Party Competition and Government Formation in Germany: Business as Usual or New Patterns?

References

• Arzheimer, Kai. 2015. “The AfD: Finally a Successful Right-wing Populist Eurosceptic Party for Germany?” West European Politics 38 (3): 535–556.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Austen-Smith, David, and Jeffrey Banks. 1988. “Elections, Coalitions, and Legislative Outcomes.” The American Political Science Review 82 (2): 405–422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Axelrod, Robert M. 1970. Conflict of Interest: A Theory of Divergent Goals with Applications to Politics. Chicago: Markham.
   Google Scholar
• Baron, David P., and John A. Ferejohn. 1989. “Bargaining in Legislatures.” The American Political Science Review 83 (4): 1181–1206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumann, Markus, Marc Debus, and Martin Gross. 2017. “Strength of weakness? Innerparteiliche Heterogenität, divergierende Koalitionspräferenzen und die Ergebnisse von Koalitionsverhandlungen in den deutschen Bundesländern [Strength of Weakness? Intra-party Heterogeneity, Divergent Coalition Preferences and the Results of Coalition Negotiations in the German States].” Politische Vierteljahresschrift 58 (2): 179–204.
   Google Scholar
• Bäck, Hanna, Marc Debus, Jochen Müller, and Henry Bäck. 2013. “Regional Government Formation in Varying Multilevel Contexts: A Comparison of Eight European Countries.” Regional Studies 47 (3): 363–387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benoit, Kenneth, and Michael Laver. 2006. Party Policy in Modern Democracies. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bergman, Torbjörn. 1993. “Formation Rules and Minority Governments.” European Journal of Political Research 23 (1): 55–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bieber, Christoph, Andreas Blätte, Karl-Rudolf Korte, and Niko Switek. 2017. Regieren in der Einwanderungsgesellschaft [Governance in an Immigration Society]. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
   Google Scholar
• Bolleyer, Nicole. 2006. “Intergovernmental Arrangements in Spanish and Swiss Federalism: The Impact of Power-concentrating and Power-sharing Executives on Intergovernmental Institutionalization.” Regional & Federal Studies 16 (4): 385–408.
   Google Scholar
• Bowler, Shaun, Thomas Bräuninger, Marc Debus, and Indridi H. Indridason. 2016. “‘Let’s Just Agree to Disagree’: Dispute Resolution Mechanisms in Coalition Agreements.” The Journal of Politics 78 (4): 1264–1278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bräuninger, Thomas, and Marc Debus. 2008. “Der Einfluss von Koalitionsaussagen, programmatischen Standpunkten und der Bundespolitik auf die Regierungsbildung in den deutschen Ländern [The Influence of Coalition Statements, Programmatic Positions and Federal Politics on Government Formation in the German States].” Politische Vierteljahresschrift 49 (2): 309–338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bräuninger, Thomas, Marc Debus, and Jochen Müller. 2013. Estimating Policy Positions of Political Actors Across Countries and Time. MZES Working Paper 153. Mannheim: Mannheim Centre for European Social Research.
   Google Scholar
• Bräuninger, Thomas, Marc Debus, Jochen Müller, and Christian Stecker. Forthcoming. “Die programmatischen Positionen der deutschen Parteien zur Bundestagswahl 2017: Ergebnisse einer Expertenbefragung.” [The Programmatic Positions of the German Parties in the 2017 Bundestag Election: Results of an Expert Survey]. In Jahrbuch für Handlungs- und Entscheidungstheorie. Band 11 [Yearbook of Analytical Politics. Volume 11], edited by Marc Debus, Markus Tepe, and Jan Sauermann. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
   Google Scholar
• Bundesministerium des Innern. 2016. Migrationsbericht des Bundesamtes für Migration und Flüchtlinge im Auftrag der Bundesregierung. Migrationsbericht 2015. Bonn: Bundesministerium des Inneren.
   Google Scholar
• Bundeswahlleiter. 2017. Wahl zum 19. Deutschen Bundestag am 24. September 2017. Endgültige Ergebnisse nach Wahlkreisen. Wiesbaden: Der Bundeswahlleiter.
   Google Scholar
• De Swaan, Abram. 1973. Coalition Theories and Cabinet Formations: A Study of Formal Theories of Coalition Formation Applied to Nine European Parliaments after 1918. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Debus, Marc. 2009. “Pre-electoral Commitments and Government Formation.” Public Choice 138 (1–2): 45–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Debus, Marc, and Martin Gross. 2016. “Coalition Formation at the Local Level: Institutional Constraints, Party Policy Conflict, and Office-seeking Political Parties.” Party Politics 22 (6): 835–846.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Debus, Marc, and Jochen Müller. 2013. “Do Voters’ Coalition Preferences Affect Government Formation?” West European Politics 36 (5): 1007–1028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Decker, Frank. 2017. “Die Ankunft des neuen Rechtspopulismus im Parteiensystem der Bundesrepublik [The Arrival of the New Right-wing Populism in the Party System of the Federal Republic].” In Regieren in der Einwanderungsgesellschaft, edited by Christoph Bieber, Andreas Blätte, Karl-Rudolf Korte, and Niko Switek, 55–61. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
   Google Scholar
• Deschouwer, Kris. 2006. “Political Parties as Multi-level Organizations.” In Handbook of Party Politics, edited by Richard S. Katz and William J. Crotty, 291–300. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Downs, William M. 1998. Coalition Government, Subnational Style: Multiparty Politics in Europe’s Regional Parliaments. Columbus: The Ohio State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elff, Martin, and Sigrid Roßteutscher. 2017. “Social Cleavages and Electoral Behaviour in Long-term Perspective: Alignment Without Mobilisation?” German Politics 26 (1): 12–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fortunato, David, Thomas König, and Sven-Oliver Proksch. 2013. “Government Agenda-setting and Bicameral Conflict Resolution.” Political Research Quarterly 66 (4): 938–951.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franzmann, Simon T. 2018. “Von der EURO-Opposition zur Kosmopolitismus-Opposition [From Opposition to the Euro to Opposition to Cosmopolitism].” In Parteien und die Politisierung der Europäischen Union, edited by Lisa H. Anders, Henrik Scheller, and Thomas Tuntschew, 365–402. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
   Google Scholar
• Ganghof, Steffen, and Christian Stecker. 2015. “Investiture Rules and Government Formation in Germany.” In Unpacking Parliamentarism: How Investiture Rules Shape Government Formation, edited by Bjørn Erik Rasch, Shane Martin, and José Antonio Cheibub, 67–85. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gassert, Philipp. 2017. “Bildung und Management von Koalitionen. Die Bundesrepublik Deutschland in historischer Perspektive.” In Koalitionen in der Bundesrepublik. Bildung, Management und Krisen von Adenauer bis Merkel, edited by Philipp Gassert and Hans Jörg Hennecke, 11–28. Paderborn: Ferdinand Schöningh.
   Google Scholar
• Geys, Benny. 2006. “Explaining Voter Turnout: A Review of Aggregate-level Research.” Electoral Studies 25 (4): 637–663.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golder, Sona N. 2005. “Pre-electoral Coalitions in Comparative Perspective: A Test of Existing Hypotheses.” Electoral Studies 24 (4): 643–663.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grande, Edgar, and Hans-Peter Kriesi. 2015. “Die Eurokrise: Ein Quantensprung in der Politisierung des europäischen Integrationsprozesses? [The Euro Crisis: A Quantum Leap in the Politicisation of the European Integration Process?].” Politische Vierteljahresschrift 56 (3): 479–505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gschwend, Thomas, and Marc Hooghe. 2008. “Should I Stay or Should I Go? An Experimental Study on Voter Responses to Pre-electoral Coalitions.” European Journal of Political Research 47 (5): 556–577.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hjorth, Frederik, Robert Klemmensen, Sara Hobolt, Martin Ejnar Hansen, and Peter Kurrild-Klitgaard. 2015. “Computers, Coders, and Voters: Comparing Automated Methods for Estimating Party Positions.” Research & Politics 2 (2).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hough, Dan, and Charlie Jeffery. 2006. Devolution and Electoral Politics. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jakobs, Simon, and Uwe Jun. 2018. “Parteienwettbewerb und Koalitionsbildung in Deutschland 2017/18: Eine Analyse der Wahlprogramme [Party Competition and Coalition Formation in Germany 2017/18: An Analysis of the Electoral Platforms].” Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen 49 (2): 265–285.
   Google Scholar
• Jun, Uwe. 1994. Koalitionsbildung in den deutschen Bundesländern: Theoretische Betrachtungen, Dokumentationen und Analyse der Koalitionsbildung auf Länderebene seit 1949. Opladen: Leske und Budrich.
   Google Scholar
• Klingelhöfer, Tristan, and Jochen Müller. 2015. “Consociational and Rational Coalitions: Norm-based Government Formation and the Case of the Dutch Provinces.” Acta Politica 50 (1): 101–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kortmann, Matthias, and Christian Stecker. 2017. “Party Competition and Immigration and Integration Policies: A Comparative Analysis.” Comparative European Politics. doi:10.1057/s41295-017-0108-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kriesi, Hans-Peter, Edgar Grande, Romain Lachat, Martin Dolezal, Simon Bornschier, and Thimoteos Frey. 2006. “Globalization and the Transformation of the National Political Space: Six European Countries Compared.” European Journal of Political Research 45 (6): 921–956.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laver, Michael, Kenneth Benoit, and John Garry. 2003. “Extracting Policy Positions from Political Texts Using Words as Data.” American Political Science Review 97 (2): 311–331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laver, Michael, and Ben W. Hunt. 1992. Policy and Party Competition. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Laver, Michael, and Kenneth A. Shepsle. 1990. “Coalitions and Cabinet Government.” The American Political Science Review 84 (3): 873–890.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lees, Charles. 2011. “Coalition Formation and the German Party System.” German Politics 20 (1): 146–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lees, Charles. 2018. “The Alternative for Germany: The Rise of Right-wing Populism in the Heart of Europe.” Politics 38 (3): 295–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leiserson, Michael A. 1966. “Coalitions in Politics.” PhD thesis. Yale University.
   Google Scholar
• Linhart, Eric. 2018. “Coalition Building on the Federal and on the Länder Level in Germany.” In Coalition Politics and Federalism, edited by Adrián Albala and Josep M. Reniu, 33–51. Cham: Springer International.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, Shane G. 2018. “Bargaining in Legislatures, Portfolio Allocation, and the Electoral Costs of Governing.” West European Politics. doi:10.1080/01402382.2018.1427946.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, Lanny W., and Randolph T. Stevenson. 2001. “Government Formation in Parliamentary democracies.” American Journal of Political Science 45 (1): 33–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, Lanny W., and Randolph T. Stevenson. 2010. “The Conditional Impact of Incumbency on Government Formation.” American Political Science Review 104 (3): 503–518.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meffert, Michael F., and Thomas Gschwend. 2011. “Polls, Coalition Signals and Strategic Voting: An Experimental Investigation of Perceptions and Effects.” European Journal of Political Research 50 (5): 636–667.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, Wolfgang C. 2009. “Government formation.” In The SAGE Handbook of Comparative Politics, edited by Todd Landmann and Neil Robinson, 227–245. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Müller, Jochen. 2013. “On a Short Leash? Sub-national Party Positions Between Regional Context and National Party Unity.” Journal of Elections, Public Opinion & Parties 23 (2): 177–199.
   Google Scholar
• Müller, Jochen. 2018. “German Regional Elections: Patterns of Second-order Voting.” Regional and Federal Studies 28 (3): 301–324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pappi, Franz U., Axel Becker, and Alexander Herzog. 2005. “Regierungsbildung in Mehrebenensystemen: Zur Erklärung der Koalitionsbildung in den deutschen Bundesländern [Government Formation in Multi-level Systems. How to Explain the Coalition Formation in the German States].” Politische Vierteljahresschrift 46 (3): 432–458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton, David F. 2018. “The Free Democrats’ Second Chance.” German Politics 27 (1): 136–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riker, William H. 1962. The Theory of Political Coalitions. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, Richard, and Thomas T. Mackie. 1983. “Incumbency in Government: Asset or Liability.” In Western European Party Systems: Continuity and Change, edited by Hans Daalder and Peter Mair, 115–137. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Saalfeld, Thomas. 2000. “Coalitions in Germany: Stable Parties, Chancellor Democracy and the Art of Informal Settlement.” In Coalition Government in Western Europe, edited by Wolfgang C. Müller and Kaare Strøm, 32–85. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Saalfeld, Thomas. 2015. “Coalition Formation and Coalition Governance after the Election of 2013.” In Germany after the 2013 Elections: Breaking the Mould of Post-Unification Politics?, edited by Gabriele D’Ottavio and Thomas Saalfeld, 203–224. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Saalfeld, Thomas, Matthias Bahr, and Olaf Seifert. 2018. “Contractual Arrangements, Formal Institutions and Personalised Crisis Management: Coalition Governance Under Chancellor Merkel (2013–2017).” German Politics. doi:10.1080/09644008.2018.1512591.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitt-Beck, Rüdiger. 2017. “The ‘Alternative für Deutschland’ in the Electorate: Between Single-Issue and Right-Wing Populist Party.” German Politics 26 (1): 124–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitt-Beck, Rüdiger, Jan W. van Deth, and Alexander Staudt. 2017. “Die AfD nach der rechtspopulistischen Wende. Wählerunterstützung am Beispiel Baden-Württembergs [The AfD After its Right-wing Populist Turn. Voter Support in Baden-Württemberg].” Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft 27 (3): 273–303.
   Google Scholar
• Schwarzbözl, Tobias, and Matthias Fatke. 2016. “Außer Protesten nichts gewesen? Das politische Potenzial der AfD [Nothing Happened if Not Protests? The Political Potential of the Alternative for Germany].” Politische Vierteljahresschrift 57 (2): 276–299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stecker, Christian. 2016. “The Effects of Federalism Reform on the Legislative Process in Germany.” Regional and Federal Studies 26 (5): 604–624.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ştefuriuc, Irina. 2009. “Government Coalitions in Multi-level Settings – Institutional Determinants and Party Strategy.” Regional and Federal Studies 19 (1): 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Strøm, Kaare, Ian Budge, and Michael J. Laver. 1994. “Constraints on Cabinet Formation in Parliamentary Democracies.” American Journal of Political Science 38 (2): 303–335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strøm, Kaare, and Wolfgang C. Müller. 1999. “Political Parties and Hard Choices.” In Policy, Office, or Votes? How Political Parties in Western Europe Make Hard Decisions, edited by Kaare Strøm and Wolfgang C. Müller, 1–35. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Swenden, Wilfried, and Bart Maddens. 2009. Territorial Party Politics in Western Europe. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, Ed. 2018. “The SPD at the Bundestagswahl 2017: Die Hoffnung stirbt zuletzt?” German Politics 27 (1): 119–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Houten, Pieter. 2009. “Multi-level Relations in Political Parties: A Delegation Approach.” Party Politics 15 (2): 137–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Neumann, John, and Oskar Morgenstern. 1944. Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Warwick, Paul V. 1996. “Coalition Government Membership in West European Parliamentary Democracies.” British Journal of Political Science 26 (4): 471–499.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winkler, Jürgen R. 2018. “Die saarländische Landtagswahl vom 26. März 2017: Bestätigung der CDU-geführten Großen Koalition [The State Election in the Saarland on March 26, 2017: Confirmation of the Grand Coalition Led by the CDU].” Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen 49 (1): 40–56.
   Google Scholar