Regulatory thickening and the politics of market-oriented environmental policy

References

• Ambrose, R.F., Callaway, J.C., and Lee, S.F., 2007. An evaluation of compensatory mitigation projects permitted under clean water act section 401 by the California State Water Resources Control Board, 1991–2002. Los Angeles: University of California.
   Google Scholar
• Bäckstrand, K. and Lövbrand, E., 2006. Planting trees to mitigate climate change: contested discourses of ecological modernization, green governmentality and civic environmentalism. Global Environmental Politics, 6 (1), 50–75. doi:10.1162/glep.2006.6.1.50
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey, I., Gouldson, A., and Newell, P., 2011. Ecological modernisation and the governance of carbon: a critical analysis. Antipode, 43 (3), 682–703. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8330.2011.00880.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakker, K., 2005. Neoliberalizing nature? Market environmentalism in water supply in England and Wales. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 95 (3), 542–565. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8306.2005.00474.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakker, K., 2010. The limits of ‘neoliberal natures’: debating green neoliberalism. Progress in Human Geography, 34 (6), 715–735. doi:10.1177/0309132510376849
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartley, T., 2014. Transnational governance and the re-centered state: sustainability or legality? Regulation & Governance, 8 (1), 93–109. doi:10.1111/rego.12051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohr, J., 2016. The ‘climatism’ cartel: why climate change deniers oppose market-based mitigation policy. Environmental Politics, 25 (5), 812–830. doi:10.1080/09644016.2016.1156106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonefeld, W., 2012. Freedom and the strong state: on German ordoliberalism. New Political Economy, 17 (5), 633–656. doi:10.1080/13563467.2012.656082
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd, W., Prudham, W.S., and Schurman, R.A., 2001. Industrial dynamics and the problem of nature. Society & Natural Resources, 14 (7), 555–570. doi:10.1080/08941920120686
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broder, J.M., 2009. House passes bill to address threat of climate change. New York Times, 26 June, p. A1.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, S.C. and Veneman, P.L.M., 2001. Effectiveness of compensatory wetland mitigation in Massachusetts, USA. Wetlands, 21 (4), 508–518. doi:10.1672/0277-5212(2001)021[0508:EOCWMI]2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Büscher, B., et al., 2012. Towards a synthesized critique of neoliberal biodiversity conservation. Capitalism Nature Socialism, 23 (2), 4–30. June doi:10.1080/10455752.2012.674149
   Google Scholar
• Büscher, B., Dressler, W., and Fletcher, R., 2014. Nature, inc.: environmental conservation in the neoliberal age. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, N., Fox, J., and Bayon, R., eds., 2009. Conservation and biodiversity banking: a guide to setting up and running biodiversity credit trading systems. London and Sterling, VA: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Carruthers, B.G. and Ariovich, L., 2004. The sociology of property rights. Annual Review of Sociology, 30 (1), 23–46. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.30.012703.110538
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carton, W., 2014. Environmental protection as market pathology?: carbon trading and the dialectics of the ‘double movement’. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 32 (6), 1002–1018. doi:10.1068/d13038p
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carton, W. and Andersson, E., 2017. Where forest carbon meets its maker: forestry-based offsetting as the subsumption of nature. Society & Natural Resources, 30 (7), 829–843. doi:10.1080/08941920.2017.1284291
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castree, N., 2008. Neoliberalising nature: the logics of deregulation and re-regulation. Environment and Planning A, 40 (1), 131–152. doi:10.1068/a3999
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coase, R.H., 1960. The problem of social cost. The Journal of Law and Economics, 3, 1–44. doi:10.1086/466560
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, B.J., 1988. Bureaucratic politics and regulatory reform: the EPA and emissions trading. Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood.
   Google Scholar
• Costanza, R., 2003. Social goals and the valuation of natural capital. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 86 (1–2), 19–28. doi:10.1023/A:1024045221992
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahl, T.E., 2011. Status and trends of wetlands in the conterminous United States 2004 to 2009. Washington, DC: Fish and Wildlife Service.
   Google Scholar
• Dales, J.H., 1968. Pollution, property & prices: an essay in policy-making and economics. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dempsey, J. and Suarez, D.C., 2016. Arrested development? The promises and paradoxes of ‘selling nature to save it’. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 106 (3), 653–671. doi:10.1080/24694452.2016.1140018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ecosystem Marketplace, 2011. The state of biodiversity markets. Washington, DC: Ecosystem Marketplace.
   Google Scholar
• Engel, S., Pagiola, S., and Wunder, S., 2008. Designing payments for environmental services in theory and practice: an overview of the issues. Ecological Economics, 65 (4), 663–674. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.03.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Environmental Law Institute, 1994. National wetland mitigation banking study: wetland mitigation banking IWR Report 94-WMB-6. Washington, DC: Environmental Law Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Federal Register, 1973. Federal Register, 38 (90), 12217–12230.
   Google Scholar
• Federal Register, 1975. Federal Register, 40 (144), 31319–31344.
   Google Scholar
• Federal Register, 1977. Federal Register, 42 (138), 37121–37164.
   Google Scholar
• Federal Register, 2008. Federal Register, 73 (70), 19594–19705.
   Google Scholar
• Federal Register, 2015. Federal Register, 80 (215), 68743–68747.
   Google Scholar
• Federal Register, 2017. Federal Register, 82 (61), 16093–16097.
   Google Scholar
• Felli, R., 2015. Environment, not planning: the neoliberal depoliticisation of environmental policy by means of emissions trading. Environmental Politics, 24 (5), 641–660. doi:10.1080/09644016.2015.1051323
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fligstein, N., 2001. The architecture of markets: an economic sociology of twenty-first-century capitalist societies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foster, J.B., Clark, B., and York, R., 2009. The Midas effect: a critique of climate change economics. Development and Change, 40 (6), 1085–1097. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7660.2009.01613.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foucault, M., 2008. The birth of biopolitics: lectures at the Collège de France. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 1978–1979.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, R.C., 2011. Lawyers, swamps, and money: U.S. wetland law, policy, and politics. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Héritier, A. and Rhodes, M., 2011. New modes of governance in Europe: governing in the shadow of hierarchy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hochschild, A.R., 2016. Strangers in their own land: anger and mourning on the American right. New York: The New Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, A., Wurzel, R.K.W., and Zito, A.R., 2003. Comparative conclusions: ‘new’ environmental policy instruments: an evolution or a revolution in environmental policy? Environmental Politics, 12 (1), 201–224. doi:10.1080/714000667
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan, A., Wurzel, R.K.W., and Zito, A.R., 2013. Still the century of ‘new’ environmental policy instruments? Exploring patterns of innovation and continuity. Environmental Politics, 22 (1), 155–173. doi:10.1080/09644016.2013.755839
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lave, R., 2012. Fields and streams: stream restoration, neoliberalism, and the future of environmental science. Athens and London: University of Georgia Press.
   Google Scholar
• Layzer, J.A., 2012. Open for business: conservatives’ opposition to environmental regulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lederer, M., 2012. Market making via regulation: the role of the state in carbon markets. Regulation & Governance, 6 (4), 524–544. doi:10.1111/j.1748-5991.2012.01145.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levi-Faur, D., 2005. The global diffusion of regulatory capitalism. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 598, 12–32. doi:10.1177/0002716204272371
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levi-Faur, D., 2010. Regulation and regulatory governance. Jerusalem Papers in Regulation & Governance, No. 1, 1–47. Feb.
   Google Scholar
• Lockhart, A., 2015. Developing an offsetting programme: tensions, dilemmas and difficulties in biodiversity market-making in England. Environmental Conservation, 42 (4), 335–344. doi:10.1017/S0376892915000193
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKenzie, D., 2009. Making things the same: gases, emission rights and the politics of carbon markets. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34 (3–4), 440–455. doi:10.1016/j.aos.2008.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacNeil, R. and Paterson, M., 2012. Neoliberal climate policy: from market fetishism to the developmental state. Environmental Politics, 21 (2), 230–247. doi:10.1080/09644016.2012.651900
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mann, M., 1993. The sources of social power: the rise of classes and nation-states, 1760–1914. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mann, M., 2013. The sources of social power: globalizations, 1945–2011. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCright, A.M. and Dunlap, R.E., 2003. Defeating Kyoto: the conservative movement’s impact on US climate change policy. Social Problems, 50 (3), 348–373. doi:10.1525/sp.2003.50.3.348
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meckling, J., 2011. Carbon coalitions: business, climate politics, and the rise of emissions trading. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meckling, J. and Jenner, S., 2016. Varieties of market-based policy: instrument choice in climate policy. Environmental Politics, 25 (5), 853–874. doi:10.1080/09644016.2016.1168062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mol, A.P.J., 2012. Carbon flows, financial markets and climate change mitigation. Environmental Development, 1 (1), 10–24. doi:10.1016/j.envdev.2011.12.003
   Google Scholar
• Mol, A.P.J. and Spaargaren, G., 2000. Ecological modernisation theory in debate: a review. Environmental Politics, 9 (1), 17–49. doi:10.1080/09644010008414511
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, J.W., 2015. Capitalism in the web of life: ecology and the accumulation of capital. New York: Verso Books.
   Google Scholar
• Moreno, D., 2016. Elon Musk tells shareholders a trump presidency will not affect Tesla. International Business Times, 21 Nov.
   Google Scholar
• Moreno-Mateos, D., et al., 2012. Structural and functional loss in restored wetland ecosystems. PLOS Biol, 10 (1), e1001247. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001453
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, K.J. and Campbell, A.L., 2011. The delegated welfare state: medicare, markets, and the governance of social policy. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morgenson, G. and Gebeloff, R., 2013. Wall St. exploits ethanol credits, and prices spike. The New York Times, 14 Sep, Available from: https://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/15/business/wall-st-exploits-ethanol-credits-and-prices-spike.html
   Google Scholar
• Mulligan, S.P., 2016. Evolution of the meaning of ‘waters of the United States’ in the clean water act. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service. Available from: https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R44585.pdf
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council, 2001. Compensating for wetland losses under the clean water act. Washington D.C.: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pirard, R., 2012. Market-based instruments for biodiversity and ecosystem services: a lexicon. Environmental Science & Policy, 19–20, 59–68. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2012.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polanyi, K., 2001. The great transformation: the political and economic origins of our time. Boston: Beacon.
   Google Scholar
• Rea, C.M., 2017. Theorizing command-and-commodify regulation: the case of species conservation banking in the United States. Theory and Society, 46 (1), 21–56. doi:10.1007/s11186-017-9283-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson, M.M., 2006. The nature that capital can see: science, state, and market in the commodification of ecosystem services. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 24 (3), 367–387. doi:10.1068/d3304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson, M.M., 2012. Measurement and alienation: making a world of ecosystem services. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 37 (3), 386–401. doi:10.1111/tran.2012.37.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson, M.M. and Hayden, N., 2008. Evaluation of a market in wetland credits: entrepreneurial wetland banking in Chicago. Conservation Biology, 22 (3), 636–646. 1 June. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.00963.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneiberg, M. and Bartley, T., 2008. Organizations, regulation, and economic behavior: regulatory dynamics and forms from the nineteenth to twenty-first century. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 4 (1), 31–61. doi:10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.4.110707.172338
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, N., 2007. Nature as accumulation strategy. Socialist Register, 43 (16), 16–36.
   Google Scholar
• Solomon, B.D. and Gorman, H.S., 2002. The origins, practice, and limits of emissions trading. Journal of Policy History, 14 (3), 293–320. doi:10.1353/jph.2002.0015
   Google Scholar
• Streeck, W. and Yamamura, K., eds., 2001. The origins of nonliberal capitalism: Germany and Japan in comparison. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stuart, D., Gunderson, R., and Petersen, B., 2017. Climate change and the Polanyian counter-movement: carbon markets or degrowth? New Political Economy, 1–14. doi:10.1080/13563467.2017.1417364
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarrow, S., 2018. Mann, war, and cyberspace: dualities of infrastructural power in America. Theory and Society, 47 (1), 61–85. doi:10.1007/s11186-018-9306-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tietenberg, T., 2006. Emissions trading: principles and practice. Washington D.C.: Resources for the Future.
   Google Scholar
• Tischew, S., et al., 2010. Evaluating restoration success of frequently implemented compensation measures: results and demands for control procedures. Restoration Ecology, 18 (4), 467–480. doi:10.1111/j.1526-100X.2008.00462.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, R.E., Redmond, A.M., and Zedler, J.B., 2001. Count it by acre or function—mitigation adds up to net loss of wetlands. National Wetlands Newsletter, 23 (6), 5–6, 14–16.
   Google Scholar
• United States, 2018. 33 U.S.C. §1344(a), Permits for Dredged or Fill Material. United States Code.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. House of Representatives, 2009. Proceedings and debates of the 111th congress, first session. Congressional Record, 155 (86), H6417–H6540. 10 June.
   Google Scholar
• Vaissière, A.-C. and Levrel, H., 2015. Biodiversity offset markets: what are they really? An empirical approach to wetland mitigation banking. Ecological Economics, 110, 81–88. Feb. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veblen, T., 2009. The theory of the leisure class; an economic study of institutions. New York: Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Vogel, S., 1996. Freer markets, more rules: regulatory reform in advanced industrial countries. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar