Ecological reflexivity: characterising an elusive virtue for governance in the Anthropocene

References

• Ansell, C.K. and Bartenberger, M., 2016. Varieties of experimentalism. Ecological Economics, 130, 64–73. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.05.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arias-Maldonado, M., 2013. Rethinking sustainability in the Anthropocene. Environmental Politics, 22 (3), 428–446. doi:10.1080/09644016.2013.765161
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armitage, D., Marschke, M., and Plummer, R., 2008. Adaptive co-management and the paradox of learning. Global Environmental Change, 18 (1), 86–98. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2007.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnold, D.G., 2016. Corporate responsibility, democracy, and climate change. Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 40 (1), 252–261. doi:10.1111/misp.12059
   Google Scholar
• Bai, X., et al., 2016. Plausible and desirable futures in the Anthropocene: a new research agenda. Global Environmental Change, 39, 351–362. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.09.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnett, J. and O’Neill, S., 2010. Maladaptation. Global Environmental Change, 20 (2), 211–213. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.11.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastrup-Birk, H. and Wildemeersch, D., 2011. Navigating the tides of change: revisiting the notion of reflexivity in the context of social learning for transboundary collective experimentation. Studies in Continuing Education, 33 (3), 219–234. doi:10.1080/0158037X.2011.580735
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, U., 1992. Risk society: towards a new modernity. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Boyd, E., et al., 2015. Anticipatory governance for social-ecological resilience. AMBIO, 44 (1), 149–161. doi:10.1007/s13280-014-0604-x
   Google Scholar
• Chaffin, B.C., Gosnell, H., and Cosens, B.A., 2014. A decade of adaptive governance scholarship: synthesis and future directions. Ecology and Society, 19, 3. doi:10.5751/ES-06824-190356
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christoff, P. and Eckersley, R., 2013. Globalization and the environment. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Cote, M. and Nightingale, A.J., 2011. Resilience thinking meets social theory: situating social change in Socio-Ecological Systems (SES) research. Progress in Human Geography, 36 (4), 475–489. doi:10.1177/0309132511425708
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crutzen, P.J., 2002. Geology of mankind. Nature, 415 (6867), 23. doi:10.1038/415023a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Búrca, G., Keohane, R.O., and Sabel, C., 2014. Global experimentalist governance. British Journal of Political Science, 44 (03), 477–486. doi:10.1017/S0007123414000076
   Google Scholar
• Dietz, T., Ostrom, E., and Stern, P.C., 2003. The struggle to govern the commons. Science, 302 (5652), 1907–1912. doi:10.1126/science.1091015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobson, A., 2014. Listening for democracy: recognition, representation, reconciliation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dryzek, J.S., 2016. Institutions for the Anthropocene: governance in a changing Earth system. British Journal of Political Science, 46 (4), 937–956. doi:10.1017/S0007123414000453
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dryzek, J.S. and Pickering, J., 2017. Deliberation as a catalyst for reflexive environmental governance. Ecological Economics, 131, 353–360. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.09.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dryzek, J.S. and Pickering, J., Forthcoming. The politics of the Anthropocene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dunlop, C.A. and Radaelli, C.M., 2013. Systematising policy learning: from monolith to dimensions. Political Studies, 61 (3), 599–619. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.2012.00982.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feola, G., 2015. Societal transformation in response to global environmental change: a review of emerging concepts. Ambio, 44 (5), 376–390. doi:10.1007/s13280-014-0582-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folke, C., et al., 2010. Resilience thinking: integrating resilience, adaptability and transformability. Ecology and Society, 15 (4), 20. doi:10.5751/ES-03610-150420
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folke, C., et al., 2005. Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 30 (1), 441–473. doi:10.1146/annurev.energy.30.050504.144511
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galaz, V., 2014. Global environmental governance, technology and politics: the Anthropocene gap. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A., 1990. The consequences of modernity. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Goodin, R.E., 1992. Green political theory. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Gross, M., 2010. Ignorance and surprise: science, society, and ecological design. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Guston, D.H., 2013. Understanding ‘anticipatory governance’. Social Studies of Science, 44 (2), 218–242. doi:10.1177/0306312713508669
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hahn, T. and Nykvist, B., 2017. Are adaptations self-organized, autonomous, and harmonious? Assessing the social-ecological resilience literature. Ecology and Society, 22, 1. doi:10.5751/ES-09026-220112
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayward, T., 2005. Constitutional environmental rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hendriks, C.M. and Grin, J., 2007. Contextualizing reflexive governance: the politics of Dutch transitions to sustainability. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 9 (3–4), 333–350. doi:10.1080/15239080701622790
   Google Scholar
• Hoffmann, M.J., 2011. Climate governance at the crossroads: experimenting with a global response after Kyoto. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holling, C.S., 1973. Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 4 (1), 1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Lash, S., 1993. Reflexive modernization: the aesthetic dimension. Theory, Culture & Society, 10 (1), 1–23. doi:10.1177/026327693010001001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynch, M., 2000. Against reflexivity as an academic virtue and source of privileged knowledge. Theory, Culture & Society, 17 (3), 26–54. doi:10.1177/02632760022051202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCright, A.M. and Dunlap, R.E., 2010. Anti-reflexivity: the American conservative movement’s success in undermining climate science and policy. Theory, Culture & Society, 27 (2–3), 100–133. doi:10.1177/0263276409356001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meadowcroft, J. and Steurer, R., 2013. Assessment practices in the policy and politics cycles: a contribution to reflexive governance for sustainable development? Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 1–23. doi:10.1080/1523908X.2013.829750
   Google Scholar
• Mol, A.P.J., 1996. Ecological modernisation and institutional reflexivity: environmental reform in the late modern age. Environmental Politics, 5 (2), 302–323. doi:10.1080/09644019608414266
   Google Scholar
• O’Brien, K., 2012. Global environmental change II: from adaptation to deliberate transformation. Progress in Human Geography, 36 (5), 667–676. doi:10.1177/0309132511425767
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsson, L., et al., 2015. Why resilience is unappealing to social science: theoretical and empirical investigations of the scientific use of resilience. Science Advances, 1, e1400217–e1400217. doi:10.1126/sciadv.1400217
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Overdevest, C. and Zeitlin, J., 2014. Assembling an experimentalist regime: transnational governance interactions in the forest sector. Regulation & Governance, 8 (1), 22–48. doi:10.1111/j.1748-5991.2012.01133.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pahl-Wostl, C., 2009. A conceptual framework for analysing adaptive capacity and multi-level learning processes in resource governance regimes. Global Environmental Change, 19 (3), 354–365. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pelling, M., 2011. Adaptation to climate change: from resilience to transformation. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Quay, R., 2010. Anticipatory governance: a tool for climate change adaptation. Journal of the American Planning Association, 76 (4), 496–511. doi:10.1080/01944363.2010.508428
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rawls, J., 1999. A theory of justice. revised ed. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. Original edition, 1971.
   Google Scholar
• Reed, M.S., et al., 2010. What is social learning? Ecology and Society, 15, 4. doi:10.5751/ES-03564-1504r01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy, E.A., 2017. New Zealand river granted same legal rights as human being. Guardian (UK), 16 March. Available from: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/mar/16/new-zealand-river-granted-same-legal-rights-as-human-being
   Google Scholar
• Schellnhuber, H.J., 1999. `Earth System’ analysis and the second Copernican revolution. Nature, 402 (6761supp), C19–C23. doi:10.1038/35011515
   Google Scholar
• Schlosberg, D., 2007. Defining environmental justice: theories, movements, and nature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Siebenhüner, B., 2008. Learning in international organizations in global environmental governance. Global Environmental Politics, 8 (4), 92–116. doi:10.1162/glep.2008.8.4.92
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, A. and Stirling, A., 2007. Moving outside or inside? Objectification and reflexivity in the governance of socio-technical systems. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 9 (3–4), 351–373. doi:10.1080/15239080701622873
   Google Scholar
• Steffen, W., et al., 2015. The trajectory of the Anthropocene: the Great Acceleration. The Anthropocene Review, 2 (1), 81–98. doi:10.1177/2053019614564785
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevenson, H., 2016. The possibility of reflexive global climate politics. Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale, 89, 55–69. doi:10.3917/rmm.161.0055
   Google Scholar
• Stevenson, H. and Dryzek, J.S., 2014. Democratizing global climate governance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tàbara, J.D. and Pahl-Wostl, C., 2007. Sustainability learning in natural resource use and management. Ecology and Society, 12, 2. doi:10.5751/ES-02063-120203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNEP, 2016.Amendment to the Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer [‘Kigali Amendment’]. United Nations Environment Programme. Available from: http://conf.montreal-protocol.org/meeting/mop/mop-28/final-report/English/Kigali_Amendment-English.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Voß, J.-P., Bauknecht, D., and Kemp, R., eds. 2006. Reflexive governance for sustainable development. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Voß, J.-P. and Kemp, R., 2006. Sustainability and reflexive governance: introduction. In: J.-P. Voß, D. Bauknecht, and R. Kemp, eds. Reflexive governance for sustainable development. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 3–28.
   Google Scholar
• Voß, J.-P., Kemp, R., and Bauknecht, D., 2006. Reflexive governance: a view on an emerging path. In: J.-P. Voß, D. Bauknecht, and R. Kemp, eds. Reflexive governance for sustainable development. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 419–437.
   Google Scholar
• Voß, J.-P. and Bornemann, B., 2011. The politics of reflexive governance: challenges for designing adaptive management and transition management. Ecology and Society, 16 (2), 9. doi:10.5751/ES-04051-160209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, B., et al., 2004. Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society, 9 (2), 5. doi:10.5751/ES-00650-090205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williston, B., 2015. The Anthropocene project: virtue in the age of climate change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wong, J.K., 2016. A dilemma of green democracy. Political Studies, 64 (1_suppl), 136–155. doi:10.1111/1467-9248.12189
   Google Scholar
• Wynne, B., 1993. Public uptake of science: a case for institutional reflexivity. Public Understanding of Science, 2 (4), 321–337. doi:10.1088/0963-6625/2/4/003
   Google Scholar
• Zelli, F. and Pattberg, P.H., 2016. Conclusions: complexity, responsibility and urgency in the Anthropocene. In: P. Pattberg and F. Zelli, eds. Environmental politics and governance in the Anthropocene: institutions and legitimacy in a complex world. Abingdon: Routledge, 231–242.
   Google Scholar