Divided yet united: Balancing convergence and divergence in environmental movement mobilization

References

• Allan, J.I. and Hadden, J., 2017. Exploring the framing power of NGOs in global climate politics. Environmental Politics, 26 (4), 600–620. doi:10.1080/09644016.2017.1319017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ambrose, J., 2019. Fracking halted in England in major government U-turn. The Guardian. 2 November. Available from: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2019/nov/02/fracking-banned-in-uk-as-government-makes-major-u-turn[Accessed 5 Nov 2019]
   Google Scholar
• BBC News, 2013. Fracking Ok for ‘desolate’ North East, says Tory peer. BBC. 30 July. Available from: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-23505723[Accessed 4 Aug 2013]
   Google Scholar
• Benford, R.D. and Snow, D.A., 2000. Framing processes and social movements: an overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 26 (1), 611–639. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.611.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boudet, S.H., 2011. From NIMBY to NIABY: regional mobilization against liquefied natural gas in the United States. Environmental Politics, 20 (6), 786–806. doi:10.1080/09644016.2011.617166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chong, D. and Druckman, J.N., 2007. Framing theory. Annual Review of Political Science, 10, 103–126. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.10.072805.103054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• della Porta and Parks, 2014. Framing processes in the climate movement: from climate change to social justice. In: M. Dietz and H. Garrelts, eds. Routledge Handbook of the Climate Change Movement. New York: Routledge, 19–30.
   Google Scholar
• della Porta, D. and Diani, M., 1999. Social movements: an introduction. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• della Porta, D. and Piazza, G., 2007. Local contention, global framing: the protest campaigns against the TAV in Val di Susa and the bridge on the Messina Straits. Environmental Politics, 16 (5), 864–882. doi:10.1080/09644010701634257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Gregorio, M., 2012. Networking in environmental movement organisation coalitions: interest, values or discourse? Environmental Politics, 21 (1), 1–25. doi:10.1080/09644016.2011.643366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dietz, M. and Garrelts, H., eds. 2014. Routledge Handbook of the Climate Change Movement. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Frack Free Fernhurst. 2014. Let's talk fracking. Available at: http://www/frackfreefernhurst.com/news/ [Accessed 25 Sep 2014]
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E., 1974. Frame Analysis. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hajer, M., 1993. Discourse coalitions and the institutionalization of practice: the case of acid rain in Great Britain. In: F. Fischer and J. Forester, eds. The Argumentative turn in policy analysis and planning. London: Duke University Press, 43–76.
   Google Scholar
• Jimenez, M., 1999. Consolidation through institutionalisation? Dilemmas of the Spanish environmental movement in the 1990s. Environmental Politics, 8 (1), 149–171. doi:10.1080/09644019908414442.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, S., 2008. Framing contests: strategy making under uncertainty. Organization Science, 19 (5), 729–752. doi:10.1287/orsc.1070.0340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levkoe, C. and Wakefield, S., 2014. Understanding contemporary networks of environmental and social change: complex assemblages within Canada’s ‘food movement’. Environmental Politics, 23 (2), 302–320. doi:10.1080/09644016.2013.818302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAdam, D., et al., 2010. “Site fights”: explaining opposition to pipeline projects in the developing world. Sociological Forum, 25 (3), 401–427. doi:10.1111/j.1573-7861.2010.01189.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nana, 2016. Talk Fracking. Available from: http://www.talkfracking.org/nanashire-tour/who-are-the-nanas/ [Accessed 3 Mar 2016]
   Google Scholar
• North, P., 1998. ‘Save our Solsbury!’ The anatomy of an anti-road protest. Environmental Politics, 2 (3), 1–25. doi:10.1080/09644019808414406.
   Google Scholar
• Nyberg, D., Wright, C., and Kirk, J., 2020. Fracking the Future: the Temporal Portability of Frames in Political Contests. Organization Studies, 41, 175–196. doi:10.1177/0170840618814568
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özen, H., 2009. Located locally, disseminated nationally: the Bergama movement. Environmental Politics, 18 (3), 408–423. doi:10.1080/09644010902823766.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rootes, C., 1999a. Environmental Movements: from the local to the global. Environmental Politics, 8 (1), 1–12. doi:10.1080/09644019908414435.
   Google Scholar
• Rootes, C., 1999b. The transformation of environmental activism: activists, organizations and policy‐making, Innovation. The European Journal of Social Science Research, 12 (2), 155–173. doi:10.1080/13511610.1999.9968595.
   Google Scholar
• Rootes, C., 2007. Acting locally: the character, contexts and significance of local environmental mobilisations. Environmental Politics, 16 (5), 722–741. doi:10.1080/09644010701640460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Routledge, P., 2000. ‘Our resistance will be as transnational as capital’: convergence space and strategy in globalising resistance. GeoJournal, 52 (1), 25–33. doi:10.1023/A:1013188131666.
   Google Scholar
• Routledge, P., 2017. Space invaders: radical geographies of protest. London: PlutoPress.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, J., 2002. Bridging global divides? Strategic framing and solidarity in transnational social movement organizations. International Sociology, 17 (4), 505–528. doi:10.1177/0268580902017004003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snow, D.A., et al., 1986. Frame alignment processes, micromobilization, and movement participation. American Sociological Review, 51 (4), 464–481. doi:10.2307/2095581.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tal, A., et al., 2013. Israel’s environmental movement: strategic challenges. Environmental Politics, 22 (5), 779–791. doi:10.1080/09644016.2013.825139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaughan, A., 2018. UK fracking backlash: seven of eight plans rejected in 2018. The Guardian. 3th March, Available from: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2018/mar/08/uk-fracking-backlash-seven-out-of-eight-plans-rejected-in-2018 [Accessed 23 Mar 2018]
   Google Scholar
• Vickerstaff, A., 2019. Fracking is finished in the UK – thanks to the power of public protest. The Guardian. 5 November. Available from: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2019/nov/05/fracking-uk-protest-gas [Accessed 8 Nov 2019]
   Google Scholar
• Watt, N., 2014. Fracking in the UK: ‘We’re going all out for shale’, admits Cameron. The Guardian. 13th January. Available from: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2014/jan/13/shale-gas-fracking-cameron-all-out [Accessed 2 Feb 2014]
   Google Scholar
• Westwell, E. and Bunting, J., 2020. The regenerative culture of Extinction Rebellion: self-care, people care, planet care. Environmental Politics, 29 (3), 546–551. doi:10.1080/09644016.2020.1747136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, L., et al., 2017. Framing ‘fracking’: exploring public perceptions of hydraulic fracturing in the United Kingdom. Public Understanding of Science, 26 (1), 89–104. doi:10.1177/0963662515595159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodcock, A., 2016. Theresa May accused of trying to bribe public to accept fracking. The Independent. 7th August. Available from: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/fracking-shale-wealth-fund-thousands-households-families-theresa-may-a7177136.html [Accessed 15 Aug 2016]
   Google Scholar
• Zeng, F., Dai, J., and Javed, J., 2019. Frame alignment and environmental advocacy: the influence of NGO strategies on policy outcomes in China. Environmental Politics, 28 (4), 747–770. doi:10.1080/09644016.2018.1525805.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar