Regional-scale non-market benefits of improved lakes and rivers when perceived and monitored ecological status diverge

References

• Adamowicz, W., J. Swait, P. Boxall, J. Louviere, and M. Williams. 1997. “Perceptions versus Objective Measures of Environmental Quality in Combined Revealed and Stated Preference Models of Environmental Valuation.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 32 (1): 65–84. doi:10.1006/jeem.1996.0957.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahtiainen, H., E. Pouta, and J. Artell. 2015. “Modelling Asymmetric Preferences for Water Quality in Choice Experiments with Individual-Specific Status Quo Alternatives.” Water Resources and Economics 12: 1–13. doi:10.1016/j.wre.2015.10.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alberini, A., K. Boyle, and M. Welsh. 2003. “Analysis of Contingent Valuation Data with Multiple Bids and Response Options Allowing Respondents to Express Uncertainty.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 45 (1): 40–62. doi:10.1016/S0095-0696(02)00010-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvarez, S., and S. Asci. 2014. “Estimating the Benefits of Water Quality Improvements Using Meta-Analysis and Benefits Transfer.” Paper presented at the annual meeting for the Southern Agricultural Economics Association, Dallas TX, February 1-4.
   Google Scholar
• Artell, J., H. Ahtiainen, and E. Pouta. 2013. “Subjective vs. Objective Measures in the Valuation of Water Quality.” Journal of Environmental Management 130: 288–296. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.09.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Artell, J., and A. Huhtala. 2017. “What Are the Benefits of the Water Framework Directive? Lessons Learned for Policy Design from Preference Revelation.” Environmental and Resource Economics 68 (4): 847–873. doi:10.1007/s10640-016-0049-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayer, Miriam, H. D. Brunk, G. M. Ewing, W. T. Reid, and Edward Silverman. 1955. “An Empirical Distribution Function for Sampling with Incomplete Information.” The Annals of Mathematical Statistics 26 (4): 641–647. doi:10.1214/aoms/1177728423.
   Google Scholar
• Bateman, I. J., R. T. Carson, B. Day, M. Hanemann, N. Hanley, T. Hett, M. Jones-Lee, et al. 2002. Economic Valuation with Stated Preference Techniques: A Manual. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Boeuf, B., and O. Fritsch. 2016. “Studying the Implementation of the Water Framework Directive in Europe: A Meta-Analysis of 89 Journal Articles.” Ecology and Society 21 (2): 19. doi:10.5751/ES-08411-210219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broberg, T., and R. Brännlund. 2008. “An Alternative Interpretation of Multiple Bounded WTP Data-Certainty Dependent Payment Card Intervals.” Resource and Energy Economics 30 (4): 555–567. doi:10.1016/j.reseneeco.2008.09.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brouwer, R. 2008. “The Potential Role of Stated Preference Methods in the Water Framework Directive to Assess Disproportionate Costs.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 51 (5): 597–614. doi:10.1080/09640560802207860.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brouwer, R., and R. Pinto. 2021. “How Much Are Canadians Willing to Pay for Clean Surface and Ground Water? A Meta-Analysis of the Canadian Non-Market Valuation Literature.” Canadian Water Resources Journal 46 (4): 207–228. doi:10.1080/07011784.2021.1973568.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buckley, C., P. Howley, C. O’Donoghue, and P. Kilgarriff. 2016. “Willingness to Pay for Achieving Good Status across Rivers in the Republic of Ireland.” Economic and Social Review 47 (3): 425–445.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Wit, H. A., S. Valinia, G. A. Weyhenmeyer, M. N. Futter, P. Kortelainen, K. Austnes, D. O. Hessen, A. Räike, H. Laudon, and J. Vuorenmaa. 2016. “Current Browning of Surface Waters Will Be Further Promoted by Wetter Climate.” Environmental Science & Technology Letters 3 (12): 430–435. doi:10.1021/acs.estlett.6b00396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deely, J., S. Hynes, and J. Curtis. 2019. “Are Objective Data an Appropriate Replacement for Subjective Data in Site Choice Analysis?” Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy 8 (2): 159–178. doi:10.1080/21606544.2018.1528895.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Del Saz-Salazar, S., F. Hernandez-Sancho, and R. Sala-Garrido. 2009. “The Social Benefits of Restoring Water Quality in the Context of the Water Framework Directive: A Comparison of Willingness to Pay and Willingness to Accept.” The Science of the Total Environment 407 (16): 4574–4583. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.05.010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Environment Agency. 2018. European Waters. Assessment of Status and Pressures 2018. EEA Report. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. doi:10.2800/303664.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, A. M., J. A. Herriges, and C. L. Kling. 2014. “The Measurement of Environmental and Resource Values: Theory and Methods.” Third ed. New York: Resources for the Future (RFF) Press. doi:10.4324/9781315780917.
   Google Scholar
• Haab, T. C., and K. E. McConnell. 1997. “Referendum Models and Negative Willingness to Pay: Alternative Solutions.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 32 (2): 251–270. doi:10.1006/jeem.1996.0968.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanley, N., and A. R. Black. 2006. “Cost-Benefit Analysis and the Water Framework Directive in Scotland.” Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management 2 (2): 156–165.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanley, N., R. E. Wright, and B. Alvarez-Farizo. 2006. “Estimating the Economic Value of Improvements in River Ecology Using Choice Experiments: An Application to the Water Framework Directive.” Journal of Environmental Management 78 (2): 183–193. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2005.05.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heiskanen, A. S., W. van de Bund, A. C. Cardoso, and P. Noges. 2004. “Towards Good Ecological Status of Surface Waters in Europe: Interpretation and Harmonisation of the Concept.” Water Science and Technology 49 (7): 169–177. doi:10.2166/wst.2004.0447.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hime, S., I. J. Bateman, P. Posen, and M. Hutchins. 2009. “A Transferable Water Quality Ladder for Conveying Use and Ecological Information within Public Surveys.” In CSERGE Working Paper EDM 09-01. University of East Anglia, Norwich: CSEGRE. http://hdl.handle.net/10419/48821.
   Google Scholar
• Hynes, S., and C. O’Donoghue. 2020. “Value Transfer Using Spatial Microsimulation Modelling: Estimating the Value of Achieving Good Ecological Status under the EU Water Framework Directive across Catchments.” Environmental Science & Policy 110: 60–70. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2020.05.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Härkönen, L. H., A. Lepistö, S. Sarkkola, P. Kortelainen, and A. Räike. 2023. “Reviewing Peatland Forestry: Implications and Mitigation Measures for Freshwater Ecosystem Browning.” Forest Ecology and Management 531: 120776. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2023.120776.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeon, Y., J. Herriges, C. Kling, and J. A. Downing. 2005. The Role of Water Quality Perceptions in Modeling Lake Recreation Demand. Staff General Research Papers Archive 12474. Ames: Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, R. J., and P. J. Thomassin. 2010. “Willingness to Pay for Water Quality Improvements in the United States and Canada: Considering Possibilities for International Meta-Analysis and Benefit Transfer.” Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 39 (1): 114–131.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, R. J., K. J. Boyle, W. Adamowicz, J. Bennett, R. Brouwer, T. A. Cameron, W. M. Hanemann, et al. 2017. “Contemporary Guidance for Stated Preference Studies.” Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists 4 (2): 319–405. doi:10.1086/691697.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston, R. J., E. T. Schultz, K. Segerson, E. Y. Besedin, and M. Ramachandran. 2012. “Enhancing the Content Validity of Stated Preference Valuation: The Structure and Function of Ecological Indicators.” Land Economics 88 (1): 102–120. doi:10.3368/le.88.1.102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kataria, M., I. Bateman, T. Christensen, A. Dubgaard, B. Hasler, S. Hime, J. Ladenburg, G. Levin, L. Martinsen, and C. Nissen. 2012. “Scenario Realism and Welfare Estimates in Choice Experiments: A Non-Market Valuation Study on the European Water Framework Directive.” Journal of Environmental Management 94 (1): 25–33. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.08.010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kriström, B. 1990. “A Nonparametric Approach to the Estimation of Welfare Measures in Discrete Response Valuation Studies.” Land Economics 66 (2): 135–139. doi:10.2307/3146363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kritzberg, E. S., E. M. Hasselquist, M. Škerlep, S. Löfgren, O. Olsson, J. Stadmark, S. Valinia, L. A. Hansson, and H. Laudon. 2020. “Browning of Freshwaters: Consequences to Ecosystem Services, Underlying Drivers, and Potential Mitigation Measures.” Ambio 49 (2): 375–390. doi:10.1007/s13280-019-01227-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazaridou, D., and A. Michailidis. 2020. “Valuing Users’ Willingness to Pay for Improved Water Quality in the Context of the Water Framework Directive.” International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology 27 (5): 424–434. doi:10.1080/13504509.2020.1719545.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manninen, P., and J. Kotanen, 2016. ed “Vesien Tila Hyväksi Yhdessä.” Vuoksen Vesienhoitoalueen Vesienhoitosuunnitelma Vuosiksi 2016-2021. Etelä-Savon elinkeino-, liikenne- ja ympäristökeskus. Raportteja 3. Mikkeli, Finland. https://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-314-391-3.
   Google Scholar
• Martin-Ortega, J. 2012. “Economic Prescriptions and Policy Applications in the Implementation of the European Water Framework Directive.” Environmental Science & Policy 24: 83–91. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2012.06.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metcalfe, P. J., W. Baker, K. Andrews, G. Atkinson, I. J. Bateman, S. Butler, R. T. Carson, et al. 2012. “An Assessment of the Nonmarket Benefits of the Water Framework Directive for Households in England and Wales.” Water Resources Research 48 (3): 1–8. doi:10.1029/2010wr009592.
   Google Scholar
• Meyerhoff, J., M. R. Morkbak, and S. B. Olsen. 2014. “A Meta-Study Investigating the Sources of Protest Behaviour in Stated Preference Surveys.” Environmental & Resource Economics 58 (1): 35–57. doi:10.1007/s10640-013-9688-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newbold, S. C., and R. J. Johnston. 2020. “Valuing Non-Market Valuation Studies Using Meta-Analysis: A Demonstration Using Estimates of Willingness-to-Pay for Water Quality Improvements.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 104: 102379. doi:10.1016/j.jeem.2020.102379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nieminen, M., S. Sarkkola, T. Sallantaus, E. M. Hasselquist, and H. Laudon. 2021. “Peatland Drainage: A Missing Link behind Increasing TOC Concentrations in Waters from High Latitude Forest Catchments?” Science of the Total Environment 774: 145150. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perman, R., Y. Ma, M. Common, D. Maddison, and J. McGilvray. 2011. Natural Resource and Environmental Economics. Fourth ed. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Pinto, R., R. Brouwer, J. Patricio, P. Abreu, C. Marta-Pedroso, A. Baeta, J. N. Franco, T. Domingos, and J. C. Marques. 2016. “Valuing the Non-Market Benefits of Estuarine Ecosystem Services in a River Basin Context: Testing Sensitivity to Scope and Scale.” Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science 169: 95–105. doi:10.1016/j.ecss.2015.11.028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poor, P. J., K. J. Boyle, L. O. Taylor, and R. Bouchard. 2001. “Objective versus Subjective Measures of Water Clarity in Hedonic Property Value Models.” Land Economics 77 (4): 482–493. doi:10.2307/3146935.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramajo-Hernández, J., and S. del Saz-Salazar. 2012. “Estimating the Non-Market Benefits of Water Quality Improvement for a Case Study in Spain: A Contingent Valuation Approach.” Environmental Science & Policy 22: 47–59. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2012.05.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowe, R. D., W. E. Schulze, and W. S. Breffle. 1996. “A Test for Payment Card Biases.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 31 (2): 178–185. doi:10.1006/jeem.1996.0039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soliño, M., J. Joyce, and B. A. Farizo. 2013. “Improving Water Quality in England and Wales: Local Endowments and Willingness to Pay.” International Journal of Environmental Research 7 (3): 723–732. doi:10.22059/IJER.2013.642.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turnbull, B. W. 1976. “The Empirical Distribution Function with Arbitrarily Grouped, Censored and Truncated Data.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological) 38 (3): 290–295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Houtven, G., J. Powers, and S. K. Pattanayak. 2007. “Valuing Water Quality Improvements in the United States Using Meta-Analysis: Is the Glass Half-Full or Half-Empty for National Policy Analysis?” Resource and Energy Economics 29 (3): 206–228. doi:10.1016/j.reseneeco.2007.01.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vilmi, A., M. Järvinen, S. M. Karjalainen, K. Kulo, M. Kuoppala, S. Mitikka, J. Ruuhijärvi, T. Sutela, and J. Aroviita. 2021. “Maa- ja metsätalouden kuormittamien pintavesien tila - MaaMet-seuranta 2008–2020 (Ecological Status of Surface Waters Polluted by Agriculture and Forestry in Finland – Monitoring Results from 2008–2020).” In Suomen Ympäristökeskuksen Raportteja: Suomen ympäristökeskus (Finnish Environment Institute), Helsinki. http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-11-5449-2.
   Google Scholar
• Vossler, C. 2003. “Multiple Bounded Discrete Choice Contingent Valuation: Parametric and Nonparametric Welfare Estimation and a Comparison to the Payment Card.” The Munich Personal RePEc Archive (MPRA) Paper 38867. Munich University Library, Munich, Germany. https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:Pra:Mprapa:38867.
   Google Scholar
• Vossler, C. A., and S. B. Watson. 2013. “Understanding the Consequences of Consequentiality: Testing the Validity of Stated Preferences in the Field.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 86: 137–147. doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2012.12.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vuori, K.-M., and K. Korjonen-Kuusipuro. 2018. “Kolme Kertomusta Järviemme Tilasta. Vesistömuutokset Kansalaisten, Limnologisten Mittausten ja Ympäristöhallinnon Näkökulmasta.” Alue ja Ympäristö 47: 50–61. [In Finnish.] doi:10.30663/ay.65784.
   Google Scholar
• Welsh, M. P., and R. C. Bishop. 1993. “Multiple Bounded Discrete Choice Models.” In Western Regional Research Publication, W-133, 331–352. Athens, GA: Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics, University of Georgia.
   Google Scholar
• Welsh, M. P., and G. L. Poe. 1998. “Elicitation Effects in Contingent Valuation: Comparisons to a Multiple Bounded Discrete Choice Approach.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 36 (2): 170–185. doi:10.1006/jeem.1998.1043.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitehead, J. C. 2006. “Improving Willingness to Pay Estimates for Quality Improvements through Joint Estimation with Quality Perceptions.” Southern Economic Journal 73 (1): 100–111. doi:10.2307/20111876.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar