Overcoming bureaucratic silos? Environmental policy integration in the Obama administration

References

• Andrews, R., et al., 2009. Centralization, organizational strategy, and public sector performance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19 (1), 57–80. doi:10.1093/jopart/mum039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barber, E. and Teitz, M., 2009. Blueprint planning in California: an experiment in regional planning for sustainable development. In: D.A. Mazmanian and M.E. Kraft, eds. Toward sustainable communities: transitions and transformations in environmental policy. 2nd ed. Cambridge. MA: MIT Press, 171–200.
   Google Scholar
• Bartlett, R., ed, 1989. Policy through impact assessment: institutionalized analysis as a policy strategy. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
   Google Scholar
• Biesbroek, G.R., et al., 2013. On the nature of barriers to climate change adaptation. Regional Environmental Change, 13 (5), 119–1129. doi:10.1007/s10113-013-0421-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogdanor, V.E., 2005. Joined-up government. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bolleyer, N., 2011. The influence of political parties on policy coordination. Governance, 24 (3), 469–494. doi:10.1111/gove.2011.24.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryner, G. and Duffy, R., 2012. Integrating climate, energy, and air pollution policies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Caldwell, L., 1975. Man and his environment: policy and administration. New York: Harper and Row.
   Google Scholar
• Candel, J. and Biesbroek, R., 2016. Toward a processual understanding of policy integration. Policy Sciences, 1–21. Available from: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11077-016-9248-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrigan, C., 2018. Unpacking the effects of competing mandates on agency performance. Public Administration Review, accessed July 18, 2018. doi:10.1111/puar.12912
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carswell, C., 2017. The contradictions at the heart of the fight over methane rules. High Country News, (February7 Available from:) http://www.hcn.org/articles/the-contradictions-at-the-heart-of-the-fight-over-methane-rules
   Google Scholar
• Chapin, T.S., 2012. Introduction: from growth controls, to comprehensive planning, to smart growth: planning’s emerging fourth wave. Journal of the American Planning Association, 78 (1), 5–15. doi:10.1080/01944363.2011.645273
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chow, D., Humphrey, C., and Moll, J., 2007. Developing whole of government accounting in the U.K.: grand claims, practical complexities, and suggested future research agenda. Financial Accountability and Management, 23 (1), 27–54. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0408.2007.00418.x
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, T., Fimreite, A.L., and Laegreid, P., 2014. Joined-up government for welfare reform administration in Norway. Public Organization Review, 14 (4), 439–456. doi:10.1007/s11115-013-0237-8
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, T. and Laegreid, P., 2007. The whole-of-government approach to public sector reform. Public Administration Review, 67 (6), 1059–1066. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00797.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chun, Y. and Rainey, H., 2005. Goal ambiguity and organizational performance in U.S. federal agencies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15 (1), 529–557. doi:10.1093/jopart/mui030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, T., 2002. New Labour’s big idea: joined-up government. Social Policy and Society, 1 (2), 107–117. doi:10.1017/S1474746402000234
   Google Scholar
• Colburn, K., et al., 2013. Integrating environmental and energy policy. Regulatory Assistance Project. Available from: http://www.raponline.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/rap-colburngerhard-integratingenergyenvironmentalpolicy-2012-dec-31.pdf. [Accessed July 17, 2018.]
   Google Scholar
• Cook, J.J., 2014. Explaining innovation: the Environmental Protection Agency, rule making, and stakeholder engagement. Environmental Practice, 16 (3), 171–181. doi:10.1017/S1466046614000167
   Google Scholar
• Cook, J.J., 2018. The EPA, NHTSA, and the multiple streams drive climate policy in the United States. Environmental Practice, 20 (1), 23–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, J.C. and Mazurek, J., 1998. Pollution control in the United States: evaluating the system. Washington, D.C.: Resources for the Future.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, J.S., 2009. The limits of joined-up government: towards a practical analysis. Public Administration, 87 (1), 80–96. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2008.01740.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Den Uyl, R.M. and Russel, D., 2018. Climate adaptation in fragmented governance settings: the consequences of reform in public administration. Environmental Politics, 27 (2), 341–361. doi:10.1080/09644016.2017.1386341
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dryzek, J., 2005. The politics of the Earth: environmental discourses. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dunleavy, P., et al. 2006. New public management is dead—long live digital era governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16 (3), 467–494. doi:10.1093/jopart/mui057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission, 2007. EU report on policy coherence for development: COM (2007) 545. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Fiorino, D.J., 2006. The new environmental regulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fountain, J., 2013. The GPRA Modernization Act of 2010: Examining constraints to, and providing tools for cross-agency collaboration. Washington, D.C.: Administrative Conference of the United States.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, J., 2011. The Obama administration’s national auto policy: lessons from the “car deal.”. Harvard Environmental Law Review, 35 (2), 344–374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Funke, O., 1993. Struggling with integrated environmental policy: the EPA experience. Review of Policy Research, 11 (3–4), 137–161. doi:10.1111/j.1541-1338.1993.tb00557.x
   Google Scholar
• Gerlak, A.E., Heikkila, T., and Lubell, M., 2013. The promise and performance of collaborative governance. In: S. Kamieniecki and K. Me, eds. The Oxford Handbook of U.S. Environmental Policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 413–434.
   Google Scholar
• Gerth, H.H. and Mills, C.W., eds, 1946. From max weber: essays in sociology. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gilad, S., 2015. Political pressures, organizational identity and attention to tasks: illustrations from pre-crisis financial regulation. Public Administration, 93 (3), 593–608. doi:10.1111/padm.12155
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howlett, M. and Ramesh, M., 2014. The two orders of governance failure: design mismatches and policy capacity issues in modern governance. Policy and Society, 33 (4), 317–327. doi:10.1016/j.polsoc.2014.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan, A. and Lenschow, A., 2008. Innovation in environmental policy? Integrating the environment for sustainability. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, A. and Lenschow, A., 2010. Environmental policy integration: a state of the art review. Environmental Policy and Governance, 20 (3), 147–158. doi:10.1002/eet.v20:3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalafatis, S., 2018. When do climate change, sustainability, and economic development considerations overlap in cities? Environmental Politics, 27 (1), 115–138. doi:10.1080/09644016.2017.1373419
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keiser, L.R. and Meier, K., 1996. Policy design, bureaucratic incentives, and public management: the case of child support enforcement. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 6 (3), 337–364. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024316
   Google Scholar
• Kickbusch, I., 2010. Health in all policies: the evolution of the concept of horizontal health governance. In: I. Kickbusch and K. Buckett, eds. Implementing health in all policies. Adelaide: Department of Health, Government of South Australia, 11–24.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, R.J.T., et al., 2005. Integrating mitigation and adaptation into climate and development policy: three research questions. Environmental Science and Policy, 8 (6), 579–588. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2005.06.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klyza, C. and Sousa, D., 2013. American environmental policy: beyond gridlock. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. updated and expanded Edition.
   Google Scholar
• Kraft, M.E., 2018. Environmental policy in Congress. In: N.J. Vig and M.E. Kraft, eds. Environmental policy: new directions for the twenty-first century. 10th ed. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press, 117–143.
   Google Scholar
• Laffan, B. and O’Mahoney, J., 2007. Managing Europe from an Irish perspective: critical junctures and the increasing formalization of the core executive in Ireland. Public Administration, 85 (1), 167–188. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2007.00639.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lafferty, W. and Hovden, E., 2003. Environmental policy integration: towards an analytical framework. Environmental Politics, 12 (3), 1–22. doi:10.1080/09644010412331308254
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenschow, A., 2002. Greening the European Union: an introduction. In: A. Lenschow, ed. Environmental policy integration: greening sectoral policies in Europe. London: Earthscan, 3–21.
   Google Scholar
• Lubell, M., Leach, W.D., and Sabatier, P.A. 2009. Collaborative watershed partnerships in the epoch of sustainability. In: D.A. Mazmanian et al., eds. Toward sustainable communities: transitions and transformations in environmental policy. 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 255–288.
   Google Scholar
• Mawson, J. and Hall, S., 2000. Joining it up locally: area regeneration and holistic government in England. Regional Studies, 34 (1), 67–74. doi:10.1080/00343400050005899
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May, P.J., et al., 2005. Policy coherence and component-driven policymaking: arctic policy in Canada and the United States. Policy Studies Journal, 33 (1), 37–63. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.2005.00091.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May, P.J., Jochim, A., and Sapotichne, J., 2011. Constructing homeland security: an anemic policy regime. Policy Studies Journal, 39 (2), 285–307. doi:10.1111/psj.2011.39.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meijers, E. and Stead, D., 2004. Policy integration: what does it mean and how can it be achieved? A multi-disciplinary review. Paper presented at the 2004 Berlin Conference on the Human Dimensions of Global Environmental Change: Greening of Policies—Interlinkages and Policy Integration, Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• Milman, O., 2017. Trump budget would gut EPA programs tackling climate change and pollution, March 16. The Guardian. Available from: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2017/mar/16/trump-budget-cuts-climate-change-clean-up-programs-epa.
   Google Scholar
• Moomaw, W., et al., 1999. The Kyoto Protocol: a blueprint for sustainability. Journal of Environment and Development, 8 (1), 82–90. doi:10.1177/107049659900800106 Available from:
   Google Scholar
• NHTSA, no date. a. NHTSA’s core values. Available from: https://www.nhtsa.gov/about-nhtsa/nhtsas-core-values. [Accessed July 17, 2018].
   Google Scholar
• Nilsson, M. and Persson, A., 2003. Framework for analyzing environmental policy integration. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 5 (4), 333–559. doi:10.1080/1523908032000171648
   Google Scholar
• Nunan, F., Campbell, A., and Foster, E., 2012. Environmental mainstreaming: the organisational challenges of policy integration. Public Administration and Development, 32 (3), 262–277. doi:10.1002/pad.1624
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Leary, R. and Vij, N., 2012. Collaborative public management: where have we been and where are we going? The American Review of Public Management, 42 (5), 507–522. doi:10.1177/0275074012445780
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oberthur, S., 2009. Interplay management: enhancing environmental policy integration among international institutions. International Environmental Agreements—Politics, Law, and Economics, 9 (4), 371–391. doi:10.1007/s10784-009-9109-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ott, J.S., 1989. The organizational culture perspective. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
   Google Scholar
• Persson, A., 2004. Environmental policy integration: an introduction. Policy integration for sustainability background paper. Stockholm: Stockholm Environmental Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, B.G., 1998. Managing horizontal government: the politics of co-ordination. Public Administration, 76 (2), 295–311. doi:10.1111/padm.1998.76.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, B.G., 2015. Pursuing horizontal management: the politics of public sector coordination. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.
   Google Scholar
• Plumer, B., 15 Mar 2017a. Trump’s plan to roll back Obama’s fuel economy rules for cars, explained. Vox.com. Available from: http://www.vox.com/energy-and-environment/2017/3/15/14828070/trump-fuel-economy-standards. [Accessed July 17, 2018].
   Google Scholar
• Plumer, B., 2017b. Trump’s big new executive order to tear up Obama’s climate policies, explained. March 28. Vox.com. Available from: http://www.vox.com/energy-and-environment/2017/3/27/14922516/trump-executive-order-climate. [Accessed July 17, 2018].
   Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C., 2003. Joined-up government: a survey. Political Studies Review, 1 (1), 34–49. doi:10.1111/1478-9299.00004
   Google Scholar
• Ross, A. and Dovers, S., 2008. Making the harder yards: environmental policy integration in Australia. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 67 (3), 245–260. doi:10.1111/ajpa.2008.67.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanchirico, J.N., et al., 2010. Comprehensive planning, dominant-use zones, and user rights: a new area in ocean governance. Bulletin of Marine Sciences, 86 (2), 273–285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schout, A., 2001. Managing environmental policy integration at the national level: from event to issue coordination. Paper presented at the Seventh ECSA Biennial Conference, Madison, WI.
   Google Scholar
• Shalala, D., 1998. Guest editorial: are large public organizations manageable? Public Administration Review, 58 (4), 284–289. doi:10.2307/977557 Available from:
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steurer, R. and Berger, G., 2010. Horizontal policy integration: concepts, administrative barriers, and selected practices. institute of forest, environmental, and natural resource policy. Vienna, Austria: University of Natural Resources and Applied Life Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• The White House. 2009a. Remarks by the President on national fuel efficiency standards. Available from: https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/remarks-president-national-fuel-efficiency-standards. [Accessed 17 Nov 2016].
   Google Scholar
• The White House, 2009b. President Obama announces national fuel efficiency policy. Available from: https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/president-obama-announces-national-fuel-efficiency-policy. [Accessed November 17, 2016].
   Google Scholar
• Tosun, J. and Lang, A., 2017. Policy integration: mapping the different concepts. Policy Studies, 38 (6), 553–570. doi:10.1080/01442872.2017.1339239
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tosun, J. and Solario, I., 2011. Exploring the energy-environment relationship in the EU: perspectives and challenges for theorizing and empirical analysis. European Integration Online Papers, 15 (1), 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Trein, P., 2017. Coevolution of policy sectors: a comparative analysis of health care and public health. Public Administration, 95 (3), 744–758. doi:10.1111/padm.2017.95.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trein, P., Meyer, I., and Maggetti, M., 2017. The integration and coordination of public policies: a systematic review of the literature. Unpublished Paper. University of Lausanne.
   Google Scholar
• Turnpenny, J., et al., 2008. Why is integrating policy assessment so hard? A comparative analysis of the institutional capacities and constraints. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 51 (6), 759–775. doi:10.1080/09640560802423541
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Bureau of Land Management, 2016a. Energy and minerals: methane and waste prevention rule. Available from: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2016/11/18/2016-27637/waste-prevention-production-subject-to-royalties-and-resource-conservation.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Bureau of Land Management, 2016b. BLM fact sheet on methane and waste production rule. Available from: https://www.doi.gov/sites/doi.gov/files/uploads/methane_waste_prevention_rule_factsheet.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Bureau of Land Management, 2016c. Question and answers for methane waste rule Available from: https://www.blm.gov/sites/blm.gov/files/documents/files/oilandgas_QandA_WastePreventionRuleFinal.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Interior, 2016. Interior department announces final rule to reduce methane emissions & wasted gas on public, tribal lands press release, November 15. Available from: https://www.doi.gov/pressreleases/interior-department-announces-final-rule-reduce-methane-emissions-wasted-gas-public.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2011. Oil and natural gas sector: new source performance standards and national emission standards for hazardous air pollutants reviews. Federal Register, 76 (163), 52738–52843.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2015c. Carbon pollution emission guidelines for existing stationary sources: electric utility generating units; final rule. Federal Register. 80 (205), 64661–65120. Available from: https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2015-10-23/pdf/2015-22842.pdf
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2016. Inventory of U.S. greenhouse gas emissions and sinks: 1990–2014. EPA 430-R-16-002. Available from: https://www3.epa.gov/climatechange/Downloads/ghgemissions/US-GHG-Inventory-2016-Main-Text.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2017a. Our mission and what we do. Available from: https://www.epa.gov/aboutepa/our-mission-and-what-we-do.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2017b. 2009 Commitment letters for MY 2012–2016 light-duty national program. Available from: https://www.epa.gov/regulations-emissions-vehicles-and-engines/2009-commitment-letters-my-2012-2016-light-duty-national.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA), 30 Sep 2010a. FY 2011–2015 EPA strategic plan: achieving our vision.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and Department of Transportation (U.S. EPA & U.S. DOT), 2010. Light-duty vehicles greenhouse gas emission standards and corporate average fuel economy standards, final rule. Federal Register, 73 (88). 25324–25728. Available from: http://www.nhtsa.gov/staticfiles/rulemaking/pdf/cafe/CAFE-GHG_MY_2012-2016_Final_Rule_FR.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, 2012. Air, climate, and energy strategic research action plan, 2012–2016. EPA 601/R-12/003.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, 2015a. Science to protect public health and the environment: EPA research program overview, 2016–2019. EPA 601/K-15/007.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, 2015b. Air, climate and energy strategic research action plan, 2016–2019. EPA 601/K-15/005.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (U.S. EPA), 2009. Notice of upcoming joint rulemaking to establish vehicle GHG emissions and CAFÉ standards. 74 Federal Reg, 24, 007.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (U.S. EPA), 2010b. Prevention of significant deterioration and title V greenhouse gas tailoring rule; final rule. 75 Federal Register, 106, 31415–31608. Available from:
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Executive Office of the President, June 2013. The President’s climate action plan. https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/image/president27sclimateactionplan.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Government Accountability Office, 2010a. GAO-11-34. Federal oil and gas leases: opportunities exist to capture vented and flared natural gas, which would increase royalty payments and reduce greenhouse gases.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Government Accountability Office, 2010b. GAO-10-336. Vehicle fuel economy report: NHTSA and EPA’s partnership for setting fuel economy and greenhouse gas emissions standards improved analysis and should be maintained 3–4.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Government Accountability Office, 2012. GAO-12–1022. Managing for results: key considerations for implementing interagency collaborative mechanisms. Available from: https://www.gao.gov/assets/650/648934.pdf. [Accessed 1 Dec 2017]
   Google Scholar
• Underdal, A., 1980. Integrated marine policy: what? Why? How? Marine Policy, 4 (3), 159–169. doi:10.1016/0308-597X(80)90051-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vig, N. and Kraft, M.E., 2018. U.S. environmental policy: achievements and new directions. In: N. Vig and M. Kraft, eds. Environmental policy: new directions for the twenty-first century. 10th ed. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press, 2–32.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, M., Bulkeley, H., and Hudson, R., 2008. Unpicking environmental policy integration with tales from waste management. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 26 (3), 481–498. doi:10.1068/c0510j
   Google Scholar
• Weible, C.M. and Sabatier, P., 2018. Theories of the policy process. 4th ed. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, J.Q., 1989. Bureaucracy. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R.K., 2009. Case study research design and methods. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc..
   Google Scholar
• 6, P., 2004. Joined-up government in the western world in comparative perspective: a preliminary literature review and exploration. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 14 (1), 102–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar