Digital CoPs and Robbers: communities of practice and the use of digital artefacts

References

• AHRC. 2012. “Digital Transformations in the Arts and Humanities.” Accessed March 28 2014. http://www.ahrc.ac.uk/Funding-Opportunities/Research-funding/Themes/Digital-Transformations/Pages/Digital-Transformations.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• Appadurai, A. 2005. The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective, 3–63. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Armitage, L. H., and P. G. B. Enser 1997. “Analysis of User Need in Image Archives.” Journal of Information Science 23 (4): 287–299. doi: 10.1177/016555159702300403.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, A. 1997. Writing Home. London: Faber and Faber.
   Google Scholar
• Black, G. 2005. The Engaging Museum: Developing Museums for Visitor Involvement. Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• British Library. 2007. Annual Report and Accounts 2006/07. London: The British Library.
   Google Scholar
• British Library. 2009. The Knowledge Network: Thirty-sixth Annual Report and Accounts 2008/09. London: The British Library.
   Google Scholar
• British Library. 2012. The Power of Partnership: Thirty-ninth Annual Report and Accounts 2011/12. London: The British Library.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, J. S., and P. Duguid. 2001. “Knowledge and Organization: A Social-practice Perspective.” Organization Science 12 (2): 198–213.doi: 10.1287/orsc.12.2.198.10116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatterjee, H. J. 2010. “Staying Essential: Articulating the Value of Object Based Learning.” University Museums and Collections Journal 3. Accessed January 15, 2009. http://edoc.hu-berlin.de/umacj.
   Google Scholar
• Collections Trust. 2013. Culture Grid. Accessed February 11, 2014. www.culturegrid.org.uk.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., and V. L. Plano Clark. 2011. Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Deutschmann, S. 2009. “Understanding the Digital Supply Chain.” MEDIA-TECH Conference, Arvato Digital Services, Frankfurt, April 23.
   Google Scholar
• DeWalt, K. M., B. R. DeWalt, and C. B. Wayland. 1998. Handbook of Methods in Cultural Anthropology. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, D. 1993. “Modeling the Information-seeking Patterns of Academic Researchers: A Grounded Theory Approach.” The Library Quarterly 63 (4): 469–486. doi:10.1086/602622.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Europeana. 2013. “Europeana Celebrates 5 Years and 30 Million Objects.” europeana blog. Europeana. Accessed March 2, 2014. www.blog.europeana.eu2014.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G., and A. L. Strauss. 1999. The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Gould, S. Forthcoming. “Sequel – An Artistic Collaboration between the Slade School of Fine Art and UCL Museums & Collections.” University Museums and Collections Journal. International ICOM Committee for University Museums and Collections. http://edoc.hu-berlin.de/umacj.
   Google Scholar
• Heritage Lottery Fund. 2013. “Sharing Heritage: Digital Outputs.” Accessed September 28, 2013. http://www.hlf.org.uk/HowToApply/programmes/Pages/SmallGrantsDigitaloutputs.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• Hooper-Greenhill, E. 2007. Museums and Education: Purpose, Pedagogy, Performance. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hopes, D., and H. Chapman. 2012. “Digital CoPs and Robbers: Communities of Practice and the Transformation of Research.” Final Report, Unpublished, Arts and Humanities Research Council.
   Google Scholar
• Hunsaker, J. 1980. “The Experiential Learning Model and the Learning Style Inventory: An Assessment of Current Findings.” Journal of Experiential Learning and Simulation 2: 145–152.
   Google Scholar
• Itin, C. M. 1999. “Reasserting the Philosophy of Experiential Education as a Vehicle for Change in the 21st Century.” Journal of Experiential Education 22 (2): 91–98. doi:10.1177/105382599902200206.
   Google Scholar
• JISC. 2005. Digitisation in the UK: The Case for a UK Framework. Joint Information Systems Committee. Accessed March 2, 2014. http://www.jisc.ac.uk/whatwedo/programmes/digitisation/reports/digiukframework.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• JISC. 2009. Effective Practice in a Digital Age: A Guide to Technology-enhanced Learning and Teaching. Joint Information Systems Committee. Accessed March 2, 2014. http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/publications/effectivepracticedigitalage.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• JISC 2011. “JISC Content Programme 2011–2013.” Accessed March 2, 2014. http://www.jisc.ac.uk/whatwedo/programmes/digitisation/content2011_2013.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• Julien, H., and L. J. Duggan 2000. “A Longitudinal Analysis of the Information Needs and Uses Literature.” Library & Information Science Research 22 (3): 291–309. doi:10.1016/S0740-8188(99)00057-2.
   Google Scholar
• Karvonen, M. 2010. Digitising Museum Materials – Towards Visibility and Impact. Encouraging Collections Mobility – A Way Forward for Museums in Europe. Berlin: Finnish National Gallery, Erfgoed Nederland, Institut für Museumsforschung Staatliche Museen Zu Berlin Preussischer Kulturbesitz.
   Google Scholar
• Kolb, D. A. 1984. Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Koob, J. J., and J. Funk. 2002. “Kolb’s Learning Style Inventory: Issues of Reliability and Validity.” Research on Social Work Practice 12 (2): 293–308. doi:10.1177/104973150201200206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lave, J. 1991. “Situating Learning in Communities of Practice.” In Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition, edited by L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, and S. D. Teasley, 63–82. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Levine-Clark, M. 2007. “Electronic Books and the Humanities: A Survey at the University of Denver.” Collection Building 26 (1): 7–14. doi:10.1108/01604950710721548.
   Google Scholar
• Massa, L. J., and R. E. Mayer. 2006. “Testing the ATI Hypothesis: Should Multimedia Instruction Accommodate Verbaizer-Visualizer Cognitive Style?” Learning and Individual Differences 16: 321–336. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2006.10.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mätikalo, A., and R. Säljö. 2002. “Talk in Institutional Context and Institutional Context in Talk: Categories as Situated Practices.” Text 22: 57–82.
   Google Scholar
• NESTA. 2013. About Us. Accessed December 10, 2013, http://www.nesta.org.uk/about-us.
   Google Scholar
• Nicholas, D., P. Huntington, and H. R. Jamali. 2008. “User Diversity: As Demonstrated by Deep Log Analysis.” The Electronic Library 26 (1): 21–38. doi:10.1108/02640470810851716.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OERCommons. 2013. “Learn about the Movement.” Accessed December 9, 2013. http://www.oercommons.org/learn-about-the-movement.
   Google Scholar
• Ooghe, B., and D. Moreels. 2009. “Analysing Selection for Digitisation: Current Practices and Common Incentives.” D-Lib Magazine, 15. Accessed July 29, 2014. http://www.dlib.org/dlib/september09/ooghe/09ooghe.html.
   Google Scholar
• Pask, G. 1998. “Learning Strategies, Teaching Strategies, and Conceptual or Learning Style.” In Learning Styles and Learning Strategies, edited by R. R. Schmeck, 83–100. New York: Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Portin, R. A. 1981. “The Challenge of a Humanities Approach.” In Museum, Adults and the Humanities: A Guide for Educational Programming, edited by Z. W. Collins. Washington, DC: American Association of Museums.
   Google Scholar
• Riding, R. J., and S. Rayner. 1998. Cognitive Styles and Learning Strategies: Understanding Style Differences in Learning and Behaviour. London: David Fulton.
   Google Scholar
• Romanek, D., and B. Lynch. 2008. “Touch and the Value of Object Handling: Final Conclusions for a New Sensory Museology.” In Touch in Museums: Policy and Practice in Object Handling, edited by H. Chatterjee, 275–286. New York: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, C., and M. Terras. 2011. “Scholarly Information-seeking Behaviour in the British Museum Online Collection.” Museums and the Web 2011, Archives and Museums Informatics, Philadelphia. Accessed July 29, 2014. http://www.museumsandtheweb.com/mw2011/papers/scholarly_information_seeking_behaviour_in_the.html.
   Google Scholar
• Rumbold, K. 2010. “From ‘Access’ to ‘Creativity’: Shakespeare Institutions, New Media, and the Language of Cultural Value.” Shakespeare Quarterly 61 (3): 313–336. doi:10.1353/shq.2010.0009.
   Google Scholar
• Sady, W. 2001. “Ludwik Fleck – Thought Collectives and Thought Styles.” Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 74: 197–205.
   Google Scholar
• Schön, D. A. 1983. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. London: Temple Smith.
   Google Scholar
• Sparks, R. T. 2009. “Object Handling in the Archaeology Classroom – Strategies for Success.” 9th Conference of the International Committee of ICOM for University Museums and Collections (UMAC), Berkley, CA. Accessed July 29, 2014. http://edoc.hu-berlin.de/umacj/2010/sparks-191/XML/Sparks_xdiml.xml.
   Google Scholar
• ST. 2012. “Digital CoPs and Robbers: Workshop 1 PM D. Hopes.” Unpublished. Stratford-upon-Avon, Shakespeare Birthplace Trust TR47/1/1/1.
   Google Scholar
• Star, S. 1989. “The Structure of Ill-structured Solutions: Boundary Objects and Heterogeneous Distributed Problem Solving.” In Distributed Artificial Intelligence (Vol. 2), edited by M. Huhns, 37–54. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, K. L., and L. A. Felicetti. 1992. “Learning Styles of Marketing Majors.” Educational Research Quarterly 15 (2): 15–23.
   Google Scholar
• Swales, J. (2003). “Is the University a Community of Practice?” British Studies in Applied Linguistics 18: 203–216.
   Google Scholar
• Tenopir, C., D. W. King, J. Spencer, and L. Wu. 2009. “Variations in Article Seeking and Reading Patterns of Academics: What Makes a Difference?” Library & Information Science Research 31 (3): 139–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tusting, K. 2005. “Language and Power in Communities of Practice.” In Beyond Communities of Practice: Language, Power and Social Context, edited by K. T. Barton, 36–54. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• V&A, M. 2009. Victoria and Albert Museum – Annual Report and Accounts 2008–2009. London: V&A Museum.
   Google Scholar
• V&A, M. 2012. Victoria and Albert Museum – Annual Report and Accounts 2011–2012. London: V&A Museum.
   Google Scholar
• Verheij, J., E. Stoutjesdijk, and J. Beishuizen. 1996. “Search and Study Strategies in Hypertext.” Computers in Human Behavior 12 (1): 1–15. doi:10.1016/0747-5632(95)00015-1.
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, E. 1998. Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, E. 2009. Digital Habitats: Stewarding Technology for Communities. Portland, OR: CPsquare.
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, E. 2013. “Communities of Practice: A Brief Introduction.” Wenger-Trayner. Accessed November 26, 2013. http://www.ewenger.com/theory/.
   Google Scholar
• West, R. F. 1982. “A Construct Validity Study of Kolb’s Learning Style Types in Medical Education.” Journal of Medical Education 57: 795–796.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, T. D. 1990. “Object or Participant – The Information User in Information Research.” Swedish Library Research 3: 5–16.
   Google Scholar