Digitalizing forest landscape restoration: a social and political analysis of emerging technological practices

References

• Adams, W.M., 2018. Conservation by algorithm. Oryx, 52 (1), 1–2. doi:10.1017/S0030605317001764.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, S., Eckerberg, K., and Zachrisson, A., 2014. Political science and ecological restoration. Environmental Politics, 23 (3), 509–524. doi:10.1080/09644016.2013.835201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bond, W.J., 2016. Ancient grasslands at risk. Science, 351 (6269), 120–122. doi:10.1126/science.aad5132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Büscher, B., 2016. Nature 2.0: exploring and theorizing the links between new media and nature conservation. New Media & Society, 18 (5), 726–743. doi:10.1177/1461444814545841.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castro, J., et al., 2021. Precision restoration: a necessary approach to foster forest recovery in the 21st century. Restoration Ecology, 29 (7). doi:10.1111/rec.13421.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chazdon, R.L., et al., 2017. A policy-driven knowledge agenda for global forest and landscape restoration. Conservation Letters, 10 (1), 125–132. doi:10.1111/conl.12220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crouzeilles, R., et al., 2020. Achieving cost-effective landscape-scale forest restoration through targeted natural regeneration. Conservation Letters, 13 (3), e12709. doi:10.1111/conl.12709.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Almeida, D.R.A., et al., 2020. A new era in forest restoration monitoring. Restoration Ecology, 28 (1), 8–11. doi:10.1111/rec.13067.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeWitt, S., et al., 2016. Seeing the grasslands through the trees. Science, 351 (6277), 1036. doi:10.1126/science.351.6277.1036-a.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott, S., 2016. The potential for automating assisted natural regeneration of tropical forest ecosystems. Biotropica, 48 (6), 825–833. doi:10.1111/btp.12387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott, S., Gale, L., and Robertson, M., 2020. Automated forest restoration: could robots revive rain forests? FORRU-CMU. Thailand: Forest Restoration Research Unit, Chiang Mai University. https://www.forru.org/library/0000099.
   Google Scholar
• Enni, S.A. and Herrie, M.B., 2021. Turning biases into hypotheses through method: a logic of scientific discovery for machine learning. Big Data & Society, 8 (1), 20539517211020776. doi:10.1177/20539517211020775.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erbaugh, J.T., et al., 2020. Global forest restoration and the importance of prioritizing local communities. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 4 (11), 1472–1476. doi:10.1038/s41559-020-01282-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleischman, F., et al., 2020. Pitfalls of tree planting show why we need people-centered natural climate solutions. BioScience, 70 (11), 947–950. doi:10.1093/biosci/biaa094.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabrys, J., 2016. Program earth: environmental sensing technology and the making of a computational planet. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gabrys, J., 2020. Smart forests and data practices: from the internet of trees to planetary governance. Big Data & Society, 7 (1), 205395172090487. doi:10.1177/2053951720904871.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gann, G.D., et al., 2019. International principles and standards for the practice of ecological restoration. Second edition. Restoration Ecology, 27 (S1). doi:10.1111/rec.13035.
   Google Scholar
• Gillespie, T., 2010. The politics of ‘platforms’. New Media & Society, 12 (3), 347–364. doi:10.1177/1461444809342738.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant, M.J. and Booth, A., 2009. A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information and Library Journals, 26 (2), 91–108. doi:10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helmond, A., 2015. The platformization of the web: making web data platform ready. Social Media + Society, 1 (2), 1–11. doi:10.1177/2056305115603080.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendriks, C.M., Duus, S., and Ercan, S.A., 2016. Performing politics on social media: the dramaturgy of an environmental controversy on Facebook. Environmental Politics, 25 (6), 1102–1125. doi:10.1080/09644016.2016.1196967.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holl, K.D. and Brancalion, P.H.S., 2020. Tree planting is not a simple solution. Science, 368 (6491), 580–581. doi:10.1126/science.aba8232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howson, P., 2019. Tackling climate change with blockchain. Nature Climate Change, 9 (9), 644–645. doi:10.1038/s41558-019-0567-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hukal, P. and Henfridsson, O., 2017. Digital innovation – a definition and integrated perspective. In: R. D. Galliers and M. Stein, (Eds). The Routledge companion to management information systems. New York: Routledge, 360-369.
   Google Scholar
• IUCN, 2011. The Bonn challenge. https://www.bonnchallenge.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Jarić, I., et al., 2020. Expanding conservation culturomics and iEcology from terrestrial to aquatic realms. PLOS Biology, 18 (10), e3000935. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3000935.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jepson, P. and Ladle, R.J., 2015. Nature apps: waiting for the revolution. Ambio, 44 (8), 827–832. doi:10.1007/s13280-015-0712-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaunga, O. and Johnson, M., 2017. The use of Indigenous traditional knowledge for ecological and bio-diverse resource management by the Laikipia Maasai and the Samburu. In: M. Roué, N. Césard, Y. C. Adou Yao and A. Oteng-Yeboah, eds. Knowing our Lands and Resources. Indigenous and Local Knowledge of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services in Africa. Paris: Intergovernmental Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES), 6-17.
   Google Scholar
• Laestadius, L., et al., 2011. Mapping opportunities for forest landscape restoration. Unasylva, 62 (238), 47–48.
   Google Scholar
• Mansourian, S., et al., 2020. Putting the pieces together: integration for forest landscape restoration implementation. Land Degradation & Development, 31 (4), 419–429. doi:10.1002/ldr.3448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansourian, S., et al., 2021. Reflecting on twenty years of forest landscape restoration. Restoration Ecology, 29 (7), e13441. doi:10.1111/rec.13441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masarei, M.I., et al., 2021. Engineering restoration for the future. Ecological Engineering, 159, 106103. doi:10.1016/j.ecoleng.2020.106103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minnemeyer, S., et al., 2011. Global map of forest landscape restoration opportunities. Forest and landscape restoration project. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Nitoslawski, S.A., et al., 2021. The digital forest: mapping a decade of knowledge on technological applications for forest ecosystems. Earth’s Future, 9 (8), e2021EF002123. doi:10.1029/2021EF002123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, T., et al., 2021. The political ecology playbook for ecosystem restoration: principles for effective, equitable, and transformative landscapes. Global Environmental Change, 70, 102320. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102320
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pritchard, R., et al., 2022. Data justice and biodiversity conservation. Conservation Biology: the Journal of the Society for Conservation Biology. doi:10.1111/cobi.13919.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radil, S.M. and Anderson, M.B., 2019. Rethinking PGIS: participatory or (post)political GIS? Progress in Human Geography, 43 (2), 195–213. doi:10.1177/0309132517750774.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sacande, M. and Berrahmouni, N., 2016. Community participation and ecological criteria for selecting species and restoring natural capital with native species in the Sahel. Restoration Ecology, 24 (4), 479–488. doi:10.1111/rec.12337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sacco, A.D., et al., 2021. Ten golden rules for reforestation to optimize carbon sequestration, biodiversity recovery and livelihood benefits. Global Change Biology, 27 (7), 1328–1348. doi:10.1111/gcb.15498.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sampaio, A., et al., 2020. Cerrado De Pé Association: community engagement promoting ecological restoration and local livelihoods in the neotropical savanna. In: C. Precott, S. Ribeiro, and F. Santos, eds. Forest landscape restoration and social opportunities in the tropical World. Recife: Centro de Pesquisas Ambientais do Nordeste - Cepan, 217–233.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, I.B., et al., 2019. Community-based native seed production for restoration in Brazil – the role of science and policy. Plant Biology, 21 (3), 389–397. doi:10.1111/plb.12842.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skarlatidou, A. and Haklay, M., 2021. Geographic citizen science design: no one left behind. In: A. Skarlatidou and M. Haklay, eds. Geographic citizen science design. London: UCL Press, 3–12. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctv15d8174.8.
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, S., 2013. Banking nature? The spectacular financialisation of environmental conservation. Antipode, 45 (1), 198–217. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8330.2012.00989.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UN, 2021. UN decade on restoration. https://www.decadeonrestoration.org/.
   Google Scholar
• UNFCCC, 2 November 2021. Glasgow leaders’ declaration on forests and land use. In:UN Climate Change Conference (COP26) at the SEC, Glasgow. https://ukcop26.org/glasgow-leaders-declaration-on-forests-and-land-use/.
   Google Scholar
• Urzedo, D.I., et al., 2020. A global production network for ecosystem services: the emergent governance of landscape restoration in the Brazilian Amazon. Global Environmental Change, 61, 102059. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urzedo, D., et al., 2022. Indigenous and local communities can boost seed supply in the UN decade on ecosystem restoration. Ambio, 51 (3), 557–568. doi:10.1007/s13280-021-01593-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Breugel, P., et al., 2015. Environmental gap analysis to prioritize conservation efforts in eastern Africa. PLoS One, 10 (4). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0121444
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dijck, J., Poell, T., and De Waal, M., 2018. The platform society: public values in a connective world. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Verma, A., van der Wal, R., and Fischer, A., 2015. Microscope and spectacle: on the complexities of using new visual technologies to communicate about wildlife conservation. Ambio, 44 (S4), 648–660. doi:10.1126/science.351.6277.1036-a.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wolff, S., et al., 2018. Meeting global land restoration and protection targets: what would the world look like in 2050? Global Environmental Change, 52, 259–272. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WRI, 2014. Atlas of forest and landscape restoration opportunities. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute. https://www.wri.org/data/atlas-forest-and-landscape-restoration-opportunities.
   Google Scholar
• Yusoff, K. and Gabrys, J., 2011. Climate change and the imagination. WIREs Climate Change, 2 (4), 516–534. doi:10.1002/wcc.117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar