References
- A Guide to Representing Yourself in Court. (2014). The Bar Council. Retrieved from: http://www.barcouncil.org.uk/media/203109/srl_guide_final_for_online_use.pdf.
- A Handbook for Litigants in Person. Retrieved from: https://www.judiciary.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/JCO/Documents/Guidance/A_Handbook_for_Litigants_in_Person.pdf.
- Assy, R. (2011). Can the law speak directly to its subjects? The limitation of plain language. Journal of Law and Society, 38(3), 376–404.
- Atkinson, J. M. (1982). Understanding formality: The categorization and production of formal interaction. British Journal of Sociology, 33(1), 86–117.
- Bhatia, V. K. (1993). Analysing genre: Language use in professional settings. London: Longman.
- Bhatia, V. (2004). Worlds of written discourse: A genre-based view. London and New York: Continuum.
- Billett, S. (1996). Situated learning: Bridging sociocultural and cognitive theorising. Learning and Instruction, 6(3), 263–280.
- Black, Rt., Cleary, A., & Culworth, W. (Eds). (2014). The family court practice. Family Law.
- Brown, G., & Yule, G. (1983). Discourse analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Conley, J. M., & O’Barr, W. M. (1998). Just words: Law, language, and power. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.
- Coulthard, M., & Johnson, A. (2007). Introducing forensic linguistics: Language in evidence. New York, NY: Routledge.
- Cotterill, J. (2003). Language and power in court: A Linguistic analysis of the O.J. Simpson trial. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Drew, P., & Heritage, J. (1993). Analysing talk at work. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings (pp. 3–65). Cambridge: CUP.
- Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. London: Longman.
- Fielding, N. (2010). Mixed methods research in the real world. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 13(2), 127–138.
- Gibbons, J. (2003). Forensic linguistics: An introduction to language in the legal system. London: Blackwell.
- Heffer, C. (2005). The language of jury trial: A corpus-aided analysis of legal-lay discourse. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Heydon, G. (2005). The language of police interviewing: A critical analysis. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Leggatt, A. (2001). Tribunals for Users – One System, One Service. Retrieved from: http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/http://www.tribunals-review.org.uk/leggatthtm/leg-00.htm
- Litigants in person: guidelines for lawyers. (2015). Bar Council, CILEx and the Law Society. Retrieved from: https://www.lawsociety.org.uk/Support-services/Advice/Articles/Litigants-in-person-new-guidelines-for-lawyers-June-2015/
- Maclean, M. (2014). The changing professional landscape. Family law, 44(2), 177–182.
- Moorhead, R., & Sefton, M. (2005). Litigants in person: Unrepresented litigants in first instance proceedings. London: Department for Constitutional Affairs.
- O’Barr, W. M., & Conley, J. M. (1990). Litigant satisfaction versus legal adequacy in small claims court narratives. In J. N. Levi & A. G. Walker (Eds.), Language in the judicial process. New York and London: Plenum.
- Professional Conduct Department Thematic Review: Complaints Received from Litigants in Person (Self-Represented Litigants). (2012). Bar Standards Board. Retrieved from: https://www.barstandardsboard.org.uk/media/1438061/lip_-_final_version.pdf
- Pilnick, A., & Dingwall, R. (2011). On the remarkable persistence of asymmetry in doctor/patient interaction: A critical review. Social Science & Medicine, 72(8), 1374–1382.
- Raymond, G. (2003). Grammar and social organisation: Yes/No interrogatives and the structure of responding. American Sociological Review, 68, 939–967.
- Reed, L. (2014). The family court without a lawyer: A handbook for litigants in person. Bath Publishing Limited.
- Sommerlad, H. (2015). Access to justice in hard times: The deconstruction of democratic citizenship. In M. Maclean, J. Eekelaar, & B. Bastard (Eds.), Delivering Family Justice in the 21st Century 2015 (pp. 243–64). Oxford: Hart.
- Report of the Financial Remedies Working Group. (2014). Retrieved from: http://www.familylaw.co.uk/news_and_comment/report-of-the-financial-remedies-working-group-31-july-2014#.VWdzm_RDuSq
- The Judicial Working Group on Litigants in Person: Report. (2013). Judicial Office. Retrieved from:https://www.judiciary.gov.uk/publications/judicial-working-group-lip-report/
- The Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 (LASPO): One year on. Final Report. (2014). Retrieved from: http://www.barcouncil.org.uk
- Thornborrow, J. (2002). Power talk: Language and interaction in institutional discourse. London: Longman.
- Tkacukova, T. (2010). Cross-examination questioning: Lay people as cross-examiners. In M. Coulthard & A. Johnson (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of forensic linguistics. London and New York: Routledge.
- Tkacukova, T. (2011). Lay people as cross-examiners: A linguistic analysis of the Libel case McDonald’s Corporation v. Helen Steel and David Morris. The International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law, 17(2), 307–310.
- Tkacukova, T. (2015, in press). A corpus-assisted study of the discourse marker ‘well’ as an indicator of institutional roles: Professional and lay use in court cases with litigants in person. Corpora.
- Trinder, L., Hunter, R., Hitchings, E., Miles, J., Moorhead, R., Smith, L., … Pearce, J. (2014). Litigants in person in private family law cases. et al. (2014). Litigants in person in private family law cases. Ministry of Justice Analytical Series. Retrived from: www.justice.gov.uk/publications/research-and-analysis/moj
- Trinch, S. (2005). Acquiring authority through the acquisition of genre: Latinas, intertextuality and violence. Speech, Language, and the Law, 12(1), 19–47.
- Wang, J. (2006). Questions and the exercise of power. Discourse and Society, 17(4), 529–548.
- Williams, K. (2011). Litigants in person: A literature review. Research summary, 2(11).
- Zuckerman, A. A. (2014). No justice without lawyers—The myth of an inquisitorial solution. Oxford Legal Studies Research Paper, 66, 355–374.