REFERENCES
- Artis, J. (2004). Judging the best interests of the child: Judges' accounts of the tender years doctrine. Law and Society Review, 38, 769–792.
- Bainham, A. (2010). Rowing back from Re G? Natural parents in the Supreme Court. Family Law, 40, 394–400.
- Bartlett, K. (1999). Child custody in the 21st century. Willamette Law Review, 35, 467–497.
- Braithwaite, J. (2002). Rules and principles: A theory of legal certainty. Australian Journal of Legal Philosophy, 27, 47–64.
- Collier, R. (2005). Fathers 4 Justice, law and the new politics of fatherhood. Child and Family Law Quarterly, 17, 511–533.
- Everett, K., & Yeatman, L. (2010). Are some parents more natural than others?Child and Family Law Quarterly, 23, 290–311.
- Fineman, M. (1994). The illusion of equality. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
- Flu¨ckiger, A. (2008). The ambiguous principle of the clarity of law. In A.Wagner & S.Cacciaguidi-Fahy (Eds.), Obscurity and clarity in the law: prospects and challenges (pp. 9–24). Aldershot: Ashgate.
- Fortin, J. (2011). A decade of the HRA and its impact on children's rights. Family Law, 41, 176–182.
- Gilmore, S. (2006). Contact/shared residence and child well-being: Research evidence and its implications for legal decision-making. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, 20, 344–371.
- Gilmore, S. (2008). Disputing contact: Challenging some assumptions. Child and Family Law Quarterly, 20, 285–304.
- Gilmore, S. (2012). ‘Why should they cite us?’: Lessons from an ‘uncommon’ family lawyer's influence on the common law. In R.Probert & C.Barton (Eds.), Fifty years in family law essays for Stephen Cretney (pp. 33–49). Cambridge: Intersentia.
- Hale, B. (1999). The view from court 45. Child and Family Law Quarterly, 11, 377–397.
- Herring, J. (1999). The Human Rights Act and the welfare principle in family law – conflicting or complementary?Child and Family Law Quarterly, 11, 223–245.
- Herring, J. (2005). Farewell welfare. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 27, 159–171.
- Herring, J. (2011). Family Law. Harlow: Pearson.
- Herring, J., & Foster, C. (2012). Welfare means relationality, virtue and altruism. Legal Studies, 32, 480–499.
- Herring, J., & Powell, O. (2013). The rise and fall of presumptions surrounding the welfare principle. Family Law, 44, 553–559.
- King, M., & Piper, C. (1995). How the law thinks about children. Aldershot: Ashgate.
- Krauss, D., & Sales, B. (2000). Legal standards, expertise, and experts in the resolution of contested child custody cases. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 6, 843–854.
- Kushner, M. (2006). Is ‘best interests’ a solution to filling potholes in child custody planning?Journal of Child Custody, 3, 71–90.
- Moloney, L. (2008). The elusive pursuit of Solomon: Faltering steps toward the rights of the child. Family Court Review, 46, 39–61.
- Norgrave, D. (2011). Family Justice Review. London: Ministry of Justice.
- Piper, C. (2000). Assumptions about children's best interests. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 22, 261–282.
- Reece, H. (1996). The paramountcy principle: Consensus or construct?Current Legal Problems, 49, 267–298.
- Ruthus, Z. (2010). Social science or ‘Lego-science’? Presumptions, politics, parenting and the new family law. Queensland University of Technology Law and Justice Journal, 10, 164–182.
- Skivenes, M. (2010). ‘Judging the child's best interests: Rational reasoning or subjective presumptions?Acta Sociologica, 53, 339–353.
- Trinder, L., Connolly, J., Kellett, J., Notley, C., & Swift, L. (2006). Making contact happen or making contact work? The process and outcomes of in-court conciliation. London: Department for Constitutional Affairs.
- Trinder, L. (2010). Shared residence: A review of the recent research evidence. Child and Family Law Quarterly, 22, 475–491.
- WilkinsonIII, J.(1992). Toward a jurisprudence of presumptions. New York University Law Review, 67, 907–924.
- Zimmerman, M. (2002). Intrinsic v extrinsic value [online]. Retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/value-intrinsic-extrinsic/.