730
Views
12
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Oil and power industries’ responses to EU emissions trading: laggards or low-carbon leaders?

&

References

  • Ambec, S., et al. 2011. The Porter hypothesis at 20: can environmental regulation enhance innovation and competitiveness? Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
  • Bach, M., 2019. The oil and gas sector: from climate laggards to climate leaders? Environmental Politics, 28, 1.
  • Bohr, J., 2016. The ‘climatism’ cartel: why climate change deniers oppose market-based mitigation policy. Environmental Politics, 25 (5), 812–830. doi:10.1080/09644016.2016.1156106.
  • CDP, 2015. Carbon disclosure project: Exxon’s response [online]. Available from: http://cdn.exxonmobil.com/~/media/global/files/energy-and-environment/2015_cdp_response-pdf.pdf [Accessed 4 June 2018].
  • Coll, S., 2011. Private empire: ExxonMobil and American power. New York: Penguin.
  • Cyert, R.M. and March, J.G., 1963. A behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Eikeland, P.O., 2013. Electric power industry. In: J.B. Skjærseth and P.O. Eikeland, eds. Corporate responses to EU emissions trading. Aldershot: Ashgate, 45–98.
  • Ellerman, A.C., Convery, F., and de Perthuis, C., 2010. Pricing carbon: the European Union emissions trading scheme. Cambridge University Press.
  • Eurelectric, 2002. Eurelectric comments to parliament on the commission’s proposal for a community greenhouse gas emissions trading scheme. Brussels: Eurelectric.
  • Eurelectric, 2007. Position paper on the review of the EU emissions trading directive (2003/87/EC) and the linking directive (2004/10/EC). Brussels: Eurelectric.
  • Eurelectric, 2009a. A declaration by European electricity sector chief executives [online]. Brussels: Eurelectric. Available from: http://www.eurelectric.org/CEO/CEODeclaration.asp [Accessed 4 May 2017].
  • Eurelectric, 2009b. Power choices—pathways to carbon-neutral electricity in Europe by 2050, full report. Brussels: Eurelectric.
  • Eurelectric, 2013. Consultation on structural options to strengthen the EU emissions trading system: a Eurelectric response. Brussels: Eurelectric.
  • Eurelectric, 2016. Reform of the EU ETS: a Eurelectric statement. Brussels: Eurelectric.
  • European Commission, 2006. EU ETS review: report on international competitiveness. Brussels: DG Environment.
  • European Commission, 15 July 2015. Proposal for a directive of the European parliament and of the council amending directive 2003/87/EC to enhance cost-effective emission reductions and low carbon investments, COM (2015) 337 final. Brussels: European Commission.
  • Europia, 2008. Position paper on the proposed directive amending directive 2003/87/EC. Brussels: European Petroleum Industry Association.
  • Europia, 2010a. White paper on EU refining: a contribution of the refining industry to the EU energy debate. Brussels: Europia.
  • Exxon, 2007. Exxon citizen report. Available from: http://exxonmobil.com/corporate/ [Accessed 12 June 2018].
  • ExxonMobil, 2010. The outlook for energy: a view to 2030 [online]. Available from: http://www.exxonmobil.com/Corporate/files/news_pub_eo.pdf [Accessed 4 June 2018].
  • Financial Times, 28 March 2017. Exxon urges Trump to keep US in Paris.
  • FuelsEurope, 2014. Statement on the proposed market stability mechanisms under the EU ETS Directive. Brussels: FuelsEurope.
  • FuelsEurope, 2015. FuelsEurope position on EU ETS Reform. Brussels: FuelsEurope.
  • Gravelle, H. and Rees, R., 1981. Microeconomics. London: Longman.
  • Guardian. 2017. The end of coal: EU energy companies pledge no new plants from 2020 [online], 5 April. Available from:: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2017/apr/05/the-end-of-coal-eu-energy-companies-pledge-no-new-plants-from-2020 [Accessed 3 May 2017].
  • Handelsblatt Global, 6 October 2016. Making a renewable giant [online]. Available from: https://global.handelsblatt.com/companies-markets/making-a-renewable-giant-619138 [Accessed 3 May 2017].
  • Homsy, G.C. and Warner, M.E., 2015. Cities and sustainability polycentric action and multilevel governance. Urban Affairs Review, 51 (1), 46–73. doi:10.1177/1078087414530545.
  • Kolk, A. and Pinkse, J., 2004. Market strategies for climate change. European Management Journal, 22 (3), 304–314. doi:10.1016/j.emj.2004.04.011.
  • Kolk, A. and Pinkse, J., 2008. A perspective on multinational enterprises and climate change: learning from ‘an inconvenient truth’? Journal of International Business Studies, 39 (8), 1359–1378. doi:10.1057/jibs.2008.61.
  • Liefferink, D. and Wurzel, R.K.W., 2017. Environmental leaders and pioneers: agents of change? Journal of European Public Policy, 24 (7), 651–668. doi:10.1080/13501763.2016.1161657.
  • Liefferink, D. and Wurzel, R.K.W., 2018. Leaders and pioneers in polycentric climate governance. In: A. Jordan, et al. eds. Governing climate change: polycentricity in action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Meckling, J., 2011. Carbon coalitions: business, climate politics, and the rise of emissions trading. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Porter, M. and van der Linde, C., 1995. Toward a new conception of the environment–competitiveness relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9 (4), 97–118. doi:10.1257/jep.9.4.97.
  • RWE, 2001. Environmental report 2001. Essen: RWE.
  • RWE, 2003. 2003 sustainability report. Essen: RWE.
  • RWE, (2013). Consultation on structural options to strengthen the EU emissions trading system—RWE’s response [online]. Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/clima/sites/clima/files/docs/0017/organisations/rwe_en.pdf [Accessed 4 May 2017].
  • Simon, H.A., 1976. Administrative behaviour: a study of decision-making processes in administrative organisation. 3rd ed. London: Free Press, Collier Macmillan.
  • Skjærseth, J.B., 2003. ExxonMobil: tiger or turtle on corporate social responsibility? FNI Report 7. Lysaker: The Fridtjof Nansen Institute.
  • Skjærseth, J.B., 2013. Oil industry. In: J.B. Skjærseth and P.O. Eikeland, eds.. Corporate responses to EU emissions trading. Aldershot: Ashgate, 99–126
  • Skjærseth, J.B., et al. 2016. Linking EU climate and energy policies: decision-making, implementation and reform. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  • Skjærseth, J.B., 2017. The European Commission’s shifting climate leadership. Global Environmental Politics, 17 (2), 84–105. doi:10.1162/GLEP_a_00402.
  • Skjærseth, J.B. and Eikeland, P.O., 2013. Corporate responses to EU emissions trading. Aldershot: Ashgate.
  • Skjærseth, J.B. and Skodvin, T., 2003. Climate change and the oil industry: common problem, varying strategies. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
  • Skjærseth, J.B. and Wettestad, J., 2008. EU emissions trading: initiation, decision-making and implementation. Aldershot: Ashgate.
  • Skjærseth, J.B. and Wettestad, J., 2010. Fixing the EU emissions trading system? Understanding the post-2012 changes. Global Environmental Politics, 10 (4), 101–123. doi:10.1162/GLEP_a_00033.
  • Teece, D.J., 2007. Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28 (13), 1319–1350. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1097-0266.
  • Tillerson, R., 2010. Remarks by Tex W. Tillerson, chairman and CEO [online]. http://www.exxonmobil.com/Corporate/energy_climate_views.aspx [Accessed 12 June 2012].
  • Vattenfall, 2013. Vattenfall consultation reply to the European Commission green paper: a 2030 framework for climate and energy policies [online]. Available from: https://crowdsourcing.simpolproject.eu/static/staticdata/gpc/consultations/vattenfall.pdf [Accessed 4 May 2017].
  • Vattenfall, 2015. Vattenfall annual and sustainability report 2014. Stockholm: Vattenfall.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.