‘Now that you mention it, museums probably are a target’: museums, terrorism and security in the United Kingdom

References

• Ajala, I. 2014. “Muslims in France and Great Britain: Issues of Securitization, Identities and Loyalties Post 9/11.” Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs 34 (2): 123–133. doi: 10.1080/13602004.2014.911583
   Google Scholar
• Aradau, C. 2004. “Security and the Democratic Scene: Desecuritization and Emancipation.” Journal of International Relations and Development 7 (4): 388–413. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.jird.1800030
   Google Scholar
• Aradau, C. 2015. “‘Crowded Places are Everywhere We Go’: Crowds, Emergency, Politics.” Theory, Culture & Society 32 (2): 155–175. doi: 10.1177/0263276414562429
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkinson, C., D. Yates, and N. Brooke. 2019. “Researching a Risky Business? The Use of Freedom of Information to Explore Counterterrorism Security at Museums in the United Kingdom.” Studies in Conflict and Terrorism. Accessed 19 October 2019. doi:10.1080/1057610X.2019.1647682.
   Google Scholar
• Awan, I. 2012. ““I Am a Muslim Not an Extremist”: How the Prevent Strategy Has Constructed a “Suspect” Community.” Politics & Policy 40 (6): 1158–1185. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-1346.2012.00397.x
   Google Scholar
• Balzacq, T. 2011. “A Theory of Securitization: Origins, Core Assumptions, and Variants.” In Understanding Securitisation Theory: How Security Problems Emerge and Dissolve, edited by T. Balzacq. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Blackwood, L., N. Hopkins, and S. Reicher. 2013. “I Know Who I Am, But Who Do They Think I Am? Muslim Perspectives on Encounters with Airport Authorities.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 36 (6): 1090–1108. doi: 10.1080/01419870.2011.645845
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackwood, L., N. Hopkins, and S. Reicher. 2015. “‘Flying While Muslim’: Citizenship and Misrecognition in the Airport.” Journal of Social and Political Psychology 3 (2): 148–170. doi: 10.5964/jspp.v3i2.375
   Google Scholar
• Bonino, S. 2017. Muslims in Scotland: The Making of Community in a Post-9/11 World. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bowers, K. J. 2001. “Small Business Crime: The Evaluation of a Crime Prevention Initiative.” Crime Prevention and Community Safety 3 (1): 23–42. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.cpcs.8140079
   Google Scholar
• Breen Smyth, M. 2009. “Subjectivities, ‘Suspect Communities’, Governments, and the Ethics of Research on ‘Terrorism’.” In Critical Terrorism Studies: A New Research Agenda, edited by R. Jackson, M. Breen Smyth, and J. Gunning. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, K. 2008. “The Promise and Perils of Women’s Participation in UK Mosques: The Impact of Securitisation Agendas on Identity, Gender and Community.” The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 10 (3): 472–491. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-856x.2008.00324.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buzan, B., O. Ole Wæver, and J. de Wilde. 1998. Security: A New Framework for Analysis. London: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Chakraborti, N. 2007. “Policing Muslim Communities.” In Policing Beyond Macpherson: Issues in Policing, Race and Society, edited by M. Rowe. Cullompton: Willan.
   Google Scholar
• Chambers, J. 1993. “Vigilance and Guard Services.” In Museum Security: A Handbook for Cultural Heritage Institutions, edited by D. Liston. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Choudhury, T., and H. Fenwick. 2011. “The Impact of Counter-Terrorism Measures on Muslim Communities.” International Review of Law, Computers & Technology 25 (3): 151–181. doi: 10.1080/13600869.2011.617491
   Google Scholar
• Côté, A. 2016. “Agents Without Agency: Assessing the Role of the Audience in Securitization Theory.” Security Dialogue 47 (6): 541–558. doi: 10.1177/0967010616672150
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cragin, R. K. 2017. “The November 2015 Paris Attacks: the Impact of Foreign Fighter Returnees.” Orbis 2: 212–226. doi: 10.1016/j.orbis.2017.02.005
   Google Scholar
• Ergün, N., B. Açıkel, and U. Turhan. 2017. “The Appropriateness of Today’s Airport Security Measures in Safeguarding Airline Passengers.” Security Journal 30 (1): 89–105. doi: 10.1057/sj.2014.41
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Floyd, R. 2016. “The Promise of Theories of Just Securitisation.” In Ethical Security Studies: A New Research Agenda, edited by J. Nyman, and A. Burke. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Frost, L. 2017. “No Safe Spaces: Notes on the National September 11 Museum.” Journal of Urban Cultural Studies 4 (1/2): 221–239. doi: 10.1386/jucs.4.1-2.221_1
   Google Scholar
• Gadher, R. 2017. “Museums Put on Alert for Isis Suitcase Bomb.” The Sunday Times, 19 February. Accessed 19 October 2019. http://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/museums-put-on-alert-for-isis-suitcase-bomb-3wk0h6b3n.
   Google Scholar
• Grove, L., and S. Thomas. 2016. “‘The Rhino Horn on Display Has Been Replaced by a Replica’: Museum Security in Finland and England.” Journal of Conservation and Museum Studies 14 (1): 1–11. doi: 10.5334/jcms.124
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasisi, B., and D. Weisburd. 2011. “Going Beyond Ascribed Identities: the Importance of Procedural Justice in Airport Security Screening in Israel.” Law & Society Review 45 (4): 867–892. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5893.2011.00459.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holt, A. 2010. “Using the Telephone for Narrative Interviewing: a Research Note.” Qualitative Research 10 (1): 113–121. doi: 10.1177/1468794109348686
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooper-Greenhill, E. 2007. Museums and Education: Purpose, Pedagogy, Performance. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hickman, M. J., L. Thomas, H. C. Nickels, and S. Silverstri. 2007. “Social Cohesion and the Notion of ‘Suspect Communities’: a Study of the Experiences and Impacts of Being ‘Suspect’ for Irish Communities and Muslim Communities in Britain.” Critical Studies on Terrorism 5 (1): 89–106. doi: 10.1080/17539153.2012.659915
   Google Scholar
• HM Government. 2012. Crowded Places: The Planning System and Counter-Terrorism. London: The Stationary Office.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, A. 2009. “Conclusion: Back to the Future of Terrorism Research.” Critical Studies on Terrorism 2 (2): 361–363. doi: 10.1080/17539150903025085
   Google Scholar
• Jarvis, L., and M. Lister. 2016. “What Would You Do? Everyday Conceptions and Constructions of Counter-Terrorism.” Politics 36 (3): 277–291. doi: 10.1177/0263395715613644
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonathan-Zamir, T., B. Hasisi, and Y. Margalioth. 2016. “Is It the What or the How? The Roles of High-Policing Tactics and Procedural Justice in Predicting Perceptions of Hostile Treatment: the Case of Security Checks at Ben-Gurion Airport, Israel.” Law & Society Review 50 (3): 608–636. doi: 10.1111/lasr.12216
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, N., and C. Horrocks. 2010. Interviews in Qualitative Research. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Lisle, D. 2013. “Frontline Leisure: Securitizing Tourism in the War on Terror.” Security Dialogue 44 (2): 127–146. doi: 10.1177/0967010613479426
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maguire, M. 2014. “Counter-terrorism in European Airports.” In The Anthropology of Security: Perspectives From the Frontline of Policing, Counter-Terrorism and Border Control, edited by M. Maguire, C. Frois, and N. Zurawski. London: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Malcolm, J. A. 2013. “Project Argus and the Resilient Citizen.” Politics 33 (4): 311–321. doi: 10.1111/1467-9256.12021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McIlhatton, D., Berry, J., Chapman, D., Christensen, PH., Cuddihy, J., Monaghan, R. and Range, R. (2018). “Protecting Crowded Places from Terrorism: An Analysis of the Current Considerations and Barriers Inhibiting the Adoption of Counterterrorism Protective Security Measures.” Studies in Conflict and Terrorism, Latest Articles. Accessed 19 October 2019. doi:10.1080/1057610X.2018.1507311.
   Google Scholar
• McLean, F., and M. O’Neill. 2007. “‘The Social Museum’ and its Implications for Marketing.” In Museum Marketing, edited by R. Rentschler, and A. Hede. Amsterdam: Butterworth-Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Mythen, G. 2012. “‘No one Speaks for us’: Security Policy, Suspected Communities and the Problem of Voice.” Critical Studies on Terrorism 5 (3): 409–424. doi: 10.1080/17539153.2012.723519
   Google Scholar
• Mythen, G., S. Walklate, and F. Khan. 2013. “‘Why Should we Have to Prove We’re Alright?’: Counter-Terrorism, Risk and Partial Securities.” Sociology 47 (2): 383–398. doi: 10.1177/0038038512444811
   Google Scholar
• NaCTSO. 2014. Counter Terrorism Protective Security Advice for Visitor Attractions. London: ACPO. Accessed 19 October 2019. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/375180/VisitorAttractions_Reviewed.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Nance, M. 2016. Defeating ISIS: Who They Are, How They Fight, What They Believe. New York: Skyhorse Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Neal, A. W. 2017. “To Speak Security or not to Speak Security? Responsibility and Deference in the Scottish Independence Debate.” In Security in a Small Nation: Scotland, Democracy, Politics, edited by A. W. Neal, 203–223. Cambridge: Open Book Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• O’Connor, H., and C. Madge. 2017. “Online Interviewing.” In The SAGE Handbook of Online Research Methods, edited by N. G. Fielding, R. M. Lee, and G. Blank, 416–434. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Omand, D. 2015. “What Should be the Limits of Western Counter-Terrorism Policy?” In Illusions of Terrorism and Counter-Terrorism, edited by R. English, 57–72. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oppenheimer, A. R. 2008. IRA, The Bombs and the Bullets: A History of Deadly Ingenuity. Dublin: Irish Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pantazis, C., and S. Pemberton. 2009. “From the ‘Old’ to the ‘New’ Suspect Community: Examining the Impacts of Recent UK Counter-Terrorist Legislation.” British Journal of Criminology 49 (5): 646–666. doi: 10.1093/bjc/azp031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prenzler, T., and R. Sarre. 2014. “The Role of Partnerships in Security Management.” In The Handbook of Security, edited by M. Gill, 769–790. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Ragazzi, F. 2016. “Suspect Community or Suspect Category? The Impact of Counter-Terrorism as ‘Policed Multiculturalism’.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 42 (5): 724–741. doi: 10.1080/1369183X.2015.1121807
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, L. 2007. What Terrorists Want. New York: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Roe, P. 2012. “Is Securitization a ‘Negative’ Concept? Revisiting the Normative Debate Over Normal Versus Extraordinary Politics.” Security Dialogue 43 (3): 249–266. doi: 10.1177/0967010612443723
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salter, M. B. 2008. “Securitization and Desecuritization: a Dramaturgical Analysis of the Canadian Air Transport Security Authority.” Journal of International Relations and Development 11 (4): 321–349. doi: 10.1057/jird.2008.20
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spalek, B. 2010. “Community Policing, Trust, and Muslim Communities in Relation to “new Terrorism”.” Politics & Policy 38 (4): 789–815. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-1346.2010.00258.x
   Google Scholar
• Spalek, B. 2011. “‘New Terrorism’ and Crime Prevention Initiatives Involving Muslim Young People in the UK: Research and Policy Contexts.” Religion, State and Society 39 (2/3): 191–207. doi: 10.1080/09637494.2011.577202
   Google Scholar
• Thelen, D. 2005. “Learning Community: Lessons in co-Creating the Civic Museum.” In Heritage, Museums and Galleries, edited by G. Corsane, 333–338. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Vermeulen, F. 2014. “Suspect Communities – Targeting Violent Extremism at the Local Level: Policies of Engagement in Amsterdam, Berlin, and London.” Terrorism and Political Violence 26 (2): 286–306. doi: 10.1080/09546553.2012.705254
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vidino, L. 2014. “European Foreign Fighters in Syria: Dynamics and Responses.” European View 13 (2): 217–224. doi: 10.1007/s12290-014-0316-4
   Google Scholar
• White, J. R. 2017. Terrorism and Homeland Security. Boston: Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Zedner, L. 2009. Security. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar