References
- Blackburn-Starza, A. (2016, October 17). Council of Europe rejects surrogacy guidelines. Bionews. Retrieved from http://www.bionews.org.uk/page_715312.asp
- Committee on Social Affairs, Health and Sustainable Development of the Parliamentary Assembly. (2016). Report on Children’s rights related to surrogacy (Doc. 13562). Retrieved from http://website-pace.net/documents/19855/2463558/20160921-SurrogacyRights-EN.pdf/a434368b-2530-4ce4-bbc0-0113402749b5
- Committee on the Rights of the Child. (2013). General comment No. 14 (2013) on the right of the child to have his or her best interests taken as a primary consideration (art. 3, para. 1) ( CRC/C/GC/14), Geneva.
- Daly, A. (2011). The right of children to be heard in civil proceedings and the emerging law of the European Court of Human Rights. The International Journal of Human Rights, 15, 441–461.10.1080/13642980903542710
- European Parliament. (2015). Annual report on Human Rights and Democracy in the World 2014 and the European Union’s policy on the matter ( 2015/2229(INI)), Strasbourg.
- Finnerty, S. (2015). Who profits from international surrogacy? The legal and bioethical ramifications of international surrogacy. Medico-Legal Journal of Ireland, 21, 83–87.
- Hague Conference on Private International Law. (2017). Report of the experts’ group on the parentage/surrogacy project (Report February 2017).
- Kilkelly, U. (2001). The best of both worlds for children’s rights? Interpreting the European convention on human rights in the light of the UN convention on the rights of the child. Human Rights Quarterly, 23, 308–326.10.1353/hrq.2001.0019
- Letsas, G. (2006). Two concepts of the margin of appreciation. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 26, 705–732.10.1093/ojls/gql030
![Supercharge Your Next Research Paper: Research and write your next paper with Jenni AI.]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/112448/MPU-L1SN.png"})