New families, new governance and old habits

References

• Agger, A., Sorenson, E., & Torfing, J. (2008). It takes two to tango: When public and private actors interact. In K.Yang & E.Bergrud (Eds.), Civic engagement in a network society. Charlotte, NC: IAP.
   Google Scholar
• Andrew, Sparrow. (2013, March 31). Churches accuse ministers of perpetuating myths about poverty. The Guardian.
   Google Scholar
• Bauman, Z. (2004). Wasted lives: Modernity and its outcasts. Cambridge: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Blair, T. (1997). ‘The Will To Win’, speech at the Aylesbury estate, Southwark, on 2nd June.
   Google Scholar
• Bristow, J. (2013). Reporting the riots: Parenting culture and the problem of authority in media analysis of August 2011. Sociological Research Online, 18, 11.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, I., & Drakeford, M. (2011). Social work on trial: The Colwell inquiry and the state of welfare. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service. (2009). The Baby Peter effect and the increase in s31 care order applications. London: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service. (2012). Three weeks in November … three years on.. Cafcass care application study 2012. London: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Daily Mail. (2011, October 18). How Britain's Shameless families cost the taxpayer £8bn every year.
   Google Scholar
• Daily Mail. (2012, May 7). Scandal of the babies parents won't adopt because they're called Chrystal and Chardonnay. and the social workers who won't let them change their names.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, J. S. (2011). Challenging governance theory: From networks to hegemony. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• DCLG. (2012a). The Troubled Families programme. Financial framework for the Troubled Families programme's payment-by-results scheme for local authorities. London: CLG.
   Google Scholar
• DCLG. (2012b). Troubled families: Top 10 areas are on board as government is ready to go. News Release, 28 March. Retrieved from www.communities.gov.uk.
   Google Scholar
• DCLG. (2012c). Working with troubled families: A guide to the evidence and good practice. London: DLGC.
   Google Scholar
• DCLG. (2012d). Listening to troubled families: A report by Louise Casey CB. London: DCLG.
   Google Scholar
• DCLG. (2013a). The fiscal case for working with troubled families: Analysis and evidence on the costs of troubled families to government. London: DCLG.
   Google Scholar
• DCLG. (2013b). The cost of troubled families. London: DCLG.
   Google Scholar
• DCLG. (2013c). Troubled families; progress information at September 2013 and families turned around at October 2013. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/troubled-families-progress-information-at-september-2013-and-families-turned-around-at-october-2013.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Education. (2011). An action plan for adoption: Tackling delay. London: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Education. (2014). Adoption Scorecards and thresholds published. Press Release, 14 January . London: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Donzelot, J. (1980). The policing of families: Welfare versus the state. London: Hutchinson.
   Google Scholar
• Edward, Malnick. (2013, March 9). Archbishop of Canterbury attacks Government welfare reforms. Daily Telegraph.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick, T. (1998). The rise of market collectivism. In E.Brunsdon, H.Dean, & R.Woods (Eds.), Social policy review, 10 (pp. 13–33). London: Social Policy Association.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (2008). The birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the College de France, 1978–1979 (Senellart, M., Ed. & Burchell, G., Trans).New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Guardian. (2012, June 11). ‘Troubled families’: Poverty of argument.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, S. (1998). The Great Moving Nowhere Show. Marxism Today, 9–14.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Herman, E. S., & Chomsky, N. (1988). Manufacturing consent: The political economy of the Mss media. New York: Pantheon.
   Google Scholar
• Holman, R. (1976). Inequality in child care. London: Family Rights Group.
   Google Scholar
• House of Commons (HC). (2014, March 24). Programmes to help families facing multiple challenges. House of commons committee of public accounts fifty-first report of session 2013–2014. London: The Stationery Office Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Independent on Sunday. (2012, June 10). IOS exclusive: Problem families told – ‘Stop blaming others.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, T. (2013). Riots, restraint and the new cultural politics of wanting. Sociological Research Online, 18(4)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levitas, R. (2012). There may be trouble ahead: What we know about those 120, 000 ‘troubled’ families. In Policy response series No. 3, Poverty and Social Exclusion in the UK Project. http://www.poverty.ac.uk/sites/default/files/attachments/WP%20Policy%20Response%20No.3-%20%20%27Trouble%27%20ahead%20%28Levitas%20Final%2021April2012%29.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Methodist Church in Britain. (2013). The lies we tell ourselves: Ending comfortable myths about poverty. London: Methodist Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Narey, M. (2011). The Narey report on adoption. Our blueprint for Britain's lost children. London: The Times.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, J., Glendinning, C., & Hughes, M. (2008). Beyond modernisation? Social Care and the transformation of welfare governance. Journal of Social Policy, 37, 531–557.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parton, N. (1991). Governing the family: Child care, child protection and the state. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Ridge, T. (2011). The everyday costs of poverty in childhood: A review of qualitative research exploring the lives and experiences of low-income children in the UK. Children & Society, 25, 73–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robert, Winnett. (2011, August 16). Cameron pledges to turn round 120,000 ‘troubled’ families. Daily Telegraph.
   Google Scholar
• Rowe, J., & Lambert, L. (1973). Children who wait: A study of children needing substitute families. London: British Agencies for Adoption and Fostering.
   Google Scholar
• Sharp, A. (2013, December 11). The shameless house: Remains of home ripped apart by neighbour from hell who is finally evicted after racking up 80 convictions. Daily Mail.
   Google Scholar
• Sissay, L. (2012, December 13). On inter-racial adoption, Cameron is wrong. Colour blindness is a disability. The Guardian.
   Google Scholar
• Social Exclusion Task Force (SETF). (2007). Families at risk: Background on families with multiple disadvantages. London: Cabinet Office.
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, I. (2013). The riots of the underclass? Stigmatisation, mediation and the government of poverty and disadvantage in neoliberal Britain. Sociological Research Online, 18, 6.
   Google Scholar
• Wacquant, L. (2009). Punishing the poor the national government of social insecurity. Durham/ London: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wacquant, L. (2010). Crafting the neoliberal state: Workfare, prisonfare, and social insecurity1. Sociological Forum, 25, 197–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welshman, J. (2006). Underclass: A history of the excluded: 1800–2000. London: Hambledon Continuum.
   Google Scholar