When does the structural power of business fade? assessing business privileged access at global climate negotiations

References

• Ahmed, S.A., Diffenbaugh, N.S., and Hertel, T.W., 2009. Climate volatility deepens poverty vulnerability in developing countries. Environmental Research Letters, 4 (3), 034004. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/4/3/034004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allan, J.I. and Hadden, J., 2017. Exploring the framing power of NGOs in global climate politics. Environmental Politics, 26 (4), 600–620. doi:10.1080/09644016.2017.1319017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andonova, L.B., Hale, T.N., and Roger, C.B., 2017. National policy and transnational governance of climate change: substitutes or complements? International Studies Quarterly, 61 (2), 253–268. doi:10.1093/isq/sqx014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bäckstrand, K., et al., 2017. Non-state actors in global climate governance: from Copenhagen to Paris and beyond. Environmental Politics, 26 (4), 561–579. doi:10.1080/09644016.2017.1327485
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berkhout, J., Hanegraaff, M., and Braun, C., 2017. Is the EU different? Comparing the diversity of national and EU-level systems of interest organisations. West European Politics, 40 (5), 1109–1131. doi:10.1080/01402382.2017.1308695
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berkhout, J., et al., 2018. Making inference across mobilization and influence research: comparing top-down and bottom-up mapping of interest systems. Political Studies, 66 (1), 43–62. doi:10.1177/0032321717702400
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernauer, T., Böhmelt, T., and Koubi, V., 2013. Is there a democracy–civil society paradox in global environmental governance? Global Environmental Politics, 13 (1), 88–107. doi:10.1162/GLEP_a_00155
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernhagen, P. and Bräuninger, T., 2005. Structural power and public policy: a signaling model of business lobbying in democratic capitalism. Political Studies, 53 (1), 43–64. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.2005.00516.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernhagen, P., 2008. Business and international environmental agreements: domestic sources of participation and compliance by advanced industrialized democracies. Global Environmental Politics, 8 (1), 78–110. doi:10.1162/glep.2008.8.1.78
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Betsill, M.M. and Corell, E., 2001. NGO influence in international environmental negotiations: a framework for analysis. Global Environmental Politics, 1 (4), 65–85. doi:10.1162/152638001317146372
   Google Scholar
• Böhmelt, T., 2013. A closer look at the information provision rationale: civil society participation in states’ delegations at the UNFCCC. The Review of International Organizations, 8 (1), 55–80. doi:10.1007/s11558-012-9149-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brook, T. and Frolic, B.M., 2015. Civil society in China. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cabré, M.M., 2011. Issue-Linkages to Climate Change Measured through NGO Participation in the UNFCCC. Global Environmental Politics, 11 (3), 10–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheon, A. and Urpelainen, J., 2013. How do competing interest groups influence environmental policy? The case of renewable electricity in industrialized democracies, 1989–2007. Political Studies, 61 (4), 874–897. doi:10.1111/1467-9248.12006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Culpepper, P.D., 2015. Structural power and political science in the post-crisis era. Business and Politics, 17 (3), 391–409. doi:10.1515/bap-2015-0031
   Google Scholar
• Dür, A. and Mateo, G., 2016. Insiders versus outsiders: interest group politics in multilevel Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Falkner, R., 2017. Business power and conflict in international environmental politics. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, D.R. and Green, J.F., 2004. Understanding disenfranchisement: civil society and developing countries' influence and participation in global governance for sustainable development. Global Environmental Politics, 4 (3), 65–84.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, D.R., 2010. COP-15 in Copenhagen: how the merging of movements left civil society out in the cold. Global Environmental Politics, 10 (2), 11–17. doi:10.1162/glep.2010.10.2.11
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraussen, B., Beyers, J., and Donas, T., 2015. The expanding core and varying degrees of insiderness: Institutionalised interest group access to advisory councils. Political Studies, 63 (3), 569–588.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadden, J., 2015. Networks in contention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hale, T., 2020. Transnational actors and transnational governance in global environmental politics. Annual Review of Political Science, 23 (1), 203–220. doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-050718-032644
   Google Scholar
• Halpin, D.R. and Fraussen, B., 2017. Conceptualising the policy engagement of interest groups: involvement, access and prominence. European Journal of Political Research, 56 (3), 723–732. doi:10.1111/1475-6765.12194
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanegraaff, M., 2015. Transnational advocacy over time: business and NGO mobilization at UN climate summits. Global Environmental Politics, 15 (1), 83–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanegraaff, M., 2015a. Transnational advocacy over time: business and NGO mobilization at UN climate summits. Global Environmental Politics, 15 (1), 83–104. doi:10.1162/GLEP_a_00273
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanegraaff, M., 2015b. Interest groups at transnational negotiation conferences: goals, strategies, interactions, and influence. Global Governance, 21 (4), 599. doi:10.1163/19426720-02104007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanegraaff, M., Vergauwen, J., and Beyers, J., 2020. Should I stay or should I go? Explaining variation in nonstate actor advocacy over time in global governance. Governance, 33 (2), 287–304. doi:10.1111/gove.12427
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, J.M., 1991. Gaining access: congress and the farm lobby, 1919-1981. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, S.L., 2002. Selling civil society: western aid and the nongovernmental organization sector in Russia. Comparative Political Studies, 35 (2), 139–167. doi:10.1177/0010414002035002001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, L. and Urpelainen, J., 2015. Interests, institutions, and climate policy: explaining the choice of policy instruments for the energy sector. Environmental Science & Policy, 54, 52–63. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2015.06.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Junk, W.M. and Rasmussen, A., 2019. Framing by the flock: collective issue definition and advocacy success. Comparative Political Studies, 52 (4), 483–513. doi:10.1177/0010414018784044
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Junk, W.M., et al., 2021. Changes in interest group access in times of crisis: no pain, no (lobby) gain. Journal of European Public Policy, 1–21. doi:10.1080/13501763.2021.1968936
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao, T.F., 1994. Interpreting probability models: logit, probit, and other generalized linear models (No. 101). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lowery, D., 2007. Why do organized interests lobby? A multi-goal, multi-context theory of lobbying. Polity, 39 (1), 29–54. doi:10.1057/palgrave.polity.2300077
   Google Scholar
• Lowery, D., 2013. Lobbying influence: meaning, measurement and missing. Interest Groups & Advocacy, 2 (1), 1–26. doi:10.1057/iga.2012.20
   Google Scholar
• Lucas, K., 2019. Behind success stories: goal attainment in global trade and climate negotiations. Interest Groups & Advocacy, 8 (1), 44–67. doi:10.1057/s41309-018-0038-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maloney, W.A., Jordan, G., and McLaughlin, A.M., 1994. Interest groups and public policy: the insider/outsider model revisited. Journal of Public Policy, 14 (1), 17–38. doi:10.1017/S0143814X00001239
   Google Scholar
• McGregor, I.M., 2011. Disenfranchisement of countries and civil society at COP-15 in Copenhagen. Global Environmental Politics, 11 (1), 1–7. doi:10.1162/GLEP_a_00039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, H. and Kellow, A., 2013. Forum shopping in global governance: understanding states, business and NGOs in multiple arenas. Global Policy, 4 (2), 139–149. doi:10.1111/j.1758-5899.2012.00195.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olson, M., 1965. The logic of collective action. Vol. 124. Boston: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Prakash, A. and Potoski, M., 2006. Racing to the bottom? Trade, environmental governance, and ISO 14001. American Journal of Political Science, 50 (2), 350–364. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00188.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, A. and Carroll, B.J., 2013. Determinants of upper-class dominance in the heavenly chorus: lessons from European Union online consultations. British Journal of Political Science, 44 (2), 445–459. doi:10.1017/S0007123412000750
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, A. and Gross, V., 2015. Biased access? Exploring selection to advisory committees. European Political Science Review, 7 (3), 343–372. doi:10.1017/S1755773914000228
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schattschneider, E., 1960. The semi-sovereign people. New York: Holt, Rhinehart and Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Schroeder, H., Boykoff, M.T., and Spiers, L., 2012. Equity and state representations in climate negotiations. Nature Climate Change, 2 (12), 834–836. doi:10.1038/nclimate1742
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sikkink, K., 2005. Patterns of Dynamic Multilevel Governance and the Insider-Outsider Coalition. In: D. Della Porta, and S. Tarrow, eds. Transnational Protest and Global Activism. New York: Rowman and Littlefield, 151–173.
   Google Scholar
• Stroup, S.S. and Wong, W.H., 2017. The authority trap. New York: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tallberg, J., et al., 2018. NGO influence in international organizations: information, access and exchange. British Journal of Political Science, 48 (1), 213–238. doi:10.1017/S000712341500037X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Truman, D., 1951. The governmental process. New York: Knopf.
   Google Scholar
• Uhre, A.N., 2014. Exploring the diversity of transnational actors in global environmental governance. Interest Groups & Advocacy, 3 (1), 59–78.
   Google Scholar