Climate protection, energy security, and Germany’s policy of ecological modernisation

References

• AG Energiebilanzen, 2012. Stromerzeugung nach Energieträgern von 1990 bis 2011 (in TWh) Deutschland insgesamt [online]. Available from: http://www.ag-energiebilanzen.de/viewpage.php?idpage=65 [Accessed 3 July 2012].
   Google Scholar
• Berger, G., et al., 2001. Ecological modernization as a basis for environmental policy: current environmental discourse and policy and the implications on environmental supply chain management. Innovation, 14 (1), 55–72.
   Google Scholar
• BMWI and BMU, 2010. Energy concept for an environmentally sound, reliable and affordable energy supply [online]. Available from: http://www.bmu.de/files/english/pdf/application/pdf/energiekonzept_bundesregierung_en.pdf [Accessed 16 September 2011].
   Google Scholar
• Buttel, F.H., 2000. Ecological modernization as social theory. Geoforum, 31, 57–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christoff, P., 1996. Ecological modernization, ecological modernities. Environmental Politics, 5 (3), 476–500.
   Google Scholar
• DENA, 2010. Integration erneuerbarer Energien in die deutsche Stromversorgung im Zeitraum 2015–2020 mit Ausblick auf 2025, dena-Netzstudie II [online]. Available from: http://www.dena.de/fileadmin/user_upload/Download/Dokumente/Studien___Umfragen/Endbericht_dena-Netzstudie_II.PDF [Accessed 28 December 2011].
   Google Scholar
• Deutscher Bundestag, 2010. Antwort der Bundesregierung auf die Kleine Anfrage ‘Stand des Aufbaus der Internationalen Agentur für Erneuerbare Energien und ihrer internationalen Einbindung. Berlin: Deutscher Bundestag, Drucksache 17/3247.
   Google Scholar
• DLR, IWES and IFNE, 2010. Langfristszenarien und Strategien für den Ausbau der erneuerbaren Energien in Deutschland bei Berücksichtigung der Entwicklung in Europa und global („Leitstudie 2010“) [online]. Available from: http://www.bmu.de/files/pdfs/allgemein/application/pdf/leitstudie2010_bf.pdf [Accessed 29 December 2011].
   Google Scholar
• EWI, GWS and PROGNOS, 2010. Energieszenarien für ein Energiekonzept der Bundesregierung [online]. Project no. 12/2010, Federal Ministry of Economics and Technology. Available from: http://www.bmu.de/files/pdfs/allgemein/application/pdf/energieszenarien_2010.pdf [Accessed 17 September 2011].
   Google Scholar
• Federal Economics Ministry (BMWI), 2006. Verfügbarkeit und Versorgung mit Energierohstoffen [online]. Working Group Energy Resources Report of 26 March 2006. Available from: http://www.bmwi.de/BMWi/Redaktion/PDF/E/energierohstoffbericht,property=pdf,bereich=bmwi,sprache=de,rwb=true.pdf [Accessed 28 December 2011].
   Google Scholar
• Federal Economics Ministry (BMWI), 2011a. Ausgewählte Grafiken zu Energiegewinnung und Energieverbrauch [online]. Available from: http://www.bmwi.de/BMWi/Redaktion/PDF/E/energiestatistiken-energiegewinnung-energieverbrauch,property=pdf,bereich=bmwi,sprache=de,rwb=true.pdf [Accessed 28 December 2011].
   Google Scholar
• Federal Economics Ministry (BMWI), 2011b. Ausgewählte Grafiken zu Energiepreisen und Energiekosten [online]. Available from: http://www.bmwi.de/Dateien/BMWi/PDF/Energiedaten/energiestatistiken-energiepreise-energiekosten,property=pdf,bereich=bmwi,sprache=de,rwb=true.pdf [Accessed 28 December 2011].
   Google Scholar
• Federal Economics Ministry (BMWI), 2011c. Energy policy [online]. Available from: http://www.bmwi.de/English/Navigation/energy-policy,did=79110.html [Accessed 15 September 2011].
   Google Scholar
• Federal Environmental Agency, 2012. Röttgen: Greenhouse gas reduction efforts a great success – emissions down by 25% over 1990 levels [online]. Press release no. 02/2012. Available from: http://www.umweltbundesamt.de/uba-info-presse-e/2012/pe12-002_roettgen_greenhouse_gas_reduction_efforts_a_great_success_emissions_down_by_25_percent_over_1990_levels.htm [Accessed 8 March 2012].
   Google Scholar
• Federal Environmental Ministry (BMU), 2011a. Development of renewable energy sources in Germany 2010 [online]. Available from: http://www.erneuerbare-energien.de/files/english/pdf/application/pdf/ee_in_deutschland_graf_tab_en.pdf [Accessed 10 January 2012].
   Google Scholar
• Federal Environmental Ministry (BMU), 2011b. Informationen zur Anwendung von § 40 ff. EEG (Besondere Ausgleichsregelung) für das Jahr 2012 [online]. Available from: http://www.bmu.de/files/pdfs/allgemein/application/pdf/eeg_hintergrundpapier_besar_bf.pdf [Accessed 10 January 2012].
   Google Scholar
• Frondel, M., Ritter, N., and Schmidt, C.M., 2008. Germany’s solar cell promotion: dark clouds on the horizon. Energy Policy, 36 (2008), 4198–4204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geden, O. and Dröge, S., 2010. Integration der europäischen Energiemärkte: Notwendige Voraussetzung für eine effektive EU-Energieaußenpolitik. Berlin: German Institute for International and Security Affairs, SWP Study S13.
   Google Scholar
• German Advisory Council on Global Change, 2011. Transforming energy systems [online]. Available from: http://www.wbgu.de/fileadmin/templates/dateien/veroeffentlichungen/factsheets/fs2011-fs2/WBGU_FS2_2011_Energie_en.pdf [Accessed 25 October 2011].
   Google Scholar
• Gros, D. and Egenhofer, C., 2010. Decision Time for Europe on Climate Change: Keep the head buried in the sand or get tough?. Brussels: CEPS, CEPS Commentary of 6 October 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Häder, M., 2010. Das Energiekonzept der Bundesregierung – Darstellung und ökonomische Bewertung. Orientierungen zur Wirtschafts- und Gesellschaftspolitik, 126 (4/2010), 36–42.
   Google Scholar
• Hajer, M., 1995. The politics of environmental discourse: ecological modernization and the policy process. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harks, E. and Pointvogl, A., 2007. Deutschlands Energieversorgungssicherheit im Schatten europäischer Energiemärkte. Berlin: German Institute for International and Security Affairs, Discussion Paper FG8.
   Google Scholar
• Hey, C., 2010. The green paradox: climate leader and green car laggard. In: S. Oberthür and M. Pallemaerts, eds. The new climate policies of the European Union: internal legislation and climate diplomacy. Brussels University Press, 211–230.
   Google Scholar
• Hillebrand, R., 2004. Rationale Umweltpolitik und Globalisierung der Wirtschaftsbeziehungen: eine Analyse ausgewählter Umweltpolitikansätze. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• IEA, 2008. CO₂ emissions from fuel combustion. Paris: International Energy Agency.
   Google Scholar
• IPCC, 2007. Climate change 2007: mitigation. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jahn, D. and Korolczuk, S., 2012. German exceptionalism: the end of nuclear energy in Germany!. Environmental Politics, 21 (1), 159–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jänicke, M., 2008. Ecological modernisation: new perspectives. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16, 557–565.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jänicke, M., 2010.German climate change policy: political and economic leadership. In: R. Wurzel and J. Connolly, eds. The European Union as a leader in international climate change policy. London: Routledge, 129–146.
   Google Scholar
• Jänicke, M. and Jacob, K., 2004. Lead markets for environmental innovations: a new role for the nation state. Global Environmental Politics, 41 (1), 29–46.
   Google Scholar
• Jänicke, M. and von Prittwitz, V., 2010. Climate policy: the role of Germany in the European context [online]. Paper presented at the Conference ‘EU’s Climate Change Policy and Korea-EU Environmental Cooperation’, Seoul, 3 September 2010. Available from: http://www.volkervonprittwitz.de/vortrag_klimapolitik-seoul-060910.txt [Accessed 6 January 2012].
   Google Scholar
• KfW, 2011. Energiewende in Deutschland: Ein Einstieg in das postfossile Zeitalter? [online]. Available from: http://www.kfw.de/kfw/de/I/II/Download_Center/Fachthemen/Research/PDF-Dokumente_Akzente/Akzente_Nr._48_-2.pdf [Accessed 28 December 2011].
   Google Scholar
• Lees, Ch., 2005. Environmental policy: the law of diminishing returns?. In: S. Green and W. Paterson, eds. Governance in contemporary Germany: the semisovereign state revisited. Cambridge University Press, 212–238.
   Google Scholar
• Michaelowa, A., 2005. The German wind energy lobby: how to promote costly technological change successfully. European Environment, 15, 192–199.
   Google Scholar
• Mol, A.P.J., 1995. Ecological modernisation theory and the chemical industry. Utrecht: Van Arkel.
   Google Scholar
• Morbee, J. and Proost, S., 2010. Russian gas imports in Europe: how does Gazprom reliability change the game?. The Energy Journal, 31 (4), 79–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patt, A., et al., 2011. Regional integration to support full renewable power deployment for Europe by 2050. Environmental Politics, 20 (5), 727–742.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, S., 2011. Die wahren Kosten der Atomkraft. Wirtschaftsdienst, 91 (4), 224.
   Google Scholar
• Posen, A.S., 2008.Exportweltmeister – so what? Better goals for German foreign economic policy. In: R. Schettkat and J. Langkau, eds. Economic policy proposals for Germany and Europe. London: Routledge, 119–143.
   Google Scholar
• Prat, A.G., 2010. Effective regional energy governance – not global environmental governance – is what we need right now for climate change. Global Environmental Change, 20 (2010), 33–35.
   Google Scholar
• Schreurs, M.A., 2010. German perspectives on ecological modernisation, technology transfer, and intellectual property rights in the case of climate change. In: American Institute for Contemporary German Studies, ed. AICGS Policy Report, No. 45. Washington, DC: The Johns Hopkins University, 61–77.
   Google Scholar
• Seippel, Ø., 2000. Ecological modernization as a theoretical device: strengths and weaknesses. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 2, 287–302.
   Google Scholar
• Spiegel Online, 2010. Stadtwerke befürchten Milliardenverluste, Speigel [online]. Available from http://www.spiegel.de/politik/deutschland/0,1518,druck-716093,00.html [Accessed 5 January 2011].
   Google Scholar
• Stefes, C.H., 2010. Bypassing Germany’s Reformstau: the remarkable rise of renewable energy. German Politics, 19 (2), 148–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toke, D., 2011. Ecological modernization, social movements and renewable energy. Environmental Politics, 20 (1), 60–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Umbach, F., 2008.German debates on energy security and impacts on Germany’s 2007 EU Presidency. In: A. Marquina, ed. Energy security: visions from Asia and Europe. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Vorholz, F., 2011. Ihr wollt gar nicht sparen!. Die Zeit, 7 July, 23.
   Google Scholar
• Vorholz, F., 2012. Ein Blackout ist möglich. Die Zeit, 10 May, 33.
   Google Scholar
• Welt Online, 2012. Umweltminister zweifelt an Zielen der Energiewende, Welt [online]. Available from: http://www.welt.de/wirtschaft/energie/article108294324/Umweltminister-zweifelt-an-Zielen-der-Energiewende.html [Accessed 6 July 2012].
   Google Scholar
• Westphal, K., 2009. Russian gas, Ukrainian pipeline, and European supply security. Berlin: German Institute for International and Security Affairs, SWP Research Paper 11.
   Google Scholar
• Wetzel, D., 2011. E.ON geht in die Offensive. Welt Kompakt, 1 June, 20–21.
   Google Scholar
• Wurzel, R.K.W., 2010. Environmental, climate and energy policies: path-dependent incrementalism or quantum leap?. German Politics, 19 (3), 460–478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• York, R. and Rosa, E.A., 2003. Key challenges to ecological modernization theory. Organization & Environment, 16 (3), 273–288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar