1,961
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Main Section

Hearing parties' voices in Coordinated Family Dispute Resolution (CFDR): An Australian pilot of a family mediation model designed for matters involving a history of domestic violence

&

References

  • Australian Institute of Family Studies, (AIFS). (2009). Evaluation of the 2006 family law reforms. Melbourne: Australian Institute of Family Studies.
  • Australian Law Reform Commission, (ALRC). (2010). Family Violence – A National Legal Response. ALRC Report 114.
  • Bancroft, L., Silverman, J. G., & Ritchie, D. (2012). Sage series on violence against women: The batterer as parent: Addressing the impact of domestic violence on family dynamics (2nd ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
  • Bryan, P. (1992). Killing us softly: Divorce mediation and the politics of power. Buffalo Law Review, 40, 441.
  • Domestic Abuse Intervention Programs (DAIP). (2011). The Duluth model. Available from: http://www.theduluthmodel.org/ [Accessed 26 April 2014].
  • Field, R. (1996). Mediation and the art of power (im)balancing. QUT Law Journal, 12, 264.
  • Field, R. (1998). Family law mediation: Process imbalances women should be aware of before they take part. QUT Law Journal, 14, 23.
  • Field, R. (1998). Participation in pre-trial negotiations of family law disputes: Some issues for women. Australian Journal of Family Law, 12, 240.
  • Field, R. (2001). Convincing the policy makers that mediation is often an inappropriate dispute resolution process for women: A case of being seen but not heard. National Law Review. January, online.
  • Field, R. (2004). A feminist model of mediation that centralises the role of lawyers as advocates for participants who are victims of domestic violence. The Australian Feminist Law Journal, 20, 65–91.
  • Field, R. (2005). Federal family law reform in 2005: The problems and pitfalls for women and children of an increased emphasis on post-separation informal dispute resolution. QUT Law and Justice Journal, 5, 28.
  • Field, R. (2006). Using the feminist critique of mediation to explore ‘the good, the bad and the ugly’ implications for women of the introduction of mandatory family dispute resolution in Australia. Australian Journal of Family Law, 20, 45.
  • Field, R. (2010). Family dispute resolution and victims of domestic violence: Looking to ensure a safe process and safe outcomes. Australasian Dispute Resolution Journal, 21, 185.
  • Field, R., & Brandon, M. (2007). A conversation about the introduction of compulsory family dispute resolution in Australia: Some positive and negative issues for women. Australasian Dispute Resolution Journal, 18, 27.
  • Field, R., & Crowe, J. (2007). The construction of rationality in Australian family dispute resolution: A feminist analysis. The Australian Feminist Law Journal, 27, 97–122.
  • Fisher, L., & Brandon, M. (2012). Mediating with families (3rd ed). Australia: Thomson Reuters.
  • Gondolf, E. W. (2007). Theoretical and research support for the Duluth model: A reply to Dutton and Corvo. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 12, 644–657.
  • Grillo, T. (1991). The mediation alternative: Process dangers for women. The Yale Law Journal, 100, 1545.
  • Herrnstein, B. (1996). Women and mediation: A chance to speak and to be heard. Mediation Quarterly, 13, 229–241.
  • Kaspiew, R., De Maio, J., Deblaquiere, J., & Horsfall, B. (2012). Evaluation of a pilot of legally assisted and supported family dispute resolution in family violence cases: Final report. Australia: Australian Institute of Family Studies.
  • Kaspiew, R., Gray, M., Watson, R., Moloney, L., Handf, K., & Qu, L. (2009). Evaluation of the 2006 Family Law Reform. Australia: Australian Institute of Family Studies.
  • Kelly, J. B. (1989). Mediated and adversarial divorce: Respondents' perceptions of their processes and outcomes. Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 1989, 71–88.
  • Kelly, J. B. (1995). Power imbalance in divorce and interpersonal mediation: Assessment and intervention. Mediation Quarterly, 13, 85–98.
  • Kelly, J. B., & Duryee, M. (1992). Women's and men's views of mediation in voluntary and mandatory mediation settings. Family Court Review, 30, 34–49.
  • Lichtenstein, M. (2000). Mediation and feminism: Common values and challenges. Mediation Quarterly, 18, 19–32.
  • McIntosh, J., Long, C. M., & Wells, Y. D. (2009). Children beyond dispute: A four year follow up study of outcomes from child focused and child inclusive post-separation family dispute resolution. Australia: Attorney-General's Department.
  • Moore, C. (2003). The mediation process: practical strategies for resolving conflict (3rd ed). San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
  • Relationships Australia. (2006). \Child focussed practice and child inclusive practice in the family relationships services program: A briefing paper written in consultation with the sector. Australia.
  • Rhoades, H., Astor, A., Sanson, A., & O'Connor, M. (2008). Enhancing inter-professional relationships in a changing family law system: Final report. Australia: University of Melbourne.
  • Shea Hart, A. (2004). Children exposed to domestic violence: Undifferentiated needs in Australian family law. Australian Journal of Family Law, 18, 170.
  • Shea Hart, A. (2008). Child inclusive mediation in parenting disputes where domestic violence is an issue. 4th Asia Pacific Mediation Forum, Mediation in the Asia Pacific: Constraints and Challenges. 16–18 June. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
  • Shea Hart, A. (2009). Child-inclusive mediation in cases of domestic violence in Australia. Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 27, 3–26.
  • Women's Legal Service. (2010). Towards a coordinated community response in family dispute resolution: A model to pilot FDR for families where past or current family violence exists. Brisbane: Women's Legal Service.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.