References
- Abramowitz, A.I., 2011. The disappearing center: engaged citizens, polarization, and American Democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
- Airoldi, E.M. and Bischof, J.M., 2016. Improving and evaluating topic models and other models of text. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 111, 1381–1403. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.2015.1051182
- Benoit, K., et al., 2018. Quanteda: an R package for the quantitative analysis of textual data. Journal of Open Source Software, 3, 774. doi:https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.00774
- Bernauer, T. and McGrath, L.F., 2016. Simple reframing unlikely to boost public support for climate policy. Nature Climate Change, 6, 680. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2948
- Blei, D.M., Ng, A.Y., and Jordan, M.I., 2003. Latent dirichlet allocation. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 3, 993–1022.
- Bohr, J., 2016. The “Climatism” cartel: why climate change deniers oppose market-based mitigation policy. Environmental Politics, 25, 812–830. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2016.1156106
- Boussalis, C. and Coan, T.G., 2016. Text-mining the signals of climate change doubt. Global Environmental Change, 36, 89–100. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.12.001
- Boykoff, M., Daly, M., McNatt, and Nacu-Schmidt, A. 2020. United States newspaper coverage of climate change or global warming, 2000-2020. Media and Climate Change Observatory Data Sets. Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado. doi:https://doi.org/10.25810/jck1-hf50
- Broder, J.M. 2010. “Cap and Trade” loses its standing as energy policy of choice. The New York Times, March 25.
- Brooks, J., et al., 2014. Abnormal daily temperature and concern about climate change across the United States. Review of Policy Research, 31, 199–217. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.12067
- Brulle, R.J., 2014. Institutionalizing delay: foundation funding and the creation of U.S. climate change counter-movement organizations. Climatic Change, 122, 681–694. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-1018-7
- Brulle, R.J., Carmichael, J., and Craig Jenkins, J., 2012. Shifting public opinion on climate change: an empirical assessment of factors influencing concern over climate change in the U.S., 2002–2010. Climatic Change, 114, 169–188. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-012-0403-y
- Bullock, J.G., 2011. Elite influence on public opinion in an informed electorate. The American Political Science Review, 105, 496–515. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055411000165
- Cardin, B.L. 2018. Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection Act—Continued Washington, D.C.
- Carmichael, J.T. and Brulle, R.J., 2017. Elite cues, media coverage, and public concern: an integrated path analysis of public opinion on climate change, 2001–2013. Environmental Politics, 26, 232–252. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2016.1263433
- Cohen, J., Pfeiffer, K., and Francis, J.A., 2018. Warm arctic episodes linked with increased frequency of extreme winter weather in the United States. Nature Communications, 9, 869. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-02992-9
- Cooney, C.M., 2010. The perception factor: climate change gets personal. Environmental Health Perspectives, 118, A484–A89. doi:https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.118-a484
- Corner, A., Whitmarsh, L., and Xenias, D., 2012. Uncertainty, scepticism and attitudes towards climate change: biased assimilation and attitude polarisation. Climatic Change, 114, 463–478. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-012-0424-6
- Csardi, G. and Nepusz, T., 2006. The igraph software package for complex network research. InterJournal, Complex Systems, 1695, 109.
- Dahlstrom, M.F., 2014. Using narratives and storytelling to communicate science with nonexpert audiences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111 (Suppl 4), 13614–13620. doi:https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1320645111.
- Davenport, C. and Landler, M., Trump administration hardens its attack on climate science. The New York Times, May 27, 2019.
- Diermeier, D., et al., 2012. Language and ideology in Congress. British Journal of Political Science, 42, 31–55. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123411000160
- Dillon, J. 2018. Whitehouse preps 200th climate speech, hoping Senate will stire. Roll Call, March 13
- Druckman, J.N. and McGrath, M.C., 2019. The evidence for motivated reasoning in climate change preference formation. Nature Climate Change, 9, 111–119. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0360-1
- Dunlap, R.E. and McCright, A.M., 2015. Challenging climate change: the denial countermovement. In: R.E. Dunlap and R.J. Brulle, eds.. Climate change and society: sociological perspectives (pp. 300–332). New York: Oxford University Press.
- Dunlap, R.E. and Jacques, P.J., 2013. Climate change denial books and conservative think tanks: exploring the connection. American Behavioral Scientist, 57, 699–731. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764213477096
- Dunlap, R.E., McCright, A.M., and Yarosh, J.H., 2016. The political divide on climate change: partisan polarization widens in the U.S. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 58, 4–23.
- Egan, P.J. and Mullin, M., 2012. Turning personal experience into political attitudes: the effect of local weather on Americans’ perceptions about global warming. The Journal of Politics, 74, 796–809. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381612000448
- Farrell, J., 2015. Network structure and influence of the climate change counter-movement. Nature Climate Change, 6, 370. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2875
- Farrell, J., 2016. Corporate funding and ideological polarization about climate change. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113, 92. doi:https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1509433112
- Farrell, J., McConnell, K., and Brulle, R., 2019. Evidence-based strategies to combat scientific misinformation. Nature Climate Change, 9, 191–195. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0368-6
- Feinberg, M. and Willer, R., 2015. From gulf to bridge: when do moral arguments facilitate political influence? Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 41, 1665–1681. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167215607842
- Fenno, R., 1978. Home style: House members in their districts. New York: Little, Brown.
- Freedman, A. 2018. What you learn by giving 200 Senate speeches on climate change. Mashable, March 17.
- Gentzkow, M., Shapiro, J.M., and Taddy, M., 2019. Measuring group differences in high-dimensional choices: method and application to congressional speech. Econometrica, 87, 1307–1340. doi:https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA16566
- Grimmer, J., 2013. Representational style in Congress: what legislators say and why it matters. New York: Cambridge University Press.
- Grimmer, J. and Stewart, B.M., 2013. Text as data: the promise and pitfalls of automatic content analysis methods for political texts. Political Analysis, 21, 267–297. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mps028
- Grimmer, J., Westwood, S.J., and Messing, S., 2014. The impression of influence: legislator communication, representation, and democratic accountability. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
- Guber, D.L. and Bosso, C.J., 2009. Past the tipping point: debating the future of public discourse on the environment. In: N.J. Vig and M.E. Kraft, eds.. Environmental policy: new directions for the twenty-first century (pp. 51–74). Washington, DC: CQ Press.
- Guber, D.L. and Bosso, C.J., 2012. “High hopes and bitter disappointment:” public discourse and the limits of the environmental movement. In: C.C. Politics, N.J. Vig, and M.E. Kraft, eds.. Environmental policy: new directions for the twenty-first century (pp. 54–58). Washington, DC: CQ Press.
- Hall, R.L., 1998. Participation in Congress. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
- Hamilton, L.C., et al., 2015. Tracking public beliefs about anthropogenic climate change. PloS One, 10, e0138208. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138208
- Hertel-Fernandez, A., Mildenberger, M., and Stokes, L.C., 2019. Legislative staff and representation in Congress. American Political Science Review, 113, 1–18. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055418000606
- Hetherington, M.J., 2001. Resurgent mass partisanship: the role of elite polarization. The American Political Science Review, 95, 619-31. 3
- Hill, K.Q. and Hurley, P.A., 2002. Symbolic speeches in the U.S. Senate and their representational implications. Journal of Politics, 64, 219–231. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2508.00125
- Iyengar, S. and Valentino, N.A., 2000. Who says what? Source credibility as a mediator of campaign advertising. In: M.D. Arthur Lupia and S. Popkin, eds.. Elements of reason (pp. 108–129). New York: Cambridge University Press.
- Jacobs, L.R., et al., 2013. Congressional leadership of public opinion. Political Science Quarterly, 113, 21–41. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2657649
- Jensen, J., et al. 2012. Political polarization and the dynamics of political language: evidence from 130 years of partisan speech [with Comments and Discussion]. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 43, 1–81. Washington DC: Economic Studies Program, The Brookings Institution.
- Jones, D.R., 2003. Position taking and position avoidance in the U.S. Senate. The Journal of Politics, 65, 851–863. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2508.00215
- Kingdon, J.W., 1984. Agendas, alternatives, and public policies. New York: Little, Brown.
- Kraft, M.E., 1995. Congress and environmental policy. In: J.P. Lester, ed.. Environmental politics and policy: theories and evidence (pp. 168–205). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
- Kraft, M.E., 2013. Congress and environmental policy. In: M.E. Kraft and S. Kamieniecki, eds.. The oxford handbook of U.S. environmental policy (pp. 280–305). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Lauderdale, B.E. and Herzog, A., 2016. Measuring political positions from legislative speech. Political Analysis, 24, 374–394. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpw017
- Leiserowitz, A., et al., 2019. Climate change in the American mind. New Haven, CT: Yale University and George Mason University.
- Lewandowsky, S., Gignac, G.E., and Vaughan, S., 2012. The pivotal role of perceived scientific consensus in acceptance of science. Nature Climate Change, 3, 399. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1720
- Lewandowsky, S., Ullrich, K.H., and Cook, J., 2017. Beyond misinformation: understanding and coping with the “post-truth” era. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 6, 353–369. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.07.008
- Maltzman, F. and Sigelman, L., 1996. The politics of talk: unconstrained floor time in the U.S. House of Representatives. Journal of Politics, 58, 819–830. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2960448
- Mayhew, D.R., 1974. Congress: the electoral connection. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
- McCright, A.M. and Dunlap, R.E., 2000. Challenging global warming as a social problem: an analysis of the conservative movement’s counter-claims. Social Problems, 47, 499–522. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/3097132
- McCright, A.M. and Dunlap, R.E., 2010. Anti-reflexivity: the American conservative movement’s success in undermining climate science and society. Theory, Culture & Society, 27, 100–133. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276409356001
- Mimno, D., et al. 2011. Optimizing semantic coherence in topic models. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, 262–272. Edinburgh, United Kingdom: Association for Computational Linguistics.
- Morris, J.S., 2001. Reexamining the politics of talk: partisan rhetoric in the 104th House. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 26, 101–121. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/440405
- Mulvihill, M., 1997. One minute speeches: current House practices. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.
- Muro, M., Victor, D.G., and Whiton, J., 2019. How the geography of climate damage could make the politics less polarizing. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institute.
- Newport, F. 2010. Americans global warming concerns continue to drop. The Gallup Organization, March 11.
- Oreskes, N. and Conway, E.M., 2010. Merchants of doubt: how a handful of scientists obscured the truth on issues from tobacco smoke to global warming. London, UK: Bloomsbury Publishing.
- Palm, R., Lewis, G.B., and Feng, B., 2017. What causes people to change their opinion about climate change? Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 107, 883–896. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2016.1270193
- Poole, K.T. and Rosenthal, H., 1991. Patterns of congressional voting. American Journal of Political Science, 35, 228–278. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2111445
- Poole, K.T. and Rosenthal, H., 1996. Are legislators ideologues or the agents of constituents?. European Economic Review, 40, 707–717. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-2921(95)00080-1
- Poole, K.T. and Rosenthal, H., 2007. Ideology and Congress. London and New York: Routledge.
- Pooley, E. 2008. Why the climate bill failed. Time, June 9.
- Quinn, K., et al., 2010. How to analyze political attention with minimal assumptions and costs. American Journal of Political Science, 54, 209–228. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2009.00427.x
- Rabe, B.G. and Borick, C.P., 2010. The climate of belief: American public opinion on climate change. Issues in Governance Studies, 31, 1–15.
- Roberts, M., Stewart, B., and Tingley, D. 2014. stm: R package for structural topic models. Harvard University OpenScholar. https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:qsh:wpaper:176291.
- Rocca, M.S., 2007. Nonlegislative debate in the U.S. House of Representatives. American Politics Research, 35, 489–505. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X07300233
- Rocca, M.S. and Gordon, S.B., 2010. The position-taking value of bill sponsorship in Congress. Political Research Quarterly, 63, 387–397. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912908330347
- Shao, W., et al., 2014. Weather, climate, and the economy: explaining risk perceptions of global warming, 2001–10. Weather, Climate, and Society, 6, 119–134. doi:https://doi.org/10.1175/WCAS-D-13-00029.1
- Shipan, C.R. and Lowry, W.R., 2001. Environmental policy and party divergence in Congress. Political Research Quarterly, 54, 245–263. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/106591290105400201
- Shirzaei, M. and Roland, B., 2018. Global climate change and local land subsidence exacerbate inundation risk to the San Francisco bay area. Science Advances, 4, eaap9234. doi:https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aap9234
- Sunstein, C.R., 2009. Going to extremes: how like minds unite and divide. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Tesler, M., 2018. Elite domination of public doubts about climate change (not evolution). Political Communication, 35, 306–326. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2017.1380092
- Volden, C. and Wiseman, A.E., 2014. Legislative effectiveness in the United States Congress: the lawmakers. New York: Cambridge University Press.
- Volden, C. and Wiseman, A.E., 2018. Legislative effectiveness in the United States Senate. Journal of Politics, 80, 731–735. doi:https://doi.org/10.1086/697121
- Weber, E.U. and Stern, P.C., 2011. Public understanding of climate change in the United States. American Psychologist, 66, 315–328. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023253
- Westwood, S.J. n.d. The partisanship of bipartisanship: how representatives use bipartisan assertions to cultivate support. http://www.dartmouth.edu/~seanjwestwood/papers/bipartisan.pdf.
- Whitehouse, S. 2017a. Congress and climate change [lettter to the editor]. The New York Times, September 15.
- Whitehouse, S. 2017b. Republicans want to fight climate change, but fossil-fuel bullies won’t let them: lawmakers need political cover from corporate America, Washington Post Blogs, January 11.
- Whitehouse, S., 2018. Economic growth, regulatory relief, and consumer protection act—continued. The Congressional Record, 164, S1680.
- Zaller, J., 1992. The nature and origins of mass opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press.