Does size matter? Comparing the party politics of climate change in Australia and Norway

References

• Abou-Chadi, T. and Orlowski, M., 2016. Moderate as necessary: the role of electoral competitiveness and party size in explaining parties’ policy shifts. The Journal of Politics, 78 (3), 868–881. doi:10.1086/685585
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arter, D., 2008. Scandinavian politics today. 2nd ed. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS), 2016. Labour force [online]. Available from: http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/[email protected]/mf/6202.0 [Accessed 18 September 2016].
   Google Scholar
• Båtstrand, S., 2014. Giving content to new politics: from broad hypothesis to empirical analysis using Norwegian manifesto data on climate change. Party Politics, 20 (6), 930–939. doi:10.1177/1354068812462923
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Båtstrand, S., 2015. more than markets: a comparative study of nine conservative parties on climate change. Politics and Policy, 43 (4), 538–561. doi:10.1111/polp.12122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernauer, T., and Böhmelt, T., 2013. National climate policies in international comparison: the climate change cooperation index. Environmental Science And Policy, 25, 196-206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernhagen, P., 2008. Business and international environmental agreements: domestic sources of participation and compliance by advanced industrialized democracies. Global Environmental Politics, 8 (1), 78–110. doi:10.1162/glep.2008.8.1.78
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter, N., 2006. Party politicization of the environment in Britain. Party Politics, 12 (6), 747–767. doi:10.1177/1354068806068599
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter, N., et al., 2017. Political parties and climate policy: a new approach to measuring parties’ climate policy preferences. Party Politics. doi:10.1177/1354068817697630
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ćetković, S. and Buzogány, A., 2016. Varieties of capitalism and clean energy transitions in the European Union: when renewable energy hits different economic logics. Climate Policy, 16 (5), 642–657. doi:10.1080/14693062.2015.1135778
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dryzek, J.S., et al., 2002. Environmental transformation of the state: the USA, Norway, Germany and the UK. Policy Studies, 50 (4), 659–682.
   Google Scholar
• Dunlap, R.E., McCright, A.M., and Yarosh, J.H., 2016. The political divide on climate change: partisan polarization widens in the U.S. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 58 (5), 4–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eckersley, R., 2013. Poles apart? The social construction of responsibility for climate change in Australia and Norway. Australian Journal of Politics and History, 59 (3), 382–396. doi:10.1111/ajph.12022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fankhauser, S., Gennaioli, C., and Collins, M., 2015. The political economy of passing climate change legislation: evidence from a survey. Global Environmental Change, 35, 52–61. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.08.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farstad, F.M., 2017. What explains variation in parties’ climate change salience? Party Politics. doi:10.1177/1354068817693473
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fielding, K.S., et al., 2012. Australian politicians’ beliefs about climate change: political partisanship and political ideology. Environmental Politics, 21 (5), 712–733. doi:10.1080/09644016.2012.698887
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffiths, A.B., Haigh, N., and Rassisas, J., 2007. A framework for understanding institutional governance systems and climate change: the case of Australia. European Management Journal, 25 (6), 415–442. doi:10.1016/j.emj.2007.08.001
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, K. and Sundstrom, L.M., eds., 2010. Global commons domestic decisions: the comparative politics of climate change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ingebritsen, C., 2002. Norm entrepreneurs: Scandinavia’s role in world politics. Cooperation and Conflict, 37 (1), 11–23. doi:10.1177/0010836702037001689
   Google Scholar
• International Energy Agency (IEA), 2011. Energy policies of IEA countries: norway [online]. Available from: http://www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/publication/energy-policies- of-iea-countries—norway-2011-review.html [Accessed 16 September 2016].
   Google Scholar
• International Energy Agency (IEA), 2012. Energy policies of IEA countries: Australia [online]. Available from: http://www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/publication/energy-policies-of-iea-countries—australia-2012-review.html [Accessed 21 September 2016].
   Google Scholar
• Ireland, J., 2013. Emissions scheme a trade in the invisible: Abbott. Sydney Morning Herald, 15 July.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, C.B. and Spoon, J.J., 2011. Testing the ‘party matters’ thesis: explaining progress towards Kyoto protocol targets. Political Studies, 59, 99–115. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.2010.00852.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katzenstein, P.J., 1985. Small states in world markets: industrial policy in Europe. New York: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Katzenstein, P.J., 2003. Small states and small states revisited. New Political Economy, 8 (1), 9–30. doi:10.1080/1356346032000078705
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keating, M., 2015. The political economy of small states in Europe. In: H. Baldersheim and M. Keating, eds. Small states in the modern world : vulnerabilities and Opportunities. Cheltenham, Gloucestershire: Edward Elgar, 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Keating, M. and Harvey, M., 2014. The political economy of small European states: and lessons for Scotland. National Institute Economic Review, 227 (1), R54–R66.
   Google Scholar
• Klingemann, H.D., Hofferbert, R., and Budge, I., 1995. Parties, policies and democracy. Boulder, CO: Westview.
   Google Scholar
• Lachapelle, E. and Paterson, M., 2013. Drivers of national climate policy. Climate Policy, 13 (5), 547–571. doi:10.1080/14693062.2013.811333
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehmbruch, G., 1984. Concertation and the structure of corporatist networks. In: J.H. Goldthorpe, ed. Order and conflict in contemporary capitalism. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 60–80.
   Google Scholar
• Liefferink, D., et al., 2009. Leaders and laggards in environmental policy: a quantitative analysis of domestic policy outputs. Journal of European Public Policy, 16 (5), 677–700. doi:10.1080/13501760902983283
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madden, N.J., 2014. Green means stop: veto players and their impact on climate change policy outputs. Environmental Politics, 23 (4), 570–589. doi:10.1080/09644016.2014.884301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, I., 2007. Interest groups. In: B. Galligan and W. Roberts, eds. Oxford companion to Australian politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCright, A.M. and Dunlap, R.E., 2011. The politicization of climate change and polarization in the American public’s views of global warming, 2001–2010. The Sociological Quarterly, 52, 155–194. doi:10.1111/j.1533-8525.2011.01198.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neumayer, E., 2002a. Does trade openness promote multilateral environmental cooperation? World Economy, 25 (6), 815–832. doi:10.1111/1467-9701.00464
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neumayer, E., 2002b. Do democracies exhibit stronger international environmental commitment? A cross-country analysis. Journal of Peace Research, 39 (2), 139–164. doi:10.1177/0022343302039002001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norgaard, K.M., 2011. Living in denial: climate change, emotions and everyday life. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• NSD [Nordic Social Science Data Services], 2011. Political constraint index dataset [online]. Available from: http://www.nsd.uib.no/macrodataguide/set.html?id=29&sub=1 [Accessed 11 March 2015].
   Google Scholar
• Polity IV Project, 2016. Political regime characteristics and transitions, 1800–2012 [online]. Available from: http://www.systemicpeace.org/polity/polity4.htm [Accessed 18 April 2014].
   Google Scholar
• Ragin, C.C., 2000. Fuzzy set social science. London: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds, A., Reilly, B., and Ellis, A., 2005. Electoral system design: the new international IDEA handbook. Stockholm: International IDEA.
   Google Scholar
• Rootes, C., Zito, A., and Barry, J., 2012. Climate change, national politics and grassroots action: an introduction. Environmental Politics, 21 (5), 677–690. doi:10.1080/09644016.2012.720098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scruggs, L.A., 1999. Institutions and environmental performance in seventeen Western democracies. British Journal of Political Science, 29 (1), 1–31. doi:10.1017/S0007123499000010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spoon, J.J., Hobolt, S.B., and De Vries, C.E., 2014. Going green: explaining issue competition on the environment. European Journal of Political Research, 53, 363–380. doi:10.1111/1475-6765.12032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SSB (Statistics Norway), 2016. Labour force survey, seasonally-adjusted figures, June 2016 [online]. Available from: https://www.ssb.no/en/arbeid-og-lonn/statistikker/akumnd/maaned [Accessed 16 September 2016].
   Google Scholar
• Talberg, A. and Howes, S., 2010. Party divides: expertise in and attitude towards climate change among Australian members of parliament. CCEP working paper 8.10. Centre for Climate Economics and Policy, Crawford School of Economics and Government, The Australian National University.
   Google Scholar
• Thorhallsson, B. and Wivel, A., 2006. Small states in the European Union: what do we know and what would we like to know? Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 19 (4), 651–668. doi:10.1080/09557570601003502
   Google Scholar
• Tranter, B., 2013. The great divide: political candidate and voter polarisation over global warming in Australia. Australian Journal of Politics and History, 59 (3), 397–413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tvinnereim, E. and Austgulen, M.H., 2014. Fossil fuel employment and public opinion about climate change. Stein Rokkan Centre for Social Studies, Working Paper 3-2014.
   Google Scholar
• UNDP, 2015. Human development index [online]. Available from: http://hdr.undp.org/en/content/human-development-index-hdi [Accessed 16 September 2016].
   Google Scholar
• Unruh, G., 2000. Understanding carbon lock-in. Energy Policy, 28, 817–830. doi:10.1016/S0301-4215(00)00070-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, M., 2012. When do parties emphasise extreme positions?: how strategic incentives for policy differentiation influences issue importance. European Journal of Political Research, 51, 64–88. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6765.2011.01989.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar