The EU childcare strategy in times of austerity

References

• Ackers, L., & Stalford, H. (2004). A community for children?: Children, citizenship and internal migration in the EU. Ashgate: Aldershot.
   Google Scholar
• Arnull, A. (1990). General principles of EC law and the individual. Leicester: Leicester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Association des Femmes de l'Europe Méridionale (AFEM). (2005). Concilier vie familiale et vie professionnelle pour les femmes et les hommes: du droit a la pratique. Sakkoulas: Brussels; Bruylant: Athens.
   Google Scholar
• Bain, J., & Masselot, A. (2013). Gender equality law and identity building for Europe. Canterbury Law Review, 18, 99–120.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, M. (2011). The principle of equal treatment: Widening and deepening. In P. Craig & G. De Búrca (Eds.), The evolution of EU law (pp. 611–639). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bettio, F., & Plantenga, J. (2004). Comparing care regimes in Europe. Feminist Economics, 10, 85–113. doi:10.1080/1354570042000198245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonoli, G. (2005). The politics of the new social policies: Providing coverage against new social risks in mature welfare states, 33, 431–449. doi:10.1332/0305573054325765
   Google Scholar
• Bullock, J., & Masselot, A. (2013). Multiple discrimination and intersectional disadvantages: Challenges and opportunities in the European Union legal framework. Columbia Journal of European Law, 19, 55–80.
   Google Scholar
• Caracciolo di Torella, E., & Masselot, A. (2010). Reconciling work and family life in EU law and policy. Basinstock: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Caracciolo Di Torella, E., & Masselot, A. (2013). Work and family life balance in the EU law and policy 40 years on: Still balancing, still struggling. European Gender Equality Law Review, 2(6), 6–14.
   Google Scholar
• Connelly, R. (1991). The importance of child care costs on women's decision-making. In D. Blau (Ed.), The economics of child care (pp. 87–117). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Connor, T. (2010). Discrimination by association: A step in the right direction. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 32, 59–69. doi:10.1080/09649061003675881
   Google Scholar
• Crimman, A., Wiener, F., & Bellman, L. (2010). The German work-sharing scheme: An instrument for the crisis (Conditions of Work and Employment Series No. 25). International Labour Organization.
   Google Scholar
• Crompton, R., & Lyonette, C. (2005). The new gender essentialism – domestic and family ‘choices’ and their relation to attitudes1. The British Journal of Sociology. 56: 601-620. 10.1111/j.1468-4446.2005.00085.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Docksey, C. (1991). Industrial Law Journal, 20, 258–280. doi:10.1093/ilj/20.4.258
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2010a). Communication on Europe 2020 Strategy, A strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth. COM(2010): 2020.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2010b). Communication on Strategy for Equality between Women and Men, 2010-2015. COM(2010)491 final. European Commission: Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2011). Communication on Early Childhood Education and Care: Providing all our children with the best start for the world of tomorrow. COM(2011): 66.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2013a). Communication on Towards Social Investment for Growth and Cohesion – including implementing the European Social Fund 2014-2020. COM(2013): 83.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2013b). Barcelona objectives, the development of childcare facilities for young children in Europe with a view to sustainable and inclusive growth. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2013c). Social investment package: Key facts and figures. Luxembourg: Publication Office of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• European Council. (2010). Conclusions on A new European Strategy for jobs and growth. EUCO 13/10.
   Google Scholar
• Eurostat. (2014). Gender Pay Gap Statistics. [http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Gender_pay_gap_statistics#cite_note-1]
   Google Scholar
• Garcia, M., & Masselot, A. (2015a). The value of gender equality in the EU-Asian trade policy: An assessment of the EU’s ability to implement its own legal obligations. In A. Björkdahl, N. Chaban, J. Leslie, & A. Masselot (Eds.), Importing EU norms? Conceptual framework and empirical findings (pp. 191–209). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Garcia, M., & Masselot, A. (2015b). EU-Asia free trade agreements as tools for social norm/legislation transfer. Asia-Europe Journal. doi:10.1007/s10308-015-0423-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregory, A., Milner, S., & Winderbank, J. (2013). Work-life balance in times of economic crisis and austerity. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 33, 528–541. doi:10.1108/IJSSP-05-2013-0061
   Google Scholar
• Hakim, C. (2002). Lifestyle preferences as determinants of women's differentiated labor market careers. Work and Occupations, 29, 428–459. doi:10.1177/0730888402029004003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hochschild, A., & Machung, A. (1989). The second shift: Working parents and the revolution at home. New York, NY: Viking Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Hoskyns, C. (1996). Integrating gender: Women, law and politics in the European Union. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• James, G. (2012). Forgotten children: Work-family reconciliation in the EU. Journal of Social Welfare & Family Law, 34, 363–379.
   Google Scholar
• Koukoulis-Spiliotopoulos, S. (2008). The Lisbon treaty and the charter of fundamental rights: Maintaining and developing the aquis in gender equality. European Gender Equality Law Review, 1, 15–24.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, J. (2006). Work/family reconciliation, equal opportunities and social policies: The interpretation of policy trajectories at the EU Level and the meaning of gender equality. Journal of European Public Policy, 13, 420–437. doi:10.1080/13501760600560490
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, J., Knijn, T., Martin, C., & Ostner, I. (2008). 15, 261–286. doi:10.1093/sp/jxn016
   Google Scholar
• MacRae, H. (2013). Women's Studies International Forum, 39, 3–11. doi:10.1016/j.wsif.2013.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masselot, A. (2011). The right and reality of flexible working arrangements in New Zealand. In G. James & N. Busby (Eds.), Families, care-giving and paid work (pp. 69–85). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Masselot, A. (2015). Gender implications of the right to request flexible working arrangements: Raising Pigs and children in New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Employment Relations, 39, 59–71.
   Google Scholar
• Masselot, A., Caracciolo di Torella, E., & Burri, S. (2012). Fighting discrimination on the grounds of pregnancy, maternity and parenthood – the application of EU and national law in practice in 33 European countries. Brussels: Publication of the European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• McGlynn, C. (2000). Ideologies of motherhood in European Community sex equality law. European Law Journal, 6, 29–44. doi:10.1111/1468-0386.00094
   Google Scholar
• O'Brien, C. (2012). Confronting the care penalty: The case for extending reasonable adjustment rights along the disability/care continuum. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 34, 5–30. doi:10.1080/09649069.2012.675462
   Google Scholar
• O'Donovan, K. (1984). Sexual divisions in Law. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.
   Google Scholar
• Plantenga, J., Remery, C., Siegel, M., & Sementini, L. (2008). Childcare services in 25 European Union member states: The Barcelona targets revisited. In A. Leira & C. Saraceno (Eds.), Childhood: Changing contexts (Comparative Social Research, Volume 25) (pp. 27–53). Emerald Group: Bingley.
   Google Scholar
• Radulova, E. (2009). The construction of EU's childcare policy through the open method of coordination. In S. Kröger (Ed.), What we have learnt: Advances, pitfalls and remaining questions in OMC research, European Integration online Papers (EIoP), Special Issue 1, Vol. 13, Art. 13. http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/2009-013a.htm
   Google Scholar
• Ribar, D. (1995). A structural model of child care and the labor supply of married women. Journal of Labor Economics, 13, 558–597. doi:10.1086/298385
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, N. (1987). Beyond the public/private division: Law power and the family. Journal of Law and Society, 14, 61–76. doi:10.2307/1410297
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saraceno, C., & Keck, W. (2010). Can we identify intergenerational policy regimes in Europe? European Societies, 12, 675–696. doi:10.1080/14616696.2010.483006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Social Protection Committee. (2014). Social Europe – Aiming for inclusive growth – Annual report of the Social Protection Committee on the social situation in the European Union (10/03/2015).
   Google Scholar
• Solera, C., & Bettio, F. (2013). Women's continuous careers in Italy: The education and public sector divide. Population Review, 52, 129–148. [http://muse.jhu.edu/]
   Google Scholar
• Stalford, H., & Drywood, E. (2009). Coming of age?: Children's rights in the European Union. Common Market Law Review, 46, 143–172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• True, J. (2009). Trading-off gender equality for global Europe? The European Union and free trade agreements. European Foreign Affairs Review, 14, 723–742.
   Google Scholar
• Votinious, J. (2013). Parenthood meets market-functionalism: Parental rights in the labour market and the importance of the gender dimension. In A. Numhauser-Henning & M. Rönmar (Eds.), Normative patterns and legal developments in the social dimension of the EU. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
   Google Scholar