Public?” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 45 (1): 79–95. doi:10.1007/s11166-012-9147-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlsson, F., M. Kataria, and E. Lampi. 2011. “Do EPA Administrators Recommend Environmental Policies That Citizens Want?” Land Economics 87 (1): 60–74. doi:10.3368/le.87.1.60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carson, R. T., and T. Groves. 2007. “Incentive and Informational Properties of Preference Questions.” Environmental and Resource Economics 37 (1): 181–210. doi:10.1007/s10640-007-9124-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheval, H., C. Gutleben, and P. Laille. 2017. “Technical and Economic Solutions for Pesticide-Free Transition [Conditions technico-économiques du passage au « Zéro Phyto »].” https://www.plante-et-cite.fr/files/ressource/file:1079836
   Google Scholar
• Colombo, S., A. Angus, J. Morris, D. J. Parsons, M. Brawn, K. Stacey, and N. Hanley. 2009. “A Comparison of Citizen and “Expert” Preferences Using an Attribute-Based Approach to Choice.” Ecological Economics 68 (11): 2834–2841. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.06.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Groot, W. T, and R. J. G. van den Born. 2003. “Visions of Nature and Landscape Type Preferences: An Exploration in The Netherlands.” Landscape and Urban Planning 63 (3): 127–138. doi:10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00184-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eggert, H., M. Kataria, and E. Lampi. 2018. “Difference in Preferences or Multiple Preference Orderings? Comparing Choices of Environmental Bureaucrats, Recreational Anglers, and the Public.” Ecological Economics 151: 131–141. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.04.034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ek, C., K. Elofsson, and C.-J. Lagerkvist. 2018. “Which Type of Policy Instrument Do Citizens and Experts Prefer? A Choice Experiment on Swedish Marine and Water Policy.” Working Paper in Economics University of Gothenburg (746). https://gupea.ub.gu.se/handle/2077/58220
   Google Scholar
• Espinosa-Goded, M., J. Barreiro-Hurlé, and E. Ruto. 2010. “What Do Farmers Want from Agri-Environmental Scheme Design? A Choice Experiment Approach.” Journal of Agricultural Economics 61 (2): 259–273. doi:10.1111/j.1477-9552.2010.00244.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2020. “Farm to Fork Strategy: For a Fair, Healthy and Environmentally-Friendly Food System.” https://ec.europa.eu/food/system/files/2020-05/f2f_action-plan_2020_strategy-info_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament and Council. 2009. “Directive 2009/128/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 Establishing a Framework for Community Action to Achieve the Sustainable Use of Pesticide.” https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2009:309:0071:0086:EN:PDF
   Google Scholar
• Giergiczny, M., and J. Kronenberg. 2014. “From Valuation to Governance: Using Choice Experiment to Value Street Trees.” Ambio 43 (4): 492–501. doi:10.1007/s13280-014-0516-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutleben, C. 2020. “The Pesticide-Free City Trend in Public Spaces: Creative Ways to Healthier Landscapes. [Les politiques « Zéro pesticide » au sein des collectivités territoriales: l’innovation dans le paysage pour la santé des habitants].” Environnement Risques Santé 19 (2): 113–121. DOI doi:10.1684/ers.2020.1415.
   Google Scholar
• Hanemann, W. M. 1984. “Welfare Evaluations in Contingent Valuation Experiments with Discrete Responses.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 66 (3): 332–341. doi:10.2307/1240800.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, V., D. Kendal, A. K. Hahs, and C. G. Threlfall. 2018. “Green Space Context and Vegetation Complexity Shape People’s Preferences for Urban Public Parks and Residential Gardens.” Landscape Research 43 (1): 150–162. doi:10.1080/01426397.2017.1302571.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hensher, D., J. Rose, and W. Greene. 2015. Applied Choice Analysis, Second ed. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hess, S., and K. Train. 2017. “Correlation and Scale in Mixed Logit Models.” Journal of Choice Modelling 23: 1–8. doi:10.1016/j.jocm.2017.03.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirsch, R., and J. Baxter. 2009. “The Look of the Lawn: Pesticide Policy Preference and Health-Risk Perception in Context.” Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 27 (3): 468–490. doi:10.1068/c0809.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirsch, R. A., and J. Baxter. 2011. “Context, Cultural Bias, and Health Risk Perception: The “Everyday” Nature of Pesticide Policy Preferences.” Risk Analysis 31 (5): 847–865. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01560.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirschauer, N., S. Grüner, O. Mußhoff, C. Becker, and A. Jantsch. 2020. “Can p-Values be Meaningfully Interpreted without Random Sampling?” Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 14 (3): 71–91. doi:10.1214/20-SS129.
   Google Scholar
• Hole, A. R. 2007. “A Comparison of Approaches to Estimating Confidence Intervals for Willingness to Pay Measures.” Health Economics 16 (8): 827–840. doi:10.1002/hec.1197.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoyos, D. 2010. “The State of the Art of Environmental Valuation with Discrete Choice Experiments.” Ecological Economics 69 (8): 1595–1603. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.04.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsee, C. K. 1996. “The Evaluability Hypothesis: An Explanation for Preference Reversals between Joint and Separate Evaluations of Alternatives.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 67 (3): 247–257. doi:10.1006/obhd.1996.0077.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ignatieva, M., D. Haase, D. Dushkova, and A. Haase. 2020. “Lawns in Cities: From a Globalised Urban Green Space Phenomenon to Sustainable Nature-Based Solutions.” Land 9 (3): 73. doi:10.3390/land9030073.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacquet, F., M. Jeuffroy, J. Jouan, E. L. Cadre, I. Litrico, T. Malausa, X. Reboud, and C. Huyghe. 2022. “Pesticide-Free Agriculture as a New Paradigm for Research.” Agronomy for Sustainable Development 42 (1): 8. doi:10.1007/s13593-021-00742-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., and A. Tversky. 2012. “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk.” In Handbook of the Fundamentals of Financial Decision Making, Vol. 4 of World Scientific Handbook in Financial Economics Series, edited by L. C. MacLean, and W. T. Ziemba. 99–127. Singapore: World Scientific. doi:10.1142/9789814417358_0006.
   Google Scholar
• Krinsky, I., and A. L. Robb. 1986. “On Approximating the Statistical Properties of Elasticities.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 68 (4): 715–719. doi:10.2307/1924536.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kristoffersen, P., A. Rask, A. Grundy, I. Franzen, C. Kempenaar, J. Raisio, H. Schroeder, J. Spijker, A. Vershwele, and L. Zarina. 2008. “A Review of Pesticide Policies and Regulations for Urban Amenity Areas in Seven European Countries.” Weed Research 48: 201–214. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3180.2008.00619.x.
   Google Scholar
• Lancaster, K. J. 1966. “A New Approach to Consumer Theory.” Journal of Political Economy 74 (2): 132–157. doi:10.1086/259131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancsar, E., J. Louviere, and T. Flynn. 2007. “Several Methods to Investigate Relative Attribute Impact in Stated Preference Experiments.” Social Science & Medicine 64 (8): 1738–1753. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.12.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latacz-Lohmann, U., and J. A. Schreiner. 2019. “Assessing Consumer and Producer Preferences for Animal Welfare Using a Common Elicitation Format.” Journal of Agricultural Economics 70 (2): 293–315. doi:10.1111/1477-9552.12297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lefebvre, M., M. Maslianskaia-Pautrel, and P. Laille. 2021. “Users’ Preferences for Pesticide-Free Management of Urban Green Spaces: The French Example [Préférences des usagers pour la gestion des espacaces verts urbains sans pesticides: l’exemple de la France].” Revue Economique 72 (4): 947–967. doi:10.3917/reco.726.0947.
   Google Scholar
• Legifrance. 2014. “Law n°2014-110 of February 6, 2014 Aiming to Better Control the Use of Phytosanitary Products on the National Territory (Labbé Law).” https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/jorf/id/JORFTEXT000028571536
   Google Scholar
• Legifrance. 2021. “Order of January 15, 2021 on Measures to Protect People When Using Plant Protection Products in Private Properties, Places Frequented by the Public and in Places for Collective Use.” https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/jorf/id/JORFTEXT000043023130
   Google Scholar
• Lindholst, A. C. 2008. “Improving Contract Design and Management for Urban Green-Space Maintenance through Action Research.” Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 7 (2): 77–91. doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2008.02.001.
   Google Scholar
• Louvière, J., and H. Timmermans. 1990. “Stated Preference and Choice Models Applied to Recreation Research: A Review.” Leisure Sciences 12 (1): 9–32. doi:10.1080/01490409009513087.
   Google Scholar
• Mariel, P., and J. Meyerhoff. 2018. “A More Flexible Model or Simply More Effort? On the Use of Corrélâtes Random Parameters in Applied Choice Studies.” Ecological Economics 154: 419–429. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.08.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marrelli, P., D. Hoyos, J. Meyerhoff, M. Czajkowski, T. Dekker, K. Glenk, J. B. Jacobsen, U. Liebe, S. B. Olsen, J. Sagebiel, and M. Thiene. 2021. Environmental Valuation with Discrete Choice Experiments: Guidance on Design, Implementation and Data Analysis. Cham, Switzerland: SpringerBriefs in Economics, Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62669-3.
   Google Scholar
• Marrelli, M., and G. Pignataro. 2001. Public Decision-Making Processes and Asymmetry of Information. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• McFadden, D. 1973. “Condition Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice Behavior.” In Frontiers in Econometrics, edited by P. Zarembka, 105–142. Cambridge, MA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meyerhoff, J., U. Liebe, and V. Hartje. 2009. “Benefits of Biodiversity Enhancement of Nature-Oriented Silviculture: Evidence from Two Choice Experiments in Germany.” Journal of Forest Economics 15 (1-2): 37–58. doi:10.1016/j.jfe.2008.03.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muratet, A., and B. Fontaine. 2015. “Contrasting Impacts of Pesticides on Butterflies and Bumblebees in Private Gardens in France.” Biological Conservation 182: 148–154. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2014.11.045.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nassauer, J. I. 1995. “Messy Ecosystems, Orderly Frames.” Landscape Journal 14 (2): 161–170. doi:10.3368/lj.14.2.161.
   Google Scholar
• Niskanen, W. A. 1971. Bureaucracy and Representative Government. Piscataway, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Nordén, A., J. Coria, A. M. Jönsson, F. Lagergren, and V. Lehsten. 2017. “Divergence in Stakeholders’ Preferences: Evidence from a Choice Experiment on Forest and Scapes Preferences in Sweden.” Ecological Economics 132: 179–195. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.09.032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patterson, Z., J. M. Darbani, A. Rezaei, J. Zacharias, and A. Yazdizadeh. 2017. “Comparing Text-Only and Virtual Reality Discrete Choice Experiments of Neighbourhood Choice.” Landscape and Urban Planning 157: 63–74. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.05.024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poe, G. L., K. L. Giraud, and J. B. Loomis. 2005. “Computational Methods for Measuring the Difference of Empirical Distributions.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 87 (2): 353–365. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8276.2005.00727.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pralle, S. 2006. “Timing and Sequence in Agenda-Setting and Policy Change: A Comparative Study of Lawn Care Pesticide Politics in Canada and the US.” Journal of European Public Policy 13 (7): 987–1005. doi:10.1080/13501760600923904.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Entrena, M., J. Barreiro-Hurlé, J. A. Gómez-Limón, M. Espinosa-Goded, and J. Castro-Rodríguez. 2012. “Evaluating the Demand for Carbon Sequestration in Olive Grove Soils as a Strategy toward Mitigating Climate Change.” Journal of Environmental Management 112: 368–376. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.08.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, A. A. 2013. “Public and Expert Preference Divergence: Evidence from a Choice Experiment of Marine Reserves in Australia.” Land Economics 89 (2): 346–370. doi:10.3368/le.89.2.346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, J. M., and M. C. J. Bliemer. 2013. “Sample Size Requirements for Stated Choice Experiments.” Transportation 40 (5): 1021–1041. doi:10.1007/s11116-013-9451-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosol, M. 2010. “Public Participation in Post-Fordist Urban Green Space Governance: The Case of Community Gardens in Berlin.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 34 (3): 548–563. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2427.2010.00968.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sang, O., I. Knez, B. Gunnarsson, and M. Hedblom. 2016. “The Effects of Naturalness, Gender, and Age on How Urban Green Space Is Perceived and Used.” Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 18: 268–276. doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2016.06.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shr, Y.-H., R. Ready, B. Orland, and S. Echols. 2019. “How Do Visual Representations Influence Survey Responses? Evidence from a Choice Experiment on Landscape Attributes of Green Infrastructure.” Ecological Economics 156 (3): 375–386. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.10.015.
   Google Scholar
• Spegel, E. 2017. “Valuing the Reduction of Floods: Public Officials’ versus Citizens’ Preferences.” Climate Risk Management 18: 1–14. doi:10.1016/j.crm.2017.08.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terwel, B. W., and E. ter Mors. 2015. “Host Community Compensation in a Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage (CCS) Context: Comparing the Preferences of Dutch Citizens and Local Government Authorities.” Environmental Science & Policy 50: 15–23. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2015.01.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tienhaara, A., E. Haltia, E. Pouta, K. Arovuori, I. Grammatikopoulou, A. Miettinen, K. Koikkalainen, H. Ahtiainen, and J. Artell. 2020. “Demand and Supply of Agricultural ES: Towards Benefit-Based Policy.” European Review of Agricultural Economics 47 (3): 1223–1249. doi:10.1093/erae/jbz044.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Train, K. 2003. Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tu, G., J. Abildtrup, and S. Garcia. 2016. “Preferences for Urban Green Spaces and Peri-Urban Forests: An Analysis of Stated Residential Choices.” Landscape and Urban Planning 148: 120–131. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.12.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkerson, M. L., M. G. Mitchell, D. Shanahan, K. A. Wilson, C. D. Ives, C. E. Lovelock, and J. R. Rhodes. 2018. “The Role of Socio-Economic Factors in Planning and Managing Urban Ecosystem Services.” Ecosystem Services 31: 102–110. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.02.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar