The relationship between climate change and energy security: key issues and conclusions

References

• Aldy, J., et al., 2009. Designing climate mitigation policy. Discussion Paper. Resources for the Future [online]. Available from: http://www.rff.org/documents/rff-dp-08-16.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, I. and Compston, H., eds., 2012. Feeling the heat: the politics of climate policy in rapidly industrializing countries. London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Baumert, K., Herzog, T., and Pershing, J., 2005. Navigating the numbers: greenhouse gas data and international climate policy. World Resources Institute. Available from: http://pdf.wri.org/navigating_numbers.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Beck, U. and Sznaider, N., 2006. Unpacking cosmopolitanism for the social sciences: a research agenda. British Journal of Sociology, 57 (1), 1–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulkeley, H. and Betsill, M., 2003. Cities and climate change. Urban sustainability and global environmental governance. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Carrington, D. and Vaughan, A., 13 December 2011. Canada condemned at home and abroad for pulling out of Kyoto treaty. The Guardian [online]. Available from: http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2011/dec/13/canada-condemned-kyoto-climate-treaty
   Google Scholar
• Chang, T.-K., 1998. All countries not created equal to be news: world system and international communication. Communication Research, 25 (5), 528–563.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciuta, F., 2010. Conceptual notes on energy security: total or banal security?. Security Dialogue, 41, 123–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalby, S., 2002. Environmental security. Minneapolis, MN: Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Depledge, J., 2008. Striving for no: Saudi Arabia in the climate change regime. Global Environmental Politics, 8 (4), 9–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drape, J., 13 December 2011. Australia defends Canada’s Kyoto exit. The Sydney Morning Herald [online]. Available from: http://news.smh.com.au/breaking-news-national/australia-defends-canadas-kyoto-exit-20111213-1osyd.html
   Google Scholar
• Elkind, J., 2009. Energy security: call for a broader agenda. In: C. Pascual and J. Elkind eds. Energy Security: Economics, Politics, Strategies, and Implications. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 57–73.
   Google Scholar
• Floyd, R., 2008. The environmental security debate and its significance for climate change. The International Spectator, 43 (3), 51–65.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M., 1998. The will to knowledge – The history of sexuality. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, T., 17 June 2005. As Toyota goes …. The New York Times [online]. Available from: http://www.nytimes.com/2005/06/17/opinion/17friedman.html
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A., 2011. The politics of climate change. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grundmann, R., 2007. Climate change and knowledge politics. Environmental Politics, 16 (3), 414–432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardin, G., 2009. Tragedy of the commons. Journal of Natural Resources Policy Research, 1 (3), 243–253.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, P., ed., 2011. China’s responsibility for climate change: ethics, fairness and environmental policy. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Held, D.. Hervey, A. and Theros, M., eds., 2011. The governance of climate change: science, economics, politics and ethics. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Helm, D., 2009. EU climate change policy – a critique. In: D. Helm and C. Hepburn eds. The economics and politics of climate change. Oxford University Press, 222–244.
   Google Scholar
• Helm, D. and Hepburn, C. eds., 2009. The economics and politics of climate change. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• International Energy Agency (IEA), 2011. The IEA model of short term energy security: primary energy sources and secondary fuels [online]. Paris: IEA. Available from: http://www.iea.org/media/freepublications/2011/moses_paper.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Lisowski, M., 2002. Playing the two-level game: US President Bush’s decision to repudiate the Kyoto protocol. Environmental Politics, 11 (4), 101–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, M., 2012. The Failed Securitization of Climate Change in Australia. Australian journal of Political Science, 47 (4), 579–592.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piebalgs, A., 2009. EU energy and climate policy: speech at the 7th Doha natural gas conference, 11 March 2009 Doha. Available from: http://www.europa.eu.rapid/pressReleasesAction.do
   Google Scholar
• Rootes, C., Zito, A., and Barry, J., 2012. Climate change, national politics and grassroots action: an introduction. Environmental Politics, 21 (5), 677–690.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, V., 2008. Discursive institutionalism. The explanatory power of ideas and discourse. Annual Review of Social Science, 11, 303–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaffer, B., 2009. Energy politics. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Szarka, J., 2010. Bringing interests back in: using coalition theories to explain European wind power policies. Journal of European Public Policy, 17 (6), 836–853.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vieira, M., 2012. Brazilian foreign policy in the context of global climate norms. Foreign Policy Analysis [article first published online], 10 July 2012. Available from: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1743-8594.2012.00191.x/abstract
   Google Scholar