Navigation behaviour of visitors in museums based on visibility analysis and neural network simulation

References

• Basiri, A., P. Amirian, A. Winstanley, S. Marsh, T. Moore, and G. Gales. 2019. Seamless Pedestrian Positioning and Navigation Using Landmarks 24–40. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0373463315000442.
   Google Scholar
• Batty, M. 2001. “Exploring Isovist Fields : Space and Shape in Architectural and Urban Morphology.” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 28: 123–150. doi: 10.1068/b2725
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benedikt, M. L. 1979. “To Take Hold of Space : Isovists and Isovist Fields.” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 6: 47–65. doi: 10.1068/b060047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bitgood, S. 2010. “An Attention-Value Model of Museum Visitors.” Visit. Atten 1: 230–251.
   Google Scholar
• Borgers, A. W. J. 2005. “Modelling Pedestrian Behavior in Downtown Shopping Areas”.
   Google Scholar
• Braaksma, J. P. and W. J. Cook. 1980. “Human Orientation in Transportation Terminals.” Transportation Engineering Journal 106 (TE2): 189–203.
   Google Scholar
• Bronnenkant, K., and S. Yalowitz. 2009. “Timing and Tracking: Unlocking Visitor Behavior.” Visit. Stud.
   Google Scholar
• Cashdan, E. A., J. K. Stefanucci, S. H. Creem Regehr, and L. M. Padilla. 2016. “Sex Differences in Virtual Navigation Influenced by Scale and Navigation Experience.” Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 24: 582–590.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christidou, D., and S. Diamantopoulou. 2019. “Museum Encounters: a Choreography of Visitors’ Bodies in Interaction.” Museum Manag. Curatorsh 29: 344–361.
   Google Scholar
• Devlin, A. S. 2014. “Wayfinding in Healthcare Facilities: Contributions from Environmental Psychology.”
   Google Scholar
• Doxa, M., and D. O. Sullivan. 2001. “From Isovists to Visibility Graphs : a Methodology for the Analysis of Architectural Space.” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 28: 103–121. doi: 10.1068/b2684
   Google Scholar
• Dzebic, V. 2013. Isovist Analysis as a Tool for Capturing Responses Towards the Built Environment. Ontario: University of Waterloo.
   Google Scholar
• Franz, J. M. W., and G. Franz. 2005. “Isovists as a Means to Predict Spatial Experience and Behavior.”
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. J. 1950. “The Perception of the Visual World.”
   Google Scholar
• Goss, J. 1993. “The “ Magic of the Mall “: An Analysis of Form, Function, and Meaning in the Contemporary Retail Built Environment.” 83.
   Google Scholar
• Grasso, N., E. Verbree, S. Zlatanova, and M. Piras. 2017. “Strategies to Evaluate the Visibility Along an Indoor Path in a Point Cloud Presentation.” ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences IV-2/W4: 311–317. doi: 10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-2-W4-311-2017
   Google Scholar
• Herzog, T.R., 2003. “Searching for Legibility.”
   Google Scholar
• Hillier, B. 1996. “Space is the Machine.” Design Studies 1: 480.
   Google Scholar
• Hölscher, C., and M. Brösamle. 2007. “Capturing Indoor Wayfinding Strategies and Differences in Spatial Knowledge with Space Syntax.” Proceedings, 6th Int. Sp. Syntax Symp. İstanbul.
   Google Scholar
• Ji-Hyun Lee, T. Y. 2019. “ The Process of Visitor Studies in Art Museum Tracking the Behavior of Museum Visitors.” In IHSI International Intelligent Human Systems Integration Conference.
   Google Scholar
• Kaynar, I., 2005. “Visibility, Movement Paths and Preferences in Open Plan Museums: An Observational and Descriptive Study of the Ann Arbor Hands-on Museum.”
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Bia, Sewon Lee, and Jaesik Lee. 2007. “Gender Differences in Spatial Navigation.” International Journal of Psychology and Behavioral Sciences 1: 311–314.
   Google Scholar
• Koseoglu, Emine, and A. Deniz Erinsel Onder. 2011. “Subjective and Objective Dimensions of Spatial Legibility.”
   Google Scholar
• Lanir, Joel, Tsvi Kuflik, Nisan Yavin, Kate Leiderman, and Michael Segal. 2016. “Visualizing Museum Visitors’ Behavior.” Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 21: 313–326. doi: 10.1007/s00779-016-0994-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazaridou, A., and S. Psarra. 2017. “Spatial Navigation in Real and Virtual Multi-Level Museums.” Proc. 11th Sp. Syntax Symp. #14.
   Google Scholar
• Li, Jun, Syao Fu, Haibo He, Hongfei Jia, Yanzhong Li, and Yi Guo. 2015. “Simulating Large-Scale Pedestrian Movement Using CA and Event Driven Model: Methodology and Case Study.”
   Google Scholar
• Lovden, Martin, Agneta Herlttz, Michael Schellenbach, Barbara Grossman-Hutter, Antonio Kruger, and Ulman Lindenberger. 2007. “Quantitative and Qualitative Sex Differences in Spatial Navigation.” Blackwell Publ. Ltd Cogn. Neurosci.
   Google Scholar
• Mandel, L. H. 2018. “Understanding and Describing Users’ Wayfinding Behavior in Public Library Facilities Lauren.” Journal of Librarianship and Information Science 35: 264–271.
   Google Scholar
• Martella, C., A. Miraglia, J. Frost, M. Cattani, M. Richardus, and V. Steen. 2016. “Visualizing, Clustering, and Predicting the Behavior of Museum Visitors.” Pervasive and Mobile Computing 38: 430–443. doi: 10.1016/j.pmcj.2016.08.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millonig, A., and G. Gartner. 2009. “Supporting Pedestrian Wayfinding by Analysing Movement Patterns.” Proceedings of the XXIVe International Cartographic Conference (ICC'09). Santiago de Chile.
   Google Scholar
• Moussaïd, M., Helbing, D., & Theraulaz, G., 2011. “How Simple Rules Determine Pedestrian Behavior and Crowd Disasters.”
   Google Scholar
• Natapov, A., Czamanski, D., Fisher-gewirtzman, D., 2016. “Visuospatial Search in Urban Environment Simulated by Random Walks 0349.” https://doi.org/10.1080/21650349.2015.1130651.
   Google Scholar
• Omer, I., 2016. “Using space Syntax and Q-analysis for Investigating Movement Patterns in Buildings : The Case of Shopping Malls.” https://doi.org/10.1177/0265813516647061
   Google Scholar
• O’Neill, M.J., 1991. “Evaluation of a Conceptual Model of Architectural Legibility.”
   Google Scholar
• Ostwald, M. J. 2011. “The Mathematics of Spatial Configuration: Revisiting, Revising and Critiquing Justified Plan Graph Theory.” Nexus Network Journal 13: 445–470. doi: 10.1007/s00004-011-0075-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parvin, A., A. Min Ye, and B. Jia. 2007. “Multilevel Pedestrian Movement: Does Visibility Make Any Difference?” In Proceedings, 6th International Space Syntax Symposium, İstanbul.
   Google Scholar
• Penn, A. 2001. “Space syntax and Spatial Cognition.”
   Google Scholar
• Peponis, John, Ruth Conroy Dalton, Jean Wineman, and Nick Sheep Dalton. 2004. “Measuring the Effects of Layout upon Visitors’ Spatial Behaviors in Open Plan Exhibition Settings.” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design31: 453–473. doi: 10.1068/b3041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rainoldi, M., B. Neuhofer, and M. Jooss. 2018. “Mobile Eyetracking of Museum Learning Experiences.” In Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism.
   Google Scholar
• Ramamtitham, K. 2017. “Efficient Dynamic Floor Field Methods for Microscopic Pedestrian Crowd Simulations.”
   Google Scholar
• Rohloff, Ipek Kaynar, Sophia Psarra, and Jean Wineman. 2009. “Experiencing Museum Gallery Layouts Through Local and Global Visibility Properties in Morphology.” Proc. 7th Int. Sp. Syntax Symp. Stock.
   Google Scholar
• Safaria, Hossein, Fataneh Fakouri Moridania, and Sharifah Syed Mahdzar. 2016. “Influence of Geometry on Legibility: An Explanatory Design Study of Visitors at the Kuala Lampur City Center.”
   Google Scholar
• Salgamcioglu, M. E. C. 2017. “Permanent and Temporary Museum Spaces: A Study on Human Behavior and Spatial Organization Relationship in Refunctioned Warehouse Spaces of Karaköy, Istanbul.” in: Proceedings of the 11th Space Syntax Symposium.
   Google Scholar
• Sas, C., R. Reilly, G. O. Hare, I. Marian, and E. Mangina. 2003. Modelling User Navigation 2 Navigation within VEs.
   Google Scholar
• Saucier, Deborah M, Sheryl M Green, Jennifer Leason, Alastair Mac Fadden, Scott Bell, and Lorin J Elias. 2002. “Are sex Differences in Navigation Caused by Sexually Dimorphic Strategies or by Differences in Ability to use the Strat … ” Behav. Neurosci 116: 403–410. doi: 10.1037/0735-7044.116.3.403
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sneider, Jennifer Tropp, Derek A. Hamiltond, Julia E. Cohen-Gilberta, David J. Crowleya, and Isabelle M. Rossob. 2015. “Sex Differences in Spatial Navigation and Perception in Human Adolescents and Emerging Adults.” Behavioural Processes 111: 42–50. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2014.11.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strohmaier, Robert, Gerhard Sprung, and Alexander Nischelwitzer. 2015. “Using Visitor Flow Visualization to Improve Visitor Experience in Museums and Exhibitions.” in: Museums and the Web.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, P. 2009. “Taxonomy of Human Wayfinding Tasks : A Knowledge-Based Approach Taxonomy of Human Wayfinding Tasks : A Knowledge-Based Approach Access details : Access Details : [subscription number 906465279] Taxonomy of Human Wayfinding Tasks : A Knowledge-Based Appr.” https://doi.org/10.1080/13875860902906496.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, A. 2001. “Depthmap: A Program to Perform Visibility Graph Analysis.” 3rd Int. Symp. Sp. Syntax 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, Alasdair, and Alan Penn. 1999. “Making Isovists Syntactic: Isovist Integration Analysis.” 2nd Int. Symp. Sp. Syntax. Univ. Bras. Brazil.
   Google Scholar
• Tzortzi, K. 2007. The Interaction Between Building Layout and Display Layout in Museums. London: University College London.
   Google Scholar
• Tzortzi, K., 2011. Interconnecting Museology and Architecture. J. Sp. Syntax Sp 2: 26–53.
   Google Scholar
• Tzortzi, K. 2014. “Museum Management and Curatorship Movement in Museums : Mediating Between Museum Intent and Visitor Experience 37–41.” https://doi.org/10.1080/09647775.2014.939844.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, W. L., S. M. Lo, and S. B. Liu. 2017. “A Cognitive Pedestrian Behavior Model for Exploratory Navigation: Visibility Graph Based Heuristics Approach.” Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory 77: 350–366. doi:10.1016/j.simpat.2017.07.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, W. L., S. M. Lo, S. B. Liu, and H. Kuang. 2014. “Microscopic Modeling of Pedestrian Movement Behavior : Interacting with Visual Attractors in the Environment.” Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 44: 21–33. doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2014.03.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weisman, J. 1981. “Evaluating Architectural Legibility: Way-Finding in the Built Environment.” Environ. Behav 13: 189–204. doi: 10.1177/0013916581132004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiener, Jan M, Gerald FranzÁ, Nicole Rossmanith, Andreas Reichelt, Hanspeter A Mallotô, and Heinrich H Bullthof. 2007. “Isovist Analysis Captures Properties of Space Relevant for Locomotion and Experience.”
   Google Scholar
• Ying, Shen, Lin Li, and Yurong Gao. 2009. “Pedestrian Simulation and Distribution in Urban Space Based on Visibility Analysis and Agent Simulation.” In International Symposium on Spatial Analysis, Spatial-Temporal Data Modeling, and Data Mining.
   Google Scholar
• Yun, Y. W., and Y. Ook Kim. 2007. “The Effect of Depth and Distance in Spatial Cognition.” Proceedings of 6th International Space Syntax Symposium Istanbul.
   Google Scholar
• Zancanaro, Massimo, Tsvi Kuflik, Zvi Boger, Dina Goren-Bar, and Dan Goldwasser. 2007. “Analyzing Museum Visitors’ Behavior Patterns Massimo.” In International Conference on User Modelling.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, M., H. Dong, F. Wang, Q. Wang, and X. Yang. 2016. “Modelling and Simulation of Pedestrian Dynamical Behavior Based on a Fuzzy Logic Approach.” Information Sciences 360: 112–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2016.04.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar