Jiří Procháska (1749–1820): Part 2: “De structura nervorum”—Studies on a Structure of the Nervous System

References

• Aristotle (1907): De anima. Cambridge, The University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Aristotle (2004): On the Parts of Animals. Oxford, Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Avicenna (1981a): Al-Kánún Fi Al-Tibb. Kanon vračebnoj nauki [in Russian]. Vol. 1. Tashkent, FAN.
   Google Scholar
• Avicenna (1981b): Al-Kánún Fi Al-Tibb. Kanon vračebnoj nauki [in Russian]. Vol. 2. Tashkent, FAN.
   Google Scholar
• Baker JR (1948): The cell-theory: A restatement, history and critique. The Quarterly Journal of Microscopical Science 89: 103–125.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Barba A (1819): Osservazioni microscopiche sul cervello e sue parti adjacenti. Napoli, Dai torchi di Saverio Giordano.
   Google Scholar
• Bay NS, Bay BH (2010): Greek anatomist Herophilus: The father of anatomy. Anatomy & Cell Biology 43: 280–283.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bidloo G, de Lairesse G (1685): Anatomia humani corporis. Amstelodami, Joannis à Someren, Joannis à Dyk, Henrici & Theodori Boom.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke E, O’Malley CD (1996): The Human Brain and Spinal Cord: A Historical Study Illustrated by Writings from Antiquity to the Twentieth Century. San Francisco, Norman Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Crivellato E, Ribatti D (2007): Soul, mind, brain: Greek philosophy and the birth of neuroscience. Brain Research Bulletin 71: 327–336.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Descartes R, De la Forge L (1664): L’homme. Et un traité de la formation du foetus. Paris, Charles Angot.
   Google Scholar
• Descartes R, Schuyl F (1662): De homine. Ludguni Batavorum (Leiden), Petrum Leffen, Franciscum Moyardum.
   Google Scholar
• Dutrochet H (1824): Recherches anatomiques et physiologiques sur la structure intime des animaux et des végétaux, et sur leur motilité. Paris, Chez J. B. Baillière.
   Google Scholar
• Ehrenberg CG (1836): Beobachtung einer bisher unbekannten auffallenden Structur des Seelenorgans bei Menschen und Theiren. Berlin, Königlichen Akademie der Wissenchaften.
   Google Scholar
• Ehrenberg CG (1837): Observations on the structure hitherto unknown of the nervous system in man and animals. Edinburgh Medical and Surgical Journal 48: 257–305.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Estienne C (1545): De dissectione partium corporis humani: libri 3. Paris, Simonem Colinaeum.
   Google Scholar
• Feinberg TE, Farah MJ (2000): A historical perspective on cognitive neuroscience. In: Feinberg TE, Farah MJ, eds., Patient-based Approaches to Cognitive Neuroscience. MIT Press, pp. 3–20.
   Google Scholar
• Finger S (2001): Origins of Neuroscience: A History of Explorations Into Brain Function. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Garrison FH (1921): An Introduction to the History of Medicine. Philadelphia, London, W. B. Saunders Company.
   Google Scholar
• Gross CG (1999): Brain, Vision, Memory: Tales in the History of Neuroscience. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gross CG (2011): Malpighi’s cortical glands. Cortex 47: 903–904.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajar R (2012): The air of history: Early medicine to Galen (Part I). Heart Views 13: 120–128.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Haller A (1774): Physiology, Vol. 1. London, W. Innys, J. Richardson.
   Google Scholar
• Kruta V (1956): Med. Dr. Jiří Procháska 1749–1820. Život - dílo - doba. Praha, ČSAV.
   Google Scholar
• Leake CD (1994): The Old Egyptian Medical Papyri. Lawrence, KS, University of Kansas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee JA (1981): Sydney Ringer (1834–1910) and Alexis Hartmann (1898–1964). Anaesthesia 36: 1115–1121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magnus A (1506): Philosophia naturalis. Basileae, Furter.
   Google Scholar
• Mohamed WM (2008): Arab and Muslim Contributions to Modern Neuroscience. IBRO History of Neuroscience.
   Google Scholar
• Moir DM (1831): Outlines of the Ancient History of Medicine. Edinburgh, London, W. Blackwood, T. Cadell.
   Google Scholar
• Pearce JM (2013): The neuroanatomy of Herophilus. European Neurology 69: 292–295.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pevsner J (2002): Leonardo da Vinci’s contributions to neuroscience. Trends in Neurosciences 25: 217–220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prochaska G (1779): De structura nervorum. Tractatus anatomicus. Vindobonae, Rudolphum Graeffer.
   Google Scholar
• Prochaska G (1784): De functionibus systematis nervosi. In: Adnotationum academicarum. Fasciculus tertius. Praha, Wolfgang Gerle, pp. 1–164.
   Google Scholar
• Prochaska G (1851): Dissertation on the Functions of the Nervous System. In: Laycock T. ed., The Principles of Physiology, by John Augustus Unzer, and a Dissertation on the Functions of the Nervous System, by George Prochaska. London, Sydenham Society, pp. 361–450.
   Google Scholar
• Reeves C, Taylor D (2004): A history of the optic nerve and its diseases. Eye (Lond) 18: 1096–1109.
   Google Scholar
• Reisch G (1503): Margarita philosophica. Friburgi, Jo. Schottus.
   Google Scholar
• Rose FC (2009): Cerebral localization in antiquity. Journal of the History of the Neurosciences 18: 239–247.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schickore J (2009): Error as Historiographical Challenge: The Infamous Globule Hypothesis. In: Hon G, Schickore J, Steinle F, eds., Going Amiss In Experimental Research. Springer Netherlands, pp. 27–45.
   Google Scholar
• Schmahmann JD, Pandya D (2009): White matter pathways in early neuroscience. In: Schmahmann JD, Pandya D, eds., Fiber Pathways of the Brain. Oxford, New York, Oxford University Press, pp. 7–37.
   Google Scholar
• Sironi VA (2011): The mechanics of the brain: Half a century of research on the mind-brain dichotomy: The role of Leonardo Bianchi in the modern neuropsychological approach to the consciousness. Progress in Neuroscience 1: 15–26.
   Google Scholar
• Torre GMD (1776): Nuove Osservazioni Microscopiche. Napoli, C. R. Somasco.
   Google Scholar
• Trew CJ (1731): An observation on the method of preserving anatomical preparations in liquors. In: Commercium Literarium Norimbergense, pp. 68. Translated from the Latin in Acta Germanica, 1762, Volume 1. London, G. Smith, pp. 446–448.
   Google Scholar
• Tubbs RS, Salter EG (2006): Charles Estienne (Carolus Stephanus) (ca.1504–1564): Physician and anatomist. Clinical Anatomy 19: 4–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Helden A (1977): The Invention of the Telescope. Philadelphia, American Philosophical society.
   Google Scholar
• van Leeuwenhoek A (1675): Microscopical observations of Mr. Leewenhoeck, concerning the optic nerve, communicated to the publisher in Dutch, and by him made English. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society 10: 378–380.
   Google Scholar
• van Leeuwenhoek A (1677): Mr. Leewenhoeck’s Letter Written to the Publisher from Delff the 14th of May 1677, Concerning the Observations by him Made of the Carneous Fibres of a Muscle, and the Cortical and Medullar Part of the Brain; as Also of Moxa and Cotton. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society 12: 899–905.
   Google Scholar
• van Leeuwenhoek A (1718): Send-brieven, zoo aan de hoog edele Heeren van de Koninklyke Societeit te Londen. Te Delft, Adriaan Beman.
   Google Scholar
• van Middendorp JJ, Sanchez GM, Burridge AL (2010): The Edwin Smith papyrus: A clinical reappraisal of the oldest known document on spinal injuries. European Spine Journal 19: 1815–1823.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vesalius A (1552): De Humani corporis fabrica. Lugduni (Lyon), Ioan. Tornaesiu M.
   Google Scholar
• Virchow RLK (1860): Cellular pathology. London, John Churchill.
   Google Scholar
• Willams HS, Williams EH (1904): A History of Science, Volume IV. New York, London, Harper and brothers.
   Google Scholar
• Willis T (1664): Cerebri anatome: cui accessit nervorum descriptio et usus. Londini, Ja. Flesher.
   Google Scholar