Governance through storytelling and possible futures: motorcycle-cab service planning in Mexico City

References

• Aguilar Villanueva, L. F. 2006. Gobernanza y Gestión Pública. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
   Google Scholar
• Auwerx, P., ed. 2011. Involving Stakeholders: Toolkit on Organizing Successful Consultations. Szentendre, Hungría: Civitas Initiative.
   Google Scholar
• Balducci, A., and R. Mäntysalo. 2013. “Introduction.” In Urban Planning as a Trading Zone, edited by A. Balducci and R. Mäntysalo. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bickerstaff, K., R. Tolley, and G. Walker. 2002. “Transport Planning and Participation: The Rhetoric and Realities of Public Involvement.” Journal of Transport Geography 10 (1): 61–73. doi:10.1016/S0966-6923(01)00027-8.
   Google Scholar
• Bond, S. 2011. “Negotiating a ‘Democratic Ethos’ Moving beyond the Agonistic–Communicative Divide.” Planning Theory 10 (2): 161–186. doi:10.1177/1473095210383081.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brownill, S. 2009. “The Dynamics of Participation: Modes of Governance and Increasing Participation in Planning.” Urban Policy and Research 27 (4): 357–375. doi:10.1080/08111140903308842.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruquetas Callejo, M., and F. J. Moreno Fuentes. 2005. La Regeneración de Barrios Desfavorecidos. Madrid: Fundación Alternativas.
   Google Scholar
• Büscher, M., M. Sheller, and D. Tyfield. 2016. “Mobility Intersections: Social Research, Social Futures.” Mobilities 11 (4): 485–497. doi:10.1080/17450101.2016.1211818.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Congreso de la Ciudad de México. 2014. Ley de Movilidad del Distrito Federal.
   Google Scholar
• Congreso de la Ciudad de México. 2015. Reglamento de Tránsito del Distrito Federal.
   Google Scholar
• De Fina, A., A. Georgakopoulou, and G. Barkhuizen. 2015. The Handbook of Narrative Analysis. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Egmose, J., J. Gleerup, and B. S. Nielsen. 2020. “Critical Utopian Action Research: Methodological Inspiration for Democratization?” International Review of Qualitative Research 13 (2): 233–246. doi:10.1177/1940844720933236.
   Google Scholar
• Finck Carrales, J. C. 2015. “Transporte Emergente en Colonias Periféricas de la Ciudad de México: El Caso de Los Bici y Moto-Taxis en La Conchita Zapotitlán, Tláhuac.” In Tesis de Maestría en Proyectos Para el Desarrollo Urbano. Ciudad de México: Universidad Iberoamericana.
   Google Scholar
• Forester, J. 2006. “Making Participation Work When Interests Conflict.” Journal of the American Planning Association 72 (4): 447–456. doi:10.1080/01944360608976765.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freudendal-Pedersen, M. 2015. “Whose Commons Are Mobilities Spaces?: The Case of Copenhagen Cyclists.” ACME 14 (2): 598–621.
   Google Scholar
• Freudendal-Pedersen, M. 2018. “Engaging with Sustainable Urban Mobilities in Western Europe: Urban Utopias Seen through Cycling in Copenhagen.” In Handbook of Anthropology and the City, edited by S. Low, 240–253. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Freudendal-Pedersen, M. 2020. “Sustainable Urban Futures from Transportation and Planning to Networked Urban Mobilities.” Transportation Research Part D 82 82: 102310. doi:10.1016/j.trd.2020.102310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freudendal-Pedersen, M., and S. Kesselring. 2016. “Mobilities, Futures and the City: Repositioning Discourses – Changing Perspectives – Rethinking Policies.” Mobilities 11 (4): 575–586. doi:10.1080/17450101.2016.1211825.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freudendal-Pedersen, M., K. Hartmann-Petersen, A. A. Kjaerulff, and L. D. Nielsen. 2017. “Interactive Environmental Planning: Creating Utopias and Storylines within a Mobilities Planning Project.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 60 (6): 941–958. doi:10.1080/09640568.2016.1189817.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwood, D. J. 2007. “Pragmatic Action Research.” International Journal of Action Research 3 (1): 131–148.
   Google Scholar
• Hajer, M. A. 1995. The Politics of Environmental Discourse: Ecological Modernization and the Policy Process. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hajer, M. A. 2011. Authoritative Governance: Policy-Making in the Age of Mediatization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P. 1992. “Planning through Debate: The Communicative Turn in Planning Theory.” Town Planning Review 63 (2): 143–162. doi:10.3828/tpr.63.2.422x602303814821.
   Google Scholar
• Holsti, K. 1992. “Governance without Government: Polyarchy in Nineteenth-Century European International Politics.” In Governance without Government: Order and Change in World Politics, edited by Rosenau J. and E. Czempiel, 30–57. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Innes, J. E., and D. E. Booher. 2010. Planning with Complexity: An Introduction to Collaborative Rationality for Public Policy. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Institute for Transportation and Development Policy (ITDP). 2014. Manual de participación en políticas de movilidad y desarrollo urbano. New York: ITDP.
   Google Scholar
• Kębłowski, W., and D. Bassens. 2018. “All Transport Problems Are Essentially Mathematical: The Uneven Resonance of Academic Transport and Mobility Knowledge in Brussels.” Urban Geography 39 (3): 413–437. doi:10.1080/02723638.2017.1336320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klijn, E.-H., and J. Koppenjan. 2012. “Governance Network Theory: Past, Present and Future.” Policy and Politics 40 (4): 587–606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levitas, R. 2013. Utopia as Method: The Imaginary Reconstitution of Society. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Melo, M. A., and G. Baiocchi. 2006. “Deliberative Democracy and Local Governance: Towards a New Agenda.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 30 (3): 587–600. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2427.2006.00686.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milenio. 2015. SEMOVI rechaza regularizar mototaxis y golfitaxis. https://www.milenio.com/estados/semovi-rechaza-regularizar-mototaxis-y-golfitaxis.
   Google Scholar
• Pierre, J. 1999. “Models of Urban Governance: The Institutional Dimension of Urban Politics.” Urban Affairs Review 34 (3): 372–396. doi:10.1177/10780879922183988.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pink, S. 2007. Doing Visual Ethnography. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C., and G. Bouckaert. 2011. “Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis: New Public Management.” In Governance, and the Neo-Weberian State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reporte Indigo. 2019. El transporte de los excluidos. https://www.reporteindigo.com/reporte/el-transporte-de-los-excluidos-regulacion-servicio-ilegalidad-vehiculos-taxis-movilidad/
   Google Scholar
• Reporte Indigo. 2020. Ciclotaxis y mototaxis, transporte sin contagio. https://www.reporteindigo.com/reporte/ciclotaxis-y-mototaxis-transporte-sin-contagio-modernizacion-semovi-nueva-normalidad/
   Google Scholar
• Sagaris, L. 2021. “Community Participation in Public Transport Decision-Making.” In The Routledge Handbook of Public Transport, edited by S. Ison, J. Nelson, and C. Mulley, 107–122. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schafft, Kai A., and D. Greenwood. 2003. “Promises and Dilemmas of Participation: Action Research, Search Conference Methodology, and Community Development.” Journal of the Community Development Society 34 (1): 18–35. doi:10.1080/15575330309490101.
   Google Scholar
• Schwanen, T. 2018. “Towards Decolonised Knowledge about Transport.” Palgrave Communications 4 (1): 1–6. doi:10.1057/s41599-018-0130-8.
   Google Scholar
• SCINCE. 2010. Estadísticas censales a escalas Geoelectorales. http://gaia.inegi.org.mx/geoelectoral/viewer.html.
   Google Scholar
• Stoker, G. 1998. “Governance as Theory: Five Propositions.” International Social Science Journal 50 (155): 17–28. doi:10.1111/1468-2451.00106.
   Google Scholar
• Urry, J. 2016. What is the Future? Oxford: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Assche, K., R. Beunen, and S. Verweij. 2020. “Comparative Planning Research, Learning, and Governance: The Benefits and Limitations of Learning Policy by Comparison.” Urban Planning 5 (1): 11–21. doi:10.17645/up.v5i1.2656.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagenaar, H. 2011. Meaning in Action. Interpretation and Dialogue in Policy Analysis. London: M.E. Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Wagenaar, H. 2014. “The Agnostic Experience: Informality, Hegemony and the Prospects for Democratic Governance.” In Practices of Freedom. Decentred Governance, Conflict and Democratic Participation, edited by S. Griggs, A. J. Norval, and H. Wagenaar, 217–248. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar