Subjects with agency? Children’s participation in family law proceedings

References

• Ansell, N. (2009). Childhood and the politics of scale: descaling children’s geographies? Progress in Human Geography, 33(2), 190–209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey, S., Thoburn, J., & Timms, J. (2011). Your shout too! Children’s views of the arrangements made and services provided when courts adjudicate in private law disputes. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 33(2), 123–138.
   Google Scholar
• Bala, N., Birnbaum, R. and Cyr, F. (2015). Judicial Interviews in Canada’s Family Courts: Growing acceptance but still controversial. In T. Gal and B. Faedi Duramy (Eds.) International Perspectives and Empirical Findings on Child Participation (pp. 135-156). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, L. (2008). ‘’Moral actors in their own right’: consideration of the views of children in family proceedings. Scots Law Times, 21, 139–142.
   Google Scholar
• Bevan, C. (2013). Self-represented litigants: the overlooked and unintended consequence of legal aid reform. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 35(1), 43–54.
   Google Scholar
• Birnbaum, R., & Saini, M. (2012). A scoping review of qualitative studies on the voice of the child in child custody disputes. Childhood, 20(2), 260–282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bordonaro, L. I., & Payne, R. (2012). Ambiguous agency: critical perspectives on social interventions with children and youth in Africa. Children's Geographies, 10(4), 365–372.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cobb, J. (2015). ‘Seen but not heard?’ Family Law, 45(Feb), 144–157.
   Google Scholar
• Coy, M., Scott, E., Tweedale, R., & Perks, K. (2015). ‘It’s like going through the abuse again’: domestic violence and women and children’s (un)safety in private law contact proceedings. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 37(1), 53–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, G. (2013). New families, new governance: international perspectives on hearing and listening in family regulation. Family Law, 43(5), 559–563.
   Google Scholar
• Eaton, D. (2015). The voice of the child (or is it?). Family Law, 45(Feb), 107.
   Google Scholar
• Einarsdóttir, J., Dockett, S., & Perry, B. (2009). Making meaning: children's perspectives expressed through drawings. Early Child Development and Care, 179(2), 217–32.
   Google Scholar
• European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) (2015). Child-Friendly Justice – Perspectives and Experiences of Professionals on children’s participation in civil and criminal judicial proceedings in 10 EU Member States. Retrieved from FRA http://fra.europa.eu/en/publication/2015/child-friendly-justice-professionals (6 July 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Ewing, J., Hunter, R., Barlow, A., & Smithson, J. (2015). Children’s voices: centre-stage or sidelined in out-of-court dispute resolution in England and Wales? Child and Family Law Quarterly, 27(1), 43–61.
   Google Scholar
• Faulkner, K. M. (2009). Presentation and Representation: Youth participation in ongoing public decision-making projects. Childhood, 16(1), 89–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fortin, J., Hunt, J., & Scanlan, L. (2012). Taking a longer view of contact: The perspectives of young adults who experienced parental separation in their youth. Retrieved from University of Sussex https://www.sussex.ac.uk/webteam/gateway/file.php?name=nuffield-foundation-final-report-16nov2012.pdf&site=28 (1 July 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, M. (Ed.). (2012). Law and Childhood Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gallacher, L., & Gallagher, M. (2008). Methodological immaturity in childhood research? Thinking through ‘participatory methods’. Childhood, 15(4), 499–516.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanson, K., Volonakis, D., & Al-Rozzi, M. (2015). Child labour, working children and children’s rights. In W. Vandenhole, E. Desmet, D. Reynaert, & S. Lembrechts (Eds.), Routledge International Handbook of Children’s Rights Studies (pp. 316–330). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Holloway, S., & Pimlott-Wilson, H. (2011). Geographies of children, youth and families: defining achievements, debating the agenda. In L. Holt (Ed.), Geographies of Children, Youth and Families: An international perspective (pp. 9–24). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Holt, L. (2011). Introduction. In L. Holt (Ed.), Geographies of Children, Youth and Families (pp. 1–8). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Humphreys, C., & Bradbury-Jones, C. (2015). Domestic Abuse and Safeguarding Children: Focus. Response and Intervention. Child Abuse Review, 24(4), 231–234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt, J. (2011). Through a glass darkly: the uncertain future of private law child contact litigation. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 33(4), 379–396.
   Google Scholar
• Hunter, R. (2007). Close Encounters of a Judicial Kind: “Hearing” Children’s “Voices” in Family law Proceedings. Child and Family Law Quarterly, 19(3), 283–303.
   Google Scholar
• James, A. (2010). Competition or integration? The next step in childhood studies? Childhood, 17(4), 485–499.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, A., Jenks, C., & Prout, A. (1998). Theorizing Childhood. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jupp, E. (2008). The feeling of participation: Everyday spaces and urban change. Geoforum, 39(1), 331–343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klocker, N. (2007). An example of thin agency: child domestic workers in Tanzania. In R. Panelli, S. Punch, & E. Robson (Eds.), Global Perspectives on Rural Childhood and Youth: Young Rural Lives (pp. 83–94). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mackay, K. (2013a). Hearing children in contact disputes, CRFR Briefing, Retrieved from Edinburgh Research Archive website: https://www.era.lib.ed.ac.uk/bitstream/handle/1842/6557/briefing%2065.pdf;jsessionid=34DC22EC1503E28F8E5ACAC8F0DEF332?sequence=1 (1 June 2015)
   Google Scholar
• Mackay, K. (2013b). The treatment of the views of children in private law child contact disputes where there is a history of domestic abuse. Retrieved from Scotland’s Commissioner for Children & Young People website http://www.sccyp.org.uk/ufiles/views-of-children-and-domestic-abuse.pdf (6 July 2015)
   Google Scholar
• Mannion, G. (2007). Going Spatial, Going Relational: Why ‘listening to children’ and children’s participation needs reframing. Discourse, 28(3), 405–420.
   Google Scholar
• Mantle, G., Leslie, J., Parsons, S., Plenty, J., & Shaffer, R. (2006). Establishing children’s wishes and feelings for family court reports: the significance attached to the age of the child. Childhood, 13(4), 499–518.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mantle, G., Moules, T., Johnson, K., with Leslie, J., Parsons, S., & Shaffer, R. (2007). Whose wishes and feelings? Children’s autonomy and parental influence in family court enquiries. British Journal of Social Work, 37, 785–505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, K., Tisdall, E.K.M., Cleland, A. with Plumtree, A. (2002). ‘Voice of the Child’ under the Children (Scotland) Act 1995: giving due regard to children’s views in all matters that affect them, Volume 1 – Mapping Paper. Edinburgh: Scottish Executive Central Research Unit. http://www.gov.scot/Publications/2002/09/14905/6747 (accessed 26.6.15)
   Google Scholar
• Mayall, B. (2012). An afterword: some reflections on a seminar series. Children’s Geographies, 10(3), 347–355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montgomery, H. (2007). Working with Child Prostitutes in Thailand: problems of practice and interpretation. Childhood, 14(4), 415–430.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison, F. (2014). Children, Contact and Domestic Abuse (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh.
   Google Scholar
• Morrison, F., Tisdall, E.K.M., Jones, F., & Reid, A. (2013). Child contact proceedings for children affected by domestic abuse. Retrieved from Scotland’s Commissioner for Children & Young People website http://www.sccyp.org.uk/ (27 May 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Neale, B. (2002). Dialogues with Children: Children, divorce and citizenship. Childhood, 9(4), 455–475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Office of Children’s Commissioner (2011) Response to the Family Justice Review Interim Report. Retrieved from OCC website http://www.childrenscommissioner.gov.uk/sites/default/files/publications/Response_to_the_Family_Justice_Review_Interim_Report.pdf (26 June 2015)
   Google Scholar
• Oswell, D. (2013). The Agency of Children: From family to global human rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parkinson, P., & Cashmore, J. (2008). The Voice of a Child in Family Law Disputes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Percy-Smith, B. (2010). Councils, consultations and community. Children’s Geographies, 8(2), 107–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Percy-Smith, B., & Thomas, N. (Eds.). (2010). A Handbook of Children and Young People’s Participation. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pinkney, S. (2014). Telling the quiet stories: emotional landscapes of care-embodied practices in child protection. Paper presented the meeting of ESA Symposium Theorising Childhood: Citizenship, Rights, Participation, Modena Italy. Retrieved from http://esarn4modenasymposium.wordpress.com/program/ (27 May 2014)
   Google Scholar
• Prout, A., & James, A. (1990). A new paradigm for the sociology of childhood? Provenance, promise and problems. In A. James & A. Prout (Eds.), Constructing and Reconstructing Childhood (pp. 7–33). London: The Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Punch, S., & Tisdall, E. K. M. (2012). Introduction: Exploring children and young people’s relationships across Majority and Minority Worlds. Children’s Geographies, 10(3), 241–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosen, D. M. (2007). Child Soldiers, International Humanitarian Law, and the Globalization of Childhood. American Anthropologist, 109, 296–306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruddick, S. (2007). At the horizons of the subject: neo-liberalism, neo-conservatism and the rights of the child. Gender, Place and Culture, 14(5), 513–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scottish Courts and Tribunals (2009). Report of the Scottish Civil Courts Review - Volume 2 - Chapters 10 to 15. Retrieved from Scottish Courts and Tribunals website https://www.scotcourts.gov.uk/docs/default-source/civil-courts-reform/report-of-the-scottish-civil-courts-review-vol-2-chapt-10—15.pdf?sfvrsn=4 (9 December 2015)
   Google Scholar
• Scottish Government (2015). Equally Safe – Reforming the criminal law to address domestic abuse and sexual offences. Retrieved from Scottish Government website http://www.gov.scot/Resource/0047/00473932.pdf (26 June 2015)
   Google Scholar
• Scottish Law Commission (1992). Report on Family Law. Scot Law Com No. 135. Edinburgh: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• Tisdall, E. K. M. (2012). The Challenge and Challenging of Childhood Studies? Lessons from disability studies and research with disabled children. Children & Society, 26(3), 181–191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tisdall, E. K. M., & Morrison, F. (2012). Children's Participation in Court Proceedings when Parents Divorce or Separate. In M. Freeman (Ed.), Law and Childhood Studies (pp. 156–173). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tisdall, E. K. M., & Punch, S. (2012). Not so ‘new’? Looking critically at Childhood Studies. Children’s Geographies, 10(3), 249–264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tisdall, K., Bray, R., Marshall, K., & Cleland, A. (2004). Children’s Participation in Family Law Proceedings: A step too far or a step too small? Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 26(1), 17–33.
   Google Scholar
• Tisdall, K., Cleland, A., Marshall, K., & Plumtree, A. (2002). Listening to the Views of Children? Principles and Mechanisms within the Children (Scotland) Act 1995. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 24(4), 385–399.
   Google Scholar
• Trinder, L., Connolly, J., Kellett, J., Notley, C., & Swift, L. (2006). Making contact happen or making contact work? Retrieved from Department of Constitutional Affairs, UK http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/http://www.dca.gov.uk/research/2006/03_2006.pdf (1 July 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Trinder, L., Jenks, C., & Firth, A. (2010). Talking children into being in absentia? Children as a strategic and contingent resource in family court dispute resolution. Child and Family Law Quarterly, 22, 234–257.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child (2013). General Comment No. 14 on the right of the child to have his or her best interests taken as a primary consideration (art. 3, para. 1). Retrieved from OHCHR website http://www2.ohchr.org/English/bodies/crc/docs/GC/CRC_C_GC_14_ENG.pdf (7 July 2015)
   Google Scholar
• Voice of the Child Advisory Group (2015). Final Report. Retrieved from Government UK, https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/421005/voice-of-the-child-advisory-group-report.pdf (9 December 2015)
   Google Scholar
• Vulnerable Witnesses and Children Working Group. (2015). Report of the Vulnerable Witnesses and Children Working Group. Retrieved from Judiciary of England and Wales website: https://www.judiciary.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/vwcwg-report-march-2015.pdf (26 May15)
   Google Scholar
• Whitecross, R.W. (2011). Research findings for scoping study of the commissioning, preparation and use of court reports in the Child Welfare Hearing system in the Sheriff Courts. Retrieved from Scottish Government website http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Publications/2011/01/18132523/1 (2 July 2012)
   Google Scholar
• Wyness, M. (2011). Childhood and Society (2nd ed.). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Wyness, M. (forthcoming 2016). Mapping out the field of children’s participation – definitions, narratives and disputes. In R. Bosiso, C. Belloni, & M. Olagnero (Eds.), Traguardo infanzia: Wellbeing, Participation and Citizenship. Torino: Academia University Press.
   Google Scholar