Vetoing the future: political constraints and renewable energy

References

• Aklin, M. and Urpelainen, J., 2013. Political competition, path dependence, and the strategy of sustainable energy transitions. American Journal of Political Science, 57 (3), 643–658. doi:10.1111/ajps.2013.57.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• America’s Energy Future Panel on Electricity From Renewable Resources, National Research Council, and National Academy of Engineering, 2010. Electricity from renewable resources: status, prospects, and impediments. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Avelino, F. and Rotmans, J., 2009. Power in transition: an interdisciplinary framework to study power in relation to structural change. European Journal of Social Theory, 12 (4), 543–569. doi:10.1177/1368431009349830
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, L. and Newell, P., 2014. The political economy of energy transitions: the case of South Africa. New Political Economy, 19 (6), 791–818. doi:10.1080/13563467.2013.849674
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayulgen, O., 2013. Two-steps forward, one-step back: how politics dim the lights on Turkey’s renewable energy future. Perceptions: Journal of International Affairs, 18 (4), 71–99.
   Google Scholar
• BP, 2015. BP statistical review of world energy 2015. London: BP plc.
   Google Scholar
• Busby, J., 2008. Overcoming political barriers to reform in energy policy. In: S. Burke and C. Parthemore, eds. A strategy for American power: energy climate and national security. Washington, DC: Center for A New American Security Solarium Strategy Series, 35–67.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, S., 2004. Energy dreams and energy realities. The New Atlantis, 5 (Spring), 3–17.
   Google Scholar
• Duffield, J.S. and Hankla, C.R., 2011. The efficiency of institutions: political determinants of oil consumption in democracies. Comparative Politics, 43 (2), 187–205. doi:10.5129/001041511793931816
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edenhofer, O., et al., eds., 2012. Renewable energy sources and climate change mitigation: special report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elliott, D., 2013. Why the United States does not have a renewable energy policy. Environmental Law Reporter, 43 (2), 10095–10101.
   Google Scholar
• Geels, F., 2014. Regime resistance against low-carbon transitions: introducing politics and power into the multi-level perspective. Theory, Culture & Society, 31 (5), 21–40. doi:10.1177/0263276414531627
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grubler, A., 2012. Energy transitions research: insights and cautionary tales. Energy Policy, 50 (November), 8–16. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2012.02.070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallerberg, M. and Basinger, S., 1998. Internationalization and changes in tax policy in OECD countries: the importance of domestic veto players. Comparative Political Studies, 31 (3), 321–352. doi:10.1177/0010414098031003003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henisz, W.J., 2013. Political constraints database. University of Pennsylvania, Wharton School. Available from: https://mgmt.wharton.upenn.edu/profile/1327 [Accessed 5 February 2014].
   Google Scholar
• Henisz, W.J. and Mansfield, E.D., 2006. Votes and vetoes: the political determinants of commercial openness. International Studies Quarterly, 50 (1), 189–211. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2478.2006.00398.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hess, D.J., 2016. The politics of niche-regime conflicts: distributed solar energy in the United States. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 19 (June), 42–50. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2015.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hess, D.J. and Mai, Q.D., 2014. Renewable electricity policy in Asia: a qualitative comparative analysis of factors affecting sustainability transitions. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 12 (September), 31–46. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2014.04.001
   Google Scholar
• Hess, D.J., Mai, Q.D., and Brown, K.P., 2016. Red states, green laws: ideology and renewable energy legislation in the United States. Energy Research & Social Science, 11 (January), 19–28. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2015.08.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inglehart, R., 1990. Cultural shift in advanced industrial democracies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• International Energy Agency, 2010. Energy policies of IEA countries: Turkey 2009 review. Paris, France: International Energy Agency.
   Google Scholar
• International Energy Agency, 2015. Key world energy statistics. Paris, France: International Energy Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Keefer, P. and Stasavage, D., 2003. The limits of delegation: veto players, central bank independence, and the credibility of monetary policy. American Political Science Review, 97 (3), 407–423. doi:10.1017/S0003055403000777
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kern, F. and Smith, A., 2008. Restructuring energy systems for sustainability? Energy transition policy in the Netherlands. Energy Policy, 36 (11), 4093–4103. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2008.06.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laes, E., Gorissen, L., and Nevens, F., 2014. A comparison of energy transition governance in Germany, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom. Sustainability, 6 (3), 1129–1152. doi:10.3390/su6031129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laird, F.N. and Stefes, C., 2009. The diverging paths of German and United States policies for renewable energy: sources of difference. Energy Policy, 37 (7), 2619–2629. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2009.02.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loorbach, D., 2010. Transition management for sustainable development: a perspective, complexity-based governance framework. Journal of Policy, Administration and Institutions, 23 (1), 161–183. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0491.2009.01471.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, M.G., Gurr, T.R., and Jaggers, K., 2016. Polity IV project: political regime characteristics and transitions, 1800–2015. Center for Systemic Peace. Available from: http://www.systemicpeace.org/inscrdata.html [Accessed 10 June 2016].
   Google Scholar
• McNully, P., 1 Jun 2004. Twelve reasons to exclude large hydro from renewables initiatives. International Rivers Network. Available from: http://www.rivernet.org/general/hydropower/12reasons.pdf [Accessed 25 March 2014].
   Google Scholar
• Meadowcroft, J., 2009. What about the politics? Sustainable development, transition management, and long term energy transitions. Policy Sciences, 42 (4), 323–340. doi:10.1007/s11077-009-9097-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meadowcroft, J., 2011. Engaging with the politics of sustainability transitions. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 1 (1), 70–75. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2011.02.003
   Google Scholar
• Milner, H., 1997. Interests, institutions and information: domestic politics and international relations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Normann, H.E., 2015. The role of politics in sustainable transitions: the rise and decline of offshore wind in Norway. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 15 (June), 180–193. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2014.11.002
   Google Scholar
• Onion, A., 2015. Wind proposal whips up controversy. ABC News, 29 Oct. Available from: http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/story?id=97849&page=1 [Accessed 22 March 2016].
   Google Scholar
• Onis, Z., 2012. The triumph of conservative globalism: the political economy of the AKP era. Turkish Studies, 13 (2), 135–152. doi:10.1080/14683849.2012.685252
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renewable Energy Policy Network for the 21st Century (REN21), 2015. Renewables 2015 global status report. Paris, France: REN21 Secretariat.
   Google Scholar
• Scruggs, L., 2003. Sustaining abundance: environmental performance in industrial democracies. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, A., 2007. Translating sustainabilities between green niches and sociotechnical regimes. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 19 (4), 427–450. doi:10.1080/09537320701403334
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsebelis, G., 2002. Veto players: how political institutions work. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Unruh, G.C., 2000. Understanding carbon lock-in. Energy Policy, 28 (12), 817–830. doi:10.1016/S0301-4215(00)00070-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verbong, G. and Geels, F., 2007. The ongoing energy transitions: learning from a sociotechnical, multi-level analysis of the Dutch electricity system (1960–2004). Energy Policy, 35 (2), 1025–1037. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2006.02.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verbong, G. and Loorbach, D., eds., 2012. Governing the energy transition: reality, illusion or necessity? London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank, 2014. World development indicators 1960–2015. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
   Google Scholar