‘Letters aren’t good’: the operation of the right to request flexible working post-maternity leave in UK small and medium-sized companies

References

• Allen, T. (2001). Family supportive work environments: The role of organisational perceptions. Journal of Vocational Behaviour, 58, 414–435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkinson, C. (2008). An exploration of small firm psychological contracts. Work Employment and Society, 22, 447–465.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behson, S. (2005). The relative contribution of formal and informal organisational work-family support. Journal of Vocational Behaviour, 66, 487–500.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bond, S. (2002). Family-friendly working? Putting policy into practice York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Bryman, A. (2012). Social research methods (4th ed.). Oxford: OUP.
   Google Scholar
• Connolly, S., & Gregory, M. (2007). Women and work since 1970. In N. Crafts, I. Gazeley, & A. Newell (Eds.), Work and pay in twentieth-century Britain. Oxford: OUP.
   Google Scholar
• Connolly, S., & Gregory, M. (2008). Moving down: Women’s part-time work and occupational change in Britain 1991–2001. The Economic Journal, 118, F52–F76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crompton, R., & Lyonette, C. (2011). Women’s career success and work-life adaptations in the accountancy and medical professions in Britain. Gender, Work and Organization, 18, 231–254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department for Business, Innovation and Skills. (2012). Fourth work-life balance employee survey. Employment Relations Research Series No. 122. London: BIS.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Business, Innovation and Skills. (2014). Fourth work-life balance employer survey 2013. Employment Relations Research Series No. 184. London: BIS.
   Google Scholar
• Dex, S., & Scheibl, F. (2001). Flexible and family-friendly working arrangements in UK-based SMEs: Business cases. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 39, 411–431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donnelly, N., Proctor-Thomson, S., & Plimmer, G. (2012). The role of ‘voice’ in matters of ‘choice’: Flexible work outcomes for women in the New Zealand Public Services. Journal of Industrial Relations, 54, 182–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, M., & Tudball, J. (2003). Family-friendly work practices: Differences within and between workplaces. Journal of Industrial Relations, 45, 269–291.
   Google Scholar
• Galea, C., Houkes, I., & de Rijk, A. (2014). An insider’s point of view: How a system of flexible working hours helps employees to strike a proper balance between work and personal life. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 25, 1090–1111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardiner, J., & Tomlinson, J. (2009). Organisational approaches to flexible working. Equal Opportunities International, 28, 671–686.
   Google Scholar
• Grabham, E. (2014). Legal form and temporal rationalities in UK work-life balance law. Australian Feminist Studies, 29, 67–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hakim, C. (2000). Work-lifestyle choices in the 21st century. Oxford: OUP.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, L., & Foster, C. (2005). Work practices in service sector companies. Employment Relations Research Series No. 47. London: DTI.
   Google Scholar
• James, G. (2009). Mothers and fathers as parents and workers: Family-friendly employment policies in an era of shifting identities. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 31, 271–283.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, S. (1997). ‘Family-friendly’ employment policies: A route to changing organisational culture or playing around at the margins? Gender, Work and Organisation, 4, 13–23.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, S. (2001). Restructuring workplace cultures: The ultimate work-family challenge. Women in Management Review, 16, 21–29.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, S., & Humbert, A. L. (2010). ‘Work-life balance’, flexible working policies and the gendered organization. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion, 29, 239–254.
   Google Scholar
• Manning, A., & Petrongolo, B. (2008). The part-time pay penalty for women in Britain. The Economic Journal, 118, F28–F51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marlow, S. (2002). Regulating labour management in small firms. Human Resource Management Journal, 12, 25–43.
   Google Scholar
• Matlay, H. (1999). Employee relations in small firms: A micro-business perspective. Employee Relations, 21, 285–295.
   Google Scholar
• McRae, S. (2003). Choice and constraints in mothers’ employment careers. British Journal of Sociology, 54, 585–592.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nadin, S., & Cassell, C. (2004). Using data matrices. In C. Cassell & G. Symon (Eds.), Essential guide to qualitative methods in organisational research. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Office for National Statistics. (2013). Women and the labour market. London: ONS.
   Google Scholar
• Office for National Statistics. (2015). UK labour market, statistical bulletin – June 2015. London: ONS.
   Google Scholar
• Resolution Foundation. (2012). The price of motherhood: Women and part-time work. London: Resolution Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Scase, R. (1995). Employment relations in small firms. In P. Edwards (Ed.), Industrial relations: Theory and practice in Britain. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Skinner, D. (1999). The reality of equal opportunities: The expectations and experiences of part-time staff and their managers. Personnel Review, 28, 425–438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tilly, C. (1996). Half a job: Bad and good part-time jobs in a changing labour market. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tomlinson, J. (2006). Routes to part-time management in UK service sector organizations: Implications for women’s skills, flexibility and progression. Gender, Work and Organization, 13, 585–605.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar