Affordances and distributed cognition in museum exhibitions

References

• Allen, S. 2004. “Designs for Learning: Studying Science Museum Exhibits that do More than Entertain.” Science Education 88 (1): S17–S33. doi:10.1002/sce.20016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, S. 2005. “Exhibit Design in Science Museums: Dealing with a Constructivist Dilemma.” In In principle, In Practice. Museums as Learning Institutions, edited by J. H. Falk, L. D. Dierking, and S. Foutz, 43–73. Lanham: AltaMira Press.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, S., and J. Gutwill. 2004. “Designing with Multiple Interactives: Five Common Pitfalls.” Curator: The Museum Journal 47 (2): 199–212. doi:10.1111/j.2151-6952.2004.tb00117.x.
   Google Scholar
• Arth, M., and L. Claremon. 1977. “The Discovery Room.” Curator: The Museum Journal 20 (3): 169–180. doi:10.1111/j.2151-6952.1977.tb01635.x.
   Google Scholar
• Ash, D. 2004. “How Families Use Questions at Dioramas: Ideas for Exhibit Design.” Curator: The Museum Journal 47 (1): 84–100. doi:10.1111/j.2151-6952.2004.tb00367.x.
   Google Scholar
• Austin, T. 2012. “Scales of Narrativity.” In “Museum Making. Narratives, Architectures, Exhibitions, edited by S. Macleod, L. H. Hanks, and J. Hale, 107–118. Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Beghetto, R. A. 2014. “The Exhibit as Planned Versus the Exhibit as Experienced.” Curator: The Museum Journal 57 (1): 1–4. doi:10.1111/cura.12047.
   Google Scholar
• Chemero, A. 2003. “An Outline of a Theory of Affordances.” Ecological Psychology 15 (2): 181–195. doi:10.1207/S15326969ECO1502_5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson, E. in press. “‘Not Designed for Us’: How Informal Science Learning Environments Socially Exclude Low-income, Minority Ethnic Groups.” Science Education.
   Google Scholar
• Dufresne-Tassé, C., N. Banna, M. Sauvé, Y. Lepage, A. Weltzl-Fairchild, and R. Lachapelle. 1998. “Le fonctionnement imaginaire du visiteur adulte en salle d'exposition: Définition, mode d'accès et premières observations [The Workings of the Imagination of Adult Visitors in an Exhibition Gallery: Definition, Access, and First Observations].” In Évaluation et éducation muséale: nouvelles tendances/Evaluation and Museum, Education: New Trends/Evaluación y Educación Museistica: Nuevas Tendencias, edited by C. Dufresne-Tassé, 61–77. Paris: ICOM.
   Google Scholar
• Ericsson, K. A., and H. A. Simon. 1993. Protocol Analysis. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Feher, E. 1990. “Interactive Museum Exhibits as Tools for Learning: Explorations with Light.” International Journal of Science Education 12 (1): 35–49. doi:10.1080/0950069900120104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fortin-Debart, C. 2003. “Le Musee de Sciences Naturelles, un partenaire de l’école pour une education relative a l'environnement: du message scientifique au débat de société [Le Musée de Sciences Naturelles, a School Partner for Environmental Education: From Scientific Message to Societal Debate].” VertigO - la revue électronique en sciences de l'environnement 4 (2). http://vertigo.revues.org/4494.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, M. C., K. A. Ericsson, and R. Best. 2011. “Do Procedures for Verbal Reporting of Thinking Have to be Reactive? A Meta-analysis and Recommendations for Best Reporting Methods.” Psychological Bulletin 137 (2): 316–344. doi:10.1037/a0021663.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaver, W. W. 1991. “Technology Affordances.” In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 79–84. New York: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. J. [ 1979] 1986. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Hale, J. 2012. “Narrative Environments and the Paradigm of Embodiment.” In Museum Making. Narratives, Architectures, Exhibitions, edited by S. Macleod, L. H. Hanks, and J. Hale, 192–200. Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hanks, L. H., J. Hale, and S. Macleod. 2012. “Introduction: Museum Making. The Place of Narrative.” In Museum Making. Narratives, Architectures, Exhibitions, edited by S. Macleod, L. H. Hanks, and J. Hale, xix–xxiii. Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jakobsson, A., and E. Davidsson. 2012. “Using Sociocultural Frameworks to Understand the Significance of Interactions at Science and Technology Centers and Museums.” In Understanding Interactions at Science Centers and Museums, edited by E. Davidsson, and A. Jakobsson, 3–21. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Knappett, C. 2012. “Meaning in Miniature: Semiotic Networks in Material Culture.” In Excavating the Mind, edited by N. Johannsen, M. Jessen, and H. Jensen, 87–109. Aarhus: Aarhus University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lewin, K. 2009. “Kriegslandschaft [War Landscape].” Gestalt Theory 31 (3/4): 253–262. Reprinted from Lewin, K. 1917. Zeitschrift für angewandte Psychologie 12: 440–247.
   Google Scholar
• Locker, P. 2011. Exhibition Design. Vol. 2 of Basics Interior Design. Lausanne: Ava Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Makri, S., A. Blandford, and A. L. Cox. 2011. “This is What I'm Doing and Why: Methodological Reflections on a Naturalistic Think-aloud Study of Interactive Information Behaviour.” Information Processing & Management 47 (3): 336–348. doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2010.08.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marandino, M., M. Achiam, and A. D. Oliveira. Forthcoming. “The Diorama as a Means for Biodiversity Education.” In Natural History Dioramas - History, Construction and Educational Role, edited by S. D. Tunnicliffe, and A. Scheersoi. Springer. Accessed December 2014. http://www.springer.com/education+%26+language/science+education/book/978-94-017-9495-4?otherVersion=978-94-017-9496-1.
   Google Scholar
• Monti, F., and S. Keene. 2013. Museums and Silent Objects: Designing Effective Exhibitions. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Mortensen, C. H., M. Rudloff, and V. Vestergaard. 2012. “The Museum Foyer: Structuring and Affording Visitor Behaviour.” In The Transformative Museum. Proceedings of the DREAM Conference, 431–444. Odense: Danish Research Center on Education and Advanced Media Materials (DREAM).
   Google Scholar
• Mortensen, M. F. 2010a. “Designing Immersion Exhibits as Border-crossing Environments.” Museum Management and Curatorship 25 (3): 323–336. doi:10.1080/09647775.2010.498990.
   Google Scholar
• Mortensen, M. F. 2010b. “Museographic Transposition: The Development of a Museum Exhibit on Animal Adaptations to Darkness”. Éducation & Didactique 4 (1): 119–137.
   Google Scholar
• Mortensen, M. F. 2011. “Analysis of the Educational Potential of a Science Museum Learning Environment: Visitors' experience with and understanding of an immersion exhibit.” International Journal of Science Education 33 (4): 517–545. doi:10.1080/09500691003754589.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norman, D. A. 1988. The Design of Everyday Things. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Norman, D. A. 1999. “Affordance, Conventions, and Design.” Interactions 6 (3): 38–43. doi:10.1145/301153.301168.
   Google Scholar
• Pedretti, E. 2012. “The Medium is the Message.” In Understanding Interactions at Science Centers and Museums, edited by E. Davidsson, and A. Jakobsson, 45–61. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Piqueras, J., P.-O. Wickman, and K. M. Hamza. 2012. “Student Teachers' Moment-to-moment Reasoning and the Development of Discursive Themes – An Analysis of Practical Epistemologies in a Natural History Museum Exhibit.” In Understanding Interactions at Science Centers and Museums: Approaching Sociocultural Perspectives, edited by E. Davidsson, and A. Jakobsson, 79–96. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Reich, C. A., and A. Parkes. 2005. “How the Affordances of Materials Affect Visitors' Interactions with an Exhibit.” Visitor Studies Today 8 (2): 13–17.
   Google Scholar
• Rowe, S. 2002. “The Role of Objects in Active, Distributed Meaning-making.” In Perspectives on Object-centered Learning in Museums, edited by. S. G Paris, 19–35. Mahwah: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Rowe, S., and J. Bachman. 2012. “Mediated Action as a Framework for Exploring Learning in Informal Settings.” In Putting Theory into Practice, edited by D. Ash, J. Rahm, and L. Melber, 143–162. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Savard, N., C. Savard, and C. Dufresne-Tassé. 1994. “Comparaison de deux facons d'identifier les questions et les hypothèses formulés par le visiteur de musée. [A Comparison of Two Ways to Identify the Questions and Hypotheses Formulated by Visitors to a Museum].” Canadian Journal of Education 19 (1): 94–99. doi:10.2307/1495309.
   Google Scholar
• Sutton, J. 2008. “Material Agency, Skills and History: Distributed Cognition and the Archaeology of Memory.” In Material Agency, edited by C. Knappett, and L. Malafouris, 37–55. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Tulley, A., and A. M. Lucas. 1991. “Interacting with a Science Museum Exhibit: Vicarious and Direct Experience and Subsequent Understanding.” International Journal of Science Education 13 (5): 533–542. doi:10.1080/0950069910130504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Someren, M. W., Y. F. Barnard, and J. A. C. Sandberg. 1994. The Think Aloud Method: A Practical Guide to Modelling Cognitive Processes. London: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, S. 1987. “The Discovery Room. Omniplex Science Museum.” The Journal of Museum Education 12 (2): 16.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, J., and V. L. Patel. 2006. “Distributed Cognition, Representation, and Affordance.” Pragmatics & Cognition 14 (2): 333–341. doi:10.1075/pc.14.2.12zha.
   Google Scholar