1,158
Views
27
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Administrative justice, discretion and the ‘welfare to work’ project

Pages 323-338 | Published online: 08 Dec 2008

Refereences

  • Adler , M. 2003 . A socio‐legal approach to administrative justice. . Law and policy , 25 : 323 – 352 .
  • Adler , M. and Longhurst , B. 1994 . Discourse, power and justice: towards a new sociology of imprisonment , London : Routledge .
  • Bailey , R. , Hales , J. , Hayllar , O. and Wood , M. 2007 . Pathways to Work: customer experience and outcomes. Findings from a survey of new and repeat incapacity benefits customers in the first seven pilot areas , Leeds : Corporate Document Services . DWP Research Report No.456
  • Barnes , H. and Hudson , M. 2006 . Pathways to Work: qualitative research on the condition management programme , Leeds : Corporate Document Services . DWP Research Report No.346
  • Bull , D. 1980 . The anti‐discretion movement in Britain: fact or phantom. . Journal of social welfare law , 2 : 65 – 83 .
  • Corden , A. and Nice , K. 2006 . Pathways to Work from Incapacity Benefits: a study of experience and use of Return to Work Credit , Leeds : Corporate Document Services . DWP Research Report No.353
  • Cowan , D. and Halliday , S. 2003 . The appeal of internal review Hart. Oxford
  • Dalley , G. and Berthoud , R. 1992 . Challenging discretion: the social fund review procedure , London : Policy Studies Institute .
  • Davis , K. C. 1971 . Discretionary justice , Urbana, IL : University of Illinois Press .
  • Department for Work and Pensions . 2006 . A new deal for welfare: empowering people to work , London : The Stationery Office . Cm 6730
  • Department for Work and Pensions . 2007 . In work, better off: next steps to full employment , London : The Stationery Office . Cm 7130
  • Dickens , S. , Mowlam , A. and Woodfield , K. 2004 . Incapacity Benefit reforms – the personal advisor role and practices , LeedsS : DWP Research Management .
  • Dworkin , R. 1977 . Taking rights seriously , London : Duckworth .
  • Galligan , D. 1986 . Discretionary powers , Oxford : Clarendon Press .
  • Halliday , S. 2003 . Judicial review and compliance with administrative law , Oxford : Hart .
  • Harlow , C. and Rawlings , R. 1984 . Law and administration , London : Weidenfield and Nicolson .
  • Harris , M and Partington , M , eds. 1999 . Administrative justice in the 21st century , Oxford : Hart .
  • Hawkins , K , ed. 1992 . The uses of discretion , Oxford : Clarendon Press .
  • Hood , C. 1991 . A new public management for all seasons. . Public administration , 69 : 3 – 19 .
  • Knight , T. , Dickens , S. , Mitchell , M. and Woodfield , K. 2005 . Incapacity Benefit reforms – the personal adviser role and practices: stage two , Leeds : Corporate Document Services . DWP Research Report No.278
  • Lipsky , M. 1980 . Street‐level bureaucracy , New York : Russell Sage Foundation .
  • Mashaw , J. 1983 . Bureaucratic Justice , New Haven : Yale University Press .
  • Mitchell , M. and Woodfield , K. 2008 . Qualitative research exploring the Pathways to Work sanctions regime , Leeds : Corporate Document Services . DWP Research Report No.475
  • National Audit Office . 2006 . Jobcentre Plus. Delivering effective services through personal advisers , London : The Stationery Office . HC 24
  • Sainsbury , R. 1992 . “ Administrative justice: discretion and procedure in social security decision‐making. ” . In The uses of discretion , Edited by: Hawkins , K . Oxford : Clarendon Press .
  • Sainsbury , R. 1994 . “ Internal reviews and the weakening of social security claimants' rights of appeal. ” . In Administrative law and government action , Edited by: Richardson , G and Genn , H . Oxford : Oxford University Press .
  • Sainsbury , R. and Eardley , T. 1992 . Housing Benefit review boards: a case for slum clearance? . Public law , : 551 – 558 . Winter
  • Tata , C. 2007 . Sentencing as craftwork and the binary epistemologies of the discretionary decision process. . Social & legal studies , 16 (3) : 425 – 447 .
  • Taylor , I. and Kelly , J. 2006 . Professionals, discretion and public sector reform in the UK: re‐visiting Lipsky. International journal of public sector management , 19 : 629 – 642 .

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.