1,383
Views
10
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Triggers for policy change: the 3.11 Fukushima meltdowns and nuclear policy continuity

ORCID Icon, &

References

  • Abe, Y., 2013. Risk assessment of nuclear power by Japanese newspapers following the chernobyl nuclear disaster. International Journal of Communication, 7, 1968–1989.
  • Aldrich, D.P., 2005. The limits of flexible and adaptive institutions. In: D. Shaw and S. Hayden Lesbirel, eds. Managing conflict in facility siting: an international comparison. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 109–134.
  • Aldrich, D.P., 2010. Site fights: divisive facilities and civil society in Japan and the West. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  • Aldrich, D.P., Platte, J., and Sklarew, J, 2015. Japan may soon restart a nuclear power plant. Washington Post/Monkey Cage, 20 July.
  • Arlt, D. and Wolling, J., 2014. Fukushima effects in Germany? Changes in media coverage and public opinion on nuclear power. Public Understanding of Science, 25 (7), 1–16.
  • Bargheer, S., 2018. Apocalypse adjourned: the rise and decline of cold war environmentalism in Germany. Environmental Politics, 27 (6), 1–14. doi:10.1080/09644016.2018.1459033
  • Bernardi, L., et al., 2018. The effects of the Fukushima disaster on nuclear energy debates and policies: a two-step comparative examination. Environmental Politics, 27 (1), 42–68. doi:10.1080/09644016.2017.1383007
  • Birkland, T., 1997. After disaster: agenda setting, public policy, and focusing events. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
  • Bocher, M. and Toller, A. 2012. Umweltpolitik in Deutschland: Eine politikfeldanalytische Einführung. Berlin: Springer.
  • Boyle, E., 1998. Political frames and legal activity: the case of nuclear power in four countries. Law and Society, 32 (1), 141–174. doi:10.2307/827751
  • Döring, H. and Manow, P., 2018. Parliaments and governments database (ParlGov): information on parties, elections and cabinets in modern democracies. Available from: www.parlgov.org [Accessed 9 July 2018].
  • Dusinberre, M. and Aldrich, D., 2011. Hatoko comes home: civil society and nuclear power in Japan. The Journal of Asian Studies, 70 (3), 683–705. doi:10.1017/S0021911811000866
  • Egle, C. and Zohlnhöfer, R., eds., 2007. Das rot-grüne Projekt. Eine Bilanz der Regierung Schröder 1998–2002. Opladen: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
  • Freeman, L.A., 2000. Closing the shop: information cartels and Japan’s mass media. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Fuhrmann, M., 2012. Splitting atoms: why do countries build nuclear power plants? International Interactions, 38 (1), 29–57. doi:10.1080/03050629.2012.640209
  • Geddes, B., 2003. Paradigms and sand castles: theory building and research design in comparative politics. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.
  • Hall, I. 1997. Cartels of the Mind: Japan’s Intellectual Closed Shop. New York, NY: Norton.
  • Hayashi, M. and Hughes, L., 2013. The Fukushima nuclear accident and its effect on global energy security. Energy Policy, 59, 102–111. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2012.11.046
  • Heintz, M., 2010. Der Atomausstieg in Deutschland. Eine Untersuchung anhand der Parteiendifferenzthese und des Vetospielertheorems. München: Grin.
  • Hindmarsh, R. and Priestley, R., eds., 2016. The Fukushima effect: A new geopolitical terrain. New York, NY: Taylor and Francis.
  • Huenteler, J., Schmidt, T., and Kanie, N., 2012. Japan’s post Fukushima Challenge – implications from the Germany experience on renewable energy policy. Energy Policy, 45, 6–11. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2012.02.041
  • Hug, S., 2003. Selection bias in comparative research: the case of incomplete data sets. Political Analysis, 11 (3), 255–274. doi:10.1093/pan/mpg014
  • Hughes, L., 2016. Renegotiating Japan’s Energy Compact. In: C. Hager and C. Stefes, eds. Germany’s energy transition: a comparative perspective. London: Palgrave, 165–184.
  • Hymans, J. 2011. Veto Players, Nuclear Energy, and Nonproliferation: Domestic Institutional Barriers to a Japanese Bomb. International Security. 36(2): 154–189.
  • Imtihani, N. and Mariko, Y., 2013. Media coverage of Fukushima nuclear power station accident. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 17, 938–946. doi:10.1016/j.proenv.2013.02.112
  • Iwasaki, K., Sawada, Y., and Aldrich, D.P., 2017. Social capital as a shield against unusually poor mental health among displaced residents from Fukushima. Natural Hazards, 89 (1), 405–421. doi:10.1007/s11069-017-2971-7
  • Kepplinger, H. and Lemke, R., 2014. In: J. Wolling and D. Arlt, eds. Fukushima und die Folgen – Medienberichterstattung, Öffentliche Meinung, Politische Konsequenzen. Ilmenau: Universitätsverlag, 125–152.
  • Kepplinger, H.M., 1988. Die Kernenergie in der Presse. Eine Analyse zum Einfluss subjektiver Faktoren auf die Konstruktion von Realität. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 40 (4), 659–683.
  • King, G., Pan, J., and Roberts, M.E., 2017. How the Chinese government fabricates social media posts for strategic distraction, not engaged argument. American Political Science Review, 111 (3), 484–501. doi:10.1017/S0003055417000144
  • King, G., Tomz, M. and Wittenberg, J. 2000. Making the Most of Statistical Analyses: Improving Interpretation and Presentation. American Journal of Political Science, 44, Pp. 341–355.
  • Kitschelt, H., 1986. Political opportunity structures and political protest: anti-nuclear movements in four democracies. British Journal of Political Science, 16 (1), 57–85. doi:10.1017/S000712340000380X
  • Lieberman, E.S., 2005. Nested analysis as a mixed-method strategy for comparative research. The American Political Science Review, 99 (3), 435–452. doi:10.1017/S0003055405051762
  • Merkel, A., 2011. Regierungserklärung Zur Aktuellen Lage in Japan. Deutscher Bundestag, 17 (03).
  • Okumura, N., 2009. Pseudo-democracy of the Japanese press: kisha clubs and unwritten rules. Ritsumeikan Social Sciences Review, 44 (4), 35–46.
  • Olson, R.S. and Gawronski, V.T., 2003. Disasters as critical junctures? Managua, Nicaragua 1972 and Mexico City 1985. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 21 (1), 3–35.
  • Park, J. and Sovacool, B., 2018. The contested politics of the Asian atom: peripheralisation and nuclear power in South Korea and Japan. Environmental Politics, 27 (4), 686–711. doi:10.1080/09644016.2018.1439436
  • Pekkanen, R., 2000. Japan’s new politics: the case of the NPO law. Journal of Japanese Studies, 26 (1), 111–148. doi:10.2307/133393
  • Persico, S., et al., 2012. Action publique et partis politiques: l’analyse de l’agenda législatif français entre 1981 et 2009. Gouvernement et action publique, 1, 11–35. doi:10.3917/gap.121.0011
  • Roose, J., 2010. Der endlose Streit um die Atomenergie. Konfliktsoziologische Untersuchung einer dauerhaften Auseinandersetzung. In: H Feindt. and T. Saretzki, eds. Umwelt- und Technikkonflikte. Wiesbaden: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 79–103.
  • Samuels, R., 1987. The business of the Japanese State. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  • Samuels, R., 2013. 3.11: disaster and change in Japan. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  • Scalise, P.J., 2013. Policy images, issue frames, and technical realities: emerging post-Fukushima energy policies. Social Science Japan Journal, 16 (1), 301–308. doi:10.1093/ssjj/jyt011
  • Schreurs, M., 2002. Environmental politics in Japan, Germany, and the United States. Cambridge, UK: University of Cambridge Press.
  • Steltemeir, P., 2012. Das Wahlergebnis der Partei Bündnis 90/Die Grünen bei der Landtagswahl in Baden Württemberg 2011. Ein theoretischer Erklärungsversuch mithilfe des Ann-Arbor-Ansatzes, Working Paper, Cen Working Papers. Centre for German and European Studies. Available from: http://www.zdes.spbu.ru/assets/files/wp/2012/WP_2012_5__Steltemeier.pdf
  • t’Hart, P. and Boin, A., 2001. Between crisis and normalcy: the long shadow of post-crisis politics. In: U. Rosenthal, ed. Managing crises: threats, dilemmas, opportunities. Springfield, MA: Charles C. Thomas Publisher, 28–46.
  • Weiß, H., Markutzyk, S., and Schwotzer, B., 2014. Deutscher Atomausstieg made in Japan? In: J. Wolling and D. Arlt, eds. Fukushima und die Folgen – medienberichterstattung, Öffentliche Meinung, Politische Konsequenzen. Ilmenau: Universitätsverlag, 125–152. Available from Accessed

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.