Measuring and explaining the EU’s effect on national climate performance

References

• Beck, N. and Katz, J., 1995. What to do (and not to do) with time-series cross-section data. American Political Science Review, 89 (3), 634–647. doi:10.2307/2082979
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernauer, T. and Siegfried, T., 2008. Compliance and performance in international water agreements: the Case of the Naryn/Syr Darya Basin. Global Governance, 14 (4), 479–501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bomberg, E., 2017. Environmental politics in the Trump era: an early assessment. Environmental Politics, 26 (5), 956–963. doi:10.1080/09644016.2017.1332543
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Börzel, Τ., 2000. Private actors on the rise? The role of non-state actors in compliance with international institutions. Bonn: Preprints aus der Max-Planck-Projektgruppe Recht der Gemeinschaftsgüter, No. 2000/14.
   Google Scholar
• Börzel, Τ., 2002. Pace-setting, foot-dragging, and fence-sitting: member state responses of europeanization. Journal of Common Market Studies, 40 (2), 193–214. doi:10.1111/1468-5965.00351
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Börzel, T. and Knoll, M., 2012. Quantifying non-compliance in the EU: a database on EU infringement proceedings. Berlin: Freie Universität Berlin, Working Paper on European Integration No. 15.
   Google Scholar
• Brohé, A. and Burniaux, S., 2016. The impact of the EU ETS on firms’ investment decisions: evidence from a survey. Carbon Management, 6 (5–6), 221–231. doi:10.1080/17583004.2015.1131384
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capros, P., Kouvaritakis, N., and Mantzos, L., 2001. Top-down analysis of GHG emission reduction possibilities in the EU. Athens: NTUA
   Google Scholar
• Crepaz, M., 1995. Explaining national variations of air pollution levels: political institutions and their impact on environmental policy-making. Environmental Politics, 4 (3), 391–414. doi:10.1080/09644019508414213
   Google Scholar
• De Santis, R., 2012. Impact of environmental regulations on trade in the main EU countries: conflict or synergy?. The World Economy, 35 (7), 799–815. doi:10.1111/twec.2012.35.issue-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EBRD, 2011. Special report on climate change: a low carbon transition. London: EBRD.
   Google Scholar
• EEA, 2005. Greenhouse gases trends and projections in Europe. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
   Google Scholar
• EEA, 2006. Greenhouse gases trends and projections in Europe. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
   Google Scholar
• EEA, 2007. Greenhouse gases trends and projections in Europe. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
   Google Scholar
• EEA, 2012. GHG viewer. [Online] Available from: http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/data/data-viewers/greenhouse-gases-viewer [Accessed 2 October 2014]
   Google Scholar
• EEA, 2014a. Greenhouse gas inventory 2014. Copenhagen: European Environment Agency, Technical report No. 09/2014.
   Google Scholar
• EEA, 2014b. Progress towards 2008–2012 Kyoto targets in Europe. Copenhagen: European Environment Agency, Technical Report No. 18/2014.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission, 1999. European Union energy outlook to 2020: the shared analysis project. Luxembourg: Official Publications of the European Communities.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2007. Mid-term review of the sixth community environment action programme. Brussels: COM, (2007), 225.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2009. 26th report on monitoring the application of community law 2008. Brussels: COM(2009) 675.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2010. 27th report on monitoring the application of EU law 2009. Brussels: COM(2010) 538.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission, 2011a. Progress towards achieving the Kyoto objectives. Brussels: SEC(2011) 1151 final.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2011b. 28th annual report on monitoring the application of EU law 2010. Brussels: COM(2011) 588.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2012. 29th annual report on monitoring the application of EU law 2011. Brussels: COM(2012) 714.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2013. 30th annual report on monitoring the application of EU law 2012. Brussels: COM(2013) 726.
   Google Scholar
• Falkner, G., et al., 2004. Non-compliance with EU directives in the member. states: opposition through the backdoor? West European Politics, 27 (3), 452–473. doi:10.1080/0140238042000228095
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Genovese, F., 2014. States’ interests at international climate negotiations: new measures of bargaining positions. Environmental Politics, 23 (4), 610–631. doi:10.1080/09644016.2014.904068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossman, G.M. and Krueger, A.B., 1991. Environmental impacts of a North American free trade agreement. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper Series 3914.
   Google Scholar
• Grundig, F., 2006. Patterns of international cooperation and the explanatory power of relative gains: an analysis of cooperation on global climate change, ozone depletion, and international trade. International Studies Quarterly, 50 (4), 781–801. doi:10.1111/isqu.2006.50.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haverland, M., 2007. Methodology. In: P. Graziano and P. Vink, eds. Εuropeanization: new research agendas. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 59–70.
   Google Scholar
• Helm, C. and Sprinz, D.F., 2000. Measuring the effectiveness of international environmental regimes. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 45 (5), 630–652. doi:10.1177/0022002700044005004
   Google Scholar
• Héritier, A., 1996. The accommodation of diversity in European policy‐making and its outcomes: regulatory policy as a patchwork. Journal of European Public Policy, 3 (2), 149–167. doi:10.1080/13501769608407026
   Google Scholar
• Jacob, K. and Volkery, A., 2006. Modelling capacities for environmental policy-making in global environmental politics. In: M. Jänicke and K. Jacob, eds. Environmental governance in global perspective: new approaches to ecological modernisation. Berlin: Freie Universität Berlin, 167–209.
   Google Scholar
• Jahn, D., 1998. Environmental performance and policy regimes: explaining variations in 18 OECD countries. Policy Sciences, 31 (2), 107–131. doi:10.1023/A:1004385005999
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jänicke, M., 2005. Trend-setters in environmental policy: the character and role of pioneer countries. European Environment, 15 (2), 129–142. doi:10.1002/eet.v15:2
   Google Scholar
• Jänicke, M. and Jörgens, H., 2006. New approaches to environmental governance. In: M. Jänicke and K. Jacob, eds. Environmental governance in global perspective. new approaches to ecological modernisation. Berlin: Freie Universität, 167–209.
   Google Scholar
• Knill, C. and Lehmkuhl, D., 1999. How Europe matters: different mechanisms of europeanization. European Integration Online Papers, 3 (7), 1–33.
   Google Scholar
• Knill, C. and Lenschow, A., 2005. Compliance, communication and competition: patterns of EU environmental policy making and their impact on policy convergence. European Environment, 15 (2), 114–128. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0976
   Google Scholar
• Koutalakis, C., 2003. From the ‘mediterranean’ to the ‘iron curtain syndrome’: lessons from the southern enlargement for central eastern European accession countries. Paper prepared for the ECPR workshop Explaining Environmental Policy in Central Europe, Edinburgh, March 28-April 2.
   Google Scholar
• Lenschow, A., Liefferink, D., and Veenman, S., 2005. When the birds sing: a framework for analysing domestic factors behind policy convergence. Journal of European Public Policy, 12 (5), 797–816. doi:10.1080/13501760500161373
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liefferink, D., et al., 2009. Leaders and laggards in environmental policy: a quantitative analysis of domestic policy outputs. Journal of European Public Policy, 16 (5), 677–700. doi:10.1080/13501760902983283
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liefferink, D. and Andersen, M., 1998. Strategies of the “green” member states in EU environmental policy-making. Journal of European Public Policy, 5 (2), 254–270. doi:10.1080/135017698343974
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liefferink, D., Arts, B., Kamstra, J., and Ooijevaar, J., 2009. Leaders and laggards in environmental policy: a quantitative analysis of domestic policy outputs. Journal Of European Public Policy, 16 (5), 677-700.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luterbacher, U. and Sprinz, D.F., eds, forthcoming. Global climate policy: actors, concepts, and enduring challenges. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, R., 2008. Evaluating the performance of environmental institutions: what to evaluate and how to evaluate it? In: O. Young, L. King, and H. Schroeder, eds. Institutions and environmental change: principal findings, applications, and research frontiers. Cambridge: MIT Press, 79–114.
   Google Scholar
• OECD, 1994. Climate change policy initiatives, 1994 update, OECD countries, vol. 1. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• OECD, 2014. GDP annual growth rates in percentage. [Online] Available from: https://stats.oecd.org/[Assecced 5 December 2014].
   Google Scholar
• OECD, 2015. Green growth indicators. [Online] Available from: http://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=GREEN_GROWTH [Accessed 2 April 2015]
   Google Scholar
• Porter, M.E. and Linde, C., 1995. Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9 (4), 97–118. doi:10.1257/jep.9.4.97
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pridham, G., 1996. Environmental policies and problems of European legislation in southern europe. South European Society and Politics, 1 (1), 47–73. doi:10.1080/13608749608454716
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, R.D., 1988. Diplomacy and domestic politics: the logic of two-level games. International Organization, 42 (3), 427–460. doi:10.1017/S0020818300027697
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rieckermann, J., et al., 2006. Assessing the performance of international water management at Lake Titicaca. Aquatic Sciences-Research across Boundaries, 68 (4), 502–516. doi:10.1007/s00027-006-0863-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scruggs, L.A., 1999. Institutions and environmental performance in seventeen western democracies. British Journal of Political Science, 29 (1), 1–31. doi:10.1017/S0007123499000010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siaroff, A., 1999. Corporatism in 24 industrial democracies: meaning and measurement. European Journal Of Political Research, 36 (2), 175-205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sprinz, D., et al., 1997. International governmental organizations and national participation in environmental regimes: the organizational components of the acidification regime. Rotterdam: Erasmus University Rotterdam.
   Google Scholar
• UNCTAD, 2014. Trade indicators - goods and services trade openness indicators, 1980-2013. [Online] Available from: http://unctadstat.unctad.org/wds/ReportFolders/reportFolders.aspx [Accessed 7 March 2014].
   Google Scholar
• Van Beers, C. and Van Den Bergh, J.C.J.M., 1999. An empirical multi-country analysis of the impact of environmental regulations on foreign trade flows. Kyklos, 50 (1), 29–46. doi:10.1111/1467-6435.00002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogel, D., 2003. The hare and the tortoise revisited: the new politics of consumer and environmental regulation in europe. British Journal of Political Science, 33 (4), 557–580. doi:10.1017/S0007123403000255
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Bank. 2014.Worldwide governance indicators: governance effectiveness. [Online] Available from: http://info.worldbank.org/governance/wgi/index.aspx#reports [Accessed 7 March 2014].
   Google Scholar
• Wurzel, K.W., et al., 2003. Struggling to Leave Behind a Highly Regulatory Past? ‘New’ Environmental Policy Instruments in Austria. Environmental Politics, 12 (1), 51–72. doi:10.1080/714000663
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wurzel, R. and Connelly, J., 2011. The European Union’s leadership role in international climate change politics reassessed. In: R. Wurzel and J. Connelly, eds. The European Union as a leader in international climate.change politics. London: Routledge, 271–290.
   Google Scholar
• Young, O.R., 2001. Inferences and indices: evaluating the effectiveness of international environmental regimes. Global Environmental Politics, 1 (1), 99–121. doi:10.1162/152638001570651
   Google Scholar
• Young, O.R., 2003. Determining regime effectiveness: a commentary on the Oslo-Potsdam solution. Global Environmental Politics, 3 (3), 97–104. doi:10.1162/152638003322469295
   Google Scholar