Germany After the Social Democratic Century: The Political Economy of Imbalance

WORKS CITED

• Ahram, Ariel I., Patrick Köllner, and Rudra Sil, eds. 2018. Comparative Area Studies: Methodological Rationales and Cross-Regional Approaches. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, Christopher S. 1989. “The Underdevelopment of Keynesianism in the Federal Republic of Germany.” In The Political Power of Economic Ideas: Keynesianism across Nations, edited by Peter A. Hall, 263–289. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Alvaredo, Facunda, Bertrand Garbinti, and Thomas Piketty. 2017. “On the Share of Inheritance in Aggregate Wealth: Europe and the USA, 1900-2010.” Economica 84 (334): 239–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baccaro, Lucio, and Chiara Benassi. 2017. “Throwing out the Ballast: Growth Models and the Liberalization of German Industrial Relations.” Socio-Economic Review 15 (1): 85–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baccaro, Lucio, and Chris Howell. 2017a. Trajectories of Neoliberal Transformation: European Industrial Relations Since the 1970s. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baccaro, Lucio, and Chris Howell. 2017b. “Unhinged: Industrial Relations Liberalization and Capitalist Instability.” MPIfG Discussion Paper 17/19. Cologne: Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, Thorsten, and Hans-Helmut Kotz, eds. 2017. Ordoliberalism: A German Oddity? London: CEPR Press.
   Google Scholar
• Belabed, Christian A., Thomas Theobald, and Till van Treeck. 2018. “Income Distribution and Current Account Imbalances.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 42 (1): 47–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benassi, Chiara, and Lisa Dorigatti. 2015. “Straight to the Core – Explaining Union Responses to the Casualization of Work: The IG Metall Campaign for Agency Workers.” British Journal of Industrial Relations 53 (3): 533–555.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berk, Gerald, Dennis C. Galvan, and Victoria Hattam, eds. 2013. Political Creativity: Reconfiguring Institutional Order and Change. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berman, Sheri. 2001. “Modernization in Historical Perspective: The Case of Imperial Germany.” World Politics 53 (3): 431–462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berman, Sheri. 2006. The Primacy of Politics: Social Democracy and the Making of Europe’s Twentieth Century. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beyer, Jürgen, and Martin Höpner. 2003. “The Disintegration of Organized Capitalism: German Corporate Governance in the 1990s.” West European Politics 26 (4): 179–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackbourn, David, and Geoff Eley. 1984. The Peculiarities of German History: Bourgeois Society and Politics in Nineteenth-Century Germany. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blyth, Mark. 2002. Great Transformations: Economic Ideas and Institutional Change in the Twentieth Century. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• BMAS. 2017. Lebenslagen in Deutschland: Der Fünfte Armuts- und Reichtumsbericht der Bundesregierung. Berlin: Bundesministerium für Arbeit und Soziales (BMAS).
   Google Scholar
• Bröckling, Ulrich. 2007. Das unternehmerische Selbst. Soziologie einer Subjektivierungsform. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, John, and Ove K. Pedersen. 2014. The National Origins of Policy Ideas: Knowledge Regimes in the United States, France, Germany, and Denmark. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carlin, Wendy. 1994. “West German Growth and Institutions, 1945-90.” CEPR Discussion Paper 896. https://ideas.repec.org/p/cpr/ceprdp/896.html.
   Google Scholar
• Carlin, Wendy, and David Soskice. 2009. “German Economic Performance: Disentangling the Role of Supply-Side Reforms, Macroeconomic Policy and Coordinated Economy Institutions.” Socio-Economic Review 7 (1): 67–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clasen, Jochen, and Daniel Clegg, eds. 2012. Regulating the Risk of Unemployment: National Adaptations to Post-Industrial Labour Markets in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clasen, Jochen, and Alexander Goerne. 2011. “Exit Bismarck, Enter Dualism? Assessing Contemporary Germany Labour Market Policy.” Journal of Social Policy 40 (4): 795–810.
   Google Scholar
• Crouch, Colin. 2004. Post-Democracy. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Crouch, Colin. 2005. Capitalist Diversity and Change: Recombinant Governance and Institutional Entrepreneurs. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dahrendorf, Ralf. 1999. Ein neuer Dritter Weg? Reformpolitik am Ende des 20. Jahrhunderts. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.
   Google Scholar
• Deeg, Richard. 2007. “Complementarity and Institutional Change in Capitalist Systems.” Journal of European Public Policy 14 (4): 611–630.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deeg, Richard, and Gregory Jackson. 2007. “Towards a More Dynamic Theory of Capitalist Variety.” Socio-Economic Review 5 (1): 149–179.
   Google Scholar
• DGB Bundesvorstand. 2017. “So haben GewerkschafterInnen gewählt.” September 25, 2017. http://www.dgb.de/themen/++co++1aca2e9e-a209-11e7-99c0-525400e5a74a
   Google Scholar
• Dixon, Jennifer M. 2018. Dark Pasts: Changing the State’s Story in Turkey and Japan. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Doellgast, Virginia. 2009. “Still a Coordinated Model? Market Liberalization and the Transformation of Employment Relations in the German Telecommunications Industry.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review 63 (1): 3–23.
   Google Scholar
• Doellgast, Virginia, Nathan Lillie, and Valeria Pulignano, eds. 2018. Reconstructing Solidarity: Labour Unions, Precarious Work, and the Politics of Institutional Change in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dyson, Kenneth, and Stephen Padgett. 2005. “Introduction: Global, Rhineland or Hybrid Capitalism?” German Politics 14 (2): 115–124.
   Google Scholar
• Ebbinghaus, Bernhard. 2006. Reforming Early Retirement in Europe, Japan and the USA. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ehrenberg, Alain. 2010. The Weariness of the Self: Diagnosing the History of Depression in the Contemporary Age. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Estevez-Abe, Margarita, Torben Iversen, and David Soskice. 2001. “Social Protection and the Formation of Skills: A Reinterpretation of the Welfare State.” In Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage, edited by Peter Hall and David Soskice, 145–183. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fratzscher, Marcel. 2016. Verteilungskampf: Warum Deutschland immer ungleicher wird. München: Hanser.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, Jürgen. 1973. Legitimationsprobleme im Spätkapitalismus. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Hacker, Jacob S. 2008. The Great Risk Shift: The New Economic Insecurity and the Decline of the American Dream. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haipeter, Thomas. 2017. “Lohnfindung und Lohnungleichheit in Deutschland.” IAQ Report 2017/01. University of Duisburg-Essen.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, Peter A., and David Soskice, eds. 2001. Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, Peter A., and Kathleen Thelen. 2009. “Institutional Change in Varieties of Capitalism.” Socio-Economic Review 7 (1): 7–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassel, Anke. 2014. “The Paradox of Liberalization – Understanding Dualism and the Recovery of the German Political Economy.” British Journal of Industrial Relations 52 (1): 57–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassel, Anke, and Christof Schiller. 2010. Der Fall Hartz IV: Wie es zur Agenda 2010 kam und wie es weitergeht. Frankfurt: Campus.
   Google Scholar
• Herrigel, Gary. 2015. “Globalization and the German Industrial Production Model.” Journal of Labor Market Research 48 (2): 133–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howell, Chris. 2016. “Regulating Class in the Neoliberal Era: The Role of the State in the Restructuring of Work and Employment Relations.” Work, Employment & Society 30 (4): 573–589.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Höpner, Martin. 2005. “What Connects Industrial Relations and Corporate Governance? Explaining Institutional Complementarity.” Socio-Economic Review 3 (2): 331–358.
   Google Scholar
• Immenkötter, Phillipp. 2017. “Aktienrückkäufe wieder im Kommen.” Unternehmensanalyse 06/10/2017. Köln: Flossbach von Storch Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, Gregory. 2005. “Contested Boundaries: Ambiguity and Creativity in the Evolution of German Codetermination.” In Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies, edited by Wolfgang Streeck and Kathleen Thelen, 229–254. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, Gregory, and Arndt Sorge. 2012. “The Trajectory of Institutional Change in Germany, 1979–2009.” Journal of European Public Policy 19 (8): 1146–1167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, Alan M., and R. Kent Weaver. 2015. “When Policies Undo Themselves: Self-Undermining Feedback as a Source of Policy Change.” Governance 28 (4): 441–457.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacoby, Wade. 2014. “The Politics of the Eurozone Crisis: Two Puzzles behind the German Consensus.” German Politics & Society 32 (2): 70–85.
   Google Scholar
• Jacoby, Wade, and Martin Behrens. 2016. “‘Breaking up Is Hard to Do’: German Trade Unions within the Social Democratic Party.” Comparative European Politics 14 (3): 273–297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston, Alison, and Aidan Regan. 2016. “European Monetary Integration and the Incompatibility of National Varieties of Capitalism.” JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 54 (2): 318–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katzenstein, Peter J. 1987. Policy and Politics in West Germany: The Growth of a Semisovereign State. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kinderman, Daniel. 2017. “Challenging Varieties of Capitalism’s Account of Business Interests: Neoliberal Think-Tanks, Discourse as a Power Resource and Employers’ Quest for Liberalization in Germany and Sweden.” Socio-Economic Review 15 (3): 587–613.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kommission Mitbestimmung. 1998. Mitbestimmung und neue Unternehmenskulturen – Bilanz und Perspektiven. Empfehlungen der Kommission Mitbestimmung. Gütersloh: Verlag Bertelsmann Stiftung.
   Google Scholar
• Korpi, Walter. 2006. “Power Resources and Employer-Centered Approaches in Explanations of Welfare States and Varieties of Capitalism: Protagonists, Consenters, and Antagonists.” World Politics 58 (2): 167–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krippner, Greta R. 2005. “The Financialization of the American Economy.” Socio-Economic Review 3 (2): 173–208.
   Google Scholar
• Lazonick, William. 2015. “Labor in the Twenty-First Century: The Top 0.1 Percent and the Disappearing Middle Class.” In Inequality, Uncertainty, and Opportunity: The Varied and Growing Role of Finance in Labor Relations, edited by Christian E. Weller, 143–195. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Le Gales, Patrick, and Desmond King, eds. 2017. Reconfiguring European States in Crisis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lehmbruch, Gerhard. 1984. “Concertation and the Structure of Corporatist Networks.” In Order and Conflict in Contemporary Capitalism, edited by John H. Goldthorpe, 60–80. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mabbett, Deborah. 2016. “The Minimum Wage in Germany: What Brought the State In?” Journal of European Public Policy 23 (8): 1240–1258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maier, Charles S. 1987. In Search of Stability: Explorations in Historical Political Economy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mair, Peter. 2013. Ruling the Void: The Hollowing of Western Democracy. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Manow, Philip. 1997. “Social Insurance and the German Political Economy.” MPIfG Discussion Paper 2/97. Cologne: Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
   Google Scholar
• Mares, Isabela. 2003. The Politics of Social Risk: Business and Welfare State Development. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Markovits, Andrei. ed. 1982. The Political Economy of West Germany: Modell Deutschland. New York: Praeger Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Markovits, Andrei. 1986. The Politics of the West German Trade Unions: Strategies of Class and Interest Representation in Growth and Crisis. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Matthijs, Matthias, and Mark Blyth. 2011. “Why Only Germany Can Fix the Euro: Reading Kindleberger in Berlin.” Foreign Affairs, November 17, 2011. https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/germany/2011-11-17/why-only-germany-can-fix-euro.
   Google Scholar
• Müller-Jentsch, Walther. ed. 1991. Konfliktpartnerschaft: Akteure und Institutionen der industriellen Beziehungen. München: Hampp.
   Google Scholar
• Müller-Jentsch, Walther. 2008. “Passt die Mitbestimmung zur sozialen Marktwirtschaft?” Magazin Mitbestimmung 03/2008. https://www.boeckler.de/de/magazin-mitbestimmung-2744-passt-die-mitbestimmung-zur-sozialen-marktwirtschaft-11127.htm.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2015. In It Together: Why Less Inequality Benefits All. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2018. Revenue Statistics 2018 – Germany. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Offe, Claus. 2006. Strukturprobleme des kapitalistischen Staates. Frankfurt: Campus.
   Google Scholar
• Offe, Claus, and Helmut Wiesenthal. 1980. “Two Logics of Collective Action: Theoretical Notes on Social Class and Organizational Form.” Political Power and Social Theory 1: 67–115.
   Google Scholar
• Ornston, Darius, and Tobias Schulze-Cleven. 2015. “Conceptualizing Cooperation: Coordination and Concertation as Two Logics of Collective Action.” Comparative Political Studies 48 (5): 555–585.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palier, Bruno, ed. 2010. A Long Goodbye to Bismarck? The Politics of Welfare Reform in Continental Europe. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Paster, Thomas. 2018. “How Do Business Interest Groups Respond to Political Challenges? A Study of the Politics of German Employers.” New Political Economy 23 (6): 674–689.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paterson, William E. 2011. “The Reluctant Hegemon? Germany Moves Centre Stage in the European Union.” JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 49 (S1): 57–75.
   Google Scholar
• Pierson, Paul. 2000. “Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics.” American Political Science Review 94 (2): 251–267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierson, Paul. 2004. Politics in Time: History, Institutions, and Social Analysis. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Piketty, Thomas. 2014. Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Translated by Arthur Goldhammer. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosa, Hartmut, Stephan Lessenich, and Klaus Dörre. 2015. Sociology, Capitalism, Critique. Translated by Jan-Peter Herrmann and Loren Balhorn. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Rothstein, Sidney A. 2019. “Unlikely Activists: Building Worker Power under Liberalization.” Socio-Economic Review 17 (3): 573–602.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaffer, Frederic Charles. 2019. “Two Ways to Compare.” Qualitative and Multi-Method Research 16 (1): 15–20.
   Google Scholar
• Scharpf, Fritz W. 2018. “International Monetary Regimes and the German Model.” MPIfG Discussion Paper 18/1. Cologne: Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
   Google Scholar
• Schäfer, Armin. 2013. “Liberalization, Inequality and Democracy’s Discontent.” In Politics in the Age of Austerity, edited by Armin Schäfer and Wolfgang Streeck, 169–195. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitt, Carina, and Peter Starke. 2016. “The Political Economy of Early Exit: The Politics of Cost-Shifting.” European Journal of Industrial Relations 22 (4): 391–407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulze-Cleven, Tobias. 2017. “Collective Action and Globalization: Building and Mobilizing Labour Power.” Journal of Industrial Relations 59 (4): 397–419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulze-Cleven, Tobias. 2018. “A Continent in Crisis: European Labor and the Fate of Social Democracy.” Labor Studies Journal 43 (1): 46–73.
   Google Scholar
• Schulze-Cleven, Tobias, and Jennifer R. Olson. 2017. “Worlds of Higher Education Transformed: Toward Varieties of Academic Capitalism.” Higher Education 73 (6): 813–831.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulze-Cleven, Tobias, Tilman Reitz, Jens Maesse, and Johannes Angermuller. 2017. “The New Political Economy of Higher Education: Between Distributional Conflicts and Discursive Stratification.” Higher Education 73 (6): 795–812.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulze-Cleven, Tobias, and J. Timo Weishaupt. 2015. “Playing Normative Legacies: Partisanship and Employment Policies in Crisis-Ridden Europe.” Politics & Society 43 (2): 269–299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwander, Hanna, and Philip Manow. 2017. “‘Modernize and Die’? German Social Democracy and the Electoral Consequences of the Agenda 2010.” Socio-Economic Review 15 (1): 117–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sennett, Richard. 2000. The Corrosion of Character: The Personal Consequences of Work in the New Capitalism. New York: Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Silvia, Stephen J., and Wolfgang Schroeder. 2007. “Why Are German Employers Associations Declining? Arguments and Evidence.” Comparative Political Studies 40 (12): 1433–1459.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, Gordon. 1981. “Does West German Democracy Have an ‘Efficient Secret’?” West European Politics 4 (2): 166–176.
   Google Scholar
• Sorge, Arndt, and Wolfgang Streeck. 2018. “Diversified Quality Production Revisited: Its Contribution to German Socio-Economic Performance over Time.” Socio-Economic Review 16 (3): 587–612.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Streeck, Wolfgang. 1984. “Neo-Corporatist Industrial Relations and the Economic Crisis in West Germany.” In Order and Conflict in Contemporary Capitalism, edited by John H. Goldthorpe, 291–314. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Streeck, Wolfgang. 1991. “On the Institutional Conditions of Diversified Quality Production.” In Beyond Keynesianism: The Socio-Economics of Production and Employment, edited by Egon Matzner and Wolfgang Streeck, 21–61. London: Aldershot: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Streeck, Wolfgang. 1997. “German Capitalism: Does It Exist? Can It Survive?” New Political Economy 2 (2): 237–256.
   Google Scholar
• Streeck, Wolfgang. 2009. Re-Forming Capitalism: Institutional Change in the German Political Economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Streeck, Wolfgang. 2011. “Taking Capitalism Seriously: Towards an Institutionalist Approach to Contemporary Political Economy.” Socio-Economic Review 9 (1): 137–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Streeck, Wolfgang. 2014. Buying Time: The Delayed Crisis of Democratic Capitalism. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Streeck, Wolfgang. 2016a. “Von Konflikt ohne Partnerschaft zu Partnerschaft ohne Konflikt: Industrielle Beziehungen in Deutschland.” Industrielle Beziehungen 23 (1): 47–60.
   Google Scholar
• Streeck, Wolfgang. 2016b. How Will Capitalism End? Essays on a Failing System. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Streeck, Wolfgang, and Anke Hassel. 2003. “The Crumbling Pillars of Social Partnership.” West European Politics 26 (4): 101–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Streeck, Wolfgang, and Kathleen Thelen, eds. 2005. Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Streeck, Wolfgang, and Christine Trampusch. 2005. “Economic Reform and the Political Economy of the German Welfare State.” German Politics 14 (2): 174–195.
   Google Scholar
• Thelen, Kathleen. 1991. Union of Parts: Labor Politics in Postwar Germany. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thelen, Kathleen. 2004. How Institutions Evolve: The Political Economy of Skills in Germany, Britain, the United States, and Japan. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thelen, Kathleen. 2014. Varieties of Liberalization and the New Politics of Social Solidarity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thelen, Kathleen, and Marius R Busemeyer. 2012. “Institutional Change in German Vocational Training: From Collectivism towards Segmentalism.” In The Political Economy of Collective Skill Formation, edited by Marius R. Busemeyer and Christine Trampusch, 68–100. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Trampusch, Christine. 2005. “Institutional Resettlement: The Case of Early Retirement in Germany.” In Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies, edited by Wolfgang Streeck and Kathleen Thelen, 203–228. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Trampusch, Christine. 2009. Der erschöpfte Sozialstaat: Transformation eines Politikfeldes. Frankfurt: Campus Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Vail, Mark. 2003. “Rethinking Corporatism and Consensus: The Dilemmas of German Social-Protection Reform.” West European Politics 26 (3): 41–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vail, Mark I. 2018. Liberalism in Illiberal States: Ideas and Economic Adjustment in Contemporary Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vidal, Matt. 2013. “Low-Autonomy Work and Bad Jobs in Postfordist Capitalism.” Human Relations 66 (4): 587–612.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walter, Franz. 2018. Die SPD. Biographie einer Partei von Ferdinand Lassalle bis Andrea Nahles. Reinbek bei Hamburg: Rowohlt.
   Google Scholar
• Wehler, Hans-Ulrich. 2013. Die neue Umverteilung: Soziale Ungleichheit in Deutschland. München: Beck.
   Google Scholar
• Winters, Jeffrey A. 2011. Oligarchy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Winters, Jeffrey. 2017. “Wealth Defense and the Complicity of Liberal Democracy.” In NOMOS LVIII: Wealth, edited by Jack Knight and Melissa Schwartzberg, 158–225. New York: NYU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Woll, Cornelia. 2014. The Power of Inaction: Bank Bailouts in Comparison. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar