421
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Current Developments

Norgrove and after: An overview of the Family Justice Review and the government's response

&
Pages 381-394 | Published online: 14 Jan 2013

References

  • Archard , D. and Skivenes , M. 2009 . Balancing a child's best interests and a child's views . International journal of children's rights , 17 ( 1 ) : 1 – 21 .
  • Bala , N. , Birnbaum , R. and Martinson , D. 2010 . One judge for one family: differentiated case management for families in continuing conflict . Canadian Journal of Family Law , 26 ( 2 ) : 395 – 450 .
  • Brighouse , H. 2003 . How should children be heard? . Arizona law review , 45 ( 3 ) : 691 – 711 .
  • Brophy , J. 2012 . The contribution of experts in care proceedings: evaluation of independent social work reports in care , Oxford : Oxford University Press .
  • Centre for Social Justice . 2009 . Every Family Matters , London : Centre for Social Justice .
  • Department for Children, Schools and Families . 2010 . Support for all: the families and relationships green paper , London : Department for Children, Schools and Families .
  • Douglas , G. and Ferguson , N. 2003 . The role of grandparents in divorced families . International journal of law, policy and the family , 17 ( 1 ) : 41 – 67 .
  • Drew , L. 2000 . Grandparents and divorce . Journal of the British Society of Gerontology , 10 ( 3 ) : 7 – 10 .
  • Fehlberg , B. , Smith , B. , Maclean , M. and Roberts , C. 2011 . Caring for children after parental separation: would legislation for shared parenting time help children? . Family policy briefing , 7 : 3 Oxford: Family Policy Studies Centre
  • Hasson , E. 2006 . Wedded to ‘fault’: the legal regulation of divorce and relationship breakdown . Legal studies , 26 ( 2 ) : 267 – 290 .
  • Her Majesty's Court Service . 2011 . Annual report and accounts 2010–2011 , London : The Stationery Office .
  • Horton, M., 2012. The family court: ‘be careful what you wish for’. Available from: http://www.familylawweek.co.uk/site.aspx?i = ed98862 (http://www.familylawweek.co.uk/site.aspx?i=ed98862) [Accessed 20 August 2012]
  • Hunt , A. and Macleod , J. 2008 . Outcomes of applications to court for contact orders after parental separation or divorce , London : Ministry of Justice .
  • Kaspiew , R. 2011 . Legislative aspirations and social realities: empirical reflections on Australia's 2006 family law reforms . Journal of social welfare and family law , 33 ( 4 ) : 397 – 418 .
  • Law Society, 2012. Law Society welcomes government commitment to speed up care proceedings. Available from: http://www.lawsocietymedia.org.uk/Press.aspx?ID = 1580 (http://www.lawsocietymedia.org.uk/Press.aspx?ID=1580) [Accessed 21 July 2012]
  • Long , R. 2012 . Family justice review update: contact and other issues for parents following separation , London : House of Commons .
  • Ministry of Justice and Department of Education . 2012a . Co-operative parenting following family separation: proposed legislation on the involvement of both parents in a child's life , Runcorn, Cheshire : Department of Education .
  • Ministry of Justice and Department of Education . 2012b . The government response to the family justice review: a system with children and families at its heart , London : Ministry of Justice and Department of Education .
  • Ministry of Justice, the Department of Education and the Welsh Government . 2011 . Family justice review final report , London : Ministry of Justice, the Department of Education and the Welsh Government .
  • Munro , E. 2011 . The Munro review of child protection: final report, a child centred system , London : Department of Education .
  • Office for National Statistics, 2011. Available from: http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/rel/vsob1/divorces-in-england-and-wales/2010/stb-divorces-2010.html [Accessed 21 July 2012]
  • Office of the Children's Commissioner . 2011 . Do more than act. Listen. Consultation response to the family justice review undertaken by the Family Justice Council's Voice of the Child sub-group , London : Office of the Children's Commissioner .
  • Scott , E. 1992 . Pluralism, parental preference, and child custody . California law review , 80 ( 3 ) : 615 – 672 .
  • Warshak , R.A. 2011 . Parenting by the clock: the best interests of the child standard, judicial discretion, and the American Law Institute's ‘approximation rule . University of Baltimore law review , 41 ( 1 ) : 83 – 163 .
  • Wotton, J., 2012. Shared parenting should not be confused with parental rights, says Law Society. Available from: http://www.lawsocietymedia.org.uk/Press.aspx?ID = 1642 (http://www.lawsocietymedia.org.uk/Press.aspx?ID=1642) [Accessed 16 July 2012]

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.