Transition tensions: mapping conflicts in movements for a just and sustainable transition

References

• Agyeman, J., 2013. Introducing just sustainabilities: policy, planning, and practice. London: Zed.
   Google Scholar
• Agyeman, J., Bullard, R.D., and Evans, B., eds., 2003. Just sustainabilities: development in an unequal world. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, K., and Bows, A., 2011. Beyond ‘dangerous’ climate change: emission scenarios for a new world. philosophical transactions of the royal society a: mathematical. Physical and Engineering Sciences, 369 (1934), 20–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anguelovski, I., et al., 2018. Assessing green gentrification in historically disenfranchised neighborhoods: a longitudinal and spatial analysis of Barcelona. Urban Geography, 39 (3), 458–491. doi:10.1080/02723638.2017.1349987
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barry, J., 2012. Trades Unions and the Transition away from ‘actually existing unsustainability’: from economic crisis to a new political economy beyond growth. In: N. Rathzel and D. Uzzell, eds. Trades unions in the green economy: working for the environment. Abingdon, Oxon: Taylor and Francis, 227–241.
   Google Scholar
• Borowiak, C., et al., 2018. Navigating the fault lines: race and class in Philadelphia’s solidarity economy. Antipode, 50 (3), 577–603. doi:10.1111/anti.2018.50.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brulle, R.J. and Sicotte, D.M., 2017. Social movements for environmental justice through the lens of social movement theory. In: R. Holifield, J. Chakraborty, and G. Walker, eds. Routledge handbook of environmental justice. Abington, Oxon: Routledge, 25–36.
   Google Scholar
• Ciplet, D., et al., 2013. A burden to share? Addressing unequal climate impacts in the least developed countries. International Institute for Environment and Development. Available from: http://pubs.iied.org/pdfs/17181IIED.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ciplet, D., Roberts, J.T., and Khan, M.R., 2015. Power in a warming world: the new global politics of climate change and the remaking of environmental inequality. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Climate Justice Alliance, 2017. climate justice alliance just transition principles.. Available from: https://climateaccess.org/resource/just-transition-principles. [Accessed 6 January 2018].
   Google Scholar
• Cole, L.W. and Foster, S.R., 2001. From the ground up: environmental racism and the rise of the environmental justice movement. New York: NYU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Corcoran, B. and Gudiel, B., 2016. Column: Washington carbon tax doesn’t address environmental justice. PBS News Hour. November 8. Available from: https://www.pbs.org/newshour/economy/column-washingtons-carbon-tax-doesnt-address-environmental-justice
   Google Scholar
• Curley, A., 2018. A failed green future: Navajo green jobs and energy “transition” in the Navajo Nation. Geoforum, 88, 57–65. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.11.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Lopez, T., et al., 2009. Clean development mechanism and least developed countries: changing the rules for greater participation. The Journal of Environment & Development, 18 (4), 436–452. doi:10.1177/1070496509347744
   Google Scholar
• Dobson, A., 1998. Justice and the environment: conceptions of environmental sustainability and theories of distributive justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ehresman, T. and Okereke, C., 2015. Environmental justice and conceptions of the green economy. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 15 (1), 13–27. doi:10.1007/s10784-014-9265-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eilenberg, M., 2015. Shades of green and REDD: local and global contestations over the value of forest versus plantation development on the Indonesian forest frontier. Asia Pacific Viewpoint, 56 (1), 48–61. doi:10.1111/apv.2015.56.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elkington, J., 1994. Towards the sustainable corporation: win-win-win business strategies for sustainable development. California Management Review, 36 (2), 90–100. doi:10.2307/41165746
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrell, C., 2012. A just transition: lessons learned from the environmental justice movement. Duke Forum for Law and Social Change, 4 (45), 45–63.
   Google Scholar
• Farrell, C. and Stano, M., 2017. Is renewable power reaching the people and are the people reaching the power?: creating a just transition from the ground-up. In Environmental Justice in the Anthropocene-2017. Colorado State University. Libraries. Conference paper. Available from: https://dspace.library.colostate.edu/bitstream/handle/10217/183731/CONFCNRW_EJSymp20170424_FarrellStano.pdf?sequence=1
   Google Scholar
• Felli, R., 2014. An alternative socio-ecological strategy? International trade unions’ engagement with climate change. Review of International Political Economy, 21 (2), 372–398. doi:10.1080/09692290.2012.761642
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraser, N., 2000. Rethinking recognition. New Left Review, 3, 107–120.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, N. and Honneth, A., 2003. Redistribution or recognition?: a political-philosophical exchange. New York: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Gould, K.A. and Lewis, T.L., 2017. Green gentrification: urban sustainability and the struggle for environmental justice. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Grasso, M. and Roberts, J.T., 2014. A compromise to break the climate impasse. Nature Climate Change, 4 (7), 543–549. doi:10.1038/nclimate2259
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healy, N. and Barry, J., 2017. Politicizing energy justice and energy system transitions: fossil fuel divestment and a “just transition”. Energy Policy, 108, 451–459. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2017.06.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henley, B.J. and King, A.D., 2017. Trajectories toward the 1.5° C Paris target: modulation by the interdecadal pacific oscillation. Geophysical Research Letters, 44 (9), 4256–4262. doi:10.1002/2017GL073480
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobson, B., ed., 2003. Recognition struggles and social movements: contested identities, agency and power. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Indigenous Peoples’ Global Summit on Climate Change, 2009. The anchorage declaration. [Online]. Available from: http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2009/smsn/ngo/168.pdf
   Google Scholar
• International Energy Agency, 2017. Energy access outlook 2017 [online]. Available from: https://www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/publication/weo-2017-special-report-energy-access-outlook.html
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, M., 1999. Sustainable development as a contested concept. In: A. Dobson, ed. Fairness and futurity: essays on environmental sustainability and social justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 21–45.
   Google Scholar
• Just Transition Alliance, n.d. What we do. [online]. Available from: http://www.jtalliance.org/docs/whatwedo.html
   Google Scholar
• Keeble, B.R., 1988. The Brundtland report: ‘Our common future’. Medicine and War, 4 (1), 17–25. doi:10.1080/07488008808408783
   Google Scholar
• Klein, N., 2014. This changes everything: capitalism vs. the climate. New York: Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhlman, T. and Farrington, J., 2010. What is sustainability? Sustainability, 2 (11), 3436–3448. doi:10.3390/su2113436
   Google Scholar
• Labor Network for Sustainability, 2015. green jobs in a global green new deal. [online]. Available from: http://www.labor4sustainability.org/post/green-jobs-in-a-global-green-new-deal/
   Google Scholar
• Melucci, A., 1980. The new social movements: A theoretical approach. International Social Science Council, 19 (2), 199–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newell, P. and Mulvaney, D., 2013. The political economy of the ‘just transition’. The Geographical Journal, 179 (2), 132–140. doi:10.1111/geoj.2013.179.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsen, L., 2010. Supporting a just transition: the role of international labour standards. International Journal of Labour Research, 2 (2), 293–318.
   Google Scholar
• Pagiola, S., 2002. Paying for water services in Central America: learning from Costa Rica. In: S. Pagiola, et al., eds.. Selling forest environmental services: market-based mechanisms for conservation. Abingdon: Earthscan, 37–61.
   Google Scholar
• Pastor, M., et al., 2013. Risky business: cap-and-trade, public health, and environmental justice. In: C.G. Boone and M. Fragkias, eds.. Urbanization and sustainability: linking urban ecology, environmental justice and global environmental change. New York: Springer, 75–94.
   Google Scholar
• Pellow, D.N. and Brulle, R.J., 2005. Power, justice, and the environment: toward critical environmental justice studies. In: D.N. Pellow, et al. eds.. Power, justice, and the environment: a critical appraisal of the environmental justice movement. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Pellow, D.N., 2016. Toward a critical environmental justice studies. Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race, 13 (2), 1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Princen, T., 2003. Principles for sustainability: from cooperation and efficiency to sufficiency. Global Environmental Politics, 3 (1), 33–50. doi:10.1162/152638003763336374
   Google Scholar
• Rathzel, N. and Uzzell, D., 2011. Trade unions and climate change: the jobs versus environment dilemma. Global Environmental Change, 21 (4), 1215–1223. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.07.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rawls, J., 2009. A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, B.E., Holland, M.B., and Naughton-Treves, L., 2014. Does secure land tenure save forests? A meta-analysis of the relationship between land tenure and tropical deforestation. Global Environmental Change, 29, 281–293. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.05.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosemberg, A., 2010. Building a just transition: the linkages between climate change and employment. International Journal of Labour Research, 2 (2), 125–161.
   Google Scholar
• Schlosberg, D., 2007. Defining environmental justice: theories, movements, and nature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, L.R., 2011. Perverse incentives under the CDM: an evaluation of HFC-23 destruction projects. Climate Policy, 11 (2), 851–864. doi:10.3763/cpol.2010.0096
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scoones, I., Leach, M., and Newell, P., eds, 2015. The politics of green transformations. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A., 2009. The idea of justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shrader-Frechette, K., 2002. Environmental justice: creating equality, reclaiming democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• SouthWest Organizing Project, 1990. SouthWest Organizing Project Letter – March 15 1990 [online]. Available from: https://www.ejnet.org/ej/swop.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sovacool, B.K. and Dworkin, M.H., 2015. Energy justice: conceptual insights and practical applications. Applied Energy, 142, 435–444. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephan, B., 2012. Bringing discourse to the market: the commodification of avoided deforestation. Environmental Politics, 21 (4), 621–639. doi:10.1080/09644016.2012.688357
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevis, D., 2011. Unions and the environment: pathways to global labor environmentalism. Working USA, 14 (2), 145–159. doi:10.1111/wusa.2011.14.issue-2
   Google Scholar
• Stevis, D. and Felli, R., 2015. Global labour unions and just transition to a green economy. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 15 (1), 29–43. doi:10.1007/s10784-014-9266-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevis, D. and Felli, R., 2016. Green transitions, just transitions? Broadening and deepening justice. Kurswechsel, 3, 35–45.
   Google Scholar
• Sustainable Energy for All, 2017. Missing the mark: gaps and lags in disbursement of development finance for energy access. Available from: http://www.se4all.org/sites/default/files/2017_SEforALL_FR1_0.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Swilling, M., Musango, J., and Wakeford, J., 2015. Developmental states and sustainability transitions: prospects of a just transition in South Africa. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning. 18 (5), 1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Syme, G.J., Nancarrow, B.E., and McCreddin, J.A., 1999. Defining the components of fairness in the allocation of water to environmental and human uses. Journal of Environmental Management, 57 (1), 51–70. doi:10.1006/jema.1999.0282
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trade Unions for Energy Democracy, 2015. Power to the people: toward democratic control of electricity generation. Available from: http://unionsforenergydemocracy.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/TUED-Power-to-the-Peoplefinal.pdf
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, 2016. The Paris agreement, CP/21/2. Available from: http://unfccc.int/files/essential_background/convention/application/pdf/english_paris_agreement.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Yenniti, K., Day, R., and Golubchikov, O., 2016. Spatial justice and the land politics of renewables: dispossessing vulnerable communities through solar energy mega-projects. Geoforum, 76, 90–99. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2016.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• York, R. and McGee, J.A., 2016. Understanding the Jevons paradox. Environmental Sociology, 2 (1), 77–87. doi:10.1080/23251042.2015.1106060
   Google Scholar
• Young, I.M., 1990. Justice and the politics of difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar