Post-observation conversations in the museum: using the self-evaluation of the supervisee as the starting point

References

• Best, K. 2012. “Making Museum Tours Better: Understanding What a Guided Tour Really is and What a Tour Guide Really Does.” Museum Management and Curatorship 27 (1): 35–52. doi:10.1080/09647775.2012.644695.
   Google Scholar
• Chamberlin, C. T. 2000. “TESL Degree Candidates’ Perceptions of Trust in Supervisors.” TESOL Quarterly 34 (4): 653–672. doi: 10.2307/3587780
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charlies, S., L. Ria, S. Bertone, J. Trohel, and M. Durand. 2004. “Interactions Between Preservice and Cooperating Teachers and Knowledge Construction During Post-Lesson Interviews.” Teaching and Teacher Education 20 (8): 765–781. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2004.09.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Copland, F. 2010. “Causes of Tension in Post-Observation Feedback in Pre-Service Teacher Training: An Alternative View.” Teaching and Teacher Education 26: 466–472. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2009.06.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deci, E., and R. Ryan. 2000. “The ‘What’ and ‘Why’ of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self Determination of Behavior.” Psychological Inquiry 11 (4): 227–268. doi:10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desjarlais, M., and P. Smith. 2011. “A Comparative Analysis of Reflection and Self- Assessment.” International Journal of Process Education 3 (1): 3–18. http://www.ijpe.online/2011/reflection.pdf. doi: 10.5296/ije.v3i1.544
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, R. 1990. “Activities and Procedures for Teacher Preparation.” In Second Language Teacher Education, edited by J. Richards, and D. Nunan, 26–36. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Engin, M. 2015. “Written Artefacts in Post-Conference Feedback Sessions: The Running Commentary as a Support for Teacher Learning.” Journal of Education for Teaching 41 (3): 254–266. doi:10.1080/02607476.2015.1041289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falk, J., and L. Dierking. 2013. The Museum Experience Revisited. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fleiss, J. L. 1981. Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions. New York: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Grenier, R. S. 2009. “The Role of Learning in the Development of Expertise in Museum Docents.” Adult Education Quarterly 59 (2): 142–157. doi:10.1177/0741713608327369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammersley, M., and P. Atkinson. 1995. Ethnography: Principles in Practice. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Husu, J., S. Patrikainen, and A. Toom. 2007. “Developing Teachers’ Competencies in Reflecting on Teaching.” In Making a Difference: Challenges for Teachers, Teaching and Teacher Education, edited by J. Butcher, and L. McDonald, 127–140. Amsterdam: Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Hyland, F., and M. Lo. 2006. “Examining Interaction in the Teaching Practicum: Issues of Language, Power, and Control.” Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning 14 (2): 163–186. doi:10.1080/13611260500493535.
   Google Scholar
• Katic, E. K., C. E. Hmelo-Silver, and K. H. Weber. 2009. “Material Mediation: Tools and Representations Supporting Collaborative Problem-Solving Discourse.” International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education 21: 13–24.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Y., and R. E. Silver. 2016. “Provoking Reflective Thinking in Post Observation Conversations.” Journal of Teacher Education 67 (3): 203–219. doi:10.1177/0022487116637120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landis, J. R., and G. G. Koch. 1977. “The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data.” Biometrics 33 (1): 159–174. doi: 10.2307/2529310
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marienau, C. 1999. “Self-Assessment at Work: Outcomes of Adult Learners’ Reflections on Practice.” Adult Education Quarterly 49 (3): 135–146. doi:10.1177/074171369904900301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orland-Barak, L. 2006. “Convergent, Divergent, and Parallel Dialogue: Knowledge Construction in Professional Conversations.” Teacher and Teaching: Theory and Practice 12 (1): 13–31. doi:10.1080/13450600500364547.
   Google Scholar
• Ovando, M. N., and B. M. Harris. 1993. “Teachers’ Perceptions of the Post-Observation Conference: Implications for Formative Evaluation.” Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education 7: 301–310. doi: 10.1007/BF00972507
   Google Scholar
• Ross, A., and C. D. Bruce. 2007. “Teacher Self-Assessment: A Mechanism for Facilitating Professional Growth.” Teaching and Teacher Education 23: 146–159. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2006.04.03 doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2006.04.035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schep, M., C. Van Boxtel, and J. Noordegraaf. 2015. “Wat je kunt leren van een educatieve museumrondleiding [What You Could Learn During an Educational Guided Tour].” Cultuur+Educatie 42: 33–54.
   Google Scholar
• Schep, M., C. Van Boxtel, and J. Noordegraaf. 2018. “Competent Museum Guides: Defining Competencies for Use in Art and History Museums.” Museum Management and Curatorship 33 (1): 2–24. doi:10.1080/09647775.2017.1387590.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sergiovani, T. J., and R. J. Starratt. 2002. Supervision: A Redefinition. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. S. 1987. “Knowledge and Teaching: Foundations of the New Reform.” Harvard Educational Review 57 (1): 1–23. doi: 10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Struyk, L. R., and L. H. McCoy. 1993. “Self-Evaluation Techniques.” American Secondary Education 22 (2): 2–5.
   Google Scholar
• Sweeney, J. 1983. “The Post-Observation Conference: Key to Teacher Improvement.” The High School Journal 66 (2): 135–140.
   Google Scholar
• Tang, S. Y. F., and A. W. K. Chow. 2007. “Communicating Feedback in Teaching Practice Supervision in a Learning-Oriented Field Experience Assessment Framework.” Teaching and Teacher Education 23 (7): 1066–1085. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2006.07.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vasquez, C. 2004. “‘Very Carefully Managed’: Advice and Suggestions in Post-Observation Meetings.” Linguistics and Education 15: 33–58. doi:10.1016/j.linged.2004.10.004.
   Google Scholar
• Veenman, S., and E. Denessen. 2001. “The Coaching of Teachers: Results of Five Training Studies.” Educational Research and Evaluation 7 (4): 385–417. doi:10.1076/edre.7.4.385.8936.
   Google Scholar
• Waite, D. 1995. Rethinking Instructional Supervision: Notes on Its Language and Culture. London: The Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, S. 2011. Exploring Classroom Discourse: Language in Action. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, S. 2013. Classroom Discourse and Teacher Development. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Waring, H. Z. 2017. “Going General as a Resource for Doing Advising in Post-Observation Conferences in Teacher Training.” Journal of Pragmatics 110: 20–33. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2017.01.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar