Some are more ‘equal’ than others: heteronormativity in the post-White era of financial remedies

References

• Arendell, T. (1995). Fathers and divorce. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bottomley, A. , & Wong, S. (2006). Shared households: A new paradigm for thinking about the reform of domestic property relations. In A. Diduck & K. O'Donovan (Eds.), Feminist perspectives on family law (pp. 39–58). Abingdon: Routledge-Cavendish.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. (1986). Sex and gender in Simone de Beauvoir's second sex. Yale French Studies, 72, 35–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, J. (1999). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Carrington, C. (1999). No place like home: Relationships and family life among lesbians and gay men. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chambers, S. (2007). An incalculable effect?: Subversions of heteronormativity. Political Studies, 55, 656–679.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, W. (2013). Cohabitation, civil partnership, marriage and the equal sharing principle. Legal Studies, 33, 46–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, G. (1989). On the currency of egalitarian justice. Ethics, 99, 906–944.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collier, R. (1995). Masculinity, law and the family. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Collier, R. , & Sheldon, S. (2008). Fragmenting fatherhood: A socio-legal study. Oxford: Hart.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, D. (2000). ‘And you can't find me nowhere’: Relocating identity and structure within equality jurisprudence. Journal of Law and Society, 27, 249–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, D. (2004). Challenging diversity: Rethinking equality and the value of difference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Diduck, A. (2000). Fairness and justice for all? The House of Lords in White v White [2000] 2 FLR 981. Feminist Legal Studies, 9, 173–183.
   Google Scholar
• Diduck, A. (2011). What is family law for? Current Legal Problems, 64, 287–314.
   Google Scholar
• Diduck, A. , & Kaganas, F. (2006). Family law, gender and the state (2nd ed.). Oxford: Hart.
   Google Scholar
• Diduck, A. , & O'Donovan, K. (2006). Feminism and families: Plus ça change? In A. Diduck & K. O'Donovan (Eds.), Feminist perspectives on family law (pp. 1–20). Abingdon: Routledge-Cavendish.
   Google Scholar
• Dworkin, R. (2000). Sovereign virtue: The theory and practice of equality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eekelaar, J. (1984). Family law and social policy (2nd ed.). London: George Weidenfeld & Nicolson.
   Google Scholar
• Fineman, M. (1992). Feminist theory in law: The difference it makes. Columbia Journal of Gender & Law, 2(1), 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Fineman, M. (2004). The autonomy myth: A theory of dependency. New York, NY: The New Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fineman, M. (2008). The vulnerable subject: Anchoring equality in the human condition'. Yale Journal of Law and Feminism, 20(1), 1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Fineman, M. (2010). The vulnerable subject and the responsive state. Emory Law Journal, 60, 251–275.
   Google Scholar
• Fineman, M. (2011). Grappling with equality: One feminist journey. In M. Fineman (Ed.), Transcending the boundaries of law: Generations of feminism and legal theory (pp. 47–61). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, N. (1997). Justice interruptus: Critical reflections on the ‘postsocialist’ condition. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, N. (2003). Social justice in the age of identity politics: Redistribution, recognition and participation. In N. Fraser & A. Honneth (Eds.), Redistribution or recognition? A political-philosophical exchange (pp. 7–109). London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, N. (2012). Equality, identity and social justice. Logos: A Journal of Modern Society and Culture [online] , 11(2–3). Retrieved from http://logosjournal.com/2012/spring-summer_fraser [Accessed 27 February 2013].
   Google Scholar
• George, R. (2012). Lawrence v Gallagher [2012] EWCA Civ 394 – Playing a straight bat in civil partnership appeals? Journal of Social Welfare & Family Law, 34, 357–362.
   Google Scholar
• Harding, R. (2011). Regulating sexuality. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Herring, J. (2012). Breaking bonds. New Law Journal, 162, 703–704.
   Google Scholar
• Hinton, T. (2001). Must egalitarians choose between fairness and respect? Philosophy Public Affairs, 30, 72–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hitchings, E. (2010). The impact of recent ancillary relief jurisprudence in the ‘everyday’ ancillary relief case. Child and Family Law Quarterly, 22, 93–114.
   Google Scholar
• Honneth, A. (2004). Recognition and justice: Outline of a plural theory of justice. Acta Sociologica, 47, 351–364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laufer-Ukeles, P. (2008). Selective recognition of gender difference in the law: Revaluing the caretaker role. Harvard Journal of Law and Gender, 31(1), 1–36.
   Google Scholar
• Leckey, R. (2013). Marriage and the data on same-sex couples. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 35, 179–191.
   Google Scholar
• Littleton, C. (1987). Equality and feminist legal theory. University of Pittsburgh Law Review, 48, 1043–1060.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lloyd, M. (2007). Judith Butler: From norms to politics. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• MacKinnon, C. (1989). Toward a feminist theory of state. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Munro, V. , & Scoular, J. (2012). Abusing vulnerability? Contemporary law and policy responses to sex work in the UK. Feminist Legal Studies, 20, 189–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peel, E. , & Harding, R. (2004). Divorcing romance, rights and radicalism: Beyond pro and anti in the lesbian and gay marriage debate. Feminism & Psychology, 14, 588–599.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smart, C. (1984). The ties that bind: Law, marriage and the reproduction of patriarchal relations. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul plc..
   Google Scholar
• Thompson-Schneider, D. (1997). The arc of history: Or, the resurrection of feminism's sameness/ difference dichotomy in the gay and lesbian marriage debate. Law & Sexuality Review, 7(1), 1–30.
   Google Scholar
• West, R. (1988). Jurisprudence and gender. The University of Chicago Law Review, 55(1), 1–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar