Contested views of expertise in children’s care and permanence proceedings

References

• Abbott, P., & Wallace, C. (Eds.). (1990). The sociology of the caring professions. London: Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• ALRC. (1998). Seen and heard: Priority for children in the legal process. Canberra: Australian Law Reform Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Beckett, C., McKeigue, B., & Taylor, H. (2007). Coming to conclusions: Social workers’ perceptions of the decision-making process in care proceedings. Child and Family Social Work, 12, 54–63.10.1111/cfs.2007.12.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilson, A., & White, S. (2005). Representing children’s views and best interests in court: An international comparison. Child Abuse Review, 14, 220–239. doi:10.1002/car.902
   Google Scholar
• Borowoski, A., & Sheehan, R. (2012). Magistrates’s perspectives on the criminal division of the children’s court of Victoria. Australian Social Work, 66(3), 1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101.10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Buss, E., & Maclean, M. (2011). Law and child development in the UK and the US. Journal of Children’s Services, 6, 236–247. doi:10.1108/17466661111190938
   Google Scholar
• Capital Consulting Ireland. (2004). Review of the guardian ad litem service. Dublin: Department of Children and Youth Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Carnochan, S., Taylor, S., Abranson-Madden, A., Meekyung, H., Rashid, S., Maney, J., & Austin, M. J (2008). Child Welfare and the Courts: An exploratory study of the relationship between two complex systems. Journal of Public Child Welfare, 1, 117–136.
   Google Scholar
• Children 1st. (2014). Becoming a safeguarder. Retrieved from http://www.children1st.org.uk/what-we-do/our-services/search-our-services/safeguarders-panel/becoming-a-safeguarder/#competencies
   Google Scholar
• Cover, M. (2012). O guardian, where art thou? Seen and Heard, 22, 37–45.
   Google Scholar
• Dickens, J. (2010). Social work and social policy. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Doughty, J. (2009). Identity crisis in the family courts? Different approaches in England and Wales and Australia. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 31, 231–243.10.1080/09649060903354548
   Google Scholar
• Duquette, D. N. (1994). Scottish Children’s Hearings and representation for the child. In S. Asquith, & M. Hill (Eds.), Justice for children. (pp. 133–143) Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff.
   Google Scholar
• Duquette, D. N. (2001). Legal representation for children in protection proceedings: Two distinctive lawyer roles are required. Family Law Quarterly, 34, 441–466.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duquette, D. N. (2007). Children’s Justice: A view from America. In M. Hill, A. Lockyer, & F. Stone (Eds.), Youth justice and child protection (pp. 232–249). London: Jessica Kingsley.
   Google Scholar
• Duquette, D. N., & Darwall, J. (2012). Child Representation in America: Progress Report from the National Quality Improvement Center. Family Law Quarterly, 46, 87–137. Retrieved from http://ezproxy.lib.ed.ac.uk/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=trueanddb=aphandAN=89969295andsite=eds-live
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eraut, M. (1998). Concepts of competence. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 12, 127–139. doi:10.3109/13561829809014100
   Google Scholar
• Etzioni, A. (1969). The semi-professions and their organization: Teachers, nurses, social workers. London: Collier-Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Gadda, A. M., Hill, M., Young, E., & Welch, V. (2015). The appointment of safeguarders in the Children’s Hearings System. Glasgow: Centre for Excellence for Looked After Children in Scotland (CELCIS).
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, T., & Powell, J. L. (2010). Power and social work in the United Kingdom. Journal of Social Work, 10, 3–22. doi:10.1177/0733464809335596
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glynn, G. F. (2007). The Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act – Promoting the unauthorized practice of law. Journal of Law and Family Studies, 9, 53–63.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta, A., & Lloyd-Jones, E. (2010). The representation of children and their parents in public law proceedings since the Children Act 1989: High hopes and lost opportunities? Journal of Children’s Services, 5, 64–72. doi:10.5042/jcs.2010.0303
   Google Scholar
• Hallett, C., Murray, C., Jamieson, J., & Veitch, W. (1998). The evaluation of Children’s Hearings in Scotland. Edinburgh: Scottish Executive.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, G., & Hanson, L. (2012). Children on supervision requirements for five or more years – Decisions and outcomes. Stirling: Scotland’s Children’s Reporters Administration.
   Google Scholar
• Hetherington, R., Baistow, K., Katz, I., Mesie, J., & Trowell, J. (2001). The welfare of children with mentally ill parents: Learning from inter-country comparisons. London: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, M., Lockyer, A., Morton, P., Batchelor, S., & Scott, J. (2003). Safeguarding children’s interests in welfare proceedings: The Scottish experience. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 25(1), 1–21.10.1080/0964906032000086223
   Google Scholar
• Hill, M., & Taylor, R. (2012). The Kilbrandon Lectures: Reflections on care and justice for children in Scotland. Edinburgh: Scottish Government.
   Google Scholar
• Kearney, B. (2000). Children’s Hearings and the Sheriff Court. Edinburgh: Butterworths Law.
   Google Scholar
• Kilbrandon Report. (1964). Children and Young Persons Scotland: Report by the Committee Appointed by the Secretary of State for Scotland. Edinburgh: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• Kirton, D. (2009). Child social work policy and practice. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Korpinen, J., & Poso, T. (2007). Approaching youth crime through welfare and punishment: The Finnish perspective. In M. Hill, A. Lockyer, & F. H. Stone (Eds.), Youth justice and child protection (pp. 41–60). London: Jessica Kingsley.
   Google Scholar
• Lehrmann, D. H. (2010). Advancing children’s rights to be heard and protected: The model representation of children in abuse, neglect, and custody proceedings act. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 28, 463–479. doi:10.1002/bsl.943
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liljegren, A., Hojer, S., & Forkby, T. (2014). Laypersons, professions, and governance in the welfare state: The Swedish child protection system. Journal of Professions and Organization, 1, 161–175. doi:10.1093/jpo/jou005
   Google Scholar
• Lockyer, A. (1992). Citizenship service and children’s panel membership. Edinburgh: Scottish Office.
   Google Scholar
• Lockyer, A. (1994). Commentary on Donald Duquette’s proposal. In S. Asquith, & M. Hill (Eds.), Justice for Children (pp. 117–132). Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff.
   Google Scholar
• Lockyer, A., & Stone, F. (Eds.). (1998). Juvenile Justice in Scotland. Edinburgh: TandT Clark.
   Google Scholar
• Mantle, G., Williams, I., Leslie, J., Parsons, S., & Shaffer, R. (2008). Beyond assessment: Social work intervention in family court enquiries. British Journal of Social Work, 38, 431–443. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcl346
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masson, J. (2012). ‘I think I do have strategies’: Lawyers’ approaches to parent engagement in care proceedings. Child and Family Social Work, 17, 202–211.10.1111/cfs.2012.17.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mooney, A., & Lockyer, A. (2012). Children’s representation. In M. Hill, G. Head, A. Lockyer, B. Reid, & R. Taylor (Eds.), Children’s services: Working together (pp. 163–174). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Munby, J. (2013a). View from the President’s chamber (2). London: Family Division of the High Court of England and Wales.
   Google Scholar
• Munby, J. (2013b). View from the President’s chambers (1). London: Family Division of the High Court of England and Wales.
   Google Scholar
• Munby, J. (2013c). View from the President’s Chambers (3). London: Family Division.
   Google Scholar
• Noordegraaf, M. (2007). From ‘Pure’ to ‘Hybrid’ Professionalism: Present-Day Professionalism in Ambiguous Public Domains. Administration and Society, 39, 761–785. doi:10.1177/0095399707304434
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norrie, K. (2009). Family Law. Dundee: Dundee University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Norrie, K. (2013). Children’s Hearings in Scotland (3rd ed.). Edinburgh: W. Green.
   Google Scholar
• Ofsted. (2014). Children and family court advisory and support service (Cafcass): Inspection of Cafcass as a national organisation. Manchester, NH: Ofsted.
   Google Scholar
• Parry, N., & Parry, J. (1979). Social work, professionalism and the state 21-47. In N. Parry, M. Rustin, & C. Satyamurti (Eds.), Social Work, Welfare and the State (pp. 21–47). London: Edward Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Parton, N. (1996). Introduction: Social theory, social change and social work. In N. Parton (Ed.), Social theory, social change and social work (pp. 4–18). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Prescott, D. E. (2013). Social workers as ‘experts’ in the family court system: Is evidence-based practice a missing link or host-created knowledge? Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work, 10, 466–481. doi:10.1080/15433714.2012.759844
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Reid, B., & Gillan, I. (2007). The place of lay participation in decision-making. In M. Hill, A. Lockyer, & F. Stone (Eds.), Youth Justice and Child Protection (pp. 215–231). London: Jessica Kingsley.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, P. H. (2012). Judicial Recruitment, Training and Careers. The Oxford Handbook of Empirical Legal Research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ryrstedt, E., & Masttson, T. (2008). Children’s rights to representation: A comparison between Sweden and England. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, 22, 135–147.
   Google Scholar
• Ryrstedt, E., & Mattsson, T. (2008). Children’s rights to representation: A comparison between Sweden and England. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, 22, 135–147. doi:10.1093/lawfam/ebm001
   Google Scholar
• SCRA. (2015). Statistical Analysis 2014–15. Stirling: Scottish Children’s Reporter Administration. Retrieved April 2016, from http://www.scra.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/SCRA-Statistical-Analysis-2014-15.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Stotzel, M., & Fegert, J. M. (2006). The representation of the legal interests of children and adolescents in Germany: A study of the children’s guardian from a child’s perspective. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, 20, 201–224. doi:10.1093/lawfam/ebi023
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, R., Hill, M., & Milligan, I. (2015). Children’s Hearings, Residential Child Care and Professional Education. Journal of Scottish Residential Child Care, 14, 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Thomson, L., McArthur, M., & Camilleri, P. (2015). Is it ‘fair’? Representation of children young people and parents in an adversarial court system. Child and Family Social Work. doi:10.1111/cfs.12226
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ward, T. (2012). Expert evidence, judicial reasoning, and the family courts information pilot. Journal of Law and Society, 39, 515–540. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6478.2012.00598.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar