Administrative justice? Realising the right to independent living in England: power, systems, identities

REFERENCES

• Adler, M. (2003). A socio-legal approach to administrative justice. Law & Policy, 25, 323.
   Google Scholar
• Association of Directors of Adult Social Services. (2010). Common Resource Allocation Framework. Retrieved August 3, 2010 from www.puttingpeoplefirst.org.uk/Topics/Latest/Resource/?cid = 6376& and from: Collingbourne T (2013) Realising Disability Rights? Implementation of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities in England – a critical analysis. Thesis (PhD). University of Sheffield, Appendix 2. http://etheses.whiterose.ac.uk/3904.
   Google Scholar
• Association of Directors of Adult Social Services. (2011). Report on Personalisation Survey September 2011. Retrieved October 29, 2011 from http://www.adass.org.uk/.
   Google Scholar
• Baldwin, R., & Hawkins, K. (1984). Discretionary justice: Davis reconsidered. Public Law, 570.
   Google Scholar
• Beresford, P., Fleming, J., Glynn, M., Bewley, C., Croft, S., Branfield, F., & Postle, K. (2011). Supporting people: Towards a person-centred approach. Bristol: The Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Charlton, J. I. (2000). Nothing about us without us: Disability oppression and empowerment. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, J., McDermont, M., & Newman, J. (2010). Delivering choice and administering justice: Contested logics of public services. In M.Adler (Ed.), Administrative justice in context. Oxford: Hart.
   Google Scholar
• Collingbourne, T (2013). Realising Disability Rights? Implementation of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities in England – a Critical Analysis. Thesis (PhD). University of Sheffield. Retrieved from http://etheses.whiterose.ac.uk/3904.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, K. C. (1969). Discretionary justice: A preliminary inquiry. University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health. (2002). Fair access to care servicesLAC (2002) 13. London: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health. (2003). Fair access to care services: Guidance for eligibility criteria for adult social care. London: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health. (2006). Our health, our care, our say: a new direction for community services. (Cmnd 6737, 31 January 2006).
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health. (2007). Putting people first: A shared vision and commitment to the transformation of adult social care. London: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health. (2008). Transforming adult social careLAC(DH)(2008) 1. London: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health. (2009). Transforming adult social careLAC(DH)(2009) 1. London: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health. (2010a). Prioritising need in the context of putting people first: A whole system approach to eligibility for social care – guidance on eligibility criteria for adult social care, England 2010Gateway ref 13729. London: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health. (2010b). Vision for adult social care: Capable communities and active citizensGateway reference 14847. London: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• Equality and Human Rights Commission. (2011). Hidden in plain sight: Inquiry into disability-related harassment. London: Equality and Human Rights Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Goodley, D. (2010). Disability studies: An interdisciplinary introduction. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Gulland, J. (2007). Complaining, Appealing or Just Getting It Sorted Out: complaints procedures for community care service users. Thesis (PhD) University of Edinburgh.
   Google Scholar
• HL v United Kingdom. App 45508/99, EHRR 471 (2004)
   Google Scholar
• Hodgkins, S. L. (2008). Discoursing Disability: the Personal and Political Positioning of Disabled People in Talk and Textwork. Thesis (PhD), University of Northampton.
   Google Scholar
• Jowell, J. (1973). The legal control of administrative justice. Public Law, 178.
   Google Scholar
• Lawson, A. (2007). 2006- the United Nations convention on the rights of persons with disabilities: New era or false dawn?Syracuse Journal of International Law and Commerce, 34, 563.
   Google Scholar
• London Borough of Hillingdon v Steven Neary, Mark Neary and the Equality and Human Rights Commission [2011] EWHC 1377 (COP) 9 June 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Mashaw, J. L. (1983). Bureaucratic justice: Managing social security disability claims. Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maynard-Campbell, S., & Maynard-Lupton, A. (2000). Bureaucratic Barriers to Normal Day-to-Day Activity. MusclePower! Retrieved May 10, 2011 from http://www.disability-studies.leeds.ac.uk/library/.
   Google Scholar
• Mégret, F. (2008). The disabilities convention: Human rights of persons with disabilities or disability rights?Human Rights Quarterly, 30, 493.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, J. (2005). Independent Living: the role of evidence and ideology in the development of government policy. Paper delivered at Cash and Care Conference, Social Policy Research Unit, University of York, 12–13 April 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, J. (2011a). Independent Living and Government Policy: Triumph or Tragedy?. Seminar for Leeds University Centre for Disability Studies, 23 March 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, J. (2011b). Rethinking disability policy. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Needham, C. (2009). Co-production: An emerging evidence base for adult social care transformation. London: Social Care Institute for Excellence.
   Google Scholar
• Nuffield Foundation. (2007). Call for research funding applications. Retrieved January 16, 2008 from http://www.nuffieldfoundation.org/administrative-justice (2007)
   Google Scholar
• O'Cinneide, C. (2009). Extracting protection for the rights of persons with disabilities from human rights frameworks: Established limits and new possibilities. In O. M.Arnandóttir & G.Quinn (Eds.), The UN convention on the rights of persons with disabilities: European and Scandinavian perspectives. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff.
   Google Scholar
• O'grady, A., Pleasence, P., Balmer, N. J., Buck, A., & Genn, H. (2004). Disability, social exclusion and the consequential experience of justiciable problems. Disability & Society, 19, 259–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Office of the Deputy Prime Minister. (2008). The drivers of social exclusion: A review of the literature for the social exclusion unit in the breaking the cycle series. London: Social Exclusion Unit.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, M. (1990). The politics of disablement. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, M., & Barnes, C. (2012). The new politics of disablement. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Parton, N. (2003). Rethinking professional practice: The contributions of social constructionism and the feminist ‘ethics of care’. British Journal of Social Work, 33(1), 1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pleasence, P., Buck, A., Balmer, N., O'Grady, A., Genn, H., & Smith, M. (2004). Causes of action: Civil law and social justice. London: Legal Services Research Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Pleasence, P., Balmer, N., & Buck, A. (2006). Causes of action: Civil law and social justice (2nd ed.). London: Legal Services Research Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Prime Minister's Strategy Unit. (2005). Improving the life chances of disabled people. London: Strategy Unit.
   Google Scholar
• Quarmby, K. (2011). Scapegoat: Why we are failing disabled people. Portobello books. London.
   Google Scholar
• Quinn, G, Degener, T, with Bruce, A, Burke, C, Castellino, J, Kenna, P, Kilkelly, U, & Quinlivan, S (2002). Human rights and disability: The current use and future potential of United Nations human rights instruments in the context of disability. United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2002 HR/PUB/02/1.
   Google Scholar
• Quinn, G. (2008). Added value of the UN Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. Newsletter of the European Coalition for Community Living, December 2008/January 2009, 2.
   Google Scholar
• Quinn, G. (2009). ‘Resisting the temptation of elegance’: Can the convention on the rights of persons with disabilities socialise states to right behaviour? In O. M.Arnandóttir & G.Quinn (Eds.), The UN convention on the rights of persons with disabilities: European and Scandinavian perspectives. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff.
   Google Scholar
• Reeve, D. (2008). Negotiating disability in everyday life: The experience of psycho-emotional disablism. Thesis (unpublished) (PhD), University of Lancaster. Cited in Goodley, D., 2010. Disability Studies: An Interdisciplinary Introduction. London: Sage, 86.
   Google Scholar
• Runswick-cole, K. (2007). The Tribunal was the most stressful thing: more stressful than my son's diagnosis or behaviour': The experiences of families who go to the Special Educational Needs and Disability Tribunal (SENDisT). Disability & Society, 22, 315–328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Series, L., & Clements, L. (2013). Putting the cart before the horse: Resource allocation systems and community care. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 35, 207–226.
   Google Scholar
• Social Care Institute for Excellence. (undated). Good Practice. Retrieved August 15, 2013 from www.scie.org/goodpractice; Social Care TV. Retrieved August 15, 2013 from: http://www.scie.org.uk/socialcaretv/topic.asp?t = personalisation.
   Google Scholar
• Stein, M. A. (2007). Disability human rights. California Law Review, 95, 75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stein, MA, & Lord, JE (2009). Future prospects for the United Nations convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. In OMArnandóttir & GQuinn (Eds.), The UN convention on the rights of persons with disabilities: European and Scandinavian perspectives. Martinus Nijhoff.
   Google Scholar
• Stevens, M., Glendinning, C., Jacobs, S., Moran, N., Challis, D., Manthorpe, J., Fernadez, J-L., Jones, K., Knapp, M., Netten, A., & Wilberforce, M. (2011). Assessing the role of increased choice in English social care services. Journal of Social Policy, 40, 257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sunkin, M., Calvo, K., Platt, L., & Landman, T. (2007). Mapping the use of judicial review to challenge local authorities in England and Wales. Public Law, 545.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, C. (2007). Sociologies of disability, ‘impairment’ and Chronic Illness: Ideas in disability studies and medical sociology. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Torfing, J. (1999). New theories of discourse: Laclau, Mouffe and Źiźek. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Young, I. M. (1990). Justice and the politics of difference. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar