Experimentation and collecting practice: balancing flexible policies and accountability in developing born-digital museum collections

References

• Alberti, S. J., E. Cox, T. Phillipson, and A. Taubman. 2018. “Collecting Contemporary Science, Technology and Medicine.” Museum Management and Curatorship 33 (5): 402–427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antonelli, P. 2010. “@ at MoMA.” In Inside/Out, Museum of Modern Art http://www.moma.org/explore/inside_out/2010/03/22/at-moma
   Google Scholar
• Arrigoni, G., and A. Galani. 2019. “Digitally Enhanced Polyvocality and Reflective Spaces: Challenges in Sustaining Dialogue in Museums Through Digital Technologies.” In European Heritage, Dialogue and Digital Practices, edited by Areti Galani, Rihannon Mason and Gabi Arrigoni, 37–59. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Arrigoni, G., N. Kane, S. McConnachie, and J. McKim. 2022. Preserving and Sharing Born-Digital and Hybrid Objects from and Across the National Collection. Project Report. London: V&A.
   Google Scholar
• Avrami, E. 2020. “Sustainability, Intergenerational Equity, and Pluralism: Can Heritage Conservation Create Alternative Futures?” In Cultural Heritage and the Future, edited by C. Holtorf and A. Högberg, 198–216. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, A. R. 2020. “The Museum and the Killing Jar: How Animal Crossing’s Insects Reveal Videogames’ Object Afterlife.” Loading: The Journal of the Canadian Game Studies Association 13 (22): 7–22.
   Google Scholar
• Barack, S., et al. 2021. “Planning for the Future Right Now: Riskscapes in Conserving Contemporary Design.” Journal of the American Institute for Conservation 60 (2-3): 1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barr, A. 1939. Art in Our Time. New York: The Museum of Modern Art.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, S. 2013. Planetary: Collecting and Preserving Code as a Living Object. https://www.cooperhewitt.org/2013/08/26/planetary-collecting-and-preserving-code-as-a-living-object/
   Google Scholar
• Chan, S., and A. Cope. 2015. “Strategies Against Architecture: Interactive Media and Transformative Technology at the Cooper Hewitt, Smithsonian Design Museum.” Curator: The Museum Journal 58 (3): 352–368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman, P. 2021. “The Case for Documenting User Experience as Part Preservation Strategy for Internet-Based Art.” AICCM Bulletin 42 (1): 43–52.
   Google Scholar
• Cormier, B. 2017. How We Collected WeChat. Victoria and Albert Museum Blog. https://www.vam.ac.uk/blog/international-initiatives/how-we-collected-wechat
   Google Scholar
• Cranmer, C. 2019. Building a Media Preservation Lab. ACMI Labs. https://labs.acmi.net.au/building-a-media-preservation-lab-1cf3e0ade949
   Google Scholar
• Dekker, A. 2019. “Between Light and Dark Archiving.” In Digital Art Through the Looking Glass. New Strategies for Archiving, Collecting and Preserving in Digital Humanities, edited by O. Grau, J. Hoth, and E. Krems a.d. Wandl-Vogt, 133–144. Donau: Edition Donau-Universität.
   Google Scholar
• Dekker, A. 2020. “Breathing Life into the Living Dead.” Paper presented at MAPS (Media Art Preservation) Conference, Budapest, February 13–14.
   Google Scholar
• Dekker, A., G. Giannachi, and V. Van Saaze. 2017. “Expanding Documentation, or Making the Most of the Cracks in the Wall.” In Documenting Performance. The Context and Processes of Digital Curation and Archiving, edited by T. Sant, 61–78. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Depocas, A., J. Ippolito, and C. Jones. 2003. “Permanence Through Change: The Variable Media Approach.” Science, and Technology. Montreal. https://variablemedia.net/e/preserving/html/var_pub_index.html
   Google Scholar
• DeSilvey, C. 2017. Curated Decay: Heritage Beyond Saving. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Digital Preservation Coalition. 2015. Digital Preservation Handbook. https://www.dpconline.org/handbook
   Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, P. J. 1988. “Interest & Agency in Institutional Theory.” In Institutional Patterns and Organizations: Culture and Environment, edited by L. Zucker, 3–21. Cambridge: Ballinger.
   Google Scholar
• Finn, D. 2021. “Museum Authorship and the Conservation of Media Installations: Two Case Studies from the Smithsonian American Art Museum.” Journal of the American Institute for Conservation 60 (2-3): 1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fino-Radin, B. 2019. Designing the Future of Design. A Vision for Collecting Digital Design at the Cooper Hewitt, Smithsonian Design Museum. https://opensource.smalldata.industries/research/designing-the-future/
   Google Scholar
• Geismar, H. 2018. Museum Object Lessons for the Digital Age. London: UCL Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haldrup, M., M. Achiam, and K. Drotner. 2021. Introduction: For an Experimental Museology. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, R. 2015. “Beyond “Natural” and “Cultural” Heritage: Toward an Ontological Politics of Heritage in the Age of Anthropocene.” Heritage & Society 8 (1): 24–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Himmelsbach, S. 2019. “Net-based and Networked. Challenges for the Conservation of Digital Art.” In Digital Art Through the Looking Glass. New Strategies for Archiving, Collecting and Preserving in Digital Humanities, edited by O. Grau, J. Hoth, and E. Wandl-Vogt, 233–246. Donau: Edition Donau-Universität.
   Google Scholar
• Holtorf, C. 2018. Conservation and Heritage as Future-making. In ICOMOS University Forum, 1–13. ICOMOS International.
   Google Scholar
• Innocenti, P. 2014. “Bridging the Gap in Digital Art Preservation: Interdisciplinary Reflections on Authenticity, Longevity and Potential Collaborations.” In Preserving Complex Digital Objects, edited by J. Delve and D. Anderson, 71–83. London: Facet.
   Google Scholar
• Laurenson, P. 2013. “Emerging Institutional Models and Notions of Expertise for the Conservation of Time-Based Media Works of Art.” Technè 37: 36–42.
   Google Scholar
• Laurenson, S., C. Robertson, and S. Goggins. 2020. “Collecting COVID-19 at National Museums Scotland.” Museum and Society 18 (3): 334–336.
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, B. 2013. “Reflective Debate, Radical Transparency and Trust in the Museum.” Museum Management and Curatorship 28 (1): 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Macdonald, S., and P. Basu. 2007. Exhibition Experiments. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Marontate, J. 2005. “Rethinking Permanence and Change in Contemporary Cultural Preservation Strategies.” The Journal of Arts Management, Law, and Society 34 (4): 285–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McConchie, J., and T. Ensom. 2019. “Preserving Virtual Reality Artworks: A Museum Perspective.” Paper presented at ACM SIGGRAPH 2019 Talks 1–2.
   Google Scholar
• McDonough, J. P., R. Olendorf, M. Kirschenbaum, K. Kraus, D. Reside, R. Donahue, A. Phelps, C. Egert, H. Lowood, and S. Rojo. 2010. Preserving Virtual Worlds Final Report. https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/handle/2142/17097
   Google Scholar
• Muller, L. 2016. “Collecting Experience: The Multiple Incarnations of Very Nervous System.” In New Collecting: Exhibiting and Audiences After New Media Art, edited by B. Graham, 183–202. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, O. 2018. Museum Studies as Critical Praxis: Developing an Active Approach to Teaching, Research and Practice. Tate Paper (29) https://www.tate.org.uk/research/tate-papers/29/museum-studies-critical-praxis
   Google Scholar
• Nakajima, K. 2014. “Rapid Response Collecting by Kieran Long, Victoria and Albert Museum.” Axis: World Design Journal 168: 80–83.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, J. 2012. Best Before: Videogames, Supersession and Obsolescence. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, J., and I. Simons. 2018. GAME OVER? Curating, Preserving and Exhibiting Videogames: A White Paper. https://thebgi.uk/gameoverwhitepaper/
   Google Scholar
• Rees, A. J. 2021. “Collecting Online Memetic Cultures: How tho.” Museum and Society 19 (2): 199–219.
   Google Scholar
• Rinehart, R., and J. Ippolito. 2014. Re-collection: Art, New Media, and Social Memory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Salahu-Din, D. T. 2019. “Documenting the Black Lives Matter Movement in Baltimore Through Contemporary Collecting: An Initiative of the National Museum of African American History and Culture.” Collections 15 (2-3): 101–112.
   Google Scholar
• Sandler, D. 2016. Counterpreservation: Architectural Decay in Berlin Since 1989. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, C. 2020. Preserving UK Videogame History. https://www.dpconline.org/blog/preserving-uk-videogame-history
   Google Scholar
• Srinivasan, R., K. M. Becvar, R. Boast, and J. Enote. 2010. “Diverse Knowledges and Contact Zones Within the Digital Museum.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 35 (5): 735–768.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tate. 2020. Acquisition and Disposal Policy. https://www.tate.org.uk/about-us/policies-and-procedures
   Google Scholar
• Van Oost, O. 2012. Living Lab Methodology in Museum Studies: An Exploration. The Transformative Museum Conference Proceedings, edited by E. Kristiansen, Roskilde University, Denmark. 482–493.
   Google Scholar
• Van Saaze, V., G. Wharton, and L. Reisman. 2018. “Adaptive Institutional Change: Managing Digital Works at the Museum of Modern Art.” Museum and Society 16 (2): 220–239.
   Google Scholar
• Zuanni, C. 2021. “Theorizing Born Digital Objects: Museums and Contemporary Materialities.” Museum and Society 19: 184–198.
   Google Scholar