Greener governments: partisan ideologies, executive institutions, and environmental policies

References

• Austen-Smith, D. and Banks, J., 1988. Elections, coalitions, and legislative outcomes. The American Political Science Review, 82 (2), 405. doi:10.2307/1957393
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bäck, H., Debus, M., and Tosun, J., 2015. Partisanship, ministers, and biotechnology policy. Review of Policy Research, 32 (5), 556–575. doi:10.1111/ropr.2015.32.issue-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benoit, K., Laver, M., and Mikhaylov, S., 2009. Treating words as data with error: uncertainty in text statements of policy positions. American Journal of Political Science, 53 (2), 495–513. doi:10.1111/ajps.2009.53.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao, X., et al., 2014. Research frontiers in comparative and international environmental politics: an introduction. Comparative Political Studies, 47 (3), 291–308. doi:10.1177/0010414013509567
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter, N., 2013. Greening the mainstream: party politics and the environment. Environmental Politics, 22 (1), 73–94. doi:10.1080/09644016.2013.755391
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahl, R.A., 1984. Modern political analysis. 4th ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Denzau, Arthur, T. and North, D.C., 2000. Shared mental models: ideologies and institutions. In: A. Lupia, M.D. McCubbins, and S.L. Popkin, eds. Elements of reason: cognition, choice, and the bounds of rationality. New York: Cambridge University Press, 23–46.
   Google Scholar
• Dewan, T. and Hortala-Vallve, R., 2011. The three as of government formation: appointment, allocation, and assignment. American Journal of Political Science, 55 (3), 610–627. doi:10.1111/ajps.2011.55.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diermeier, D. and Feddersen, T.J., 1998. Cohesion in legislatures and the vote of confidence procedure. The American Political Science Review, 92 (3), 611–621. doi:10.2307/2585484
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downs, A., 1957. An economic theory of democracy. Boston: Addison Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Downs, G.W., Rocke, D.M., and Barsoom, P.N., 1996. Is the good news about compliance good news about cooperation? International Organization, 50 (3), 379–406. doi:10.1017/S0020818300033427
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gärtner, L., Hörner, J., and Obholzer, L., 2011. National coordination of EU policy: a comparative study of the twelve new member states. Journal of Contemporary European Research, 7 (1), 77–100.
   Google Scholar
• Goodhart, L., 2013. Who decides? Coalition governance and ministerial discretion. Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 8 (3), 205–237. doi:10.1561/100.00011081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guinaudeau, I., 2014. Toward a conditional model of partisanship in policymaking. French Politics, 12 (3), 265–281. doi:10.1057/fp.2014.16
   Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L., Marks, G., and Wilson, C.J., 2002. Does left/right structure party positions on European integration? Comparative Political Studies, 35 (8), 965–989. doi:10.1177/001041402236310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber, J.D. and Shipan, C.R., 2002. Deliberate discretion? The institutional foundations of bureaucratic autonomy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, C.B. and Spoon, -J.-J., 2011. Testing the ‘party matters’ thesis: explaining progress towards Kyoto protocol targets. Political Studies, 59 (1), 99–115. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.2010.00852.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson, K.M. and Tallberg, J., 2010. Explaining chief executive empowerment: EU summitry and domestic institutional change. West European Politics, 33 (2), 208–236. doi:10.1080/01402380903538815
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassim, H., 2013. The Europeanization of member state institutions. In: S. Bulmer and C. Lequesne, eds. The member states of the European Union. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 279–312.
   Google Scholar
• Kassim, H.B., Peters, G., and Wright, V., eds., 2000. The national co-ordination of EU policy: the domestic level. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Klingemann, H.-D., Hofferbert, R.I., and Budge, I., 1994. Parties, policies and democracy. Boulder: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Klingemann, H.-D., et al., 2006. Mapping policy preferences II: estimates for parties, electors, and governments in Eastern Europe, European Union and OECD 1990-2003. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Knill, C., Debus, M., and Heichel, S., 2010. Do parties matter in internationalised policy areas? The impact of political parties on environmental policy outputs in 18 OECD countries, 1970-2000. European Journal of Political Research, 49 (3), 301–336. doi:10.1111/ejpr.2010.49.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• König, T., et al., 2007. Bicameral conflict resolution in the European Union: an empirical analysis of conciliation committee bargains. British Journal of Political Science, 37 (2), 281–312. doi:10.1017/S0007123407000142
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laffan, B., 2006. Mapping Europe from home in Dublin, Athens and Helsinki: a comparative analysis. West European Politics, 29 (4), 687–708. doi:10.1080/01402380600842189
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laver, M. and Shepsle, K.A., 1996. Making and breaking governments: cabinets and legislators in parliamentary democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leinaweaver, J. and Thomson, R., 2014. Testing models of legislative decision-making with measurement error: the robust predictive power of bargaining models over procedural models. European Union Politics, 15 (1), 43–58. doi:10.1177/1465116513501908
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipset, S.M. and Rokkan, S., eds., 1967. Party systems and voter alignments. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lipsmeyer, C.S. and Pierce, H.N., 2011. The eyes that bind: junior ministers as oversight mechanisms in coalition governments. The Journal of Politics, 73 (4), 1152–1164. doi:10.1017/S0022381611000879
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mair, P. and Mudde, C., 1998. The party family and its study. Annual Review of Political Science, 1, 211–229. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.1.1.211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansbridge, J., 2003. Rethinking representation. American Political Science Review, 97, 515–528. doi:10.1017/S0003055403000856
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, L.W. and Vanberg, G., 2004. Policing the bargain: coalition government and parliamentary scrutiny. American Journal of Political Science, 48 (1), 13–27. doi:10.1111/j.0092-5853.2004.00053.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller-Rommel, F., 2002. The lifespan and the political performance of green parties in Western Europe. Environmental Politics, 11 (1), 1–16. doi:10.1080/714000596
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller-Rommel, F. and Poguntke, T., eds., 2002. Green parties in national governments. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Neumayer, E., 2003. Are left-wing party strength and corporatism good for the environment? Evidence from panel analysis of air pollution in OECD countries. Ecological Economics, 45 (2), 203–220. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(03)00012-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, G.B. Jr., 2000. Elections as instruments of democracy. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rohrschneider, R., 1993. New party versus old left realignments: environmental attitudes, party policies, and partisan affiliations in four west European countries. The Journal of Politics, 55 (3), 682–701. doi:10.2307/2131994
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rüdig, W., 2006. Is government good for greens? Comparing the electoral effects of government participation in Western and East-Central Europe. European Journal of Political Research, 45 (s1), S127–S154. doi:10.1111/ejpr.2006.45.issue-s1
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, M.G., 1996. When parties matter: a review of the possibilities and limits of partisan influence on public policy. European Journal of Political Research, 30 (2), 155–183. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6765.1996.tb00673.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulze, K., 2014. Do parties matter for international environmental cooperation? An analysis of environmental treaty participation by advanced industrialised democracies. Environmental Politics, 23 (1), 115–139. doi:10.1080/09644016.2012.740938
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scruggs, L., 2003. Sustaining abundance: environmental performance in industrial democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Spoon, -J.-J., Hobolt, S.B., and De Vries, C.E., 2014. Going green: explaining issue competition on the environment. European Journal of Political Research, 53 (2), 363–380. doi:10.1111/1475-6765.12032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strøm, K., Müller, W.C., and Smith, D.M., 2010. Parliamentary control of coalition governments. Annual Review of Political Science, 13 (1), 517–535. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.10.071105.104340
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomson, R., et al., 2012. A new dataset on decision-making in the European Union before and after the 2004 and 2007 enlargements (DEUII). Journal of European Public Policy, 19 (4), 604–622. doi:10.1080/13501763.2012.662028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomson, R., et al., eds., 2006. The European Union decides. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tosun, J., 2014. Agricultural biotechnology in Central and Eastern Europe: determinants of cultivation bans. Sociologia Ruralis, 54 (3), 362–381. doi:10.1111/soru.2014.54.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Eijk, C., Schmitt, H., and Binder, T., 2005. Left-right orientations and party choice. In: J. Thomassen, ed. The European voter: a comparative study of modern democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 167–191.
   Google Scholar
• Venables, W.N. and Ripley, B.D., 2002. Modern applied statistics with S. 4th ed. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Ward, H. and Cao, X., 2012. Domestic and international influences on green taxation. Comparative Political Studies, 45 (9), 1075–1103. doi:10.1177/0010414011434007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar