The pregnant workers directive: must do better: lessons to be learned from Strasbourg?

References

• Achmad, C. (2014). Children’s rights to the fore in the European Court of Human Rights’ first international commercial surrogacy judgments. European Human Rights Law Review, 6, 638–646.
   Google Scholar
• Beck-Gernsheim, E. (2002). Reinventing the family: In search of new lifestyles. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Borgelt, L. M., O'Connell, M. B., Smith, J. A., & Calis, K. A. (2010). Women’s health across the lifespan: A pharmacotherapeutic approach. Bethesda: American Society of Health-System Pharmacists.
   Google Scholar
• Busby, N. (2011). A right to care? Unpaid care work in European employment law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Caracciolo di Torella, E. (2014). Brave new fathers for a brave new world? Fathers as caregivers in an evolving European Union. European Law Journal, 20, 88–106. doi:10.1111/eulj.12033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caracciolo di Torella, E., & Foubert, P. (2015). Surrogacy, pregnancy and maternity rights: A missed opportunity for a more coherent regime of parental rights in the EU. European Law Review, 40, 52–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caracciolo di Torella, E., & Masselot, A. (2001). Pregnancy, maternity and the organisation of family life: An attempt to classify the case law of the court of justice. European Law Review, 26, 239–260.
   Google Scholar
• De Búrca, G. (2013). After the EU charter of fundamental rights: The court of justice as a human rights adjudicator? Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 20, 168–184.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas-Scott, S. (2011). The European Union and human rights after the Treaty of Lisbon. Human Rights Law Review, 11, 645–682. doi:10.1093/hrlr/ngr038.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas-Scott, S. (2012). The court of justice of the European Union and the European court of human rights after Lisbon. In S. Weatherill, S. de Vries, & U. Bernitz (Eds.), The protection of fundamental rights in the EU after Lisbon (pp. 153–180). Oxford: Hart Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, E., & Watson, Ph. (2012). EU anti-discrimination law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foubert, P. (2002). The legal protection of the pregnant workers in the European community. Sex equality, thoughts of social and economic policy and comparative leaps to the United States of America. Den Haag: Kluwer Law International.
   Google Scholar
• Fredman, S. (2014). Reversing roles: Bringing men into the frame. International Journal of Law in Context, 10, 442–459. doi:10.1017/S1744552314000214.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (1992). The transformation of intimacy: Sexuality, love and eroticism in modern society. Cambridge: 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Harpaz, G. (2009). The European court of justice and its relations with the European court of human rights: The quest for enhanced reliance, coherence and legitimacy. Common Market Law Review, 46, 105–141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, G. (2009). Mothers and fathers as parents and workers: Family-friendly employment policies in an era of shifting identities. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 31, 271–283. doi:10.1080/09649060903354597.
   Google Scholar
• James, G. (2012). Forgotten children: Work-family reconciliation in the EU. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 34, 363–379. doi:10.1080/09649069.2012.750485.
   Google Scholar
• Krisch, N. (2008). The open architecture of European human rights law. Modern Law Review, 71, 183–216. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2230.2008.00688.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawson, R. A. (1994). Confusion and conflict? Diverging interpretations of the European convention on human rights in Strasbourg and Luxembourg. In Lawson, R. A., de Blois, M. The dynamics of the protection of human rights in Europe - essays in honour of professor Henry G. Schermers (219–252). Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Leone, C. (2010). Towards a more shared parenthood? The case of Roca Alvarez in context. European Labour Law Journal, 4, 513–516.
   Google Scholar
• Lock, T. (2009). The ECJ and the ECtHR: The future relationship between the two European courts. The Law & Practice of International Courts and Tribunals, 8, 375–398. doi:10.1163/156918509X12537882648426.
   Google Scholar
• Lock, T. (2010). EU Accession to the ECHR: Implications for judicial review in Strasbourg. European Law Review, 35, 777–798.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGlynn, C. (2000). Ideologies of motherhood in European community sex equality law. European Law Journal, 6, 29–44. doi:10.1111/1468-0386.00094.
   Google Scholar
• Odermatt, J. (2015). A giant step backwards? Opinion 2/13 on the EU’s accession to the European convention on human rights (Working Paper No 150). Leuven Centre for Global Governance Studies, KU Leuven.
   Google Scholar
• O’Leary, S. (2002). Employment law at the European court of justice: Judicial structures, policies and processes. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• O’Meara, N. (2011). A more secure Europe of rights? The European court of human rights, the court of justice of the European Union and EU accession to the ECHR. German Law Journal, 12, 1813–1832.
   Google Scholar
• Timmer, A. (2011). Toward an anti-stereotyping approach for the European court of human rights. Human Rights Law Review, 11, 707–738. doi:10.1093/hrlr/ngr036.
   Google Scholar
• Toth, A. G. (1997). The European Union and human rights: The way forward. Common Market Law Review, 34, 491–529. doi:10.1023/A:1018330912146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar