440
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Dual standards of school performance and funding? Empirical searches of school funding adequacy in Kentucky and Maine

Pages 207-228 | Published online: 25 Mar 2009

References

  • Adams , J.E. and White , W.E. 1997 . The equity consequences of school finance reform in Kentucky . Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis , 19 ( 2 ) : 165 – 84 .
  • Augenblick , J. , Alexander , K. and Guthrie , J.W. 1995 . “ Report of the panel of experts: Proposals for the elimination of wealth based disparities in education ” . Report submitted by Ohio Chief State School Officer T. Sanders to the Ohio State Legislature
  • Augenblick , J.G. , Myers , J.L. and Anderson , A.B. 1997 . Equity and adequacy in school funding . The Future of Children: Financing Schools , 7 ( 3 ) : 63 – 78 .
  • Bartman , K.D. 2002 . Public education in the 21st century: How do we ensure that no child is left behind? . Temple Political and Civil Rights Law Review , 12 ( 1 ) : 95 – 119 .
  • Carnoy , M. and Loeb , S. 2002 . Does external accountability affect student outcomes? . Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis , 24 ( 4 ) : 305 – 31 .
  • Clune , W.H. 1994 . The shift from equity to adequacy in school finance . Educational Policy , 8 ( 4 ) : 376 – 94 .
  • Duncombe , W. and Yinger , J. 1999 . “ Performance standards and educational cost indexes: You can’t have one without the other ” . In Equity and adequacy in education finance: Issues and perspectives , Edited by: Ladd , H.F. , Chalk , R. and Hansen , J.S. 260 – 97 . Washington, DC : National Academy Press .
  • Duncombe , W. , Ruggiero , J. and Yinger , J. 1996 . “ Alternative approaches to measuring the cost of education ” . In Holding schools accountable , Edited by: Ladd , H. 327 – 56 . Washington, DC : Brookings Institution .
  • Ferguson , R. 1991 . Paying for public education: New evidence on how and why money matters . Harvard Journal of Legislation , 28: : 465 – 98 .
  • Ferguson , R. and Ladd , H.F. 1996 . “ How and why money matters: An analysis of Alabama schools ” . In Holding schools accountable , Edited by: Ladd , H. 265 – 98 . Washington, DC : Brookings Institution .
  • Fuller , B. , Gesicki , K. , Kang , E. and Wright , J. 2006 . “ Is the No Child Left Behind Act working?: The reliability of how states track achievement ” . Berkeley : University of California . PACE Working paper 06‐1
  • Guthrie , J.W. and Rothstein , R. 1999 . “ Enabling ‘adequacy’ to achieve reality: Translating adequacy into state school finance distribution arrangements ” . In Equity and adequacy in education finance: Issues and perspectives , Edited by: Ladd , H.F. , Chalk , R. and Hansen , J.S. 209 – 59 . Washington, DC : National Academy Press .
  • Hanushek , E.A. 1994 . A jaundiced view of ‘adequacy’ in school finance reform . Educational Policy , 8 ( 4 ) : 460 – 9 .
  • Hanushek , E.A. 1997 . Assessing the effects of school resources on student performance: An update . Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis , 19: : 141 – 64 .
  • Hedges , L.V. , Laine , R.D. and Greenwald , R. 1994 . Does money matter? A meta‐analysis of studies of the effects of differential school inputs on student outcomes . Educational Researcher , 23 ( 3 ) : 5 – 14 .
  • Henderson‐Montero , D. , Julian , M.W. and Yen , W.M. 2003 . Multiple measures: Alternative design and analysis models . Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice , 22 ( 2 ) : 7 – 12 .
  • Imazeki , J. and Reschovsky , A. 2004 . “ Estimating the costs of meeting Texas education accountability standards ” . Report submitted to the plaintiffs as evidence in West Orange‐Cove et al. v. Neeley et al. (District Court of Travis County, Texas), rev. version, July 8
  • Imazeki , J. and Reschovsky , A. 2005 . “ Assessing the Use of econometric analysis in estimating the costs of meeting state education accountability standards: Lessons from Texas ” . Madison , Wisconsin : La Follette School . Working Paper No. 2005‐005
  • Kentucky Department of Education . 2004 . “ Kentucky’s consolidated state application ” . Revised accountability workbook, June 15, 2004. http://www.education.ky.gov (accessed May 16, 2005)
  • Klein , S.P. , Hamilton , L.S. , McCaffrey , D.F. and Stecher , B.M. 2000 . What do test scores in Texas tell us? , Santa Monica , CA : Rand .
  • Koretz , D. 2003 . Using multiple measures to address perverse incentives and score inflation . Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice , 22 ( 2 ) : 18 – 26 .
  • Koretz , D. and Barron , S.I. 1998 . “ The validity of gains on the Kentucky Instructional Results Information System (KIRIS) ” . Santa Monica , CA : Rand . MR‐792‐PCT/FF
  • Ladd , H.F. and Hansen , J.S. , eds. 1999 . Making money matter: Financing America’s schools , Washington, DC : National Academy Press .
  • Lee , J. 1998 . The impact of content‐driven state education reform on instruction . Research in Middle Level Education Quarterly , 21: : 15 – 29 .
  • Lee , J. 2004 . Evaluating the effectiveness of instructional resource allocation and use: IRT and HLM analysis of NAEP teacher survey and student assessment data . Studies in Educational Evaluation , 30 : 175 – 99 .
  • Lee , J. 2006 . Tracking achievement gaps and assessing the impact of NCLB on the gaps: An in‐depth look into national and state reading and math outcome trends , Cambridge , MA : The Civil Rights Project at Harvard University .
  • Lee , J. 2007 . Do national and state assessments converge for educational accountability? A meta‐analytic synthesis of multiple measures in Maine and Kentucky . Applied Measurement in Education , 20 ( 2 ) : 1 – 33 .
  • Lee , J. and Wong , K.K. 2004 . The impact of accountability on racial and socioeconomic equity: Considering both school resources and achievement outcomes . American Educational Research Journal , 41 ( 4 ) : 797 – 832 .
  • Lefkowits , L. 2004 . “ School finance: From equity to adequacy ” . McREL Policy Brief. http://www.mcrel.org/PDF/PolicyBriefs/5042PI_PBSchoolFinanceBrief.pdf (accessed July 13, 2004)
  • Linn , R.L. 2000 . Assessments and accountability . Educational Researcher , 2 ( 29 ) : 4 – 16 .
  • Linn , R.L. , Baker , E.L. and Betebenner , D.W. 2002 . Accountability systems: Implications of requirements of the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 . Educational Researcher , 31 : 3 – 16 .
  • Loveless , T. 2006 . How well are American students learning? , Vol. II, No. 1. , Washington, DC : Brookings Institution . Brown Center Report on American Education
  • Maine Department of Education . 2003 . “ The federal ‘No Child Left Behind’ Act: Understanding adequate yearly progress fact sheet ” . http://www.maine.gov/education (accessed May 16, 2005)
  • Mathis , W.J. 2003 . No Child Left Behind: Costs and benefits . Phi Delta Kappan , 84 ( 9 ) : 679 – 86 . http://www.pdkintl.org/kappan/k0305mat.htm (accessed 16 March, 2003)
  • Meyer , R.H. 1997 . Value‐added indicators of school performance: A primer . Economics of Education Review , 16 ( 3 ) : 283 – 301 .
  • Mislevy , R.J. 1991 . Randomization‐based inferences about latent variables from complex samples . Psychometrika , 56 ( 2 ) : 177 – 96 .
  • Mislevy , R.J. , Johnson , E.G. and Muraki , E. 1992 . Scaling procedures in NAEP . Journal of Educational Statistics , 17 ( 2 ) : 131 – 54 .
  • Monk , D.H. 1992 . Education productivity research: An update and assessment of its role in education finance reform . Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis , 14 ( 4 ) : 307 – 32 .
  • Murnane , R. 1975 . The impact of school resources on the learning of inner city children , Cambridge , MA : Ballinger Publishing Co. .
  • National Center for Education Statistics . 1996 . Assessment and analysis of school‐level expenditures: Working Paper 96–19 , Washington, DC : Author .
  • National Center for Education Statistics . 1997 . Technical report: NAEP 1996 state assessment program in mathematics , Washington, DC : Author .
  • National Center for Education Statistics . 2001 . Public school finance programs of the U.S. and Canada: 1998–99 , Washington, DC : Author .
  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics . 1989 . Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics , Reston , VA : NCTM .
  • National Education Goals Panel . 1996 . Profile of 1994–95 state assessment systems and reported results , Washington, DC : Author .
  • Odden , A. and Clune , W.H. 1995 . Improving educational productivity and school finance . Educational Researcher , 24 ( 9 ) : 6 – 10, 22 .
  • Odden , A. , Fermanich , M. and Picus , L.O. 2003 . A state‐of‐the‐art approach to school finance adequacy in Kentucky , North Hollywood , CA : Lawrence O. Picus and Associates .
  • O’Leary , M. and Moskowitz , J. 1995 . “ Proposed ‘good practices’ for creating databases from the F‐33 and CCD for school finance analyses ” . In Does money matter in education? A policymaker’s guide , Washington, DC : National Center for Education Statistics . Selected papers in school finance
  • Olson , L. 2007 . New Bills Would Prod States to Take National View on Standards . Education Week , January 11. www.edweek.org (accessed January 29, 2007)
  • Powers , J.M. 2004 . High‐stakes accountability and equity: Using evidence from California’s Public Schools Accountability Act to address the issues in Williams v. State of California . American Educational Research Journal , 41 ( 4 ) : 763 – 95 .
  • Quality Counts . 2000 . Who should teach? . Education Week , January. http://www.edweek.com (accessed September 10, 2001)
  • Quality Counts . 2005 . No small change . Education Week , January. http://www.edweek.com (accessed March 10, 2005)
  • Rebell , M.A. 2006 . Adequacy cost studies: Perspectives on the state of the art . Education Finance and Policy , 1 ( 4. ) : 465 – 83 .
  • Reschovsky , A. and Imazeki , J. 1998 . “ The development of school finance formulas to guarantee the provision of adequate education to low income students ” . In Developments in school finance 1997 , Edited by: Fowler , W.J. 121 – 48 . Washington, DC : US Department of Education, NCES .
  • Reschovsky , A. and Imazeki , J. 2001 . Achieving educational adequacy through school finance reform . Journal of Education Finance , 26 ( 4 ) : 373 – 96 .
  • Reschovsky , A. and Imazeki , J. 2003 . Let no child left behind: Determining the costs of improving student performance . Public Finance Review , 31 ( 3 ) : 263 – 90 .
  • Reschovsky , A. and Imazeki , J. 2004 . “ Financing education so that no child is left behind: Determining the costs of improving student performance ” . In Developments in school finance 2003 , Edited by: Fowler , W.J. 33 – 52 . Washington, DC : US Department of Education, NCES .
  • Ruggiero , J. 2001 . Determining the base cost of education: an analysis of Ohio school districts . Contemporary Economic Policy , 19 ( 3 ) : 268 – 79 .
  • Shepard , L.A. , Glaser , R. , Linn , R.L. and Bohrnstedt , G. 1993 . Setting performance standards for student achievement: An evaluation of the 1992 achievement levels , Stanford , CA : National Academy of Education . Report of the National Academy of Education Panel on the evaluation of the NAEP trial state assessment
  • Silvernail , D.L. Using school level achievement data in determining core education costs: The impact on perceptions and policymaking . Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association . San Diego , CA
  • Silvernail , D.L. 2000 . “ Maine school funding 2000 update: In transition to an adequacy model. University of Southern Maine report ” . http://www.usm.maine.edu/cepare/fiscal.htm (accessed May 6, 2005)
  • Taylor , L.L. 2004 . “ Estimating the cost of education in Texas ” . Report submitted to the State as evidence in West Orange‐Cove et al. v. Neeley et al. (District Court of Travis County, Texas), rev. version, July 26
  • US General Accounting Office . 1993 . Educational achievement standards: NAGB’s approach yields misleading interpretations , Washington, DC : Author . GAO/PEMD‐93‐12
  • Verstegen , D.A. 2002 . Financing the new adequacy: Towards new models of state education finance systems that support standards based reform . Journal of Education Finance , 27 ( 3 ) : 749 – 81 .
  • Wenglinsky , H. 1998 . “ School district expenditures, school resources and student achievement: Modeling the production function ” . In Developments in school finance 1997 , Edited by: Fowler , W.J. 99 – 120 . Washington, DC : US Department of Education, NCES .

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.