Australia's Children's Courts: An assessment of the status of and challenges facing the child welfare jurisdiction in Victoria

References

• Allen Report. (2003, September). Protecting children: The child protection outcomes projectReport commissioned by the Government Department of Human Services from Allen Consulting, NSW. Victoria: Victorian Government Printer.
   Google Scholar
• Applegate, B. K., Turner, M. G., Sanborn, J. B.Jr, Latessa, E. J., & Moon, M. M. (2000). Individualization, criminalization, or problem resolution: A factorial survey of Juvenile Court judges' decisions to incarcerate youthful felony offenders. Justice Quarterly, 17, 309–331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borowski, A. (2010). Indigenous participation in sentencing young offenders. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 43, 465–484.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borowski, A. (2011). In Courtroom 7: The Children's Koori Court at work. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 55, 1110–1134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, S. (1991). Magistrates at work. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Children and Young Persons Act. (1989). Victoria: Victorian Government Printer.
   Google Scholar
• Children, Youth and Families Act. (2005). Victoria: Victorian Government Printer.
   Google Scholar
• Community Services Victoria. (1992). Annual report 1992. Victoria: Victorian Government Printer.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Cummins, P., Scott, D., & Scales, W. (2012, February). Protecting Victoria's vulnerable children inquiry. Victoria: Victorian Government Printer.
   Google Scholar
• Doob, A. N. (2001). Youth Court judges' views of the youth justice system – the results of a survey: Report to the Department of Justice Canada. Toronto: Centre of Criminology, University of Toronto.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, L. (1997). Improving juvenile dependency courts. Juvenile and Family Court Journa, 48(4), 1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freiberg, A., Kirby, P., & Ward, L. (2004). The report of the panel to oversee the consultation on protecting children: The child protection outcomes project. Melbourne: Department of Human Services.
   Google Scholar
• Freymond, N. (2001). Using intermediary structures to support families: An international comparison of practice in child protection. Partnerships for Children and Families Project, Faculty of Social Work. Waterloo: Wilfred Laurier University.
   Google Scholar
• Kettner, P. M., Moroney, R. M., & Martin, L. L. (2008). Designing and managing programs (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• King, M., Freiberg, A., Batagol, B., & Hyams, R. (2009). Non-adversarial justice. Leichhardt: Federation Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kupchik, A. (2006). Judging juveniles: Prosecuting adolescents in adult and juvenile courts. New York, NY: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Liamputtong, P., & Ezzy, D. (2004). Qualitative research methods. Melbourne: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• McGrath, A. (2009). Offenders' perceptions of the sentencing process: A study of deterrence and stigmatization in the New South Wales Children's Court. The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 42(1), 24–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maclean, M., Hunter, R., Washoff, F., Ferguson, L., Bastard, B., & Ryrstedt, E. (2011). Family justice in hard times: Can we learn from other jurisdictions?Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 33, 319–341.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook of new methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, A., & Louis, E. (2010). Evaluation of the Queensland Murri Court: Final report. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology.
   Google Scholar
• National Commission of Inquiry into the Prevention of Child Abuse. (1996). Childhood matters. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.
   Google Scholar
• Office of the Victorian Ombudsman. (2009). Own motion investigation into the department of human services child protection program. Melbourne: Victorian Government Printer.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, H. J., Sumner, M., & Jarvis, G. (1989). Unmasking the magistrates: The ‘custody or not’ decision in sentencing young offenders. Milton Keynes: Open University.
   Google Scholar
• Sanborn, J. B.Jr (2001). A parens patriae figure or impartial fact finder: Policy questions and conflicts for the Juvenile Court judge. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 12, 311–332.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, D., & Swain, S. (2002). Confronting cruelty: Historical perspectives on child protection in Australia. Melbourne: Melbourne University Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Sheehan, R. (2001). Magistrates' decision-making in child protection cases. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Sheehan, R. (2006). Emotional abuse and neglect: The legal response. Child Abuse Review, 15, 38–54.
   Google Scholar
• Sprott, J. B., & Doob, A. N. (2002). Two solitudes or just one: Provincial differences in Youth Court judges and the operation of the Youth Courts. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 44, 165–180.
   Google Scholar
• Tennessee Commission on Children and Youth. (1999). Judges express opinions on child protective and juvenile justice systems. The Advocate, 9, 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Travers, M. (2007). Sentencing in the Children's Court: An ethnographic perspective. Youth Justice, 7, 21–35.
   Google Scholar
• Unrau, Y., & Grinnell, R. (Eds.). (2007). Social work research and evaluation: Quantitative and qualitative approaches. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Victorian Auditor-General. (1996, October). Annual report, 1995–6. Victorian Auditor-General's Office. Melbourne: Victorian Government Printer.
   Google Scholar
• Victorian Law Reform Commission. (2010). Protection applications in the Children's Court: Final report. Melbourne: Victorian Government Printer.
   Google Scholar
• Youth Parole Board and Youth Residential Board Victoria (2009). Annual Report, 2008-09. Melbourne: Department of Human Services.
   Google Scholar