1,599
Views
13
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Explaining support for renewable energy: commitments to self-sufficiency and communion

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon

References

  • Abele, A.E. and Wojciszke, B., 2007. Agency and communion from the perspective of self versus others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 751–753.
  • Beagan, B., Chapman, G.E., and Power, E.M., 2016. Cultural and symbolic capital with and without economic constraint. Food, Culture and Society, 19 (1), 45–70. doi:10.1080/15528014.2016.1145002
  • Bolsen, T., Druckman, J.N., and Cook, F.L., 2014. Communication and collective actions: a survey experiment on motivating energy conservation in the US. Journal of Experimental Political Science, 1 (1), 24–38. doi:10.1017/xps.2014.2
  • Brewer, M.D. and Stonecash, J.M., 2015. Polarization and the politics of personal responsibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Brounen, D. and Kok, N., 2011. On the economics of energy labels in the housing market. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 62, 166–179. doi:10.1016/j.jeem.2010.11.006
  • Costa, D.L. and Kahn, M.E., 2013. Energy conservation ‘nudges’ and environmentalist ideology. Journal of the European Economic Association, 11 (3), 680–702. doi:10.1111/jeea.12011
  • Cragg, M., et al., 2013. Carbon geography: the political economy of Congressional support for legislation intended to mitigate greenhouse gas production. Economic Inquiry, 51, 1640–1650. doi:10.1111/ecin.2013.51.issue-2
  • Cruz, S.M., 2017. The relationships of political ideology and party affiliation with environmental concern. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 53, 81–91. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2017.06.010
  • Currie, S. and Choma, B., 2018. Sociopolitical ideology and the morality of green behavior. Environmental Politics, 27 (2), 247–266. doi:10.1080/09644016.2017.1413727
  • Dastrup, S.R., et al. 2012. Understanding the solar home price premium: electricity generation and ‘green’ social status. European Economic Review, 56 (5), 961–973. doi:10.1016/j.euroecorev.2012.02.006
  • Devine-Wright, P. 2007. Reconsidering public attitudes and public acceptance of renewable energy technologies. ESRC Working Paper 1.4. Available from: https://doc.uments.com/download/s-reconsidering-public-attitudes-and-public-acceptance-of-renewable.pdf [Accessed 1 July 2018].
  • Dietz, T., Dan, A., and Shwom, R., 2007. Support for climate change policy: social psychological and social structural influences. Rural Sociology, 72 (2), 185–214. doi:10.1526/003601107781170026
  • Dunlap, R.E., McCright, A.M., and Yarosh, J.H., 2016. The political divide on climate change. Environment, Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 58 (5), 4–23. doi:10.1080/00139157.2016.1208995
  • Dunlap, R.E., et al., 2000. New trends in measuring environmental attitudes. Journal of Social Issues, 56 (3), 425–442. doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00176
  • Eriksson, K., 2018. Republicans value agency, Democrats value communion. Social Psychology Quarterly, 81 (2), 173–184. doi:10.1177/0190272518771060
  • European Union, 2017. Special eurobarometer 459 ‘Climate change’ report. Project Number. 2017.4763. Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/clima/sites/clima/files/support/docs/report_2017_en.pdf [Accessed 10 July 2018].
  • Farrell, J., 2015. The battle for Yellowstone. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Farstad, F.M., 2017. What explains variation in parties’ climate change salience? Party Politics, 1–10. doi:10.1177/1354068817693473
  • Feinberg, M. and Willer, R., 2013. The moral roots of environmental attitudes. Psychological Science, 24 (1), 56–62. doi:10.1177/0956797612449177
  • Feinberg, M. and Willer, R., 2015. From gulf to bridge: when do moral arguments facilitate political influence? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41 (12), 1665–1681. doi:10.1177/0146167215607842
  • Fielding, K.S., et al., 2012. Australian politicians’ beliefs about climate change. Environmental Politics, 21 (5), 712–733. doi:10.1080/09644016.2012.698887
  • Forchtner, B., Kroneder, A., and Wetzel, D., 2018. Being skeptical? Exploring far-Right climate-change communication in Germany. Environmental Communication, 12 (5), 589–604. doi:10.1080/17524032.2018.1470546
  • Funk, C. and Kennedy, B., 2016. Public opinion on renewables and other energy sources [online]. Pew Research Center Internet and Technology. Available from: http://www.pewinternet.org/2016/10/04/public-opinion-on-renewables-and-other-energy-sources/ [Accessed 4 October 2016].
  • Gromet, D.M., Kunreuther, H., and Larrick, R.P., 2013. Political ideology affects energy-efficiency attitudes and choices. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110 (23), 9314–9319. doi:10.1073/pnas.1218453110
  • Haidt, J. and Graham, J., 2007. When morality opposes justice: conservatives have moral intuitions that liberals may not recognize. Social Justice Research, 20 (1), 98–116. doi:10.1007/s11211-007-0034-z
  • Halbheer, D., Niggli, S., and Schmultzler, A., 2006. What does it take to sell environmental policy? An empirical analysis of referendum data. Environmental and Resource Economics, 33, 441–462. doi:10.1007/s10640-005-4993-y
  • Hess, D.J., Mai, Q.D., and Brown, K.P., 2016. Red states, green laws: ideology and renewable energy legislation in the United States. Energy Research and Social Science, 11, 19–28. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2015.08.007
  • Kennedy, B., 2017. Two-thirds of Americans give priority to developing alternative energy over fossil fuels [online]. Factank: news in the numbers, Pew Research. Available from: http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/01/23/two-thirds-of-americans-give-priority-to-developing-alternative-energy-over-fossil-fuels/ [[Accessed 23 January 2017]].
  • Koleva, S.P., et al. 2012. Tracing the threads: how five moral concerns (especially purity) help explain culture war attitudes. Journal of Research in Personality, 46 (2), 184–194. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2012.01.006
  • Laidley, T.M., 2013. The influence of social class and cultural variables on environmental behaviors. Environment and Behavior, 45 (2), 170–197. doi:10.1177/0013916511416647
  • Lockwood, M., 2018. Right-wing populism and the climate change agenda. Environmental Politics, 27 (4), 721–732. doi:10.1080/09644016.2018.1458411
  • Matisoff, D.C. and Edwards, J., 2014. Kindred spirits of intergovernmental competition? The innovation and diffusion of energy policies in the American states (1990-2008). Environmental Politics, 23 (5), 795–817. doi:10.1080/09644016.2014.923639
  • McCright, A.M. and Dunlap, R.E., 2011. Cool dudes: the denial of climate change among conservative white males in the United States. Global Environmental Change, 21 (4), 1163–1172. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.06.003
  • McCright, A.M., Dunlap, R.E., and Marquart-Pyatt, S.T., 2016. Political ideology and views about climate change in the European Union. Environmental Politics, 25 (2), 338–358. doi:10.1080/09644016.2015.1090371
  • McCright, A.M., Xiao, C., and Dunlap, R.E., 2014. Political polarization on support for government spending on environmental protection in the USA, 1974-2012. Social Science Research, 48, 251–260. doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2014.06.008
  • MORI, 2005. Energy issues research. London: EDF Energy.
  • Mutz, D.C., 2011. Population-based survey experiments. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Obradovich, N. and Guenther, S.M., 2016. Collective responsibility amplifies mitigation behaviors. Climatic Change, 137 (1–2), 307–319. doi:10.1007/s10584-016-1670-9
  • Pew, 2009. Global warming seen as a major problem around the world. Pew Research Center: Global Attitudes and Trends. Available from: http://www.pewglobal.org/2009/12/02/global-warming-seen-as-a-major-problem-around-the-world-less-concern-in-the-us-china-and-russia/ [Accessed 10 July 2018].
  • Poortinga, W., Steg, L., and Vlek, C., 2004. Values, environmental concern, and environmental behavior. Environment and Behavior, 36, 70–93. doi:10.1177/0013916503251466
  • Prager, D., 1995. The American tradition of personal responsibility [online]. Heritage Foundation. Available from: https://www.heritage.org/political-process/report/the-american-tradition-personal-responsibility [[Accessed 27 March 2018]].
  • Public Opinion Strategies, 2016. Post-election national clean energy survey [online]. Available from: http://www.conservativeenergynetwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/Clean-Energy-Survey4.pdf [Accessed 29 March 2018].
  • Rai, V. and Beck, A.L., 2015. Public perceptions and information gaps in solar energy in Texas. Environmental Research Letters, 10 (7), 074011. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/10/7/074011
  • Rai, V. and McAndrews, K., 2012. Decision-making and behavior change in residential adopters of solar PV. Proceedings of the world renewable energy forum 4:2875-2880, Denver, CO: World Renewable Energy.
  • Reiner, D.M., et al., 2006. American exceptionalism? Similarities and differences in national attitudes toward energy policy and global warming. Environmental Science and Technology, 40 (7), 2093–2098.
  • Rubin, H.J. and Rubin, I.S., 2011. Qualitative interviewing: the art of hearing data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Schelly, C., 2014. Residential solar electricity adoption: what motivates and what matters? A case study of early adopters. Energy Research and Social Science, 2, 183–191. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2014.01.001
  • Schoolman, E.D., 2016. Completing the circuit: routine, reflection, and ethical consumption. Sociological Forum, 31 (3), 619–641. doi:10.1111/socf.2016.31.issue-3
  • Schultz, P.W., 2001. The structure of environmental concern. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21 (4), 327–339. doi:10.1006/jevp.2001.0227
  • Schulze, K., 2014. Do parties matter for international environmental cooperation? Environmental Politics, 23, 115–139. doi:10.1080/09644016.2012.740938
  • Steg, L., Shwom, R., and Dietz, T., 2018. What drives energy consumers? IEEE Power and Energy Magazine, 16 (1), 20–28. doi:10.1109/MPE.2017.2762379
  • Swedberg, R., 2014. The art of social theory. Princeton, NY: Princeton University Press.
  • Thalmann, P., 2004. The public acceptance of green taxes. Public Choice, 119, 179–217. doi:10.1023/B:PUCH.0000024165.18082.db
  • Timmermans, S. and Tavory, I., 2012. Theory construction in qualitative research. Sociological Theory, 30 (3), 167–186. doi:10.1177/0735275112457914
  • Tranter, B. and Booth, K., 2015. Scepticism in a changing climate. Global Environmental Change, 33, 154–164. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.05.003
  • Whitmarsh, L., 2011. Scepticism and uncertainty about climate change. Global Environmental Change, 21, 690–700. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.01.016
  • Wolske, K.S., Stern, P.C., and Dietz, T., 2017. Explaining interest in adopting residential solar photovoltaic systems in the United States. Energy Research and Social Science, 25, 134–151. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2016.12.023
  • Wüstenhagen, R., Wolsink, M., and Bürrer, M.J., 2007. Social acceptance of renewable energy innovation. Energy Policy, 35, 2683–2691. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2006.12.001

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.