Identity crisis in the family courts? Different approaches in England and Wales and Australia

References

• Australian Government Department of Families, Housing, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs, 2008. Australia's children: safe and well, a discussion paper for consultation
   Google Scholar
• Cheer , U. , Caldwell , J. and Tully , J. 2007 . The family court, families and the public gaze , Wellington, New Zealand : The Families Commission .
   Google Scholar
• Cretney , S. 1998 . “ Marriage saving and the early days of conciliation: the role of Claud Mullins ” . In Law, law reform and the family , Edited by: Cretney , S. 115 – 136 . Oxford: Oxford University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Davis , G. 1983 . Mediation in divorce: a theoretical perspective . Journal of social welfare law , 5 : 131 – 140 .
   Google Scholar
• Davis , G. 1988 . “ The Halls of Justice and justice in the halls ” . In Divorce mediation and the legal process , Oxford: Clarendon Edited by: Dingwall , R. and Eekelaar , J.
   Google Scholar
• Denning report, 1947. Committee on procedure in matrimonial causes final report, 1947 Cmd 7024
   Google Scholar
• Department for Education and Skills/Department for Constitutional Affairs, 2005. Parental separation: the next steps, Cm 6452
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health and Social Security (DHSS), 1974. Finer report. Report of the Committee on One Parent Families, 1974 Cmnd 5629
   Google Scholar
• Doughty , J. 2006 . CAFCASS moves to private law . Family law , 36 ( 1 ) : 36 – 39 .
   Google Scholar
• Doughty , J. 2008 . From court missionaries to conflict resolution: a century of family court welfare . Child and family law quarterly , 20 ( 2 ) : 131 – 154 .
   Google Scholar
• Eekelaar , J. 2006 . Family law and personal life , Oxford University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Family Justice Council, 2006. Report to the President of the Family Division on the approach to be adopted by the Court when asked to make a contact order by consent, where domestic violence has been an issue in the case
   Google Scholar
• Freeman , M. 1984 . “ Questioning the delegalisation movement in family law: do we really want a family court? ” . In The resolution of family conflict , Edited by: Eekelaar , J. and Katz , I. Toronto: Butterworths .
   Google Scholar
• Graycar , R. 2000 . Law reform by frozen chook: family law reform for the new millennium . Melbourne University law review , 24 : 737 – 755 .
   Google Scholar
• Harris report, 1936. The Departmental Committee on the Social Services in Courts of Summary Jurisdiction, Cmd 5122
   Google Scholar
• Harrison , M. 1997 . Resolution of disputes in family law: should courts be confined to litigation? . Family matters , 46 : 43 – 45 .
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, M., 2007. Finding a better way. Canberra: Family Court of Australia
   Google Scholar
• Her Majesty's Inspectors of Courts Administration (HMICA) . 2005 . Domestic violence, safety and family proceedings , London: HMICA .
   Google Scholar
• Her Majesty's Inspectors of Courts Administration (HMICA) . 2006 . Private law frontline practice , London: HMICA .
   Google Scholar
• Higgins, D.J., 2007. Cooperation and coordination: an evaluation of the Family Court of Australia's Magellan case-management model. Canberra: Family Court of Australia and Australian Institute of Family Studies
   Google Scholar
• Home Office, 1994. National standards for probation service family court welfare work
   Google Scholar
• House of Representatives Standing Committee on Family and Community Affairs, 2003. Every picture tells a story: inquiry into child custody arrangements in the event of parental separation. Canberra: Federal Government of Australia
   Google Scholar
• Hunt, J. and Lawson, J., 1999. Crossing the boundaries, Bristol: National Council for Family Proceedings
   Google Scholar
• Hunter , R. 2003 . Adversarial mythologies: policy assumptions and research evidence in family law . Journal of law and society , 30 ( 1 ) : 156 – 176 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunter , R. 2006 . Child-related proceedings under Pt VII Div 12A of the Family Law Act: what the children's cases pilot program can and can't tell us . Australian journal of family law , 20 : 227 – 248 .
   Google Scholar
• Hunter , R. 2007 . Close encounters of a judicial kind: ‘hearing’ children's' ‘voices’ in family law proceedings . : 283 Child and Family Law Quarterly, 19
   Google Scholar
• James, A.L. and Hay, W., 1993. Court welfare in action. Hemel Hempsteod: Harvester Wheatsheaf
   Google Scholar
• Ingleby , R. 1993 . Family law and society , Sydney: Butterworths .
   Google Scholar
• Kelly , F. and Fehlberg , B. 2002 . Australia's fragmented family law system: jurisdictional overlap in the area of child protection . International journal of law, policy and the family , : 38 – 70 . 16
   Google Scholar
• Lombard, R., 2009. Poor public understanding of social work a top issue. Community care, 3 June
   Google Scholar
• McClelland , R. Speech at Newcastle Family Pathways Conference . New South Wales, 13 June
   Google Scholar
• Magistrates Court Services Inspectorate, 2003. Seeking agreement. London: MCSI
   Google Scholar
• May , T. Speech to Conservative Party Conference . Bournemouth, 5 October
   Google Scholar
• McIntosh, J., 2006. The children's cases pilot project: an exploratory study of impacts on parenting capacity and child well-being, Family Court of Australia
   Google Scholar
• McIntosh , J. , Bryant , D. and Murray , K. 2007 . Evidence of a different nature: the child-responsive and less adversarial initiatives of the Family Court of Australia . Family court review , 46 ( 1 ) : 125 – 136 .
   Google Scholar
• Murch , M. 1969 . Seebohm: a painful dilemma for probation. Probation . 5 ( 1 ) : 18
   Google Scholar
• Murch, M., 1980. Justice and welfare in divorce. Sweet and Maxwell
   Google Scholar
• Murch, M. and Hooper, D., 1992. The family justice system, Bristol: Jordan's Family Law
   Google Scholar
• Nicholson, A., 2004. Sixteen years of family law: a retrospective. Australian journal of family law, 18, 131
   Google Scholar
• Nicholson , A. and Harrison , M. 2000 . Family law and the Family Court of Australia: experiences of the first 25 years . Melbourne University Law Review , : 30
   Google Scholar
• Ofsted, 2008. Inspection of the experience of Cafcass service users in the family courts in South Yorkshire
   Google Scholar
• Parkinson , P. 2006 . Keeping in contact: the role of family relationship centres in Australia . : 157 CFLQ, 18
   Google Scholar
• Parton , N. 2006 . Safeguarding childhood: early intervention and surveillance in a late modern society , Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan .
   Google Scholar
• Parton , N. 2008 . The ‘change for children’ programme in England: towards the ‘preventive-surveillance state’ . Journal of Law and Society , 33 ( 1 ) : 166 – 187 .
   Google Scholar
• Potter, M., 2008. Report on the private law programme, Speech at the President's Conference, Highgate House, 13 May
   Google Scholar
• Pugsley, J., 2007. Parents' rights v children's needs. Family Law, 454
   Google Scholar
• Roberts , S. 1983 . Mediating in Family Disputes . Modern Law Review , 46 ( 5 ) : 537 – 557 .
   Google Scholar
• Rose , N. 1996 . Psychiatry as a political science . History of the Human Sciences , 9 ( 2 ) : 1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saunders , H. 2004 . Twenty-nine child homicides , Bristol: Women's Aid Federation of England .
   Google Scholar
• Star , L. 1996 . Counsel of perfection: the Family Court of Australia , Oxford : Oxford University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Vanstone , M. 2004 . Mission control: the origins of humanitarian service . Probation Journal , 51 ( 1 ) : 34
   Google Scholar